Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting
Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye moveme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological trauma 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned.
Clinical Impact Statement
This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-admin |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1942-9681 1942-969X |
DOI: | 10.1037/tra0000594 |