Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies
CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2020-03, Vol.125 (6) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Li, Xiaolan Hu, Xiao‐Ming Cai, Changjie Jia, Qingyu Zhang, Yao Liu, Jingmiao Xue, Ming Xu, Jianming Wen, Rihong Crowell, Sean M. R. |
description | CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes.
A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JD031686 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2019JD031686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1029_2019JD031686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYixBITGM3HiAPsEJ-2jThBoXxo8EO24FblaZftqCSoiRF8PZ0gBC-2JZsH4zQKSVnlDB1zghVD9eEUyHFAZowKlQmlRKHf7p8PkazGF_ICEl4XuQTFDYQAsQUnO5wtcIML7rhA-IcV7034FPQyfV-9Ot-CAYi1r7FV0O7hYSdx099SDvQMeFq57y-wKsmQnj_Lo2L-_Bj30Ln_Bav09A6iCfoyOouwuyXp2izuNlUd9lydXtfXS4zI4nIlMklKxpqS0EU47aQJqdUtkZxK0xTcsIk18ryhrOCgB4DYMHqnGhV5qbhUzT_mTWhjzGArd-Ce9Xhs6ak3j9W_3-MfwEC1l5V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Xiaolan ; Hu, Xiao‐Ming ; Cai, Changjie ; Jia, Qingyu ; Zhang, Yao ; Liu, Jingmiao ; Xue, Ming ; Xu, Jianming ; Wen, Rihong ; Crowell, Sean M. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolan ; Hu, Xiao‐Ming ; Cai, Changjie ; Jia, Qingyu ; Zhang, Yao ; Liu, Jingmiao ; Xue, Ming ; Xu, Jianming ; Wen, Rihong ; Crowell, Sean M. R.</creatorcontrib><description>CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes.
A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031686</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-03, Vol.125 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1976-3238 ; 0000-0001-8353-3707 ; 0000-0002-0769-5090 ; 0000-0003-0304-5581 ; 0000-0002-7468-2409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Changjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jingmiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Rihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowell, Sean M. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes.
A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency</description><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYixBITGM3HiAPsEJ-2jThBoXxo8EO24FblaZftqCSoiRF8PZ0gBC-2JZsH4zQKSVnlDB1zghVD9eEUyHFAZowKlQmlRKHf7p8PkazGF_ICEl4XuQTFDYQAsQUnO5wtcIML7rhA-IcV7034FPQyfV-9Ot-CAYi1r7FV0O7hYSdx099SDvQMeFq57y-wKsmQnj_Lo2L-_Bj30Ln_Bav09A6iCfoyOouwuyXp2izuNlUd9lydXtfXS4zI4nIlMklKxpqS0EU47aQJqdUtkZxK0xTcsIk18ryhrOCgB4DYMHqnGhV5qbhUzT_mTWhjzGArd-Ce9Xhs6ak3j9W_3-MfwEC1l5V</recordid><startdate>20200327</startdate><enddate>20200327</enddate><creator>Li, Xiaolan</creator><creator>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</creator><creator>Cai, Changjie</creator><creator>Jia, Qingyu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yao</creator><creator>Liu, Jingmiao</creator><creator>Xue, Ming</creator><creator>Xu, Jianming</creator><creator>Wen, Rihong</creator><creator>Crowell, Sean M. R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-3707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-5581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-2409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200327</creationdate><title>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</title><author>Li, Xiaolan ; Hu, Xiao‐Ming ; Cai, Changjie ; Jia, Qingyu ; Zhang, Yao ; Liu, Jingmiao ; Xue, Ming ; Xu, Jianming ; Wen, Rihong ; Crowell, Sean M. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c806-9c4825b1f760923f58c4118dc93f6cb730283a9f3b3250eaf58efefa40a974cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Changjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jingmiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Rihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowell, Sean M. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xiaolan</au><au>Hu, Xiao‐Ming</au><au>Cai, Changjie</au><au>Jia, Qingyu</au><au>Zhang, Yao</au><au>Liu, Jingmiao</au><au>Xue, Ming</au><au>Xu, Jianming</au><au>Wen, Rihong</au><au>Crowell, Sean M. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2020-03-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>CO 2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO 2 fluxes and concentrations using observations and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF‐VPRM). We also used WRF‐VPRM outputs to examine CO 2 transport/dispersion and budgets. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO 2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half‐saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using off‐line ensemble simulations. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO 2 source and sink than rice paddies in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although measured minimum daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (−10 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) than at mixed forest (−6.5 μmol·m ‐2 ·s ‐1 ) during the growing season (May–September). The monthly fluctuation of column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations (XCO 2 ) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. The large summertime biogenic sinks offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO 2 in this region. WRF‐VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO 2 concentrations; however, NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency. These findings suggest that the WRF‐VPRM modeling framework will provide greater understanding of the natural and anthropogenic contributions to the carbon cycle in China, especially after calibration of parameters that control biogenic fluxes.
A mixed forest was observed as a larger CO 2 sink/source than a rice paddy due to a longer growing period and stronger ecosystem respiration The biogenic sink offsets about 70% of anthropogenic contribution to column‐averaged CO 2 concentrations over Northeast China Uncertainty of simulated CO 2 fluxes with the WRF‐VPRM largely depends on VPRM parameters, in particular maximum light use efficiency</abstract><doi>10.1029/2019JD031686</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-3238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-3707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-5581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-2409</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-03, Vol.125 (6) |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2019JD031686 |
source | Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Terrestrial CO 2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A28%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Terrestrial%20CO%202%20Fluxes,%20Concentrations,%20Sources%20and%20Budget%20in%20Northeast%20China:%20Observational%20and%20Modeling%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Li,%20Xiaolan&rft.date=2020-03-27&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JD031686&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1029_2019JD031686%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |