Assessment of Competences in Sustainability Management: Analyses to the Construct Dimensionality

The paper discusses an examination of the dimensions of a competence model for sustainability management. A central assumption is that the dimensions of the competence model differ according to knowledge representation (i. e., declarative vs. schematic and strategic knowledge) and content area (i. e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-08, Vol.33 (2), p.148-158
Hauptverfasser: Seeber, Susan, Michaelis, Christian, Repp, Anton, Hartig, Johannes, Aichele, Christine, Schumann, Matthias, Anke, Jan Moritz, Dierkes, Stefan, Siepelmeyer, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 2
container_start_page 148
container_title Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)
container_volume 33
creator Seeber, Susan
Michaelis, Christian
Repp, Anton
Hartig, Johannes
Aichele, Christine
Schumann, Matthias
Anke, Jan Moritz
Dierkes, Stefan
Siepelmeyer, David
description The paper discusses an examination of the dimensions of a competence model for sustainability management. A central assumption is that the dimensions of the competence model differ according to knowledge representation (i. e., declarative vs. schematic and strategic knowledge) and content area (i. e., business administration and sustainability from a societal perspective, as well as sustainability management). Study participants included 850 students from 16 universities in Germany, and the analyses were conducted on the basis of structural equation modeling. The results reveal an expectation-compliant finding whereby the types of knowledge addressed by different assessment formats and content requirements can be presented in two disjunct dimensions. On the one hand, the model analyses indicate a better fit to the multidimensional model, which distinguishes between declarative knowledge in the field of business administration and sustainability from a social perspective, while on the other hand, the analyses suggest a better fit to sustainability management.
doi_str_mv 10.1024/1010-0652/a000240
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1024_1010_0652_a000240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1024_1010_0652_a000240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-10b0c5431a1ef7980bee42b8ab48d9f9f2fba14307b96930be73173948ba5ed43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A6EzsZPY7KrwlIpYAOtgpzYYtU6VcRf9exxRVjOae-4sDmPXCDcIpVwgIBRQV-XCAOQDnLAZ1rUsSo1wmvf__JxdEP0AiErVzYx9Lokc0dbFxAfP22G7c8nF3hEPkb_tKZkQjQ2bkA78xUTz5Sb2li-j2RxylaeBp2-Xm5HSuO8TvwuZoDBkIJcu2Zk3G3JXxzlnHw_37-1TsXp9fG6Xq6IvlUoFgoW-kgINOt9oBdY5WVplrFRr7bUvvTUoBTRW11rkuBHYCC2VNZVbSzFn-Pe3Hwei0fluN4atGQ8dQjcp6iYF3aSgOyoSvz1KWwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Competences in Sustainability Management: Analyses to the Construct Dimensionality</title><source>Hogrefe eContent</source><creator>Seeber, Susan ; Michaelis, Christian ; Repp, Anton ; Hartig, Johannes ; Aichele, Christine ; Schumann, Matthias ; Anke, Jan Moritz ; Dierkes, Stefan ; Siepelmeyer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Susan ; Michaelis, Christian ; Repp, Anton ; Hartig, Johannes ; Aichele, Christine ; Schumann, Matthias ; Anke, Jan Moritz ; Dierkes, Stefan ; Siepelmeyer, David</creatorcontrib><description>The paper discusses an examination of the dimensions of a competence model for sustainability management. A central assumption is that the dimensions of the competence model differ according to knowledge representation (i. e., declarative vs. schematic and strategic knowledge) and content area (i. e., business administration and sustainability from a societal perspective, as well as sustainability management). Study participants included 850 students from 16 universities in Germany, and the analyses were conducted on the basis of structural equation modeling. The results reveal an expectation-compliant finding whereby the types of knowledge addressed by different assessment formats and content requirements can be presented in two disjunct dimensions. On the one hand, the model analyses indicate a better fit to the multidimensional model, which distinguishes between declarative knowledge in the field of business administration and sustainability from a social perspective, while on the other hand, the analyses suggest a better fit to sustainability management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-0652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-2910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000240</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland), 2019-08, Vol.33 (2), p.148-158</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-10b0c5431a1ef7980bee42b8ab48d9f9f2fba14307b96930be73173948ba5ed43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-10b0c5431a1ef7980bee42b8ab48d9f9f2fba14307b96930be73173948ba5ed43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaelis, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repp, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aichele, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anke, Jan Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierkes, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siepelmeyer, David</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Competences in Sustainability Management: Analyses to the Construct