A Comparative First-Principles Study of the Structure, Energetics, and Properties of Li–M (M = Si, Ge, Sn) Alloys

On the basis of density functional theory calculations, we first present a comparative study on the behavior of Li atoms in M (M = Si, Ge, and Sn) and evaluate how Li incorporation affects the electronic structure and bonding nature of the host lattices. We then discuss the energetics, structural ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physical chemistry. C 2011-10, Vol.115 (40), p.20018-20026
Hauptverfasser: Chou, Chia-Yun, Kim, Hyunwoo, Hwang, Gyeong S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20026
container_issue 40
container_start_page 20018
container_title Journal of physical chemistry. C
container_volume 115
creator Chou, Chia-Yun
Kim, Hyunwoo
Hwang, Gyeong S
description On the basis of density functional theory calculations, we first present a comparative study on the behavior of Li atoms in M (M = Si, Ge, and Sn) and evaluate how Li incorporation affects the electronic structure and bonding nature of the host lattices. We then discuss the energetics, structural evolution, and variations in electronic and mechanical properties of crystalline and amorphous Li–M alloys. Our calculations show that Li insertion is the least favorable in Si and the most favorable in Sn owing to its large effective interstitial space and softer matrix. Upon Li incorporation, the bonding strength of the host network is weakened, attributed to the transferred charge from Li. Li interstitials can migrate easily in all three host materials with a moderate migration barrier in Si and small barriers in Ge and Sn. Because of the cation repulsive interaction, Li atoms tend to remain isolated and well dispersed in M; also induced by this cationic nature is the charge redistribution toward Li, leading to the strong screening/shielding effect in Si, in which the excess charges are highly localized, and a relatively weaker effect in Sn. According to our mixing enthalpy calculations, alloying between Li and M is energetically favorable with Li–Sn alloys being the most stable, followed by Li–Ge and Li–Si alloys. On the basis of structural, electronic, and mechanical property analyses, we also demonstrate how the incorporation of Li atoms with increasing concentration leads to the disintegration of host networks and softening of the Li–M alloys, and associated with the more flexible lattices, the volume expansion at fully lithiated states are 434 (399)% (Si), 382 (353)% (Ge), and 305 (259)% (Sn) for amorphous (crystalline) Li–M alloys.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jp205484v
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_jp205484v</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>a126433256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-eee8273e941825c0b21db5656f9b81ce3498976ac1ad7d4269d9629677b6f32d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9KAzEYxIMoWKsH3yAXwUJXk2z-bA4eSmmr0GKhel6ySVZTtrtLki305jv4hj6JK0pPnr754DfDMABcY3SHEcH325YgRjO6PwEDLFOSCMrY6VFTcQ4uQtgixFKE0wEIEzhtdq3yKrq9hXPnQ0zW3tXatZUNcBM7c4BNCeO77R_f6dh5O4az2vo3G50OY6hqA9e-aa2Prrf08NJ9fXyu4O0KPsCNG8NF79jUIzipquYQLsFZqapgr_7uELzOZy_Tx2T5vHiaTpaJIkzGxFqbEZFaSXFGmEYFwaZgnPFSFhnWNqUyk4IrjZURhhIujeREciEKXqbEpEMw-s3VvgnB2zJvvdspf8gxyn_Wyo9r9ezNL6t0yLdN5-u-2T_cN1mqaDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative First-Principles Study of the Structure, Energetics, and Properties of Li–M (M = Si, Ge, Sn) Alloys</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Chou, Chia-Yun ; Kim, Hyunwoo ; Hwang, Gyeong S</creator><creatorcontrib>Chou, Chia-Yun ; Kim, Hyunwoo ; Hwang, Gyeong S</creatorcontrib><description>On the basis of density functional theory calculations, we first present a comparative study on the behavior of Li atoms in M (M = Si, Ge, and Sn) and evaluate how Li incorporation affects the electronic structure and bonding nature of the host lattices. We then discuss the energetics, structural evolution, and variations in electronic and mechanical properties of crystalline and amorphous Li–M alloys. Our calculations show that Li insertion is the least favorable in Si and the most favorable in Sn owing to its large effective interstitial space and softer matrix. Upon Li incorporation, the bonding strength of the host network is weakened, attributed to the