Insecticides in tile drainage effluent

Drainage effluent from systems located on irrigated land in the San Joaquin Valley of California was analyzed for insecticide residues. Only relatively small quantities of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues were found in tile drainage effluent, but higher concentrations were found in effluent from ope...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 1967-06, Vol.3 (2), p.525-537
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, William R., Ittihadieh, F. T., Craig, Kenneth R., Pillsbury, Arthur F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 537
container_issue 2
container_start_page 525
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 3
creator Johnston, William R.
Ittihadieh, F. T.
Craig, Kenneth R.
Pillsbury, Arthur F.
description Drainage effluent from systems located on irrigated land in the San Joaquin Valley of California was analyzed for insecticide residues. Only relatively small quantities of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues were found in tile drainage effluent, but higher concentrations were found in effluent from open drains where both surface and subsurface drainage waters were collected. Traces of residue were found in the irrigation water applied to tile drained farms. When the concentration factor is considered, i.e., depth of irrigation water applied/depth of drainage water removed, on a unit baas, the total quantity of insecticide residue in tile drainage effluent does not exceed and is generally less than the total quantity of residue applied in the irrigation water. Tailwater, or surface runoff, contained from 7 to 12 times as much residue as the applied water when DDT was applied to the land and as much as 85 times more residue than the irrigation water when Lindane was applied to the land. Relatively large concentrations of residue were found in the surface soil of the area studied, even where no pesticides had been applied directly to the soil. (Key words: Drainage; groundwater; insecticides; quality of water)
doi_str_mv 10.1029/WR003i002p00525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_WR003i002p00525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_6Q2ZRTQ6_T</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2392-fc000a01141f08b3091ac0605b5c553ff12b172c1a6de2f03a7ae4bcee93933a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz0FLAzEQBeAgCtbq2euevK2dySQbc5SitVCUlorgJWTTiUTrWjYr2n_vSsWDF0_DwPuGeUKcIpwjSDt6WABQApAbAC31nhigVao01tC-GAAoKpGsORRHOT8DoNKVGYizaZM5dCmkFeciNUWX1lysWp8a_8QFx7h-56Y7FgfRrzOf_MyhuL--Wo5vytndZDq-nJVBkpVlDADgAVFhhIuawKIPUIGuddCaYkRZo5EBfbViGYG88azqwGzJEnkaitHubmjfcm45uk2bXn27dQjuu6b7U7MXaic--se3_8X7fbyQIHtW7ljKHX_-Mt--uMqQ6YO3E1fN5eNiOa_ckr4AZdRjcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insecticides in tile drainage effluent</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Johnston, William R. ; Ittihadieh, F. T. ; Craig, Kenneth R. ; Pillsbury, Arthur F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William R. ; Ittihadieh, F. T. ; Craig, Kenneth R. ; Pillsbury, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><description>Drainage effluent from systems located on irrigated land in the San Joaquin Valley of California was analyzed for insecticide residues. Only relatively small quantities of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues were found in tile drainage effluent, but higher concentrations were found in effluent from open drains where both surface and subsurface drainage waters were collected. Traces of residue were found in the irrigation water applied to tile drained farms. When the concentration factor is considered, i.e., depth of irrigation water applied/depth of drainage water removed, on a unit baas, the total quantity of insecticide residue in tile drainage effluent does not exceed and is generally less than the total quantity of residue applied in the irrigation water. Tailwater, or surface runoff, contained from 7 to 12 times as much residue as the applied water when DDT was applied to the land and as much as 85 times more residue than the irrigation water when Lindane was applied to the land. Relatively large concentrations of residue were found in the surface soil of the area studied, even where no pesticides had been applied directly to the soil. (Key words: Drainage; groundwater; insecticides; quality of water)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/WR003i002p00525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Water resources research, 1967-06, Vol.3 (2), p.525-537</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1967 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2392-fc000a01141f08b3091ac0605b5c553ff12b172c1a6de2f03a7ae4bcee93933a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2392-fc000a01141f08b3091ac0605b5c553ff12b172c1a6de2f03a7ae4bcee93933a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2FWR003i002p00525$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2FWR003i002p00525$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittihadieh, F. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillsbury, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><title>Insecticides in tile drainage effluent</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>Drainage effluent from systems located on irrigated land in the San Joaquin Valley of California was analyzed for insecticide residues. Only relatively small quantities of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues were found in tile drainage effluent, but higher concentrations were found in effluent from open drains where both surface and subsurface drainage waters were collected. Traces of residue were found in the irrigation water applied to tile drained farms. When the concentration factor is considered, i.e., depth of irrigation water applied/depth of drainage water removed, on a unit baas, the total quantity of insecticide residue in tile drainage effluent does not exceed and is generally less than the total quantity of residue applied in the irrigation water. Tailwater, or surface runoff, contained from 7 to 12 times as much residue as the applied water when DDT was applied to the land and as much as 85 times more residue than the irrigation water when Lindane was applied to the land. Relatively large concentrations of residue were found in the surface soil of the area studied, even where no pesticides had been applied directly to the soil. (Key words: Drainage; groundwater; insecticides; quality of water)</description><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFz0FLAzEQBeAgCtbq2euevK2dySQbc5SitVCUlorgJWTTiUTrWjYr2n_vSsWDF0_DwPuGeUKcIpwjSDt6WABQApAbAC31nhigVao01tC-GAAoKpGsORRHOT8DoNKVGYizaZM5dCmkFeciNUWX1lysWp8a_8QFx7h-56Y7FgfRrzOf_MyhuL--Wo5vytndZDq-nJVBkpVlDADgAVFhhIuawKIPUIGuddCaYkRZo5EBfbViGYG88azqwGzJEnkaitHubmjfcm45uk2bXn27dQjuu6b7U7MXaic--se3_8X7fbyQIHtW7ljKHX_-Mt--uMqQ6YO3E1fN5eNiOa_ckr4AZdRjcg</recordid><startdate>196706</startdate><enddate>196706</enddate><creator>Johnston, William R.</creator><creator>Ittihadieh, F. T.</creator><creator>Craig, Kenneth R.</creator><creator>Pillsbury, Arthur F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196706</creationdate><title>Insecticides in tile drainage effluent</title><author>Johnston, William R. ; Ittihadieh, F. T. ; Craig, Kenneth R. ; Pillsbury, Arthur F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2392-fc000a01141f08b3091ac0605b5c553ff12b172c1a6de2f03a7ae4bcee93933a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittihadieh, F. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillsbury, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, William R.</au><au>Ittihadieh, F. T.</au><au>Craig, Kenneth R.</au><au>Pillsbury, Arthur F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insecticides in tile drainage effluent</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>1967-06</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>525-537</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Drainage effluent from systems located on irrigated land in the San Joaquin Valley of California was analyzed for insecticide residues. Only relatively small quantities of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues were found in tile drainage effluent, but higher concentrations were found in effluent from open drains where both surface and subsurface drainage waters were collected. Traces of residue were found in the irrigation water applied to tile drained farms. When the concentration factor is considered, i.e., depth of irrigation water applied/depth of drainage water removed, on a unit baas, the total quantity of insecticide residue in tile drainage effluent does not exceed and is generally less than the total quantity of residue applied in the irrigation water. Tailwater, or surface runoff, contained from 7 to 12 times as much residue as the applied water when DDT was applied to the land and as much as 85 times more residue than the irrigation water when Lindane was applied to the land. Relatively large concentrations of residue were found in the surface soil of the area studied, even where no pesticides had been applied directly to the soil. (Key words: Drainage; groundwater; insecticides; quality of water)</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/WR003i002p00525</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 1967-06, Vol.3 (2), p.525-537
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_WR003i002p00525
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Insecticides in tile drainage effluent
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A32%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insecticides%20in%20tile%20drainage%20effluent&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Johnston,%20William%20R.&rft.date=1967-06&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=525-537&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/WR003i002p00525&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_6Q2ZRTQ6_T%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true