A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas

Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2020-12, Vol.644, p.A150
Hauptverfasser: Olshevsky, V., Pontin, D. I., Williams, B., Parnell, C. E., Fu, H. S., Liu, Y., Yao, S., Khotyaintsev, Y. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page A150
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 644
creator Olshevsky, V.
Pontin, D. I.
Williams, B.
Parnell, C. E.
Fu, H. S.
Liu, Y.
Yao, S.
Khotyaintsev, Y. V.
description Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields. Aims. In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered. Methods. We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain. Results. At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes. Conclusions. The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/202039182
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1051_0004_6361_202039182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487168024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwBWwssSXUryT2sipPqRIbYGvZid26TexgJyD-nkRF3bIazczRlWYOANcY3WGU4wVCiGUFLfCCIIKowJycgBlmlGSoZMUpmB2Jc3CR0m5sCeZ0BvZLWIW2U9Gl4GGwsDX9NtQJ2hChdb52fgNbtfGmdxX0Q9Mk6DxMrh0a1bvgE1S-Poz6AQadTPz6W4xpqVOVgV2jUqvSJTizqknm6q_Owfvjw9vqOVu_Pr2sluusoqLsM11bXdVMCYoMLZTWwjKmCdKi0LZWKudVbqgRqM6xZpwKhXKlraGC1rwsczoHt4fc9G26QcsuulbFHxmUk_fuYylD3MhhkON7CJ_w7H98328l4bwoxMjfHPguhs_BpF7uwhD9eJEkjJe44IiwkaIHqoohpWjsMRcjOUmTkxI5KZFHafQXGDGMAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487168024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</title><source>EDP Sciences</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>EDP Sciences - Revues - Licences nationales - accès par la plateforme ISTEX</source><creator>Olshevsky, V. ; Pontin, D. I. ; Williams, B. ; Parnell, C. E. ; Fu, H. S. ; Liu, Y. ; Yao, S. ; Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olshevsky, V. ; Pontin, D. I. ; Williams, B. ; Parnell, C. E. ; Fu, H. S. ; Liu, Y. ; Yao, S. ; Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields. Aims. In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered. Methods. We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain. Results. At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes. Conclusions. The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Cartesian coordinates ; Discretization ; Earth magnetosphere ; Energy dissipation ; Magnetic field configurations ; Magnetic fields ; Methods ; methods: numerical ; planets and satellites: magnetic fields ; plasmas ; Simulation ; Space plasmas ; Spacecraft ; Spacecraft trajectories ; Stagnation ; Sun: magnetic fields ; Taylor series</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2020-12, Vol.644, p.A150</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDP Sciences Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6059-2963 ; 0000-0001-5550-3113 ; 0000-0002-0765-1709 ; 0000-0002-1089-9270</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-288669$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-432285$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olshevsky, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontin, D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields. Aims. In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered. Methods. We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain. Results. At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes. Conclusions. The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.</description><subject>Cartesian coordinates</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Magnetic field configurations</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>methods: numerical</subject><subject>planets and satellites: magnetic fields</subject><subject>plasmas</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Space plasmas</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spacecraft trajectories</subject><subject>Stagnation</subject><subject>Sun: magnetic fields</subject><subject>Taylor series</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwBWwssSXUryT2sipPqRIbYGvZid26TexgJyD-nkRF3bIazczRlWYOANcY3WGU4wVCiGUFLfCCIIKowJycgBlmlGSoZMUpmB2Jc3CR0m5sCeZ0BvZLWIW2U9Gl4GGwsDX9NtQJ2hChdb52fgNbtfGmdxX0Q9Mk6DxMrh0a1bvgE1S-Poz6AQadTPz6W4xpqVOVgV2jUqvSJTizqknm6q_Owfvjw9vqOVu_Pr2sluusoqLsM11bXdVMCYoMLZTWwjKmCdKi0LZWKudVbqgRqM6xZpwKhXKlraGC1rwsczoHt4fc9G26QcsuulbFHxmUk_fuYylD3MhhkON7CJ_w7H98328l4bwoxMjfHPguhs_BpF7uwhD9eJEkjJe44IiwkaIHqoohpWjsMRcjOUmTkxI5KZFHafQXGDGMAQ</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Olshevsky, V.</creator><creator>Pontin, D. I.</creator><creator>Williams, B.</creator><creator>Parnell, C. E.</creator><creator>Fu, H. S.</creator><creator>Liu, Y.</creator><creator>Yao, S.</creator><creator>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8V</scope><scope>DF2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-2963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-3113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-1709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-9270</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</title><author>Olshevsky, V. ; Pontin, D. I. ; Williams, B. ; Parnell, C. E. ; Fu, H. S. ; Liu, Y. ; Yao, S. ; Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bdfbcd4a930e36abb9f44b20b96bfdaa58c5e3e90d51b4839a05abfe393d87753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cartesian coordinates</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Magnetic field configurations</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>methods: numerical</topic><topic>planets and satellites: magnetic fields</topic><topic>plasmas</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Space plasmas</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spacecraft trajectories</topic><topic>Stagnation</topic><topic>Sun: magnetic fields</topic><topic>Taylor series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olshevsky, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontin, D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnell, C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olshevsky, V.</au><au>Pontin, D. I.</au><au>Williams, B.</au><au>Parnell, C. E.</au><au>Fu, H. S.</au><au>Liu, Y.</au><au>Yao, S.</au><au>Khotyaintsev, Y. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>644</volume><spage>A150</spage><pages>A150-</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><abstract>Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields. Aims. In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered. Methods. We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain. Results. At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes. Conclusions. The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/202039182</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-2963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-3113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-1709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-9270</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2020-12, Vol.644, p.A150
issn 0004-6361
1432-0746
1432-0746
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1051_0004_6361_202039182
source EDP Sciences; EZB Electronic Journals Library; EDP Sciences - Revues - Licences nationales - accès par la plateforme ISTEX
subjects Cartesian coordinates
Discretization
Earth magnetosphere
Energy dissipation
Magnetic field configurations
Magnetic fields
Methods
methods: numerical
planets and satellites: magnetic fields
plasmas
Simulation
Space plasmas
Spacecraft
Spacecraft trajectories
Stagnation
Sun: magnetic fields
Taylor series
title A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20finding%20magnetic%20nulls%20in%20simulations%20and%20in%20situ%20observations%20of%20space%20plasmas&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Olshevsky,%20V.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=644&rft.spage=A150&rft.pages=A150-&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202039182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2487168024%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487168024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true