Computational Study on the Solubility of Lithium Salts Formed on Lithium Ion Battery Negative Electrode in Organic Solvents

The solubility of lithium salts, found in solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) films on the anode surface in lithium ion battery cells, has been examined in organic solvents through atomistic computer simulations. The salts included lithium oxide (Li2O), lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lithium oxalate ([Li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physical chemistry. C 2010-05, Vol.114 (17), p.8076-8083
Hauptverfasser: Tasaki, Ken, Harris, Stephen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8083
container_issue 17
container_start_page 8076
container_title Journal of physical chemistry. C
container_volume 114
creator Tasaki, Ken
Harris, Stephen J
description The solubility of lithium salts, found in solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) films on the anode surface in lithium ion battery cells, has been examined in organic solvents through atomistic computer simulations. The salts included lithium oxide (Li2O), lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lithium oxalate ([LiCO2]2), lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium hydroxide (LiOH), lithium methoxide (LiOCH3), lithium methyl carbonate (LiOCO2CH3), lithium ethyl carbonate (LiOCO2C2H5), and dilithium ethylene glycol dicarbonate (([CH2OCO2Li]2: LiEDC). The organic solvents were dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC). The atomic charges in the force field have been fitted to the electrostatic potential obtained from density functional theory calculations for each salt. The heat of dissolution in DMC for the salts calculated from computer simulations ranged from exothermic heats for the organic salts in general to endothermic heats for the inorganic salts in the order of LiEDC < LiOCO2CH3 < LiOH < LiOCO2C2H5 < LiOCH3 < LiF < [LiCO2]2 < Li2CO3 < Li2O where the value of the heat went from more negative in the left to more positive in the right. In EC, the order was more or less the same, but the salts were found to dissolve more than DMC in general. The analysis from simulations was performed to rationalize the solubility of each salt in DMC and also the solubility difference between in DMC and EC. The latter was found to be due not only to the difference in polarity between the two solvents, but we also suspect that it may be due to the molecular shapes of the solvents. We also found that the conformation of LiEDC changed in going from DMC to EC, which contributed to the difference in the solubility.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jp100013h
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_jp100013h</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>b468331375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-e7b7a8f01a587894b2d7792c598e87be5b700f1b87cd822a941a5a43804f24c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDFPwzAYRC0EEqUw8A-8MDAEbMeWnRGqFipVdCjMkeN8aV0lcWU7lSr-PK4KnZjudHp6wyF0T8kTJYw-b3eUEELzzQUa0SJnmeRCXJ47l9foJoQtISJP1Ah9T1y3G6KO1vW6xas41Afsehw3gFeuHSrb2piWBi9s3NihwyvdxoBnzndQH8m_fZ76q44R_AF_wDoZ94CnLZjoXQ3Y9njp17q35ujdQx_DLbpqdBvg7jfH6Gs2_Zy8Z4vl23zyssh0zkTMQFZSq4ZQLZRUBa9YLWXBjCgUKFmBqCQhDa2UNLViTBc8kZrnivCGcUPzMXo8eY13IXhoyp23nfaHkpLy-Fp5fi2xDydWm1Bu3eDTK-Ef7ge5J2y1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Study on the Solubility of Lithium Salts Formed on Lithium Ion Battery Negative Electrode in Organic Solvents</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Tasaki, Ken ; Harris, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Tasaki, Ken ; Harris, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The solubility of lithium salts, found in solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) films on the anode surface in lithium ion battery cells, has been examined in organic solvents through atomistic computer simulations. The salts included lithium oxide (Li2O), lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lithium oxalate ([LiCO2]2), lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium hydroxide (LiOH), lithium methoxide (LiOCH3), lithium methyl carbonate (LiOCO2CH3), lithium ethyl carbonate (LiOCO2C2H5), and dilithium ethylene glycol dicarbonate (([CH2OCO2Li]2: LiEDC). The organic solvents were dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC). The atomic charges in the force field have been fitted to the electrostatic potential obtained from density functional theory calculations for each salt. The heat of dissolution in DMC for the salts calculated from computer simulations ranged from exothermic heats for the organic salts in general to endothermic heats for the inorganic salts in the order of LiEDC < LiOCO2CH3 < LiOH < LiOCO2C2H5 < LiOCH3 < LiF < [LiCO2]2 < Li2CO3 < Li2O where the value of the heat went from more negative in the left to more positive in the right. In EC, the order was more or less the same, but the salts were found to dissolve more than DMC in general. The analysis from simulations was performed to rationalize the solubility of each salt in DMC and also the solubility difference between in DMC and EC. The latter was found to be due not only to the difference in polarity between the two solvents, but we also suspect that it may be due to the molecular shapes of the solvents. We also found that the conformation of LiEDC changed in going from DMC to EC, which contributed to the difference in the solubility.