A Top-Down Hierarchy in Fruit Set on Inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae)
Abstract In IRIS FULVA, the apical flower on an inflorescence opens first, and the flowering sequence then proceeds from the most basal flower upward to the apex (acropetally). Flowering order and flower position are thus partially decoupled, and this provides an opportunity to separately investigat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) Germany), 2003-11, Vol.5 (6), p.651-660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 660 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 651 |
container_title | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Wesselingh, R. A. Arnold, M. L. |
description | Abstract
In IRIS FULVA, the apical flower on an inflorescence opens first, and the flowering sequence then proceeds from the most basal flower upward to the apex (acropetally). Flowering order and flower position are thus partially decoupled, and this provides an opportunity to separately investigate the effects of these two factors upon fruit formation. We recorded natural patterns of fruit set and seed production, and found that fruit set patterns were determined by what appears to be a form of apical dominance. The first, apical flower had the highest fruit set and seed production. Fruit set decreased towards the base of the inflorescence, with later-opening flowers having a higher fruit set. This is contrary to the pattern usually observed in other acropetally flowering plants, which is a higher fruit set for basal, early flowers. By performing additional hand pollinations and counting pollen grains on naturally pollinated flowers, we found that pollen deposition was not a major factor limiting fruit set, and that it could not explain the large difference in fruit set between the apical and basal flowers. Removing the first flower after it had wilted increased fruit set in the remaining flowers, but mainly in the more apical flowers. Only by removing the two topmost flowers could we obtain an increase in fruit set for the basal flower. The fact that the basal flower rarely sets fruit, despite being closer to resources, suggests that the apical meristem is either a strong sink for resources or produces hormones that form a gradient along the inflorescence, which is comparable with apical dominance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-2003-44713 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2003_44713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_3CJLWT67_8</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b019c283b4ef305a83ff8911b9c79f1d36ad8f05904d621efe4582e2e52ae9243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PAjEURRujiYju_AFdarTaTttpZ0lQPgzqQgzLpnRewyDMkHZG5d87gHHn6t3kndzcHIQuGb1jVMr7SBJKORFCMX6EOkxwTXSq1PE-yzZTforOYlxSykRGWQc99_C02pCH6qvEowKCDW6xxUWJB6EpavwGNa5KPC79qgoQHZQO4u49DkXEvll9WnzV5tw6sHB9jk68XUW4-L1d9D54nPZHZPI6HPd7E-I4VTWZU5a5RPO5AM-ptJp7rzPG5plTmWc5T22uPZUZFXmaMPAgpE4gAZlYyBLBu-j20OtCFWMAbzahWNuwNYyanQoTzU6F2ato8ZsDXi8KWINZVk0o233_0eRAF7GG779mGz5MqriSZvYyNLz_NJlNU2U0_wHS6WxO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Top-Down Hierarchy in Fruit Set on Inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wesselingh, R. A. ; Arnold, M. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wesselingh, R. A. ; Arnold, M. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
In IRIS FULVA, the apical flower on an inflorescence opens first, and the flowering sequence then proceeds from the most basal flower upward to the apex (acropetally). Flowering order and flower position are thus partially decoupled, and this provides an opportunity to separately investigate the effects of these two factors upon fruit formation. We recorded natural patterns of fruit set and seed production, and found that fruit set patterns were determined by what appears to be a form of apical dominance. The first, apical flower had the highest fruit set and seed production. Fruit set decreased towards the base of the inflorescence, with later-opening flowers having a higher fruit set. This is contrary to the pattern usually observed in other acropetally flowering plants, which is a higher fruit set for basal, early flowers. By performing additional hand pollinations and counting pollen grains on naturally pollinated flowers, we found that pollen deposition was not a major factor limiting fruit set, and that it could not explain the large difference in fruit set between the apical and basal flowers. Removing the first flower after it had wilted increased fruit set in the remaining flowers, but mainly in the more apical flowers. Only by removing the two topmost flowers could we obtain an increase in fruit set for the basal flower. The fact that the basal flower rarely sets fruit, despite being closer to resources, suggests that the apical meristem is either a strong sink for resources or produces hormones that form a gradient along the inflorescence, which is comparable with apical dominance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-8603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Architectural effects ; flower removal ; fruit set ; Original Paper ; pollen limitation ; reproductive allocation ; seed production ; stigmatic pollen loads</subject><ispartof>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2003-11, Vol.5 (6), p.651-660</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b019c283b4ef305a83ff8911b9c79f1d36ad8f05904d621efe4582e2e52ae9243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b019c283b4ef305a83ff8911b9c79f1d36ad8f05904d621efe4582e2e52ae9243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wesselingh, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, M. L.</creatorcontrib><title>A Top-Down Hierarchy in Fruit Set on Inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae)</title><title>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</title><addtitle>Plant biol (Stuttg)</addtitle><description>Abstract
