Transient Electrical Response of Dye-Sensitized ZnO Nanorod Solar Cells

A dye-sensitized solar cell was build with an electrode consisting of ZnO nanorods with a mean diameter of 80 nm instead of the commonly used nano colloidal TiO2 substrate. The electrical response of the cell under excitation with an alternating current (AC) voltage source was measured and analyzed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physical chemistry. C 2007-06, Vol.111 (24), p.8692-8698
Hauptverfasser: Tornow, Julian, Schwarzburg, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8698
container_issue 24
container_start_page 8692
container_title Journal of physical chemistry. C
container_volume 111
creator Tornow, Julian
Schwarzburg, Klaus
description A dye-sensitized solar cell was build with an electrode consisting of ZnO nanorods with a mean diameter of 80 nm instead of the commonly used nano colloidal TiO2 substrate. The electrical response of the cell under excitation with an alternating current (AC) voltage source was measured and analyzed in a wide frequency range (40 Hz−110 MHz). The results were compared to time-resolved measurements of the photocurrent generated by a nanosecond pulsed light source. Both measurements could be described by the same electrical equivalent circuit that consisted of passive circuit elements only. The slow response of the cell in the ms time range is mainly caused by the large space charge capacitance of the ZnO nanorod electrode. Because of the low impedance of the nanorod electrode, the photo response and the AC response is also influenced by the electrical properties of other interfaces in the cell, such as the counterelectrode. Thus the signal is more complex than the single RC response usually observed for planar photo anodes. SPICE simulations of the photocurrent response are given to illustrate the influence of the different interfaces on the overall signal. The differences observed in the electrical behavior of the Grätzel cell and the ZnO equivalent are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jp071716k
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_jp071716k</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_TPS_37DRL3PV_F</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-9003c0a1a55c5477d42a2450245313e7f96da1ecfec861496a0b9ad46784987f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0D1PwzAQBmALgUQpDPwDLwwMATu243hE_QKpolVbGFisw7lIaUNc2UGi_HqCgjoxnO6GR690LyHXnN1xlvL77Z5prnm2OyEDbkSaaKnU6fGW-pxcxLhlTAnGxYDMNgGaWGHT0kmNrg2Vg5quMO59E5H6ko4PmKyxM231jQV9axb0GRoffEHXvoZAR1jX8ZKclVBHvPrbQ_IynWxGj8l8MXsaPcwTSI1uE8OYcAw4KOWU1LqQKaRSsW4EF6hLkxXA0ZXo8oxLkwF7N1DITOfS5LoUQ3Lb57rgYwxY2n2oPiAcLGf2twF7bKCzSW-r2OLXEULY2UwLrexmubZCj1dzsXy1087f9B5ctFv_GZruk39yfwAHc2hK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transient Electrical Response of Dye-Sensitized ZnO Nanorod Solar Cells</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Tornow, Julian ; Schwarzburg, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Tornow, Julian ; Schwarzburg, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>A dye-sensitized solar cell was build with an electrode consisting of ZnO nanorods with a mean diameter of 80 nm instead of the commonly used nano colloidal TiO2 substrate. The electrical response of the cell under excitation with an alternating current (AC) voltage source was measured and analyzed in a wide frequency range (40 Hz−110 MHz). The results were compared to time-resolved measurements of the photocurrent generated by a nanosecond pulsed light source. Both measurements could be described by the same electrical equivalent circuit that consisted of passive circuit elements only. The slow response of the cell in the ms time range is mainly caused by the large space charge capacitance of the ZnO nanorod electrode. Because of the low impedance of the nanorod electrode, the photo response and the AC response is also influenced by the electrical properties of other interfaces in the cell, such as the counterelectrode. Thus the signal is more complex than the single RC response usually observed for planar photo anodes. SPICE simulations of the photocurrent response are given to illustrate the influence of the different interfaces on the overall signal. The differences observed in the electrical behavior of the Grätzel cell and the ZnO equivalent are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jp071716k</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2007-06, Vol.111 (24), p.8692-8698</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-9003c0a1a55c5477d42a2450245313e7f96da1ecfec861496a0b9ad46784987f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-9003c0a1a55c5477d42a2450245313e7f96da1ecfec861496a0b9ad46784987f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jp071716k$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp071716k$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tornow, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzburg, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Transient Electrical Response of Dye-Sensitized ZnO Nanorod