The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth
This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British dental journal 1997-07, Vol.183 (1), p.11-14 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | British dental journal |
container_volume | 183 |
creator | Eley, B M |
description | This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bdj_4809419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9254957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3119-70cfcd8ec7275c980742a967a80ec47c309591c4294b27493046ec5fc412eef73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlqwzAURUVpSdNh211BP2DnyZYtK7sSOkGgWaRrI8vPiY2HICkp_Y1-ceUm7a4rPTj3HtAl5I5ByCDOZrYJi7IJeQaSM3lGpoyLNEhiEZ-TKQCIAFIGl-TK2gaAcQ7phExklHCZiCn5Wm-RVnu3N0iHipbYO9VS1al2o7o5VdTgocaPkTmfbGuHRo3pkK6UcVTM6Wqwti5apKr1sFeuPiDtlL9r1Vrqhl8drQbzYzFo3eA19dCP4t1gx_AIEd32hlxUvoi3p_eavD89rhcvwfLt-XXxsAx0zJgMBOhKlxlqEYlEywwEj5RMhcoANRc6BplIpnkkeREJLmPgKeqk0pxFiJWIr0l49Grjf2Cwynem7pT5zBnk47a5bXK_bX7a1hfuj4Xdvuiw_IufxvR8duTWk36DJm-GvR-ktf8ZvwFBFId8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Eley, B M</creator><creatorcontrib>Eley, B M</creatorcontrib><description>This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9254957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects ; Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control ; Bicuspid ; Ceramics ; Composite Resins ; Dental Alloys ; Dental Amalgam ; Dental Materials ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dental Staff ; Dentistry ; Forecasting ; Gallium ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Gold Alloys ; Humans ; Inlays ; Mercury - adverse effects ; Molar ; Resin Cements ; Risk Factors ; Safety ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>British dental journal, 1997-07, Vol.183 (1), p.11-14</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3119-70cfcd8ec7275c980742a967a80ec47c309591c4294b27493046ec5fc412eef73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9254957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eley, B M</creatorcontrib><title>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</title><title>British dental journal</title><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><description>This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam</description><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Alloys</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dental Staff</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Gallium</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements</subject><subject>Gold Alloys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inlays</subject><subject>Mercury - adverse effects</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0007-0610</issn><issn>1476-5373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlqwzAURUVpSdNh211BP2DnyZYtK7sSOkGgWaRrI8vPiY2HICkp_Y1-ceUm7a4rPTj3HtAl5I5ByCDOZrYJi7IJeQaSM3lGpoyLNEhiEZ-TKQCIAFIGl-TK2gaAcQ7phExklHCZiCn5Wm-RVnu3N0iHipbYO9VS1al2o7o5VdTgocaPkTmfbGuHRo3pkK6UcVTM6Wqwti5apKr1sFeuPiDtlL9r1Vrqhl8drQbzYzFo3eA19dCP4t1gx_AIEd32hlxUvoi3p_eavD89rhcvwfLt-XXxsAx0zJgMBOhKlxlqEYlEywwEj5RMhcoANRc6BplIpnkkeREJLmPgKeqk0pxFiJWIr0l49Grjf2Cwynem7pT5zBnk47a5bXK_bX7a1hfuj4Xdvuiw_IufxvR8duTWk36DJm-GvR-ktf8ZvwFBFId8</recordid><startdate>19970712</startdate><enddate>19970712</enddate><creator>Eley, B M</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970712</creationdate><title>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</title><author>Eley, B M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3119-70cfcd8ec7275c980742a967a80ec47c309591c4294b27493046ec5fc412eef73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Alloys</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dental Staff</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Gallium</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements</topic><topic>Gold Alloys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inlays</topic><topic>Mercury - adverse effects</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eley, B M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eley, B M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth</atitle><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle><stitle>Br Dent J</stitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><date>1997-07-12</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0007-0610</issn><eissn>1476-5373</eissn><abstract>This is the last in a series of articles on the future of dental amalgam. It considers possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. The materials discussed are gold inlays, gold foil, gallium alloys, and tooth coloured non-metal alternatives including glass-ionomer cements, composite resins, glass-ionomer-resin hybrids, compomers and ceramics. The clinical indications for these restorations are first described along with their potential clinical problems and their mean survival rates in comparison with dental amalgam. Secondly, the safety of composite resins is considered and potential toxic and hypersensitive effects of these materials are discussed. Finally, it is concluded that the present evidence does not appear to demonstrate that dental amalgam is hazardous to the health of the general population. It does, however, recommend that in continuing to use amalgam dentists must use strict mercury hygiene procedures to avoid risk to their staff and contamination of the environment. It seems that mercury contamination of the environment is likely to be the main reason for any future government action against the continued clinical use of dental amalgam</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>9254957</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0610 |
ispartof | British dental journal, 1997-07, Vol.183 (1), p.11-14 |
issn | 0007-0610 1476-5373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bdj_4809419 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control Bicuspid Ceramics Composite Resins Dental Alloys Dental Amalgam Dental Materials Dental Restoration, Permanent Dental Staff Dentistry Forecasting Gallium Glass Ionomer Cements Gold Alloys Humans Inlays Mercury - adverse effects Molar Resin Cements Risk Factors Safety Time Factors |
title | The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20future%20of%20dental%20amalgam:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature.%20Part%207:%20Possible%20alternative%20materials%20to%20amalgam%20for%20the%20restoration%20of%20posterior%20teeth&rft.jtitle=British%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Eley,%20B%20M&rft.date=1997-07-12&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0007-0610&rft.eissn=1476-5373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9254957%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9254957&rfr_iscdi=true |