Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?

The European land carbon uptake has been heavily impacted by several recent severe droughts, yet quantitative estimates of carbon uptake anomalies are uncertain. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) provide observation‐based estimates of the large‐scale carbon flux dynamics, but how well they capt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advances in modeling earth systems 2023-06, Vol.15 (6)
Hauptverfasser: He, Wei, Jiang, Fei, Ju, Weimin, Byrne, Brendan, Xiao, Jingfeng, Nguyen, Ngoc Tu, Wu, Mousong, Wang, Songhan, Wang, Jun, Rödenbeck, Christian, Li, Xing, Scholze, Marko, Monteil, Guillaume, Wang, Hengmao, Zhou, Yanlian, He, Qiaoning, Chen, Jing M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of advances in modeling earth systems
container_volume 15
creator He, Wei
Jiang, Fei
Ju, Weimin
Byrne, Brendan
Xiao, Jingfeng
Nguyen, Ngoc Tu
Wu, Mousong
Wang, Songhan
Wang, Jun
Rödenbeck, Christian
Li, Xing
Scholze, Marko
Monteil, Guillaume
Wang, Hengmao
Zhou, Yanlian
He, Qiaoning
Chen, Jing M.
description The European land carbon uptake has been heavily impacted by several recent severe droughts, yet quantitative estimates of carbon uptake anomalies are uncertain. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) provide observation‐based estimates of the large‐scale carbon flux dynamics, but how well they capture drought impacts on the terrestrial carbon uptake is poorly known. Here we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using observations of environmental variability and vegetation function and made comparisons with bottom‐up estimates of carbon uptake anomalies. We found that global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts. Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrated some improved consistency, with all inversions capturing a reduction in carbon uptake during the 2012 drought. However, they failed to capture the reduction caused by the 2015 drought. Finally, we found that a set of inversions that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured carbon uptake anomalies induced by both the 2012 and 2015 droughts. In addition, the recent Orbiting Carbon Observatory—2 XCO 2 inversions showed good potential in capturing drought impacts, with better performances for larger‐scale droughts like the 2018 drought. These results suggest that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, and satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can be used to improve observational constraints in atmospheric inversion systems. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) are useful tools for quantifying the response of large‐scale carbon uptake to climate extremes, but their capacity for monitoring drought impacts, particularly at regional scales, is not fully explored. In this study, we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs for monitoring drought impacts on the European land carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using a large array of observational and model data sets. We found: (a) global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations face a great challenge in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake; (b) Regional inversions assimilated denser CO 2 observations over Europe, for the EUROCOM project, demonstrated some impro
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022MS003150
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2022MS003150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1029_2022MS003150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c800-a588e2480ba37626ade7d47cdd2724d1600ab88a028973e14955fdef6b73c2d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4wA-AIHnl8RxVqhK-anUqouWdeTEL6TQxpHtILHjCJyRk9AKFt3MfNKMZjGMXQu4FYD5HQLiYgUQixRO2EjkCUaYSHl6xOfswvs3ACklpiM2TC1fBR3o5-t72exl3R5w4gKfhJ31fUtuU_NiyZHPug9ynvjCGtp6Xug-DI741NnhtQ18tut1HTy3HQ8t8YfB2Z50x-e6M_uyq_bBSx_0O91fsrNGbz1d_fuYrR8f1sVzNF8-zYrJPKoVQKRTpQgTBZWOM4lSG8pMktXGYIaJERJAV0ppQJVnMYkkT9PGUCOrLK7RyHjMbv5ma2e9d9SUvdvstPssBZSHx8rjx-JfPz1gJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>He, Wei ; Jiang, Fei ; Ju, Weimin ; Byrne, Brendan ; Xiao, Jingfeng ; Nguyen, Ngoc Tu ; Wu, Mousong ; Wang, Songhan ; Wang, Jun ; Rödenbeck, Christian ; Li, Xing ; Scholze, Marko ; Monteil, Guillaume ; Wang, Hengmao ; Zhou, Yanlian ; He, Qiaoning ; Chen, Jing M.</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Wei ; Jiang, Fei ; Ju, Weimin ; Byrne, Brendan ; Xiao, Jingfeng ; Nguyen, Ngoc Tu ; Wu, Mousong ; Wang, Songhan ; Wang, Jun ; Rödenbeck, Christian ; Li, Xing ; Scholze, Marko ; Monteil, Guillaume ; Wang, Hengmao ; Zhou, Yanlian ; He, Qiaoning ; Chen, Jing M.</creatorcontrib><description>The European land carbon uptake has been heavily impacted by several recent severe droughts, yet quantitative estimates of carbon uptake anomalies are uncertain. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) provide observation‐based estimates of the large‐scale carbon flux dynamics, but how well they capture drought impacts on the terrestrial carbon uptake is poorly known. Here we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using observations of environmental variability and vegetation function and made comparisons with bottom‐up estimates of carbon uptake anomalies. We found that global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts. Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrated some improved consistency, with all inversions capturing a reduction in carbon uptake during the 2012 drought. However, they failed to capture the reduction caused by the 2015 drought. Finally, we found that a set of inversions that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured carbon uptake anomalies induced by both the 2012 and 2015 droughts. In addition, the recent Orbiting Carbon Observatory—2 XCO 2 inversions showed good potential in capturing drought impacts, with better performances for larger‐scale droughts like the 2018 drought. These results suggest that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, and satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can be used to improve observational constraints in atmospheric inversion systems. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) are useful tools for quantifying the response of large‐scale carbon uptake to climate extremes, but their capacity for monitoring drought impacts, particularly at regional scales, is not fully explored. In this study, we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs for monitoring drought impacts on the European land carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using a large array of observational and model data sets. We found: (a) global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations face a great challenge in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake; (b) Regional inversions assimilated denser CO 2 observations over Europe, for the EUROCOM project, demonstrated some improved consistency but are still deficient, showing divergent estimates in interannual variability of carbon uptake for most years; and (c) A set of inversion systems that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured annual and seasonal anomalies caused by droughts. Our study demonstrates that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, whereby satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can offer observational constraints for improving the estimates. Global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts on the European carbon uptake Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrate some improved consistency but are still deficient The inversions assimilating satellite XCO 2 or environmental variables in addition to surface CO 2 largely improve the estimates</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-2466</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-2466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022MS003150</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2023-06, Vol.15 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c800-a588e2480ba37626ade7d47cdd2724d1600ab88a028973e14955fdef6b73c2d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c800-a588e2480ba37626ade7d47cdd2724d1600ab88a028973e14955fdef6b73c2d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0622-6903 ; 0000-0001-9833-8154 ; 0000-0003-3251-1799 ; 0000-0003-0779-2496 ; 0000-0001-7363-191X ; 0000-0003-1744-7565 ; 0000-0002-0010-7401 ; 0000-0002-8867-8486 ; 0000-0001-7359-1647 ; 0000-0002-9293-0365 ; 0000-0003-1141-3022 ; 0000-0001-6011-6249 ; 0000-0002-3474-5938 ; 0000-0003-0619-3045 ; 0000-0002-8682-1293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Weimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Ngoc Tu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Mousong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Songhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rödenbeck, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholze, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hengmao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yanlian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Qiaoning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing M.</creatorcontrib><title>Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?</title><title>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems</title><description>The European land carbon uptake has been heavily impacted by several recent severe droughts, yet quantitative estimates of carbon uptake anomalies are uncertain. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) provide observation‐based estimates of the large‐scale carbon flux dynamics, but how well they capture drought impacts on the terrestrial carbon uptake is poorly known. Here we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using observations of environmental variability and vegetation function and made comparisons with bottom‐up estimates of carbon uptake anomalies. We found that global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts. Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrated some improved consistency, with all inversions capturing a reduction in carbon uptake during the 2012 drought. However, they failed to capture the reduction caused by the 2015 drought. Finally, we found that a set of inversions that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured carbon uptake anomalies induced by both the 2012 and 2015 droughts. In addition, the recent Orbiting Carbon Observatory—2 XCO 2 inversions showed good potential in capturing drought impacts, with better performances for larger‐scale droughts like the 2018 drought. These results suggest that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, and satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can be used to improve observational constraints in atmospheric inversion systems. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) are useful tools for quantifying the response of large‐scale carbon uptake to climate extremes, but their capacity for monitoring drought impacts, particularly at regional scales, is not fully explored. In this study, we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs for monitoring drought impacts on the European land carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using a large array of observational and model data sets. We found: (a) global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations face a great challenge in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake; (b) Regional inversions assimilated denser CO 2 observations over Europe, for the EUROCOM project, demonstrated some improved consistency but are still deficient, showing divergent estimates in interannual variability of carbon uptake for most years; and (c) A set of inversion systems that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured annual and seasonal anomalies caused by droughts. Our study demonstrates that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, whereby satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can offer observational constraints for improving the estimates. Global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts on the European carbon uptake Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrate some improved consistency but are still deficient The inversions assimilating satellite XCO 2 or environmental variables in addition to surface CO 2 largely improve the estimates</description><issn>1942-2466</issn><issn>1942-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4wA-AIHnl8RxVqhK-anUqouWdeTEL6TQxpHtILHjCJyRk9AKFt3MfNKMZjGMXQu4FYD5HQLiYgUQixRO2EjkCUaYSHl6xOfswvs3ACklpiM2TC1fBR3o5-t72exl3R5w4gKfhJ31fUtuU_NiyZHPug9ynvjCGtp6Xug-DI741NnhtQ18tut1HTy3HQ8t8YfB2Z50x-e6M_uyq_bBSx_0O91fsrNGbz1d_fuYrR8f1sVzNF8-zYrJPKoVQKRTpQgTBZWOM4lSG8pMktXGYIaJERJAV0ppQJVnMYkkT9PGUCOrLK7RyHjMbv5ma2e9d9SUvdvstPssBZSHx8rjx-JfPz1gJg</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>He, Wei</creator><creator>Jiang, Fei</creator><creator>Ju, Weimin</creator><creator>Byrne, Brendan</creator><creator>Xiao, Jingfeng</creator><creator>Nguyen, Ngoc Tu</creator><creator>Wu, Mousong</creator><creator>Wang, Songhan</creator><creator>Wang, Jun</creator><creator>Rödenbeck, Christian</creator><creator>Li, Xing</creator><creator>Scholze, Marko</creator><creator>Monteil, Guillaume</creator><creator>Wang, Hengmao</creator><creator>Zhou, Yanlian</creator><creator>He, Qiaoning</creator><creator>Chen, Jing M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-6903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9833-8154</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-1799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-2496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-191X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1744-7565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0010-7401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-8486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-1647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9293-0365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-3022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-6249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-5938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-3045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8682-1293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?