In IRIS FULVA, the apical flower on an inflorescence opens first, and the flowering sequence then proceeds from the most basal flower upward to the apex (acropetally). Flowering order and flower position are thus partially decoupled, and this provides an opportunity to separately investigate the effects of these two factors upon fruit formation. We recorded natural patterns of fruit set and seed production, and found that fruit set patterns were determined by what appears to be a form of apical dominance. The first, apical flower had the highest fruit set and seed production. Fruit set decreased towards the base of the inflorescence, with later-opening flowers having a higher fruit set. This is contrary to the pattern usually observed in other acropetally flowering plants, which is a higher fruit set for basal, early flowers. By performing additional hand pollinations and counting pollen grains on naturally pollinated flowers, we found that pollen deposition was not a major factor limiting fruit set, and that it could not explain the large difference in fruit set between the apical and basal flowers. Removing the first flower after it had wilted increased fruit set in the remaining flowers, but mainly in the more apical flowers. Only by removing the two topmost flowers could we obtain an increase in fruit set for the basal flower. The fact that the basal flower rarely sets fruit, despite being closer to resources, suggests that the apical meristem is either a strong sink for resources or produces hormones that form a gradient along the inflorescence, which is comparable with apical dominance.</description><subject>Architectural effects</subject><subject>flower removal</subject><subject>fruit set</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>pollen limitation</subject><subject>reproductive allocation</subject><subject>seed production</subject><subject>stigmatic pollen loads</subject><issn>1435-8603</issn><issn>1438-8677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PAjEURRujiYju_AFdarTaTttpZ0lQPgzqQgzLpnRewyDMkHZG5d87gHHn6t3kndzcHIQuGb1jVMr7SBJKORFCMX6EOkxwTXSq1PE-yzZTforOYlxSykRGWQc99_C02pCH6qvEowKCDW6xxUWJB6EpavwGNa5KPC79qgoQHZQO4u49DkXEvll9WnzV5tw6sHB9jk68XUW4-L1d9D54nPZHZPI6HPd7E-I4VTWZU5a5RPO5AM-ptJp7rzPG5plTmWc5T22uPZUZFXmaMPAgpE4gAZlYyBLBu-j20OtCFWMAbzahWNuwNYyanQoTzU6F2ato8ZsDXi8KWINZVk0o233_0eRAF7GG779mGz5MqriSZvYyNLz_NJlNU2U0_wHS6WxO</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Wesselingh, R. A.</creator><creator>Arnold, M. L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>A Top-Down Hierarchy in Fruit Set on Inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae)</title><author>Wesselingh, R. A. ; Arnold, M. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-b019c283b4ef305a83ff8911b9c79f1d36ad8f05904d621efe4582e2e52ae9243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Architectural effects</topic><topic>flower removal</topic><topic>fruit set</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>pollen limitation</topic><topic>reproductive allocation</topic><topic>seed production</topic><topic>stigmatic pollen loads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wesselingh, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, M. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wesselingh, R. A.</au><au>Arnold, M. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Top-Down Hierarchy in Fruit Set on Inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae)</atitle><jtitle>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant biol (Stuttg)</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>651-660</pages><issn>1435-8603</issn><eissn>1438-8677</eissn><abstract>Abstract
In IRIS FULVA, the apical flower on an inflorescence opens first, and the flowering sequence then proceeds from the most basal flower upward to the apex (acropetally). Flowering order and flower position are thus partially decoupled, and this provides an opportunity to separately investigate the effects of these two factors upon fruit formation. We recorded natural patterns of fruit set and seed production, and found that fruit set patterns were determined by what appears to be a form of apical dominance. The first, apical flower had the highest fruit set and seed production. Fruit set decreased towards the base of the inflorescence, with later-opening flowers having a higher fruit set. This is contrary to the pattern usually observed in other acropetally flowering plants, which is a higher fruit set for basal, early flowers. By performing additional hand pollinations and counting pollen grains on naturally pollinated flowers, we found that pollen deposition was not a major factor limiting fruit set, and that it could not explain the large difference in fruit set between the apical and basal flowers. Removing the first flower after it had wilted increased fruit set in the remaining flowers, but mainly in the more apical flowers. Only by removing the two topmost flowers could we obtain an increase in fruit set for the basal flower. The fact that the basal flower rarely sets fruit, despite being closer to resources, suggests that the apical meristem is either a strong sink for resources or produces hormones that form a gradient along the inflorescence, which is comparable with apical dominance.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1055/s-2003-44713</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-8603 |
ispartof | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2003-11, Vol.5 (6), p.651-660 |
issn | 1435-8603 1438-8677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2003_44713 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Architectural effects flower removal fruit set Original Paper pollen limitation reproductive allocation seed production stigmatic pollen loads |
title | A Top-Down Hierarchy in Fruit Set on Inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T13%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Top-Down%20Hierarchy%20in%20Fruit%20Set%20on%20Inflorescences%20in%20Iris%20fulva%20(Iridaceae)&rft.jtitle=Plant%20biology%20(Stuttgart,%20Germany)&rft.au=Wesselingh,%20R.%20A.&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=651-660&rft.issn=1435-8603&rft.eissn=1438-8677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2003-44713&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_3CJLWT67_8%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |