Ancient Monuments in Northern England

IN view of the services which are being rendered to archaeological and historical studies by the Office of Works through its activities in protecting and preserving our ancient monuments, it is both an advantage and a necessity that the co-operation of the public should be obtained in furthering the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature (London) 1936-04, Vol.137 (3466), p.570-570
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 570
container_issue 3466
container_start_page 570
container_title Nature (London)
container_volume 137
description IN view of the services which are being rendered to archaeological and historical studies by the Office of Works through its activities in protecting and preserving our ancient monuments, it is both an advantage and a necessity that the co-operation of the public should be obtained in furthering the purpose of this work. For this, among other reasons, it is desirable that a knowledge of aims and methods, as well as of what has already been achieved under existing legislation, should be as widely diffused as possible. Much depends here, as with the collections in our national museums, upon the extent to which a suitable literature is available, from which the visiting public may learn what is most significant and best worth attention. Already at many of the ancient monuments—ultimately, no doubt, at all of any importance—detailed accounts, which cover technical matters, as well as plans and general descriptive notes, are available for the visitor; but a broader view which entails comparative treatment has been attempted in a new series of official publications which has been inaugurated by the First Commissioner of Works himself (“Illustrated Regional Guides to Ancient Monuments under the Ownership or Guardianship of His Majesty's Office of Works: Vol. 1, Northern England”. By the Right Hon. W. Ormsby-Gore. Pp. 52. London: H.M. Stationery Office. Is.). It is interesting to note how Mr. Ormsby-Gore has attacked what is really a difficult problem. The average visitor may be expected to have a historical background adequate for appreciation of the character of Norman castle or abbey; but how will such a visitor approach, for example, the Devil's Arrows at Boroughbridge? Wisely, differential treatment has been adopted. In the historic period the monuments are classified, each according to its kind, and then briefly described seriatim, but for the prehistoric period, the prehistory of the region has been reviewed as a whole, the protected monuments being used to support and illustrate the argument. This has the additional advantage that it brings out the essential function of the Department far more clearly than would be possible in a mere annotated list.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/137570a0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1038_137570a0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1038_137570a0</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1010-68b83cbbfa21779d6f4e301952e40ec81054d485fe3a32f8665476ec79a5af23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj81KAzEYRYMoOFbBR5iNoIvY78v_LEupP9DqpvuQySR1SpuRpF349o5UV67uXRwu5xJyi_CIwM0UuZYaHJyRCoVWVCijz0kFwAwFw9UluSplCwAStajI3Sz5PqRDvRrScT-WUvepfhvy4SPkVC_SZudSd00uotuVcPObE7J-WqznL3T5_vw6ny2pR0CgyrSG-7aNjqHWTaeiCBywkSwICN4gSNEJI2PgjrNolJKjYvC6cdJFxifk_jTr81BKDtF-5n7v8pdFsD_v7N-7EX04oWVE0iZkux2OOY1y_9lvcIFM8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ancient Monuments in Northern England</title><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><description>IN view of the services which are being rendered to archaeological and historical studies by the Office of Works through its activities in protecting and preserving our ancient monuments, it is both an advantage and a necessity that the co-operation of the public should be obtained in furthering the purpose of this work. For this, among other reasons, it is desirable that a knowledge of aims and methods, as well as of what has already been achieved under existing legislation, should be as widely diffused as possible. Much depends here, as with the collections in our national museums, upon the extent to which a suitable literature is available, from which the visiting public may learn what is most significant and best worth attention. Already at many of the ancient monuments—ultimately, no doubt, at all of any importance—detailed accounts, which cover technical matters, as well as plans and general descriptive notes, are available for the visitor; but a broader view which entails comparative treatment has been attempted in a new series of official publications which has been inaugurated by the First Commissioner of Works himself (“Illustrated Regional Guides to Ancient Monuments under the Ownership or Guardianship of His Majesty's Office of Works: Vol. 1, Northern England”. By the Right Hon. W. Ormsby-Gore. Pp. 52. London: H.M. Stationery Office. Is.). It is interesting to note how Mr. Ormsby-Gore has attacked what is really a difficult problem. The average visitor may be expected to have a historical background adequate for appreciation of the character of Norman castle or abbey; but how will such a visitor approach, for example, the Devil's Arrows at Boroughbridge? Wisely, differential treatment has been adopted. In the historic period the monuments are classified, each according to its kind, and then briefly described seriatim, but for the prehistoric period, the prehistory of the region has been reviewed as a whole, the protected monuments being used to support and illustrate the argument. This has the additional advantage that it brings out the essential function of the Department far more clearly than would be possible in a mere annotated list.