Interfacial water and ion distribution determine zeta potential and binding affinity of nanoparticles to biomolecules
The molecular features that dictate interactions between functionalized nanoparticles and biomolecules are not well understood. This is in part because for highly charged nanoparticles in solution, establishing a clear connection between the molecular features of surface ligands and common experimen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nanoscale 2020-09, Vol.12 (35), p.18106-18123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 35 |
container_start_page | 18106 |
container_title | Nanoscale |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Liang, Dongyue Dahal, Udaya (Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian Lochbaum, Christian Ray, Dhiman Hamers, Robert J. Pedersen, Joel A. Cui, Qiang |
description | The molecular features that dictate interactions between functionalized nanoparticles and biomolecules are not well understood. This is in part because for highly charged nanoparticles in solution, establishing a clear connection between the molecular features of surface ligands and common experimental observables such as zeta potential requires going beyond the classical models based on continuum and mean field models. Motivated by these considerations, molecular dynamics simulations are used to probe the electrostatic properties of functionalized gold nanoparticles and their interaction with a charged peptide in salt solutions. Counterions are observed to screen the bare ligand charge to a significant degree even at the moderate salt concentration of 50 mM. As a result, the apparent charge density and zeta potential are largely insensitive to the bare ligand charge densities, which fall in the range of ligand densities typically measured experimentally for gold nanoparticles. While this screening effect was predicted by classical models such as the Manning condensation theory, the magnitudes of the apparent surface charge from microscopic simulations and mean-field models are significantly different. Moreover, our simulations found that the chemical features of the surface ligand (e.g., primaryvs.quaternary amines, heterogeneous ligand lengths) modulate the interfacial ion and water distributions and therefore the interfacial potential. The importance of interfacial water is further highlighted by the observation that introducing a fraction of hydrophobic ligands enhances the strength of electrostatic binding of the charged peptide. Finally, the simulations highlight that the electric double layer is perturbed upon binding interactions. As a result, it is the bare charge density rather than the apparent charge density or zeta potential that better correlates with binding affinity of the nanoparticle to a charged peptide. Overall, our study highlights the importance of molecular features of the nanoparticle/water interface and underscores a set of design rules for the modulation of electrostatic driven interactions at nano/bio interfaces. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d0nr03792c |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1039_D0NR03792C</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2443586258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-3414fb6c1b8f7c3ffe16cc879205d72a632a1fc2652eeb2775c3f14f192c34853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U9rFTEQAPAgiv2jFz-ABLyI8mqSSTb7jmW1tlAqiJ6XbHYiKbvJM8lS6qc321ffoSdPmSG_GZIZQt5wdsYZbD-NLCQGeivsM3IsmGQbAC2eH-JGHpGTnG8Za7bQwEtyBKJVggl1TJarUDA5Y72Z6J2pMTVhpD4GOvpckh-W8pBgvZp9QPoHi6G7WDCUtWbVgw-jD7-occ4HX-5pdDSYEHcmFW8nzLTEiuIcJ7RLzV-RF85MGV8_nqfk58WXH93l5vrb16vu_HpjgauyAcmlGxrLh9ZpC84hb6xt60-ZGrUwDQjDnRWNEoiD0FpVVEt4HQXIVsEpeb_vu0vx94K59LPPFqfJBIxL7oUE3Uqx1W2l757Q27ikUF9XlQTVNkKt6sNe2RRzTuj6XfKzSfc9Z_26jP4zu_n-sIyu4rePLZdhxvFA_02_gnYP7nCILluPweKBMcaU5iCFrhHnnS9mXUUXl1Bq6cf_L4W_dtSmhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443586258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interfacial water and ion distribution determine zeta potential and binding affinity of nanoparticles to biomolecules</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Liang, Dongyue ; Dahal, Udaya ; (Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian ; Lochbaum, Christian ; Ray, Dhiman ; Hamers, Robert J. ; Pedersen, Joel A. ; Cui, Qiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Dongyue ; Dahal, Udaya ; (Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian ; Lochbaum, Christian ; Ray, Dhiman ; Hamers, Robert J. ; Pedersen, Joel A. ; Cui, Qiang</creatorcontrib><description>The molecular features that dictate interactions between functionalized nanoparticles and biomolecules are not well understood. This is in part because for highly charged nanoparticles in solution, establishing a clear connection between the molecular features of surface ligands and common experimental observables such as zeta potential requires going beyond the classical models based on continuum and mean field models. Motivated by