Observing coronal mass ejections without coronagraphs

A coronal mass ejection (CME), strictly speaking, is a phenomenon observed via a white‐light coronal imager. In addition to coronagraphs, a wide variety of other instruments provide independent observations of CMEs, in regimes ranging from the chromosphere to interplanetary space. In this paper we l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 2001-11, Vol.106 (A11), p.25199-25213
Hauptverfasser: Hudson, H. S., Cliver, E. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25213
container_issue A11
container_start_page 25199
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
container_volume 106
creator Hudson, H. S.
Cliver, E. W.
description A coronal mass ejection (CME), strictly speaking, is a phenomenon observed via a white‐light coronal imager. In addition to coronagraphs, a wide variety of other instruments provide independent observations of CMEs, in regimes ranging from the chromosphere to interplanetary space. In this paper we list the most important of these noncoronagraphic signatures, many of which had been known even before CMEs were first identified in coronagraph observations about 30 years ago. We summarize the new aspects of CMEs discovered in the past several years, primarily with instruments on the Yohkoh and SOHO satellites. We emphasize the need for detailed statistically based comparisons between SOHO CMEs and their noncoronagraphic manifestations. We discuss how the various aspects of CMEs fit into the current standard model (sigmoids, flux rope, double dimming, arcade). While a class of CMEs follows this pattern, it does not appear to work for all events. In particular, some CMEs involve extended dimming regions and erupting transequatorial X‐ray loops, indicating a more complex geometry than a simple bipolar magnetic configuration.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2000JA904026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2000JA904026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_61JDBT9F_R</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4216-4a3777b9e99ee2b8575d6040c4a90e48b334bf5dfcb85ca361d817cb09baaf863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81OAjEUhRujiQTZ-QDzAI7e_k-XiIISIgnBuGzaTgcGgSHtCPL2DhliXLm6i_N9J_cgdIvhHgNRDwQAxn0FDIi4QB2CuUgJAXKJOoBZlgIh8hr1Ylw1IDAuGOAO4lMbfdiX20XiqlBtzTrZmBgTv_KuLqttTA5lvay-6nO8CGa3jDfoqjDr6Hvn20Xvw-f54CWdTEevg_4kdYxgkTJDpZRWeaW8JzbjkueiedAxo8CzzFLKbMHzwjWZM1TgPMPSWVDWmCITtIvu2l4XqhiDL_QulBsTjhqDPq3Wf1c3OG3xQ7n2x39ZPR7N-phn7GSlrVXG2n__WiZ8aiGp5PrjbaQFHj89ztVQz-gPJKlngw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Observing coronal mass ejections without coronagraphs</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hudson, H. S. ; Cliver, E. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hudson, H. S. ; Cliver, E. W.</creatorcontrib><description>A coronal mass ejection (CME), strictly speaking, is a phenomenon observed via a white‐light coronal imager. In addition to coronagraphs, a wide variety of other instruments provide independent observations of CMEs, in regimes ranging from the chromosphere to interplanetary space. In this paper we list the most important of these noncoronagraphic signatures, many of which had been known even before CMEs were first identified in coronagraph observations about 30 years ago. We summarize the new aspects of CMEs discovered in the past several years, primarily with instruments on the Yohkoh and SOHO satellites. We emphasize the need for detailed statistically based comparisons between SOHO CMEs and their noncoronagraphic manifestations. We discuss how the various aspects of CMEs fit into the current standard model (sigmoids, flux rope, double dimming, arcade). While a class of CMEs follows this pattern, it does not appear to work for all events. In particular, some CMEs involve extended dimming regions and erupting transequatorial X‐ray loops, indicating a more complex geometry than a simple bipolar magnetic configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000JA904026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2001-11, Vol.106 (A11), p.25199-25213</ispartof><rights>This paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. Published in 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4216-4a3777b9e99ee2b8575d6040c4a90e48b334bf5dfcb85ca361d817cb09baaf863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4216-4a3777b9e99ee2b8575d6040c4a90e48b334bf5dfcb85ca361d817cb09baaf863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000JA904026$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000JA904026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hudson, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cliver, E. