Physicians’ Choice in Using Internet and Fax for Patient Recruitment and Follow-up in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: To examine the physicians’ preference between Web and fax-based remote data entry (RDE) system for an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a survey among all the collaborating physicians (n = 512) of the CASE-J (Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Ev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methods of information in medicine 2004-01, Vol.43 (3), p.268-272 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 272 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Methods of information in medicine |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Rahman, M. Morita, S. Fukui, T. Sakamoto, J. |
description | Objective: To examine the physicians’ preference between Web and fax-based remote data entry (RDE) system for an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a survey among all the collaborating physicians (n = 512) of the CASE-J (Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan) trial, who have been recruiting patients and sending follow-up data using the Web or a fax-based RDE system. The survey instrument assessed physicians’ choice between Web and fax-based RDE systems, their practice pattern, and attitudes towards these two modalities. Results: A total of 448 (87.5%) responses were received. The proportions of physicians who used Web, fax, and the combination of these two were 45.9%, 33.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that physicians 55 years or younger [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.3] and regular users of computers (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.1-8.2) were more likely to use the Web-based RDE system. Conclusions: This information would be useful in designing an RCT with a Web-based RDE system in Japan and abroad. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0038-1633867 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0038_1633867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66667443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-9d2f85306e27857fb6fcaa27d062505d6d490f70794620b6c1c68710f8c19b723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEokNhyxJlxS7FdmI7WaIRhUqVqKpWYnflcW4aV4k9-IfQWfEaLHg5ngQPMwI2WJZ85fvdY_mconhJyRklnL8JFSF1W1FR162Qj4oV45RWkvBPj4sVIUxUlElyUjwL4Z4Q0rakeVqcUM6Y5FysinQ1PgSjjbLh57fv5Xp0RmNpbHkbjL0rL2xEbzGWyvblufpaDs6XVyoatLG8Ru2TifO-_t130-SWKm3386q8znduNjvsy7Wz0eduLm-8UdPz4smgpoAvjudpcXv-7mb9obr8-P5i_fay0rzhsep6NrS8JgKZbLkcNmLQSjHZE8E44b3om44MksiuEYxshKZatJKSodW020hWnxavD7pb7z4nDBFmEzROk7LoUgCRl2yaOoNnB1B7F4LHAbbezMo_ACWwNxoC7I2Go9F54NVROW1m7P_iR2czUB2AOBqcEe5d8jb_9f-CPw580KOKUSX0f0THGLewLAv80-txv2d1p3bGIiTcoM9BjhF2aGIGvRkiWlCwgxnj6PoAOseQwwqgvB7Nl-xHjkj5HkwICUF0JAvaFLQ32wi17CCMbsnPz1P9C0xQxw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66667443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians’ Choice in Using Internet and Fax for Patient Recruitment and Follow-up in a Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Rahman, M. ; Morita, S. ; Fukui, T. ; Sakamoto, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahman, M. ; Morita, S. ; Fukui, T. ; Sakamoto, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To examine the physicians’ preference between Web and fax-based remote data entry (RDE) system for an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a survey among all the collaborating physicians (n = 512) of the CASE-J (Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan) trial, who have been recruiting patients and sending follow-up data using the Web or a fax-based RDE system. The survey instrument assessed physicians’ choice between Web and fax-based RDE systems, their practice pattern, and attitudes towards these two modalities. Results: A total of 448 (87.5%) responses were received. The proportions of physicians who used Web, fax, and the combination of these two were 45.9%, 33.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that physicians 55 years or younger [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.3] and regular users of computers (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.1-8.2) were more likely to use the Web-based RDE system. Conclusions: This information would be useful in designing an RCT with a Web-based RDE system in Japan and abroad.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2511-705X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633867</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15227556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Computers ; Communication ; fax ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Internet - utilization ; Japan ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; patient recruitment ; Patient Selection ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - statistics & numerical data ; physicians’ choice ; randomized controlled trial ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods ; Researcher-Subject Relations ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telefacsimile - utilization ; Web</subject><ispartof>Methods of information in medicine, 2004-01, Vol.43 (3), p.268-272</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-9d2f85306e27857fb6fcaa27d062505d6d490f70794620b6c1c68710f8c19b723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0038-1633867.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0038-1633867$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3015,3016,27922,27923,54557,54558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15227556$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians’ Choice in Using Internet and Fax for Patient Recruitment and Follow-up in a Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Methods of information in medicine</title><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><description>Objective: To examine the physicians’ preference between Web and fax-based remote data entry (RDE) system for an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a survey among all the collaborating physicians (n = 512) of the CASE-J (Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan) trial, who have been recruiting patients and sending follow-up data using the Web or a fax-based RDE system. The survey instrument assessed physicians’ choice between Web and fax-based RDE systems, their practice pattern, and attitudes towards these two modalities. Results: A total of 448 (87.5%) responses were received. The proportions of physicians who used Web, fax, and the combination of these two were 45.9%, 33.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that physicians 55 years or younger [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.3] and regular users of computers (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.1-8.2) were more likely to use the Web-based RDE system. Conclusions: This information would be useful in designing an RCT with a Web-based RDE system in Japan and abroad.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Computers</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>fax</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet - utilization</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>patient recruitment</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>physicians’ choice</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Researcher-Subject Relations</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Telefacsimile - utilization</subject><subject>Web</subject><issn>0026-1270</issn><issn>2511-705X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEokNhyxJlxS7FdmI7WaIRhUqVqKpWYnflcW4aV4k9-IfQWfEaLHg5ngQPMwI2WJZ85fvdY_mconhJyRklnL8JFSF1W1FR162Qj4oV45RWkvBPj4sVIUxUlElyUjwL4Z4Q0rakeVqcUM6Y5FysinQ1PgSjjbLh57fv5Xp0RmNpbHkbjL0rL2xEbzGWyvblufpaDs6XVyoatLG8Ru2TifO-_t130-SWKm3386q8znduNjvsy7Wz0eduLm-8UdPz4smgpoAvjudpcXv-7mb9obr8-P5i_fay0rzhsep6NrS8JgKZbLkcNmLQSjHZE8E44b3om44MksiuEYxshKZatJKSodW020hWnxavD7pb7z4nDBFmEzROk7LoUgCRl2yaOoNnB1B7F4LHAbbezMo_ACWwNxoC7I2Go9F54NVROW1m7P_iR2czUB2AOBqcEe5d8jb_9f-CPw580KOKUSX0f0THGLewLAv80-txv2d1p3bGIiTcoM9BjhF2aGIGvRkiWlCwgxnj6PoAOseQwwqgvB7Nl-xHjkj5HkwICUF0JAvaFLQ32wi17CCMbsnPz1P9C0xQxw0</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Rahman, M.</creator><creator>Morita, S.</creator><creator>Fukui, T.</creator><creator>Sakamoto, J.</creator><general>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</general><general>Schattauer GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Physicians’ Choice in Using Internet and Fax for Patient Recruitment and Follow-up in a Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Rahman, M. ; Morita, S. ; Fukui, T. ; Sakamoto, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-9d2f85306e27857fb6fcaa27d062505d6d490f70794620b6c1c68710f8c19b723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Computers</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>fax</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet - utilization</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>patient recruitment</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>physicians’ choice</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Researcher-Subject Relations</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Telefacsimile - utilization</topic><topic>Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahman, M.</au><au>Morita, S.</au><au>Fukui, T.</au><au>Sakamoto, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians’ Choice in Using Internet and Fax for Patient Recruitment and Follow-up in a Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>268-272</pages><issn>0026-1270</issn><eissn>2511-705X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To examine the physicians’ preference between Web and fax-based remote data entry (RDE) system for an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a survey among all the collaborating physicians (n = 512) of the CASE-J (Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan) trial, who have been recruiting patients and sending follow-up data using the Web or a fax-based RDE system. The survey instrument assessed physicians’ choice between Web and fax-based RDE systems, their practice pattern, and attitudes towards these two modalities. Results: A total of 448 (87.5%) responses were received. The proportions of physicians who used Web, fax, and the combination of these two were 45.9%, 33.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that physicians 55 years or younger [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.3] and regular users of computers (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.1-8.2) were more likely to use the Web-based RDE system. Conclusions: This information would be useful in designing an RCT with a Web-based RDE system in Japan and abroad.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</pub><pmid>15227556</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0038-1633867</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-1270 |
ispartof | Methods of information in medicine, 2004-01, Vol.43 (3), p.268-272 |
issn | 0026-1270 2511-705X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0038_1633867 |
source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude to Computers Communication fax Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Internet - utilization Japan Male Middle Aged Original Article patient recruitment Patient Selection Physicians - psychology Physicians - statistics & numerical data physicians’ choice randomized controlled trial Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods Researcher-Subject Relations Surveys and Questionnaires Telefacsimile - utilization Web |
title | Physicians’ Choice in Using Internet and Fax for Patient Recruitment and Follow-up in a Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians%E2%80%99%20Choice%20in%20Using%20Internet%20and%20Fax%20for%20Patient%20Recruitment%20and%20Follow-up%20in%20a%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Methods%20of%20information%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Rahman,%20M.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=268-272&rft.issn=0026-1270&rft.eissn=2511-705X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0038-1633867&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66667443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66667443&rft_id=info:pmid/15227556&rfr_iscdi=true |