Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study
Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dental journal of advance studies 2021-08, Vol.9 (2), p.70-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 76 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Dental journal of advance studies |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Dewan, Sumedha Kalra, Tarun Kumar, Manjit Bansal, Ajay Avasthi, Abhishek |
description | Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain.
Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties.
Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters.
Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0041-1731104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1731104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1055_s_0041_1731104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUEFOwzAQjBBIVNAr5_1Aiu3ETsOtCi1UKuqBwjVy4nVrlDiV7VT0YfyPBHraWe3szGii6IGSGSWcP_qYkJTGNEsoJelVNGFJmsf5XOTXI2bDKZ2z22jq_RchhGaM5URMop-ia4_SyWBOCMuTbPoBdhY6DasGv3snG3gPDu0-HEBaBW-d6pvej4RlI30wtQnncdsdHCIs1AH9qLXpg7F7KLBFGzzIAM9GaxyUAuxMi7C2Ad1g6KG3Ch1s_6xM2zcyoIKis8qMUfwTLOzAhk8TXDeE6dX5PrrRwydOL_Mu-lgtd8VrvNm-rIvFJq4pS9NYEJHpVMj5XCuFmBJecVFrngmhmayzpNIMuda5FBXWinNKaxRM0AqV4jVJ7qLZv27tOu8d6vLoTCvduaSkHHsvfTn2Xl56T34Bwll5vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dewan, Sumedha ; Kalra, Tarun ; Kumar, Manjit ; Bansal, Ajay ; Avasthi, Abhishek</creator><creatorcontrib>Dewan, Sumedha ; Kalra, Tarun ; Kumar, Manjit ; Bansal, Ajay ; Avasthi, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain.
Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties.
Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters.
Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2321-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2349-9869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731104</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Dental journal of advance studies, 2021-08, Vol.9 (2), p.70-76</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dewan, Sumedha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Manjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avasthi, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</title><title>Dental journal of advance studies</title><description>Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain.
Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties.
Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters.
Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.</description><issn>2321-1482</issn><issn>2349-9869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUEFOwzAQjBBIVNAr5_1Aiu3ETsOtCi1UKuqBwjVy4nVrlDiV7VT0YfyPBHraWe3szGii6IGSGSWcP_qYkJTGNEsoJelVNGFJmsf5XOTXI2bDKZ2z22jq_RchhGaM5URMop-ia4_SyWBOCMuTbPoBdhY6DasGv3snG3gPDu0-HEBaBW-d6pvej4RlI30wtQnncdsdHCIs1AH9qLXpg7F7KLBFGzzIAM9GaxyUAuxMi7C2Ad1g6KG3Ch1s_6xM2zcyoIKis8qMUfwTLOzAhk8TXDeE6dX5PrrRwydOL_Mu-lgtd8VrvNm-rIvFJq4pS9NYEJHpVMj5XCuFmBJecVFrngmhmayzpNIMuda5FBXWinNKaxRM0AqV4jVJ7qLZv27tOu8d6vLoTCvduaSkHHsvfTn2Xl56T34Bwll5vA</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Dewan, Sumedha</creator><creator>Kalra, Tarun</creator><creator>Kumar, Manjit</creator><creator>Bansal, Ajay</creator><creator>Avasthi, Abhishek</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</title><author>Dewan, Sumedha ; Kalra, Tarun ; Kumar, Manjit ; Bansal, Ajay ; Avasthi, Abhishek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dewan, Sumedha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Manjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avasthi, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dental journal of advance studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dewan, Sumedha</au><au>Kalra, Tarun</au><au>Kumar, Manjit</au><au>Bansal, Ajay</au><au>Avasthi, Abhishek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>Dental journal of advance studies</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>70-76</pages><issn>2321-1482</issn><eissn>2349-9869</eissn><abstract>Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain.
Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties.
Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters.
Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.</abstract><doi>10.1055/s-0041-1731104</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2321-1482 |
ispartof | Dental journal of advance studies, 2021-08, Vol.9 (2), p.70-76 |
issn | 2321-1482 2349-9869 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1731104 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A33%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Flexural%20Strength%20and%20Modulus%20of%20Elasticity%20of%20Three%20Adhesive%20Luting%20Cements%20at%20Different%20Time%20Intervals%20under%20Oral%20Simulated%20Conditions:%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20journal%20of%20advance%20studies&rft.au=Dewan,%20Sumedha&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=70-76&rft.issn=2321-1482&rft.eissn=2349-9869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0041-1731104&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1055_s_0041_1731104%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |