First clinical experience with 3.0 T MRI of the human temporomandibular joint using a 4cm surface coil for examination in comparison to 1.5 T

Purpose : Imaging of TMJ with 1.5 T MRI using dedicated surface coils is already an established method for the diagnostics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and degenerative joint disease (DJD). 3.0 T technology is expected to achieve an improved image quality, signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lemke, AJ, Hengst, S, Reitz, G, Hothan, T, Niehues, S, Griethe, M, Felix, R
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:ger
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 176
creator Lemke, AJ
Hengst, S
Reitz, G
Hothan, T
Niehues, S
Griethe, M
Felix, R
description Purpose : Imaging of TMJ with 1.5 T MRI using dedicated surface coils is already an established method for the diagnostics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and degenerative joint disease (DJD). 3.0 T technology is expected to achieve an improved image quality, signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast and edge sharpness. Purpose of the study was to compare and to optimize the images with a dedicated 4cm surface coil on 3.0 T in comparison with a 3 inch surface coil on 1.5 T. Methods : In a prospective study 12 patients with TMJ pain were examined on 1.5 T MRI (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee) using an established 3-inch-surface coil first and following up on the same day with the new 3.0 T 4cm surface coil (Rapid Biomedical, Würzburg). After optimization of the sequences performed on phantoms and volunteers modified sagittal and coronal PD-FS sequences were chosen. Analysis of image quality was carried out by three independent radiologists. It was very important to figure the anatomical structures of the TMJ like articular discus, surface of the condyle, condylar deformities, joint surface of articular tuberculum, cartilage pathology, articular capsula and bilaminar zone. Results : Overall image quality was voted slightly better for the images obtained with a 3.0 T system. The above mentioned anatomical details were certainly identified on both image sets. For small cartilage or disc lesions the 3.0 T MR shows a slightly higher sensitivity. Conclusion : Initial experiences on 3.0 Tesla imaging using a 4cm surface coil demonstrates an improvement of image quality in the majority of cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2004-820838
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>thieme_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2004_820838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1055_s_2004_820838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-e61ce884464ee286e392de7b0bdce67d6a501f72b3e28da0b0dbc546e2ab96193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK4evc8HsGvSv-lRFlcXVgTpvaTp1GZpk5KkqB_C72yWijdP82bmx-PxCLlldMNolt27KKY0jXhMecLPyIqlCY9Kyuj5n47LS3Ll3DFwlCXlinzvlHUe5KC0kmIA_JzQKtQS4UP5HpINhQpe3vZgOvA9Qj-PQoPHcTLWBNmqZh6EhaNR2sPslH4HAakcwc22E8FHGjVAZ2zwFqPSwiujQelwHydhlQubN8A2GVTX5KITg8Ob37km1e6x2j5Hh9en_fbhEMki4xHmTCLnaZqniDHPMSnjFouGNq3EvGhzkVHWFXGThG8raEPbRmZpjrFoypyVyZpEi620xjmLXT1ZNQr7VTNan6qsXX2qsl6qDPzdwvte4Yj10cxWh3z_4D-YiXWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>First clinical experience with 3.0 T MRI of the human temporomandibular joint using a 4cm surface coil for examination in comparison to 1.5 T</title><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Lemke, AJ ; Hengst, S ; Reitz, G ; Hothan, T ; Niehues, S ; Griethe, M ; Felix, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemke, AJ ; Hengst, S ; Reitz, G ; Hothan, T ; Niehues, S ; Griethe, M ; Felix, R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose : Imaging of TMJ with 1.5 T MRI using dedicated surface coils is already an established method for the diagnostics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and degenerative joint disease (DJD). 3.0 T technology is expected to achieve an improved image quality, signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast and edge sharpness. Purpose of the study was to compare and to optimize the images with a dedicated 4cm surface coil on 3.0 T in comparison with a 3 inch surface coil on 1.5 T. Methods : In a prospective study 12 patients with TMJ pain were examined on 1.5 T MRI (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee) using an established 3-inch-surface coil first and following up on the same day with the new 3.0 T 4cm surface coil (Rapid Biomedical, Würzburg). After optimization of the sequences performed on phantoms and volunteers modified sagittal and coronal PD-FS sequences were chosen. Analysis of image quality was carried out by three independent radiologists. It was very important to figure the anatomical structures of the TMJ like articular discus, surface of the condyle, condylar deformities, joint surface of articular tuberculum, cartilage pathology, articular capsula and bilaminar zone. Results : Overall image quality was voted slightly better for the images obtained with a 3.0 T system. The above mentioned anatomical details were certainly identified on both image sets. For small cartilage or disc lesions the 3.0 T MR shows a slightly higher sensitivity. Conclusion : Initial experiences on 3.0 Tesla imaging using a 4cm surface coil demonstrates an improvement of image quality in the majority of cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-9029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-9010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820838</identifier><language>ger</language><ispartof>RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebende Verfahren, 2004, Vol.176 (3)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3017,3018,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemke, AJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hengst, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitz, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hothan, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niehues, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griethe, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felix, R</creatorcontrib><title>First clinical experience with 3.0 T MRI of the human temporomandibular joint using a 4cm surface coil for examination in comparison to 1.5 T</title><title>RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebende Verfahren</title><addtitle>Fortschr Röntgenstr</addtitle><description>Purpose : Imaging of TMJ with 1.5 T MRI using dedicated surface coils is already an established method for the diagnostics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and degenerative joint disease (DJD). 3.0 T technology is expected to achieve an improved image quality, signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast and edge sharpness. Purpose of the study was to compare and to optimize the images with a dedicated 4cm surface coil on 3.0 T in comparison with a 3 inch surface coil on 1.5 T. Methods : In a prospective study 12 patients with TMJ pain were examined on 1.5 T MRI (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee) using an established 3-inch-surface coil first and following up on the same day with the new 3.0 T 4cm surface coil (Rapid Biomedical, Würzburg). After optimization of the sequences performed on phantoms and volunteers modified sagittal and coronal PD-FS sequences were chosen. Analysis of image quality was carried out by three independent radiologists. It was very important to figure the anatomical structures of the TMJ like articular discus, surface of the condyle, condylar deformities, joint surface of articular tuberculum, cartilage pathology, articular capsula and bilaminar zone. Results : Overall image quality was voted slightly better for the images obtained with a 3.0 T system. The above mentioned anatomical details were certainly identified on both image sets. For small cartilage or disc lesions the 3.0 T MR shows a slightly higher sensitivity. Conclusion : Initial experiences on 3.0 Tesla imaging using a 4cm surface coil demonstrates an improvement of image quality in the majority of cases.</description><issn>1438-9029</issn><issn>1438-9010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK4evc8HsGvSv-lRFlcXVgTpvaTp1GZpk5KkqB_C72yWijdP82bmx-PxCLlldMNolt27KKY0jXhMecLPyIqlCY9Kyuj5n47LS3Ll3DFwlCXlinzvlHUe5KC0kmIA_JzQKtQS4UP5HpINhQpe3vZgOvA9Qj-PQoPHcTLWBNmqZh6EhaNR2sPslH4HAakcwc22E8FHGjVAZ2zwFqPSwiujQelwHydhlQubN8A2GVTX5KITg8Ob37km1e6x2j5Hh9en_fbhEMki4xHmTCLnaZqniDHPMSnjFouGNq3EvGhzkVHWFXGThG8raEPbRmZpjrFoypyVyZpEi620xjmLXT1ZNQr7VTNan6qsXX2qsl6qDPzdwvte4Yj10cxWh3z_4D-YiXWI</recordid><startdate>20040316</startdate><enddate>20040316</enddate><creator>Lemke, AJ</creator><creator>Hengst, S</creator><creator>Reitz, G</creator><creator>Hothan, T</creator><creator>Niehues, S</creator><creator>Griethe, M</creator><creator>Felix, R</creator><scope>0U6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040316</creationdate><title>First clinical experience with 3.0 T MRI of the human temporomandibular joint using a 4cm surface coil for examination in comparison to 1.5 T</title><author>Lemke, AJ ; Hengst, S ; Reitz, G ; Hothan, T ; Niehues, S ; Griethe, M ; Felix, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758-e61ce884464ee286e392de7b0bdce67d6a501f72b3e28da0b0dbc546e2ab96193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemke, AJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hengst, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitz, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hothan, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niehues, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griethe, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felix, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemke, AJ</au><au>Hengst, S</au><au>Reitz, G</au><au>Hothan, T</au><au>Niehues, S</au><au>Griethe, M</au><au>Felix, R</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>First clinical experience with 3.0 T MRI of the human temporomandibular joint using a 4cm surface coil for examination in comparison to 1.5 T</atitle><btitle>RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebende Verfahren</btitle><addtitle>Fortschr Röntgenstr</addtitle><date>2004-03-16</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>176</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1438-9029</issn><eissn>1438-9010</eissn><abstract>Purpose : Imaging of TMJ with 1.5 T MRI using dedicated surface coils is already an established method for the diagnostics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and degenerative joint disease (DJD). 3.0 T technology is expected to achieve an improved image quality, signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast and edge sharpness. Purpose of the study was to compare and to optimize the images with a dedicated 4cm surface coil on 3.0 T in comparison with a 3 inch surface coil on 1.5 T. Methods : In a prospective study 12 patients with TMJ pain were examined on 1.5 T MRI (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee) using an established 3-inch-surface coil first and following up on the same day with the new 3.0 T 4cm surface coil (Rapid Biomedical, Würzburg). After optimization of the sequences performed on phantoms and volunteers modified sagittal and coronal PD-FS sequences were chosen. Analysis of image quality was carried out by three independent radiologists. It was very important to figure the anatomical structures of the TMJ like articular discus, surface of the condyle, condylar deformities, joint surface of articular tuberculum, cartilage pathology, articular capsula and bilaminar zone. Results : Overall image quality was voted slightly better for the images obtained with a 3.0 T system. The above mentioned anatomical details were certainly identified on both image sets. For small cartilage or disc lesions the 3.0 T MR shows a slightly higher sensitivity. Conclusion : Initial experiences on 3.0 Tesla imaging using a 4cm surface coil demonstrates an improvement of image quality in the majority of cases.</abstract><doi>10.1055/s-2004-820838</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-9029
ispartof RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebende Verfahren, 2004, Vol.176 (3)
issn 1438-9029
1438-9010
language ger
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2004_820838
source Thieme Connect Journals
title First clinical experience with 3.0 T MRI of the human temporomandibular joint using a 4cm surface coil for examination in comparison to 1.5 T
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-thieme_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=First%20clinical%20experience%20with%203.0%20T%20MRI%20of%20the%20human%20temporomandibular%20joint%20using%20a%204cm%20surface%20coil%20for%20examination%20in%20comparison%20to%201.5%20T&rft.btitle=R%C3%B6Fo%20:%20Fortschritte%20auf%20dem%20Gebiet%20der%20Ro%CC%88ntgenstrahlen%20und%20der%20bildgebende%20Verfahren&rft.au=Lemke,%20AJ&rft.date=2004-03-16&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1438-9029&rft.eissn=1438-9010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2004-820838&rft_dat=%3Cthieme_cross%3E10_1055_s_2004_820838%3C/thieme_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true