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jp100013h</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>C: Energy Conversion and Storage</subject><ispartof>Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2010-05, Vol.114 (17), p.8076-8083</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-e7b7a8f01a587894b2d7792c598e87be5b700f1b87cd822a941a5a43804f24c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-e7b7a8f01a587894b2d7792c598e87be5b700f1b87cd822a941a5a43804f24c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jp100013h$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp100013h$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tasaki, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Study on the Solubility of Lithium Salts Formed on Lithium Ion Battery Negative Electrode in Organic Solvents</title><title>Journal of physical chemistry. C</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The solubility of lithium salts, found in solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) films on the anode surface in lithium ion battery cells, has been examined in organic solvents through atomistic computer simulations. The salts included lithium oxide (Li2O), lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lithium oxalate ([LiCO2]2), lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium hydroxide (LiOH), lithium methoxide (LiOCH3), lithium methyl carbonate (LiOCO2CH3), lithium ethyl carbonate (LiOCO2C2H5), and dilithium ethylene glycol dicarbonate (([CH2OCO2Li]2: LiEDC). The organic solvents were dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC). The atomic charges in the force field have been fitted to the electrostatic potential obtained from density functional theory calculations for each salt. The heat of dissolution in DMC for the salts calculated from computer simulations ranged from exothermic heats for the organic salts in general to endothermic heats for the inorganic salts in the order of LiEDC < LiOCO2CH3 < LiOH < LiOCO2C2H5 < LiOCH3 < LiF < [LiCO2]2 < Li2CO3 < Li2O where the value of the heat went from more negative in the left to more positive in the right. In EC, the order was more or less the same, but the salts were found to dissolve more than DMC in general. The analysis from simulations was performed to rationalize the solubility of each salt in DMC and also the solubility difference between in DMC and EC. The latter was found to be due not only to the difference in polarity between the two solvents, but we also suspect that it may be due to the molecular shapes of the solvents. We also found that the conformation of LiEDC changed in going from DMC to EC, which contributed to the difference in the solubility.]]></description><subject>C: Energy Conversion and Storage</subject><issn>1932-7447</issn><issn>1932-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkDFPwzAYRC0EEqUw8A-8MDAEbMeWnRGqFipVdCjMkeN8aV0lcWU7lSr-PK4KnZjudHp6wyF0T8kTJYw-b3eUEELzzQUa0SJnmeRCXJ47l9foJoQtISJP1Ah9T1y3G6KO1vW6xas41Afsehw3gFeuHSrb2piWBi9s3NihwyvdxoBnzndQH8m_fZ76q44R_AF_wDoZ94CnLZjoXQ3Y9njp17q35ujdQx_DLbpqdBvg7jfH6Gs2_Zy8Z4vl23zyssh0zkTMQFZSq4ZQLZRUBa9YLWXBjCgUKFmBqCQhDa2UNLViTBc8kZrnivCGcUPzMXo8eY13IXhoyp23nfaHkpLy-Fp5fi2xDydWm1Bu3eDTK-Ef7ge5J2y1</recordid><startdate>20100506</startdate><enddate>20100506</enddate><creator>Tasaki, Ken</creator><creator>Harris, Stephen J</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100506</creationdate><title>Computational Study on the Solubility of Lithium Salts Formed on Lithium Ion Battery Negative Electrode in Organic Solvents</title><author>Tasaki, Ken ; Harris, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-e7b7a8f01a587894b2d7792c598e87be5b700f1b87cd822a941a5a43804f24c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>C: Energy Conversion and Storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tasaki, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tasaki, Ken</au><au>Harris, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Study on the Solubility of Lithium Salts Formed on Lithium Ion Battery Negative Electrode in Organic Solvents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><date>2010-05-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>8076</spage><epage>8083</epage><pages>8076-8083</pages><issn>1932-7447</issn><eissn>1932-7455</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The solubility of lithium salts, found in solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) films on the anode surface in lithium ion battery cells, has been examined in organic solvents through atomistic computer simulations. The salts included lithium oxide (Li2O), lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lithium oxalate ([LiCO2]2), lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium hydroxide (LiOH), lithium methoxide (LiOCH3), lithium methyl carbonate (LiOCO2CH3), lithium ethyl carbonate (LiOCO2C2H5), and dilithium ethylene glycol dicarbonate (([CH2OCO2Li]2: LiEDC). The organic solvents were dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC). The atomic charges in the force field have been fitted to the electrostatic potential obtained from density functional theory calculations for each salt. The heat of dissolution in DMC for the salts calculated from computer simulations ranged from exothermic heats for the organic salts in general to endothermic heats for the inorganic salts in the order of LiEDC < LiOCO2CH3 < LiOH < LiOCO2C2H5 < LiOCH3 < LiF < [LiCO2]2 < Li2CO3 < Li2O where the value of the heat went from more negative in the left to more positive in the right. In EC, the order was more or less the same, but the salts were found to dissolve more than DMC in general. The analysis from simulations was performed to rationalize the solubility of each salt in DMC and also the solubility difference between in DMC and EC. The latter was found to be due not only to the difference in polarity between the two solvents, but we also suspect that it may be due to the molecular shapes of the solvents. We also found that the conformation of LiEDC changed in going from DMC to EC, which contributed to the difference in the solubility.]]></abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/jp100013h</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-7447
ispartof Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2010-05, Vol.114 (17), p.8076-8083
issn 1932-7447
1932-7455
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_jp100013h
source ACS Publications
subjects C: Energy Conversion and Storage
title Computational Study on the Solubility of Lithium Salts Formed on Lithium Ion Battery Negative Electrode in Organic Solvents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A30%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Study%20on%20the%20Solubility%20of%20Lithium%20Salts%20Formed%20on%20Lithium%20Ion%20Battery%20Negative%20Electrode%20in%20Organic%20Solvents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20C&rft.au=Tasaki,%20Ken&rft.date=2010-05-06&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=8076&rft.epage=8083&rft.pages=8076-8083&rft.issn=1932-7447&rft.eissn=1932-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jp100013h&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Eb468331375%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true