</title><author>He, Wei ; Jiang, Fei ; Ju, Weimin ; Byrne, Brendan ; Xiao, Jingfeng ; Nguyen, Ngoc Tu ; Wu, Mousong ; Wang, Songhan ; Wang, Jun ; Rödenbeck, Christian ; Li, Xing ; Scholze, Marko ; Monteil, Guillaume ; Wang, Hengmao ; Zhou, Yanlian ; He, Qiaoning ; Chen, Jing M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c800-a588e2480ba37626ade7d47cdd2724d1600ab88a028973e14955fdef6b73c2d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Weimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Ngoc Tu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Mousong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Songhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rödenbeck, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholze, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteil, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hengmao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yanlian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Qiaoning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Wei</au><au>Jiang, Fei</au><au>Ju, Weimin</au><au>Byrne, Brendan</au><au>Xiao, Jingfeng</au><au>Nguyen, Ngoc Tu</au><au>Wu, Mousong</au><au>Wang, Songhan</au><au>Wang, Jun</au><au>Rödenbeck, Christian</au><au>Li, Xing</au><au>Scholze, Marko</au><au>Monteil, Guillaume</au><au>Wang, Hengmao</au><au>Zhou, Yanlian</au><au>He, Qiaoning</au><au>Chen, Jing M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>1942-2466</issn><eissn>1942-2466</eissn><abstract>The European land carbon uptake has been heavily impacted by several recent severe droughts, yet quantitative estimates of carbon uptake anomalies are uncertain. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) provide observation‐based estimates of the large‐scale carbon flux dynamics, but how well they capture drought impacts on the terrestrial carbon uptake is poorly known. Here we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using observations of environmental variability and vegetation function and made comparisons with bottom‐up estimates of carbon uptake anomalies. We found that global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts. Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrated some improved consistency, with all inversions capturing a reduction in carbon uptake during the 2012 drought. However, they failed to capture the reduction caused by the 2015 drought. Finally, we found that a set of inversions that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured carbon uptake anomalies induced by both the 2012 and 2015 droughts. In addition, the recent Orbiting Carbon Observatory—2 XCO 2 inversions showed good potential in capturing drought impacts, with better performances for larger‐scale droughts like the 2018 drought. These results suggest that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, and satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can be used to improve observational constraints in atmospheric inversion systems. Atmospheric CO 2 inverse models (AIMs) are useful tools for quantifying the response of large‐scale carbon uptake to climate extremes, but their capacity for monitoring drought impacts, particularly at regional scales, is not fully explored. In this study, we assessed the capacity of state‐of‐the‐art AIMs for monitoring drought impacts on the European land carbon uptake over 2001–2015 using a large array of observational and model data sets. We found: (a) global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations face a great challenge in monitoring drought impacts on the European carbon uptake; (b) Regional inversions assimilated denser CO 2 observations over Europe, for the EUROCOM project, demonstrated some improved consistency but are still deficient, showing divergent estimates in interannual variability of carbon uptake for most years; and (c) A set of inversion systems that assimilated satellite XCO 2 or assimilated environmental variables plus surface CO 2 observations better captured annual and seasonal anomalies caused by droughts. Our study demonstrates that surface CO 2 observations may still be too sparse to fully capture the impact of drought on the carbon cycle at subcontinental scales over Europe, whereby satellite XCO 2 and ancillary environmental data can offer observational constraints for improving the estimates. Global inversions with only limited surface CO 2 observations give divergent estimates of drought impacts on the European carbon uptake Regional inversions assimilating denser CO 2 observations over Europe demonstrate some improved consistency but are still deficient The inversions assimilating satellite XCO 2 or environmental variables in addition to surface CO 2 largely improve the estimates</abstract><doi>10.1029/2022MS003150</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-6903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9833-8154</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-1799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-2496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-191X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1744-7565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0010-7401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-8486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-1647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9293-0365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-3022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-6249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-5938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-3045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8682-1293</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-2466
ispartof Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2023-06, Vol.15 (6)
issn 1942-2466
1942-2466
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2022MS003150
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO 2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T09%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20State%E2%80%90Of%E2%80%90The%E2%80%90Art%20Atmospheric%20CO%202%20Inverse%20Models%20Capture%20Drought%20Impacts%20on%20the%20European%20Land%20Carbon%20Uptake?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advances%20in%20modeling%20earth%20systems&rft.au=He,%20Wei&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=1942-2466&rft.eissn=1942-2466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022MS003150&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1029_2022MS003150%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true