Dimensionality</title><title>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)</title><description>The paper discusses an examination of the dimensions of a competence model for sustainability management. A central assumption is that the dimensions of the competence model differ according to knowledge representation (i. e., declarative vs. schematic and strategic knowledge) and content area (i. e., business administration and sustainability from a societal perspective, as well as sustainability management). Study participants included 850 students from 16 universities in Germany, and the analyses were conducted on the basis of structural equation modeling. The results reveal an expectation-compliant finding whereby the types of knowledge addressed by different assessment formats and content requirements can be presented in two disjunct dimensions. On the one hand, the model analyses indicate a better fit to the multidimensional model, which distinguishes between declarative knowledge in the field of business administration and sustainability from a social perspective, while on the other hand, the analyses suggest a better fit to sustainability management.</description><issn>1010-0652</issn><issn>1664-2910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A6EzsZPY7KrwlIpYAOtgpzYYtU6VcRf9exxRVjOae-4sDmPXCDcIpVwgIBRQV-XCAOQDnLAZ1rUsSo1wmvf__JxdEP0AiErVzYx9Lokc0dbFxAfP22G7c8nF3hEPkb_tKZkQjQ2bkA78xUTz5Sb2li-j2RxylaeBp2-Xm5HSuO8TvwuZoDBkIJcu2Zk3G3JXxzlnHw_37-1TsXp9fG6Xq6IvlUoFgoW-kgINOt9oBdY5WVplrFRr7bUvvTUoBTRW11rkuBHYCC2VNZVbSzFn-Pe3Hwei0fluN4atGQ8dQjcp6iYF3aSgOyoSvz1KWwk</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Seeber, Susan</creator><creator>Michaelis, Christian</creator><creator>Repp, Anton</creator><creator>Hartig, Johannes</creator><creator>Aichele, Christine</creator><creator>Schumann, Matthias</creator><creator>Anke, Jan Moritz</creator><creator>Dierkes, Stefan</creator><creator>Siepelmeyer, David</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Assessment of Competences in Sustainability Management: Analyses to the Construct Dimensionality</title><author>Seeber, Susan ; Michaelis, Christian ; Repp, Anton ; Hartig, Johannes ; Aichele, Christine ; Schumann, Matthias ; Anke, Jan Moritz ; Dierkes, Stefan ; Siepelmeyer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-10b0c5431a1ef7980bee42b8ab48d9f9f2fba14307b96930be73173948ba5ed43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaelis, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repp, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartig, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aichele, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anke, Jan Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierkes, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siepelmeyer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seeber, Susan</au><au>Michaelis, Christian</au><au>Repp, Anton</au><au>Hartig, Johannes</au><au>Aichele, Christine</au><au>Schumann, Matthias</au><au>Anke, Jan Moritz</au><au>Dierkes, Stefan</au><au>Siepelmeyer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Competences in Sustainability Management: Analyses to the Construct Dimensionality</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>148-158</pages><issn>1010-0652</issn><eissn>1664-2910</eissn><abstract>The paper discusses an examination of the dimensions of a competence model for sustainability management. A central assumption is that the dimensions of the competence model differ according to knowledge representation (i. e., declarative vs. schematic and strategic knowledge) and content area (i. e., business administration and sustainability from a societal perspective, as well as sustainability management). Study participants included 850 students from 16 universities in Germany, and the analyses were conducted on the basis of structural equation modeling. The results reveal an expectation-compliant finding whereby the types of knowledge addressed by different assessment formats and content requirements can be presented in two disjunct dimensions. On the one hand, the model analyses indicate a better fit to the multidimensional model, which distinguishes between declarative knowledge in the field of business administration and sustainability from a social perspective, while on the other hand, the analyses suggest a better fit to sustainability management.</abstract><doi>10.1024/1010-0652/a000240</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-0652
ispartof Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland), 2019-08, Vol.33 (2), p.148-158
issn 1010-0652
1664-2910
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1024_1010_0652_a000240
source Hogrefe eContent
title Assessment of Competences in Sustainability Management: Analyses to the Construct Dimensionality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Competences%20in%20Sustainability%20Management:%20Analyses%20to%20the%20Construct%20Dimensionality&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20p%C3%A4dagogische%20Psychologie%20(Bern,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Seeber,%20Susan&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=148-158&rft.issn=1010-0652&rft.eissn=1664-2910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1024/1010-0652/a000240&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1024_1010_0652_a000240%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true