transferred charge from Li. Li interstitials can migrate easily in all three host materials with a moderate migration barrier in Si and small barriers in Ge and Sn. Because of the cation repulsive interaction, Li atoms tend to remain isolated and well dispersed in M; also induced by this cationic nature is the charge redistribution toward Li, leading to the strong screening/shielding effect in Si, in which the excess charges are highly localized, and a relatively weaker effect in Sn. According to our mixing enthalpy calculations, alloying between Li and M is energetically favorable with Li–Sn alloys being the most stable, followed by Li–Ge and Li–Si alloys. On the basis of structural, electronic, and mechanical property analyses, we also demonstrate how the incorporation of Li atoms with increasing concentration leads to the disintegration of host networks and softening of the Li–M alloys, and associated with the more flexible lattices, the volume expansion at fully lithiated states are 434 (399)% (Si), 382 (353)% (Ge), and 305 (259)% (Sn) for amorphous (crystalline) Li–M alloys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jp205484v</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>C: Energy Conversion and Storage</subject><ispartof>Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2011-10, Vol.115 (40), p.20018-20026</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-eee8273e941825c0b21db5656f9b81ce3498976ac1ad7d4269d9629677b6f32d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-eee8273e941825c0b21db5656f9b81ce3498976ac1ad7d4269d9629677b6f32d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jp205484v$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp205484v$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2766,27081,27929,27930,56743,56793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chou, Chia-Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Gyeong S</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative First-Principles Study of the Structure, Energetics, and Properties of Li–M (M = Si, Ge, Sn) Alloys</title><title>Journal of physical chemistry. C</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><description>On the basis of density functional theory calculations, we first present a comparative study on the behavior of Li atoms in M (M = Si, Ge, and Sn) and evaluate how Li incorporation affects the electronic structure and bonding nature of the host lattices. We then discuss the energetics, structural evolution, and variations in electronic and mechanical properties of crystalline and amorphous Li–M alloys. Our calculations show that Li insertion is the least favorable in Si and the most favorable in Sn owing to its large effective interstitial space and softer matrix. Upon Li incorporation, the bonding strength of the host network is weakened, attributed to the transferred charge from Li. Li interstitials can migrate easily in all three host materials with a moderate migration barrier in Si and small barriers in Ge and Sn. Because of the cation repulsive interaction, Li atoms tend to remain isolated and well dispersed in M; also induced by this cationic nature is the charge redistribution toward Li, leading to the strong screening/shielding effect in Si, in which the excess charges are highly localized, and a relatively weaker effect in Sn. According to our mixing enthalpy calculations, alloying between Li and M is energetically favorable with Li–Sn alloys being the most stable, followed by Li–Ge and Li–Si alloys. On the basis of structural, electronic, and mechanical property analyses, we also demonstrate how the incorporation of Li atoms with increasing concentration leads to the disintegration of host networks and softening of the Li–M alloys, and associated with the more flexible lattices, the volume expansion at fully lithiated states are 434 (399)% (Si), 382 (353)% (Ge), and 305 (259)% (Sn) for amorphous (crystalline) Li–M alloys.</description><subject>C: Energy Conversion and Storage</subject><issn>1932-7447</issn><issn>1932-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9KAzEYxIMoWKsH3yAXwUJXk2z-bA4eSmmr0GKhel6ySVZTtrtLki305jv4hj6JK0pPnr754DfDMABcY3SHEcH325YgRjO6PwEDLFOSCMrY6VFTcQ4uQtgixFKE0wEIEzhtdq3yKrq9hXPnQ0zW3tXatZUNcBM7c4BNCeO77R_f6dh5O4az2vo3G50OY6hqA9e-aa2Prrf08NJ9fXyu4O0KPsCNG8NF79jUIzipquYQLsFZqapgr_7uELzOZy_Tx2T5vHiaTpaJIkzGxFqbEZFaSXFGmEYFwaZgnPFSFhnWNqUyk4IrjZURhhIujeREciEKXqbEpEMw-s3VvgnB2zJvvdspf8gxyn_Wyo9r9ezNL6t0yLdN5-u-2T_cN1mqaDg</recordid><startdate>20111013</startdate><enddate>20111013</enddate><creator>Chou, Chia-Yun</creator><creator>Kim, Hyunwoo</creator><creator>Hwang, Gyeong S</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111013</creationdate><title>A Comparative First-Principles Study of the Structure, Energetics, and Properties of Li–M (M = Si, Ge, Sn) Alloys</title><author>Chou, Chia-Yun ; Kim, Hyunwoo ; Hwang, Gyeong S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-eee8273e941825c0b21db5656f9b81ce3498976ac1ad7d4269d9629677b6f32d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>C: Energy Conversion and Storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chou, Chia-Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Gyeong S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chou, Chia-Yun</au><au>Kim, Hyunwoo</au><au>Hwang, Gyeong S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative First-Principles Study of the Structure, Energetics, and Properties of Li–M (M = Si, Ge, Sn) Alloys</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><date>2011-10-13</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>40</issue><spage>20018</spage><epage>20026</epage><pages>20018-20026</pages><issn>1932-7447</issn><eissn>1932-7455</eissn><abstract>On the basis of density functional theory calculations, we first present a comparative study on the behavior of Li atoms in M (M = Si, Ge, and Sn) and evaluate how Li incorporation affects the electronic structure and bonding nature of the host lattices. We then discuss the energetics, structural evolution, and variations in electronic and mechanical properties of crystalline and amorphous Li–M alloys. Our calculations show that Li insertion is the least favorable in Si and the most favorable in Sn owing to its large effective interstitial space and softer matrix. Upon Li incorporation, the bonding strength of the host network is weakened, attributed to the transferred charge from Li. Li interstitials can migrate easily in all three host materials with a moderate migration barrier in Si and small barriers in Ge and Sn. Because of the cation repulsive interaction, Li atoms tend to remain isolated and well dispersed in M; also induced by this cationic nature is the charge redistribution toward Li, leading to the strong screening/shielding effect in Si, in which the excess charges are highly localized, and a relatively weaker effect in Sn. According to our mixing enthalpy calculations, alloying between Li and M is energetically favorable with Li–Sn alloys being the most stable, followed by Li–Ge and Li–Si alloys. On the basis of structural, electronic, and mechanical property analyses, we also demonstrate how the incorporation of Li atoms with increasing concentration leads to the disintegration of host networks and softening of the Li–M alloys, and associated with the more flexible lattices, the volume expansion at fully lithiated states are 434 (399)% (Si), 382 (353)% (Ge), and 305 (259)% (Sn) for amorphous (crystalline) Li–M alloys.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/jp205484v</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-7447
ispartof Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2011-10, Vol.115 (40), p.20018-20026
issn 1932-7447
1932-7455
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_jp205484v
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects C: Energy Conversion and Storage
title A Comparative First-Principles Study of the Structure, Energetics, and Properties of Li–M (M = Si, Ge, Sn) Alloys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T20%3A13%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20First-Principles%20Study%20of%20the%20Structure,%20Energetics,%20and%20Properties%20of%20Li%E2%80%93M%20(M%20=%20Si,%20Ge,%20Sn)%20Alloys&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20C&rft.au=Chou,%20Chia-Yun&rft.date=2011-10-13&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=40&rft.spage=20018&rft.epage=20026&rft.pages=20018-20026&rft.issn=1932-7447&rft.eissn=1932-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jp205484v&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Ea126433256%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true