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Observing coronal mass ejections without coronagraphs</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>A coronal mass ejection (CME), strictly speaking, is a phenomenon observed via a white‐light coronal imager. In addition to coronagraphs, a wide variety of other instruments provide independent observations of CMEs, in regimes ranging from the chromosphere to interplanetary space. In this paper we list the most important of these noncoronagraphic signatures, many of which had been known even before CMEs were first identified in coronagraph observations about 30 years ago. We summarize the new aspects of CMEs discovered in the past several years, primarily with instruments on the Yohkoh and SOHO satellites. We emphasize the need for detailed statistically based comparisons between SOHO CMEs and their noncoronagraphic manifestations. We discuss how the various aspects of CMEs fit into the current standard model (sigmoids, flux rope, double dimming, arcade). While a class of CMEs follows this pattern, it does not appear to work for all events. In particular, some CMEs involve extended dimming regions and erupting transequatorial X‐ray loops, indicating a more complex geometry than a simple bipolar magnetic configuration.</description><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j81OAjEUhRujiQTZ-QDzAI7e_k-XiIISIgnBuGzaTgcGgSHtCPL2DhliXLm6i_N9J_cgdIvhHgNRDwQAxn0FDIi4QB2CuUgJAXKJOoBZlgIh8hr1Ylw1IDAuGOAO4lMbfdiX20XiqlBtzTrZmBgTv_KuLqttTA5lvay-6nO8CGa3jDfoqjDr6Hvn20Xvw-f54CWdTEevg_4kdYxgkTJDpZRWeaW8JzbjkueiedAxo8CzzFLKbMHzwjWZM1TgPMPSWVDWmCITtIvu2l4XqhiDL_QulBsTjhqDPq3Wf1c3OG3xQ7n2x39ZPR7N-phn7GSlrVXG2n__WiZ8aiGp5PrjbaQFHj89ztVQz-gPJKlngw</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Hudson, H. S.</creator><creator>Cliver, E. W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Observing coronal mass ejections without coronagraphs</title><author>Hudson, H. S. ; Cliver, E. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4216-4a3777b9e99ee2b8575d6040c4a90e48b334bf5dfcb85ca361d817cb09baaf863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hudson, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cliver, E. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hudson, H. S.</au><au>Cliver, E. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Observing coronal mass ejections without coronagraphs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>A11</issue><spage>25199</spage><epage>25213</epage><pages>25199-25213</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>A coronal mass ejection (CME), strictly speaking, is a phenomenon observed via a white‐light coronal imager. In addition to coronagraphs, a wide variety of other instruments provide independent observations of CMEs, in regimes ranging from the chromosphere to interplanetary space. In this paper we list the most important of these noncoronagraphic signatures, many of which had been known even before CMEs were first identified in coronagraph observations about 30 years ago. We summarize the new aspects of CMEs discovered in the past several years, primarily with instruments on the Yohkoh and SOHO satellites. We emphasize the need for detailed statistically based comparisons between SOHO CMEs and their noncoronagraphic manifestations. We discuss how the various aspects of CMEs fit into the current standard model (sigmoids, flux rope, double dimming, arcade). While a class of CMEs follows this pattern, it does not appear to work for all events. In particular, some CMEs involve extended dimming regions and erupting transequatorial X‐ray loops, indicating a more complex geometry than a simple bipolar magnetic configuration.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000JA904026</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2001-11, Vol.106 (A11), p.25199-25213
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1029_2000JA904026
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Observing coronal mass ejections without coronagraphs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Observing%20coronal%20mass%20ejections%20without%20coronagraphs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Space%20Physics&rft.au=Hudson,%20H.%20S.&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=A11&rft.spage=25199&rft.epage=25213&rft.pages=25199-25213&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000JA904026&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_61JDBT9F_R%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true