Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study

Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental journal of advance studies 2021-08, Vol.9 (2), p.70-76
Hauptverfasser: Dewan, Sumedha, Kalra, Tarun, Kumar, Manjit, Bansal, Ajay, Avasthi, Abhishek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 2
container_start_page 70
container_title Dental journal of advance studies
container_volume 9
creator Dewan, Sumedha
Kalra, Tarun
Kumar, Manjit
Bansal, Ajay
Avasthi, Abhishek
description Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties. Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters. Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1731104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1731104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1055_s_0041_1731104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUEFOwzAQjBBIVNAr5_1Aiu3ETsOtCi1UKuqBwjVy4nVrlDiV7VT0YfyPBHraWe3szGii6IGSGSWcP_qYkJTGNEsoJelVNGFJmsf5XOTXI2bDKZ2z22jq_RchhGaM5URMop-ia4_SyWBOCMuTbPoBdhY6DasGv3snG3gPDu0-HEBaBW-d6pvej4RlI30wtQnncdsdHCIs1AH9qLXpg7F7KLBFGzzIAM9GaxyUAuxMi7C2Ad1g6KG3Ch1s_6xM2zcyoIKis8qMUfwTLOzAhk8TXDeE6dX5PrrRwydOL_Mu-lgtd8VrvNm-rIvFJq4pS9NYEJHpVMj5XCuFmBJecVFrngmhmayzpNIMuda5FBXWinNKaxRM0AqV4jVJ7qLZv27tOu8d6vLoTCvduaSkHHsvfTn2Xl56T34Bwll5vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dewan, Sumedha ; Kalra, Tarun ; Kumar, Manjit ; Bansal, Ajay ; Avasthi, Abhishek</creator><creatorcontrib>Dewan, Sumedha ; Kalra, Tarun ; Kumar, Manjit ; Bansal, Ajay ; Avasthi, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties. Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters. Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2321-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2349-9869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731104</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Dental journal of advance studies, 2021-08, Vol.9 (2), p.70-76</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dewan, Sumedha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Manjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avasthi, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</title><title>Dental journal of advance studies</title><description>Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties. Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters. Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.</description><issn>2321-1482</issn><issn>2349-9869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUEFOwzAQjBBIVNAr5_1Aiu3ETsOtCi1UKuqBwjVy4nVrlDiV7VT0YfyPBHraWe3szGii6IGSGSWcP_qYkJTGNEsoJelVNGFJmsf5XOTXI2bDKZ2z22jq_RchhGaM5URMop-ia4_SyWBOCMuTbPoBdhY6DasGv3snG3gPDu0-HEBaBW-d6pvej4RlI30wtQnncdsdHCIs1AH9qLXpg7F7KLBFGzzIAM9GaxyUAuxMi7C2Ad1g6KG3Ch1s_6xM2zcyoIKis8qMUfwTLOzAhk8TXDeE6dX5PrrRwydOL_Mu-lgtd8VrvNm-rIvFJq4pS9NYEJHpVMj5XCuFmBJecVFrngmhmayzpNIMuda5FBXWinNKaxRM0AqV4jVJ7qLZv27tOu8d6vLoTCvduaSkHHsvfTn2Xl56T34Bwll5vA</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Dewan, Sumedha</creator><creator>Kalra, Tarun</creator><creator>Kumar, Manjit</creator><creator>Bansal, Ajay</creator><creator>Avasthi, Abhishek</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</title><author>Dewan, Sumedha ; Kalra, Tarun ; Kumar, Manjit ; Bansal, Ajay ; Avasthi, Abhishek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1244-6067f46a88fddee405b56cf5766f2ac73bf2e5ff9a6becd5511ce6261bedd5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dewan, Sumedha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Manjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avasthi, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dental journal of advance studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dewan, Sumedha</au><au>Kalra, Tarun</au><au>Kumar, Manjit</au><au>Bansal, Ajay</au><au>Avasthi, Abhishek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>Dental journal of advance studies</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>70-76</pages><issn>2321-1482</issn><eissn>2349-9869</eissn><abstract>Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Methods Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties. Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters. Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.</abstract><doi>10.1055/s-0041-1731104</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2321-1482
ispartof Dental journal of advance studies, 2021-08, Vol.9 (2), p.70-76
issn 2321-1482
2349-9869
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1731104
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A33%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Flexural%20Strength%20and%20Modulus%20of%20Elasticity%20of%20Three%20Adhesive%20Luting%20Cements%20at%20Different%20Time%20Intervals%20under%20Oral%20Simulated%20Conditions:%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20journal%20of%20advance%20studies&rft.au=Dewan,%20Sumedha&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=70-76&rft.issn=2321-1482&rft.eissn=2349-9869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0041-1731104&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1055_s_0041_1731104%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true