The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth

This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British dental journal 1997-07, Vol.183 (1), p.11-14
1. Verfasser: Eley, B M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title British dental journal
container_volume 183
creator Eley, B M
description This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bdj_4809419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9254957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3119-70cfcd8ec7275c980742a967a80ec47c309591c4294b27493046ec5fc412eef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlqwzAURUVpSdNh211BP2DnyZYtK7sSOkGgWaRrI8vPiY2HICkp_Y1-ceUm7a4rPTj3HtAl5I5ByCDOZrYJi7IJeQaSM3lGpoyLNEhiEZ-TKQCIAFIGl-TK2gaAcQ7phExklHCZiCn5Wm-RVnu3N0iHipbYO9VS1al2o7o5VdTgocaPkTmfbGuHRo3pkK6UcVTM6Wqwti5apKr1sFeuPiDtlL9r1Vrqhl8drQbzYzFo3eA19dCP4t1gx_AIEd32hlxUvoi3p_eavD89rhcvwfLt-XXxsAx0zJgMBOhKlxlqEYlEywwEj5RMhcoANRc6BplIpnkkeREJLmPgKeqk0pxFiJWIr0l49Grjf2Cwynem7pT5zBnk47a5bXK_bX7a1hfuj4Xdvuiw_IufxvR8duTWk36DJm-GvR-ktf8ZvwFBFId8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Eley, B M</creator><creatorcontrib>Eley, B M</creatorcontrib><description>This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9254957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects ; Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control ; Bicuspid ; Ceramics ; Composite Resins ; Dental Alloys ; Dental Amalgam ; Dental Materials ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dental Staff ; Dentistry ; Forecasting ; Gallium ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Gold Alloys ; Humans ; Inlays ; Mercury - adverse effects ; Molar ; Resin Cements ; Risk Factors ; Safety ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>British dental journal, 1997-07, Vol.183 (1), p.11-14</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3119-70cfcd8ec7275c980742a967a80ec47c309591c4294b27493046ec5fc412eef73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9254957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eley, B M</creatorcontrib><title>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</title><title>British dental journal</title><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><description>This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam</description><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Alloys</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dental Staff</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Gallium</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements</subject><subject>Gold Alloys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inlays</subject><subject>Mercury - adverse effects</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0007-0610</issn><issn>1476-5373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlqwzAURUVpSdNh211BP2DnyZYtK7sSOkGgWaRrI8vPiY2HICkp_Y1-ceUm7a4rPTj3HtAl5I5ByCDOZrYJi7IJeQaSM3lGpoyLNEhiEZ-TKQCIAFIGl-TK2gaAcQ7phExklHCZiCn5Wm-RVnu3N0iHipbYO9VS1al2o7o5VdTgocaPkTmfbGuHRo3pkK6UcVTM6Wqwti5apKr1sFeuPiDtlL9r1Vrqhl8drQbzYzFo3eA19dCP4t1gx_AIEd32hlxUvoi3p_eavD89rhcvwfLt-XXxsAx0zJgMBOhKlxlqEYlEywwEj5RMhcoANRc6BplIpnkkeREJLmPgKeqk0pxFiJWIr0l49Grjf2Cwynem7pT5zBnk47a5bXK_bX7a1hfuj4Xdvuiw_IufxvR8duTWk36DJm-GvR-ktf8ZvwFBFId8</recordid><startdate>19970712</startdate><enddate>19970712</enddate><creator>Eley, B M</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970712</creationdate><title>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</title><author>Eley, B M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3119-70cfcd8ec7275c980742a967a80ec47c309591c4294b27493046ec5fc412eef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Alloys</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dental Staff</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Gallium</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements</topic><topic>Gold Alloys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inlays</topic><topic>Mercury - adverse effects</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eley, B M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eley, B M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</atitle><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle><stitle>Br Dent J</stitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><date>1997-07-12</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0007-0610</issn><eissn>1476-5373</eissn><abstract>This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>9254957</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0610
ispartof British dental journal, 1997-07, Vol.183 (1), p.11-14
issn 0007-0610
1476-5373
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bdj_4809419
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects
Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control
Bicuspid
Ceramics
Composite Resins
Dental Alloys
Dental Amalgam
Dental Materials
Dental Restoration, Permanent
Dental Staff
Dentistry
Forecasting
Gallium
Glass Ionomer Cements
Gold Alloys
Humans
Inlays
Mercury - adverse effects
Molar
Resin Cements
Risk Factors
Safety
Time Factors
title The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20future%20of%20dental%20amalgam:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature.%20Part%207:%20Possible%20alternative%20materials%20to%20amalgam%20for%20the%20restoration%20of%20posterior%20teeth&rft.jtitle=British%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Eley,%20B%20M&rft.date=1997-07-12&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0007-0610&rft.eissn=1476-5373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9254957%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9254957&rfr_iscdi=true