these considerations, molecular dynamics simulations are used to probe the electrostatic properties of functionalized gold nanoparticles and their interaction with a charged peptide in salt solutions. Counterions are observed to screen the bare ligand charge to a significant degree even at the moderate salt concentration of 50 mM. As a result, the apparent charge density and zeta potential are largely insensitive to the bare ligand charge densities, which fall in the range of ligand densities typically measured experimentally for gold nanoparticles. While this screening effect was predicted by classical models such as the Manning condensation theory, the magnitudes of the apparent surface charge from microscopic simulations and mean-field models are significantly different. Moreover, our simulations found that the chemical features of the surface ligand (e.g., primaryvs.quaternary amines, heterogeneous ligand lengths) modulate the interfacial ion and water distributions and therefore the interfacial potential. The importance of interfacial water is further highlighted by the observation that introducing a fraction of hydrophobic ligands enhances the strength of electrostatic binding of the charged peptide. Finally, the simulations highlight that the electric double layer is perturbed upon binding interactions. As a result, it is the bare charge density rather than the apparent charge density or zeta potential that better correlates with binding affinity of the nanoparticle to a charged peptide. Overall, our study highlights the importance of molecular features of the nanoparticle/water interface and underscores a set of design rules for the modulation of electrostatic driven interactions at nano/bio interfaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-3364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-3372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d0nr03792c</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32852025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>CAMBRIDGE: Royal Soc Chemistry</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Amines ; Binding ; Biomolecules ; Charge density ; Charge simulation ; Chemistry ; Chemistry, Multidisciplinary ; Computer simulation ; Diamonds ; Electric double layer ; Free energy ; Gold ; Ion distribution ; Ligands ; Materials Science ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary ; Metal Nanoparticles ; Molecular dynamics ; Molecular Dynamics Simulation ; Nanoparticles ; Nanoscience & Nanotechnology ; Nanostructure ; Peptides ; Physical Sciences ; Physics ; Physics, Applied ; Protonation ; Quaternary ammonium salts ; Saline solutions ; Science & Technology ; Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Simulation ; Static Electricity ; Surface charge ; Surface Properties ; Technology ; Water</subject><ispartof>Nanoscale, 2020-09, Vol.12 (35), p.18106-18123</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>14</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000571342700011</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-3414fb6c1b8f7c3ffe16cc879205d72a632a1fc2652eeb2775c3f14f192c34853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-3414fb6c1b8f7c3ffe16cc879205d72a632a1fc2652eeb2775c3f14f192c34853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3918-1860 ; 0000-0003-3821-9625 ; 0000-0002-7103-0886 ; 0000-0001-6214-5211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,28253</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahal, Udaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>(Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochbaum, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Dhiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamers, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Qiang</creatorcontrib><title>Interfacial water and ion distribution determine zeta potential and binding affinity of nanoparticles to biomolecules</title><title>Nanoscale</title><addtitle>NANOSCALE</addtitle><addtitle>Nanoscale</addtitle><description>The molecular features that dictate interactions between functionalized nanoparticles and biomolecules are not well understood. This is in part because for highly charged nanoparticles in solution, establishing a clear connection between the molecular features of surface ligands and common experimental observables such as zeta potential requires going beyond the classical models based on continuum and mean field models. Motivated by these considerations, molecular dynamics simulations are used to probe the electrostatic properties of functionalized gold nanoparticles and their interaction with a charged peptide in salt solutions. Counterions are observed to screen the bare ligand charge to a significant degree even at the moderate salt concentration of 50 mM. As a result, the apparent charge density and zeta potential are largely insensitive to the bare ligand charge densities, which fall in the range of ligand densities typically measured experimentally for gold nanoparticles. While this screening effect was predicted by classical models such as the Manning condensation theory, the magnitudes of the apparent surface charge from microscopic simulations and mean-field models are significantly different. Moreover, our simulations found that the chemical features of the surface ligand (e.g., primaryvs.quaternary amines, heterogeneous ligand lengths) modulate the interfacial ion and water distributions and therefore the interfacial potential. The importance of interfacial water is further highlighted by the observation that introducing a fraction of hydrophobic ligands enhances the strength of electrostatic binding of the charged peptide. Finally, the simulations highlight that the electric double layer is perturbed upon binding interactions. As a result, it is the bare charge density rather than the apparent charge density or zeta potential that better correlates with binding affinity of the nanoparticle to a charged peptide. Overall, our study highlights the importance of molecular features of the nanoparticle/water interface and underscores a set of design rules for the modulation of electrostatic driven interactions at nano/bio interfaces.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Amines</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Biomolecules</subject><subject>Charge density</subject><subject>Charge simulation</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Diamonds</subject><subject>Electric double layer</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Ion distribution</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Metal Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>Molecular Dynamics Simulation</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanoscience & Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics, Applied</subject><subject>Protonation</subject><subject>Quaternary ammonium salts</subject><subject>Saline solutions</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Science & Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Static Electricity</subject><subject>Surface charge</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>2040-3364</issn><issn>2040-3372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U9rFTEQAPAgiv2jFz-ABLyI8mqSSTb7jmW1tlAqiJ6XbHYiKbvJM8lS6qc321ffoSdPmSG_GZIZQt5wdsYZbD-NLCQGeivsM3IsmGQbAC2eH-JGHpGTnG8Za7bQwEtyBKJVggl1TJarUDA5Y72Z6J2pMTVhpD4GOvpckh-W8pBgvZp9QPoHi6G7WDCUtWbVgw-jD7-occ4HX-5pdDSYEHcmFW8nzLTEiuIcJ7RLzV-RF85MGV8_nqfk58WXH93l5vrb16vu_HpjgauyAcmlGxrLh9ZpC84hb6xt60-ZGrUwDQjDnRWNEoiD0FpVVEt4HQXIVsEpeb_vu0vx94K59LPPFqfJBIxL7oUE3Uqx1W2l757Q27ikUF9XlQTVNkKt6sNe2RRzTuj6XfKzSfc9Z_26jP4zu_n-sIyu4rePLZdhxvFA_02_gnYP7nCILluPweKBMcaU5iCFrhHnnS9mXUUXl1Bq6cf_L4W_dtSmhw</recordid><startdate>20200921</startdate><enddate>20200921</enddate><creator>Liang, Dongyue</creator><creator>Dahal, Udaya</creator><creator>(Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian</creator><creator>Lochbaum, Christian</creator><creator>Ray, Dhiman</creator><creator>Hamers, Robert J.</creator><creator>Pedersen, Joel A.</creator><creator>Cui, Qiang</creator><general>Royal Soc Chemistry</general><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-1860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-9625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-0886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-5211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200921</creationdate><title>Interfacial water and ion distribution determine zeta potential and binding affinity of nanoparticles to biomolecules</title><author>Liang, Dongyue ; Dahal, Udaya ; (Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian ; Lochbaum, Christian ; Ray, Dhiman ; Hamers, Robert J. ; Pedersen, Joel A. ; Cui, Qiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-3414fb6c1b8f7c3ffe16cc879205d72a632a1fc2652eeb2775c3f14f192c34853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Amines</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Biomolecules</topic><topic>Charge density</topic><topic>Charge simulation</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Diamonds</topic><topic>Electric double layer</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Ion distribution</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Metal Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>Molecular Dynamics Simulation</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanoscience & Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics, Applied</topic><topic>Protonation</topic><topic>Quaternary ammonium salts</topic><topic>Saline solutions</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Science & Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Static Electricity</topic><topic>Surface charge</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahal, Udaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>(Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochbaum, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Dhiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamers, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Qiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nanoscale</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Dongyue</au><au>Dahal, Udaya</au><au>(Kelly) Zhang, Yongqian</au><au>Lochbaum, Christian</au><au>Ray, Dhiman</au><au>Hamers, Robert J.</au><au>Pedersen, Joel A.</au><au>Cui, Qiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interfacial water and ion distribution determine zeta potential and binding affinity of nanoparticles to biomolecules</atitle><jtitle>Nanoscale</jtitle><stitle>NANOSCALE</stitle><addtitle>Nanoscale</addtitle><date>2020-09-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>18106</spage><epage>18123</epage><pages>18106-18123</pages><issn>2040-3364</issn><eissn>2040-3372</eissn><abstract>The molecular features that dictate interactions between functionalized nanoparticles and biomolecules are not well understood. This is in part because for highly charged nanoparticles in solution, establishing a clear connection between the molecular features of surface ligands and common experimental observables such as zeta potential requires going beyond the classical models based on continuum and mean field models. Motivated by these considerations, molecular dynamics simulations are used to probe the electrostatic properties of functionalized gold nanoparticles and their interaction with a charged peptide in salt solutions. Counterions are observed to screen the bare ligand charge to a significant degree even at the moderate salt concentration of 50 mM. As a result, the apparent charge density and zeta potential are largely insensitive to the bare ligand charge densities, which fall in the range of ligand densities typically measured experimentally for gold nanoparticles. While this screening effect was predicted by classical models such as the Manning condensation theory, the magnitudes of the apparent surface charge from microscopic simulations and mean-field models are significantly different. Moreover, our simulations found that the chemical features of the surface ligand (e.g., primaryvs.quaternary amines, heterogeneous ligand lengths) modulate the interfacial ion and water distributions and therefore the interfacial potential. The importance of interfacial water is further highlighted by the observation that introducing a fraction of hydrophobic ligands enhances the strength of electrostatic binding of the charged peptide. Finally, the simulations highlight that the electric double layer is perturbed upon binding interactions. As a result, it is the bare charge density rather than the apparent charge density or zeta potential that better correlates with binding affinity of the nanoparticle to a charged peptide. Overall, our study highlights the importance of molecular features of the nanoparticle/water interface and underscores a set of design rules for the modulation of electrostatic driven interactions at nano/bio interfaces.</abstract><cop>CAMBRIDGE</cop><pub>Royal Soc Chemistry</pub><pmid>32852025</pmid><doi>10.1039/d0nr03792c</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-1860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-9625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-0886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-5211</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2040-3364 |
ispartof | Nanoscale, 2020-09, Vol.12 (35), p.18106-18123 |
issn | 2040-3364 2040-3372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1039_D0NR03792C |
source | MEDLINE; Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Affinity Amines Binding Biomolecules Charge density Charge simulation Chemistry Chemistry, Multidisciplinary Computer simulation Diamonds Electric double layer Free energy Gold Ion distribution Ligands Materials Science Materials Science, Multidisciplinary Metal Nanoparticles Molecular dynamics Molecular Dynamics Simulation Nanoparticles Nanoscience & Nanotechnology Nanostructure Peptides Physical Sciences Physics Physics, Applied Protonation Quaternary ammonium salts Saline solutions Science & Technology Science & Technology - Other Topics Simulation Static Electricity Surface charge Surface Properties Technology Water |
title | Interfacial water and ion distribution determine zeta potential and binding affinity of nanoparticles to biomolecules |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T18%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interfacial%20water%20and%20ion%20distribution%20determine%20zeta%20potential%20and%20binding%20affinity%20of%20nanoparticles%20to%20biomolecules&rft.jtitle=Nanoscale&rft.au=Liang,%20Dongyue&rft.date=2020-09-21&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=18106&rft.epage=18123&rft.pages=18106-18123&rft.issn=2040-3364&rft.eissn=2040-3372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d0nr03792c&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443586258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443586258&rft_id=info:pmid/32852025&rfr_iscdi=true |