Solar Cells</title><title>Journal of physical chemistry. C</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><description>A dye-sensitized solar cell was build with an electrode consisting of ZnO nanorods with a mean diameter of 80 nm instead of the commonly used nano colloidal TiO2 substrate. The electrical response of the cell under excitation with an alternating current (AC) voltage source was measured and analyzed in a wide frequency range (40 Hz−110 MHz). The results were compared to time-resolved measurements of the photocurrent generated by a nanosecond pulsed light source. Both measurements could be described by the same electrical equivalent circuit that consisted of passive circuit elements only. The slow response of the cell in the ms time range is mainly caused by the large space charge capacitance of the ZnO nanorod electrode. Because of the low impedance of the nanorod electrode, the photo response and the AC response is also influenced by the electrical properties of other interfaces in the cell, such as the counterelectrode. Thus the signal is more complex than the single RC response usually observed for planar photo anodes. SPICE simulations of the photocurrent response are given to illustrate the influence of the different interfaces on the overall signal. The differences observed in the electrical behavior of the Grätzel cell and the ZnO equivalent are discussed.</description><issn>1932-7447</issn><issn>1932-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0D1PwzAQBmALgUQpDPwDLwwMATu243hE_QKpolVbGFisw7lIaUNc2UGi_HqCgjoxnO6GR690LyHXnN1xlvL77Z5prnm2OyEDbkSaaKnU6fGW-pxcxLhlTAnGxYDMNgGaWGHT0kmNrg2Vg5quMO59E5H6ko4PmKyxM231jQV9axb0GRoffEHXvoZAR1jX8ZKclVBHvPrbQ_IynWxGj8l8MXsaPcwTSI1uE8OYcAw4KOWU1LqQKaRSsW4EF6hLkxXA0ZXo8oxLkwF7N1DITOfS5LoUQ3Lb57rgYwxY2n2oPiAcLGf2twF7bKCzSW-r2OLXEULY2UwLrexmubZCj1dzsXy1087f9B5ctFv_GZruk39yfwAHc2hK</recordid><startdate>20070621</startdate><enddate>20070621</enddate><creator>Tornow, Julian</creator><creator>Schwarzburg, Klaus</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070621</creationdate><title>Transient Electrical Response of Dye-Sensitized ZnO Nanorod Solar Cells</title><author>Tornow, Julian ; Schwarzburg, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-9003c0a1a55c5477d42a2450245313e7f96da1ecfec861496a0b9ad46784987f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tornow, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzburg, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tornow, Julian</au><au>Schwarzburg, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transient Electrical Response of Dye-Sensitized ZnO Nanorod Solar Cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><date>2007-06-21</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>8692</spage><epage>8698</epage><pages>8692-8698</pages><issn>1932-7447</issn><eissn>1932-7455</eissn><abstract>A dye-sensitized solar cell was build with an electrode consisting of ZnO nanorods with a mean diameter of 80 nm instead of the commonly used nano colloidal TiO2 substrate. The electrical response of the cell under excitation with an alternating current (AC) voltage source was measured and analyzed in a wide frequency range (40 Hz−110 MHz). The results were compared to time-resolved measurements of the photocurrent generated by a nanosecond pulsed light source. Both measurements could be described by the same electrical equivalent circuit that consisted of passive circuit elements only. The slow response of the cell in the ms time range is mainly caused by the large space charge capacitance of the ZnO nanorod electrode. Because of the low impedance of the nanorod electrode, the photo response and the AC response is also influenced by the electrical properties of other interfaces in the cell, such as the counterelectrode. Thus the signal is more complex than the single RC response usually observed for planar photo anodes. SPICE simulations of the photocurrent response are given to illustrate the influence of the different interfaces on the overall signal. The differences observed in the electrical behavior of the Grätzel cell and the ZnO equivalent are discussed.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/jp071716k</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-7447
ispartof Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2007-06, Vol.111 (24), p.8692-8698
issn 1932-7447
1932-7455
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_jp071716k
source ACS Publications
title Transient Electrical Response of Dye-Sensitized ZnO Nanorod Solar Cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transient%20Electrical%20Response%20of%20Dye-Sensitized%20ZnO%20Nanorod%20Solar%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20C&rft.au=Tornow,%20Julian&rft.date=2007-06-21&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=8692&rft.epage=8698&rft.pages=8692-8698&rft.issn=1932-7447&rft.eissn=1932-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jp071716k&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_TPS_37DRL3PV_F%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true