Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies

CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2020-03, Vol.125 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Li, Xiaolan, Hu, Xiao‐Ming, Cai, Changjie, Jia, Qingyu, Zhang, Yao, Liu, Jingmiao, Xue, Ming, Xu, Jianming, Wen, Rihong, Crowell, Sean M. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 125
creator Li, Xiaolan
Hu, Xiao‐Ming
Cai, Changjie
Jia, Qingyu
Zhang, Yao
Liu, Jingmiao
Xue, Ming
Xu, Jianming
Wen, Rihong
Crowell, Sean M. R.
description CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes. A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JD031686
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2019JD031686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1029_2019JD031686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYixBITGM3HiAPsEJ-2jThBoXxo8EO24FblaZftqCSoiRF8PZ0gBC-2JZsH4zQKSVnlDB1zghVD9eEUyHFAZowKlQmlRKHf7p8PkazGF_ICEl4XuQTFDYQAsQUnO5wtcIML7rhA-IcV7034FPQyfV-9Ot-CAYi1r7FV0O7hYSdx099SDvQMeFq57y-wKsmQnj_Lo2L-_Bj30Ln_Bav09A6iCfoyOouwuyXp2izuNlUd9lydXtfXS4zI4nIlMklKxpqS0EU47aQJqdUtkZxK0xTcsIk18ryhrOCgB4DYMHqnGhV5qbhUzT_mTWhjzGArd-Ce9Xhs6ak3j9W_3-MfwEC1l5V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Xiaolan ; Hu, Xiao‐Ming ; Cai, Changjie ; Jia, Qingyu ; Zhang, Yao ; Liu, Jingmiao ; Xue, Ming ; Xu, Jianming ; Wen, Rihong ; Crowell, Sean M. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolan ; Hu, Xiao‐Ming ; Cai, Changjie ; Jia, Qingyu ; Zhang, Yao ; Liu, Jingmiao ; Xue, Ming ; Xu, Jianming ; Wen, Rihong ; Crowell, Sean M. R.</creatorcontrib><description>CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes. A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031686</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-03, Vol.125 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1976-3238 ; 0000-0001-8353-3707 ; 0000-0002-0769-5090 ; 0000-0003-0304-5581 ; 0000-0002-7468-2409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Changjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jingmiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Rihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowell, Sean M. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes. A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency</description><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYixBITGM3HiAPsEJ-2jThBoXxo8EO24FblaZftqCSoiRF8PZ0gBC-2JZsH4zQKSVnlDB1zghVD9eEUyHFAZowKlQmlRKHf7p8PkazGF_ICEl4XuQTFDYQAsQUnO5wtcIML7rhA-IcV7034FPQyfV-9Ot-CAYi1r7FV0O7hYSdx099SDvQMeFq57y-wKsmQnj_Lo2L-_Bj30Ln_Bav09A6iCfoyOouwuyXp2izuNlUd9lydXtfXS4zI4nIlMklKxpqS0EU47aQJqdUtkZxK0xTcsIk18ryhrOCgB4DYMHqnGhV5qbhUzT_mTWhjzGArd-Ce9Xhs6ak3j9W_3-MfwEC1l5V</recordid><startdate>20200327</startdate><enddate>20200327</enddate><creator>Li, Xiaolan</creator><creator>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</creator><creator>Cai, Changjie</creator><creator>Jia, Qingyu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yao</creator><creator>Liu, Jingmiao</creator><creator>Xue, Ming</creator><creator>Xu, Jianming</creator><creator>Wen, Rihong</creator><creator>Crowell, Sean M. R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-3707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-5581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-2409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200327</creationdate><title>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</title><author>Li, Xiaolan ; Hu, Xiao‐Ming ; Cai, Changjie ; Jia, Qingyu ; Zhang, Yao ; Liu, Jingmiao ; Xue, Ming ; Xu, Jianming ; Wen, Rihong ; Crowell, Sean M. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Changjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jingmiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Rihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowell, Sean M. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xiaolan</au><au>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</au><au>Cai, Changjie</au><au>Jia, Qingyu</au><au>Zhang, Yao</au><au>Liu, Jingmiao</au><au>Xue, Ming</au><au>Xu, Jianming</au><au>Wen, Rihong</au><au>Crowell, Sean M. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2020-03-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes. A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency</abstract><doi>10.1029/2019JD031686</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-3707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-5581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-2409</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-03, Vol.125 (6)
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2019JD031686
source Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A28%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Terrestrial%20CO%202%20Fluxes,%20Concentrations,%20Sources%20and%20Budget%20in%20Northeast%20China:%20Observational%20and%20Modeling%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Li,%20Xiaolan&rft.date=2020-03-27&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JD031686&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1029_2019JD031686%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true