Validating a Test for Measuring Knowledge and Understanding of Economics Among University Students

University students' knowledge and understanding of economics have mostly been investigated cross-sectionally; however, longitudinal analyses are needed to determine which factors influence knowledge development and to draw valid conclusions based on test results. In the WiWiKom II project, a q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-08, Vol.33 (2), p.119-133
Hauptverfasser: Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga, Jitomirski, Judith, Happ, Roland, Molerov, Dimitri, Schlax, Jasmin, Kühling-Thees, Carla, Förster, Manuel, Brückner, Sebastian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 2
container_start_page 119
container_title Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)
container_volume 33
creator Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga
Jitomirski, Judith
Happ, Roland
Molerov, Dimitri
Schlax, Jasmin
Kühling-Thees, Carla
Förster, Manuel
Brückner, Sebastian
description University students' knowledge and understanding of economics have mostly been investigated cross-sectionally; however, longitudinal analyses are needed to determine which factors influence knowledge development and to draw valid conclusions based on test results. In the WiWiKom II project, a quasi-experimental longitudinal study was conducted assessing bachelor students of business and economics over the course of their studies in Germany (N = 39 universities). In this project, running from 2016 – 2019, the test-takers complete the WiWiKom II-test of economic knowledge (adapted TUCE4G and TEL4G items) and a general cognitive ability test (BEFKI 11) at four measurement points, each one year apart. In this paper, we describe the validation of the test instrument based on the data from the first measurement (winter semester 2016/17). We compare students' results on the economic knowledge test and the general cognitive abilities test between first-year students of economic sciences (N = 3,710) and social sciences (N = 1,347) to determine the discriminant validity of the economic knowledge test. The findings from the confirmatory factor analyses presented here show that the items on general cognitive ability and economic knowledge are empirically separable. As expected, there were no differences in the factorial structure between the comparison groups (economic vs. social science students) at the beginning of their studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1024/1010-0652/a000239
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1024_1010_0652_a000239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1024_1010_0652_a000239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-57a1edf1fc7dc019fb4aa23e3a214d4964888169c7569103537d30e0712ae6033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANz8AqG7tuMkx6oqUFHEgYZr5PqnCmptZLugvj2JKKcZzaxWmo-Qe4QHBCZmCAgFyJLNFAAw3lyQCUopCtYgXA7-v78mNyl9AvCyltWEbD_Uvjcq935HFd3YlKkLkb5alY5xDF98-Nlbs7NUeUNbb2xMebBjFxxd6uDDodeJzg9hiFrffw8XfT7R93w01ud0S66c2id7d9YpaR-Xm8VzsX57Wi3m60IzUeairBRa49DpymjAxm2FUoxbrhgKIxop6rpG2eiqlMMmXvLKcLBQIVNWAudTgn9_dQwpReu6r9gfVDx1CN0IqRshdCOE7gyJ_wJjklpp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating a Test for Measuring Knowledge and Understanding of Economics Among University Students</title><source>Hogrefe eContent</source><creator>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga ; Jitomirski, Judith ; Happ, Roland ; Molerov, Dimitri ; Schlax, Jasmin ; Kühling-Thees, Carla ; Förster, Manuel ; Brückner, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga ; Jitomirski, Judith ; Happ, Roland ; Molerov, Dimitri ; Schlax, Jasmin ; Kühling-Thees, Carla ; Förster, Manuel ; Brückner, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>University students' knowledge and understanding of economics have mostly been investigated cross-sectionally; however, longitudinal analyses are needed to determine which factors influence knowledge development and to draw valid conclusions based on test results. In the WiWiKom II project, a quasi-experimental longitudinal study was conducted assessing bachelor students of business and economics over the course of their studies in Germany (N = 39 universities). In this project, running from 2016 – 2019, the test-takers complete the WiWiKom II-test of economic knowledge (adapted TUCE4G and TEL4G items) and a general cognitive ability test (BEFKI 11) at four measurement points, each one year apart. In this paper, we describe the validation of the test instrument based on the data from the first measurement (winter semester 2016/17). We compare students' results on the economic knowledge test and the general cognitive abilities test between first-year students of economic sciences (N = 3,710) and social sciences (N = 1,347) to determine the discriminant validity of the economic knowledge test. The findings from the confirmatory factor analyses presented here show that the items on general cognitive ability and economic knowledge are empirically separable. As expected, there were no differences in the factorial structure between the comparison groups (economic vs. social science students) at the beginning of their studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-0652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-2910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000239</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland), 2019-08, Vol.33 (2), p.119-133</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-57a1edf1fc7dc019fb4aa23e3a214d4964888169c7569103537d30e0712ae6033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-57a1edf1fc7dc019fb4aa23e3a214d4964888169c7569103537d30e0712ae6033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitomirski, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happ, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molerov, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlax, Jasmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühling-Thees, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Förster, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brückner, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Validating a Test for Measuring Knowledge and Understanding of Economics Among University Students</title><title>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)</title><description>University students' knowledge and understanding of economics have mostly been investigated cross-sectionally; however, longitudinal analyses are needed to determine which factors influence knowledge development and to draw valid conclusions based on test results. In the WiWiKom II project, a quasi-experimental longitudinal study was conducted assessing bachelor students of business and economics over the course of their studies in Germany (N = 39 universities). In this project, running from 2016 – 2019, the test-takers complete the WiWiKom II-test of economic knowledge (adapted TUCE4G and TEL4G items) and a general cognitive ability test (BEFKI 11) at four measurement points, each one year apart. In this paper, we describe the validation of the test instrument based on the data from the first measurement (winter semester 2016/17). We compare students' results on the economic knowledge test and the general cognitive abilities test between first-year students of economic sciences (N = 3,710) and social sciences (N = 1,347) to determine the discriminant validity of the economic knowledge test. The findings from the confirmatory factor analyses presented here show that the items on general cognitive ability and economic knowledge are empirically separable. As expected, there were no differences in the factorial structure between the comparison groups (economic vs. social science students) at the beginning of their studies.</description><issn>1010-0652</issn><issn>1664-2910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANz8AqG7tuMkx6oqUFHEgYZr5PqnCmptZLugvj2JKKcZzaxWmo-Qe4QHBCZmCAgFyJLNFAAw3lyQCUopCtYgXA7-v78mNyl9AvCyltWEbD_Uvjcq935HFd3YlKkLkb5alY5xDF98-Nlbs7NUeUNbb2xMebBjFxxd6uDDodeJzg9hiFrffw8XfT7R93w01ud0S66c2id7d9YpaR-Xm8VzsX57Wi3m60IzUeairBRa49DpymjAxm2FUoxbrhgKIxop6rpG2eiqlMMmXvLKcLBQIVNWAudTgn9_dQwpReu6r9gfVDx1CN0IqRshdCOE7gyJ_wJjklpp</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga</creator><creator>Jitomirski, Judith</creator><creator>Happ, Roland</creator><creator>Molerov, Dimitri</creator><creator>Schlax, Jasmin</creator><creator>Kühling-Thees, Carla</creator><creator>Förster, Manuel</creator><creator>Brückner, Sebastian</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Validating a Test for Measuring Knowledge and Understanding of Economics Among University Students</title><author>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga ; Jitomirski, Judith ; Happ, Roland ; Molerov, Dimitri ; Schlax, Jasmin ; Kühling-Thees, Carla ; Förster, Manuel ; Brückner, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-57a1edf1fc7dc019fb4aa23e3a214d4964888169c7569103537d30e0712ae6033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitomirski, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happ, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molerov, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlax, Jasmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühling-Thees, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Förster, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brückner, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga</au><au>Jitomirski, Judith</au><au>Happ, Roland</au><au>Molerov, Dimitri</au><au>Schlax, Jasmin</au><au>Kühling-Thees, Carla</au><au>Förster, Manuel</au><au>Brückner, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating a Test for Measuring Knowledge and Understanding of Economics Among University Students</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>119-133</pages><issn>1010-0652</issn><eissn>1664-2910</eissn><abstract>University students' knowledge and understanding of economics have mostly been investigated cross-sectionally; however, longitudinal analyses are needed to determine which factors influence knowledge development and to draw valid conclusions based on test results. In the WiWiKom II project, a quasi-experimental longitudinal study was conducted assessing bachelor students of business and economics over the course of their studies in Germany (N = 39 universities). In this project, running from 2016 – 2019, the test-takers complete the WiWiKom II-test of economic knowledge (adapted TUCE4G and TEL4G items) and a general cognitive ability test (BEFKI 11) at four measurement points, each one year apart. In this paper, we describe the validation of the test instrument based on the data from the first measurement (winter semester 2016/17). We compare students' results on the economic knowledge test and the general cognitive abilities test between first-year students of economic sciences (N = 3,710) and social sciences (N = 1,347) to determine the discriminant validity of the economic knowledge test. The findings from the confirmatory factor analyses presented here show that the items on general cognitive ability and economic knowledge are empirically separable. As expected, there were no differences in the factorial structure between the comparison groups (economic vs. social science students) at the beginning of their studies.</abstract><doi>10.1024/1010-0652/a000239</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-0652
ispartof Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie (Bern, Switzerland), 2019-08, Vol.33 (2), p.119-133
issn 1010-0652
1664-2910
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1024_1010_0652_a000239
source Hogrefe eContent
title Validating a Test for Measuring Knowledge and Understanding of Economics Among University Students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A52%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20a%20Test%20for%20Measuring%20Knowledge%20and%20Understanding%20of%20Economics%20Among%20University%20Students&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20p%C3%A4dagogische%20Psychologie%20(Bern,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia,%20Olga&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=119-133&rft.issn=1010-0652&rft.eissn=1664-2910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1024/1010-0652/a000239&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1024_1010_0652_a000239%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true