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/137570a0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; news ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 1936-04, Vol.137 (3466), p.570-570</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1936</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/137570a0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/137570a0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>Ancient Monuments in Northern England</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>IN view of the services which are being rendered to archaeological and historical studies by the Office of Works through its activities in protecting and preserving our ancient monuments, it is both an advantage and a necessity that the co-operation of the public should be obtained in furthering the purpose of this work. For this, among other reasons, it is desirable that a knowledge of aims and methods, as well as of what has already been achieved under existing legislation, should be as widely diffused as possible. Much depends here, as with the collections in our national museums, upon the extent to which a suitable literature is available, from which the visiting public may learn what is most significant and best worth attention. Already at many of the ancient monuments—ultimately, no doubt, at all of any importance—detailed accounts, which cover technical matters, as well as plans and general descriptive notes, are available for the visitor; but a broader view which entails comparative treatment has been attempted in a new series of official publications which has been inaugurated by the First Commissioner of Works himself (“Illustrated Regional Guides to Ancient Monuments under the Ownership or Guardianship of His Majesty's Office of Works: Vol. 1, Northern England”. By the Right Hon. W. Ormsby-Gore. Pp. 52. London: H.M. Stationery Office. Is.). It is interesting to note how Mr. Ormsby-Gore has attacked what is really a difficult problem. The average visitor may be expected to have a historical background adequate for appreciation of the character of Norman castle or abbey; but how will such a visitor approach, for example, the Devil's Arrows at Boroughbridge? Wisely, differential treatment has been adopted. In the historic period the monuments are classified, each according to its kind, and then briefly described seriatim, but for the prehistoric period, the prehistory of the region has been reviewed as a whole, the protected monuments being used to support and illustrate the argument. This has the additional advantage that it brings out the essential function of the Department far more clearly than would be possible in a mere annotated list.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>news</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1936</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj81KAzEYRYMoOFbBR5iNoIvY78v_LEupP9DqpvuQySR1SpuRpF349o5UV67uXRwu5xJyi_CIwM0UuZYaHJyRCoVWVCijz0kFwAwFw9UluSplCwAStajI3Sz5PqRDvRrScT-WUvepfhvy4SPkVC_SZudSd00uotuVcPObE7J-WqznL3T5_vw6ny2pR0CgyrSG-7aNjqHWTaeiCBywkSwICN4gSNEJI2PgjrNolJKjYvC6cdJFxifk_jTr81BKDtF-5n7v8pdFsD_v7N-7EX04oWVE0iZkux2OOY1y_9lvcIFM8w</recordid><startdate>19360404</startdate><enddate>19360404</enddate><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19360404</creationdate><title>Ancient Monuments in Northern England</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1010-68b83cbbfa21779d6f4e301952e40ec81054d485fe3a32f8665476ec79a5af23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1936</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>news</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ancient Monuments in Northern England</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><date>1936-04-04</date><risdate>1936</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>3466</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>570-570</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>IN view of the services which are being rendered to archaeological and historical studies by the Office of Works through its activities in protecting and preserving our ancient monuments, it is both an advantage and a necessity that the co-operation of the public should be obtained in furthering the purpose of this work. For this, among other reasons, it is desirable that a knowledge of aims and methods, as well as of what has already been achieved under existing legislation, should be as widely diffused as possible. Much depends here, as with the collections in our national museums, upon the extent to which a suitable literature is available, from which the visiting public may learn what is most significant and best worth attention. Already at many of the ancient monuments—ultimately, no doubt, at all of any importance—detailed accounts, which cover technical matters, as well as plans and general descriptive notes, are available for the visitor; but a broader view which entails comparative treatment has been attempted in a new series of official publications which has been inaugurated by the First Commissioner of Works himself (“Illustrated Regional Guides to Ancient Monuments under the Ownership or Guardianship of His Majesty's Office of Works: Vol. 1, Northern England”. By the Right Hon. W. Ormsby-Gore. Pp. 52. London: H.M. Stationery Office. Is.). It is interesting to note how Mr. Ormsby-Gore has attacked what is really a difficult problem. The average visitor may be expected to have a historical background adequate for appreciation of the character of Norman castle or abbey; but how will such a visitor approach, for example, the Devil's Arrows at Boroughbridge? Wisely, differential treatment has been adopted. In the historic period the monuments are classified, each according to its kind, and then briefly described seriatim, but for the prehistoric period, the prehistory of the region has been reviewed as a whole, the protected monuments being used to support and illustrate the argument. This has the additional advantage that it brings out the essential function of the Department far more clearly than would be possible in a mere annotated list.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/137570a0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof Nature (London), 1936-04, Vol.137 (3466), p.570-570
issn 0028-0836
1476-4687
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1038_137570a0
source Nature Journals Online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
news
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Ancient Monuments in Northern England
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A51%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ancient%20Monuments%20in%20Northern%20England&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.date=1936-04-04&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=3466&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=570-570&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/137570a0&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_sprin%3E10_1038_137570a0%3C/crossref_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true