A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas
Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2020-12, Vol.644, p.A150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | A150 |
container_title | Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) |
container_volume | 644 |
creator | Olshevsky, V. Pontin, D. I. Williams, B. Parnell, C. E. Fu, H. S. Liu, Y. Yao, S. Khotyaintsev, Y. V. |
description | Context.
Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields.
Aims.
In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered.
Methods.
We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain.
Results.
At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes.
Conclusions.
The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1051/0004-6361/202039182 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1051_0004_6361_202039182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487168024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwBWwssSXUryT2sipPqRIbYGvZid26TexgJyD-nkRF3bIazczRlWYOANcY3WGU4wVCiGUFLfCCIIKowJycgBlmlGSoZMUpmB2Jc3CR0m5sCeZ0BvZLWIW2U9Gl4GGwsDX9NtQJ2hChdb52fgNbtfGmdxX0Q9Mk6DxMrh0a1bvgE1S-Poz6AQadTPz6W4xpqVOVgV2jUqvSJTizqknm6q_Owfvjw9vqOVu_Pr2sluusoqLsM11bXdVMCYoMLZTWwjKmCdKi0LZWKudVbqgRqM6xZpwKhXKlraGC1rwsczoHt4fc9G26QcsuulbFHxmUk_fuYylD3MhhkON7CJ_w7H98328l4bwoxMjfHPguhs_BpF7uwhD9eJEkjJe44IiwkaIHqoohpWjsMRcjOUmTkxI5KZFHafQXGDGMAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487168024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</title><source>EDP Sciences</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>EDP Sciences - Revues - Licences nationales - accès par la plateforme ISTEX</source><creator>Olshevsky, V. ; Pontin, D. I. ; Williams, B. ; Parnell, C. E. ; Fu, H. S. ; Liu, Y. ; Yao, S. ; Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olshevsky, V. ; Pontin, D. I. ; Williams, B. ; Parnell, C. E. ; Fu, H. S. ; Liu, Y. ; Yao, S. ; Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Context.
Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields.
Aims.
In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered.
Methods.
We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain.
Results.
At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes.
Conclusions.
The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Cartesian coordinates ; Discretization ; Earth magnetosphere ; Energy dissipation ; Magnetic field configurations ; Magnetic fields ; Methods ; methods: numerical ; planets and satellites: magnetic fields ; plasmas ; Simulation ; Space plasmas ; Spacecraft ; Spacecraft trajectories ; Stagnation ; Sun: magnetic fields ; Taylor series</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2020-12, Vol.644, p.A150</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDP Sciences Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6059-2963 ; 0000-0001-5550-3113 ; 0000-0002-0765-1709 ; 0000-0002-1089-9270</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-288669$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-432285$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olshevsky, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontin, D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>Context.
Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields.
Aims.
In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered.
Methods.
We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain.
Results.
At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes.
Conclusions.
The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.</description><subject>Cartesian coordinates</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Magnetic field configurations</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>methods: numerical</subject><subject>planets and satellites: magnetic fields</subject><subject>plasmas</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Space plasmas</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spacecraft trajectories</subject><subject>Stagnation</subject><subject>Sun: magnetic fields</subject><subject>Taylor series</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwBWwssSXUryT2sipPqRIbYGvZid26TexgJyD-nkRF3bIazczRlWYOANcY3WGU4wVCiGUFLfCCIIKowJycgBlmlGSoZMUpmB2Jc3CR0m5sCeZ0BvZLWIW2U9Gl4GGwsDX9NtQJ2hChdb52fgNbtfGmdxX0Q9Mk6DxMrh0a1bvgE1S-Poz6AQadTPz6W4xpqVOVgV2jUqvSJTizqknm6q_Owfvjw9vqOVu_Pr2sluusoqLsM11bXdVMCYoMLZTWwjKmCdKi0LZWKudVbqgRqM6xZpwKhXKlraGC1rwsczoHt4fc9G26QcsuulbFHxmUk_fuYylD3MhhkON7CJ_w7H98328l4bwoxMjfHPguhs_BpF7uwhD9eJEkjJe44IiwkaIHqoohpWjsMRcjOUmTkxI5KZFHafQXGDGMAQ</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Olshevsky, V.</creator><creator>Pontin, D. I.</creator><creator>Williams, B.</creator><creator>Parnell, C. E.</creator><creator>Fu, H. S.</creator><creator>Liu, Y.</creator><creator>Yao, S.</creator><creator>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8V</scope><scope>DF2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-2963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-3113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-1709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-9270</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</title><author>Olshevsky, V. ; Pontin, D. I. ; Williams, B. ; Parnell, C. E. ; Fu, H. S. ; Liu, Y. ; Yao, S. ; Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cartesian coordinates</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Magnetic field configurations</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>methods: numerical</topic><topic>planets and satellites: magnetic fields</topic><topic>plasmas</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Space plasmas</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spacecraft trajectories</topic><topic>Stagnation</topic><topic>Sun: magnetic fields</topic><topic>Taylor series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olshevsky, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontin, D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olshevsky, V.</au><au>Pontin, D. I.</au><au>Williams, B.</au><au>Parnell, C. E.</au><au>Fu, H. S.</au><au>Liu, Y.</au><au>Yao, S.</au><au>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>644</volume><spage>A150</spage><pages>A150-</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><abstract>Context.
Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields.
Aims.
In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered.
Methods.
We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain.
Results.
At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes.
Conclusions.
The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/202039182</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-2963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-3113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-1709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-9270</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-6361 |
ispartof | Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2020-12, Vol.644, p.A150 |
issn | 0004-6361 1432-0746 1432-0746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1051_0004_6361_202039182 |
source | EDP Sciences; EZB Electronic Journals Library; EDP Sciences - Revues - Licences nationales - accès par la plateforme ISTEX |
subjects | Cartesian coordinates Discretization Earth magnetosphere Energy dissipation Magnetic field configurations Magnetic fields Methods methods: numerical planets and satellites: magnetic fields plasmas Simulation Space plasmas Spacecraft Spacecraft trajectories Stagnation Sun: magnetic fields Taylor series |
title | A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20finding%20magnetic%20nulls%20in%20simulations%20and%20in%20situ%20observations%20of%20space%20plasmas&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Olshevsky,%20V.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=644&rft.spage=A150&rft.pages=A150-&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202039182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2487168024%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487168024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |