Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces

In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS photonics 2016-12, Vol.3 (12), p.2303-2307
Hauptverfasser: Aygar, Ayse Melis, Balci, Osman, Cakmakyapan, Semih, Kocabas, Coskun, Caglayan, Humeyra, Ozbay, Ekmel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2307
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2303
container_title ACS photonics
container_volume 3
creator Aygar, Ayse Melis
Balci, Osman
Cakmakyapan, Semih
Kocabas, Coskun
Caglayan, Humeyra
Ozbay, Ekmel
description In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acsphotonics_6b00440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>d04089910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpH7DwD6SMX0m9hIoWpCIWhHU0cWyS0tqRnQrx96RqF12xmpHmntHVIeSewZwBZw9oUt-GIfjOpHleA0gJV2TChYBMAufXF_stmaW0BQAGSuS5nJByGfY9xi4FT4OjT2i-KfqGlqGnaxw6_0U_TGv3NtGfbmhpefBY7yxdR-xb6y1dRTQD7uibHTAdokNj0x25cbhLdnaeU_K5ei6XL9nmff26fNxkKMRiyPgCsdDoFDbOSSOxBq1Z45TRosg1H0s61TiudZEvcseUqbFQICwbk04rMSXy9NfEkFK0rupjt8f4WzGojnKqSznVWc6IwQkbr9U2HKIfS_6P_AEMAmyf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Aygar, Ayse Melis ; Balci, Osman ; Cakmakyapan, Semih ; Kocabas, Coskun ; Caglayan, Humeyra ; Ozbay, Ekmel</creator><creatorcontrib>Aygar, Ayse Melis ; Balci, Osman ; Cakmakyapan, Semih ; Kocabas, Coskun ; Caglayan, Humeyra ; Ozbay, Ekmel</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2330-4022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2330-4022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>ACS photonics, 2016-12, Vol.3 (12), p.2303-2307</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aygar, Ayse Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmakyapan, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocabas, Coskun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caglayan, Humeyra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozbay, Ekmel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</title><title>ACS photonics</title><addtitle>ACS Photonics</addtitle><description>In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.</description><issn>2330-4022</issn><issn>2330-4022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpH7DwD6SMX0m9hIoWpCIWhHU0cWyS0tqRnQrx96RqF12xmpHmntHVIeSewZwBZw9oUt-GIfjOpHleA0gJV2TChYBMAufXF_stmaW0BQAGSuS5nJByGfY9xi4FT4OjT2i-KfqGlqGnaxw6_0U_TGv3NtGfbmhpefBY7yxdR-xb6y1dRTQD7uibHTAdokNj0x25cbhLdnaeU_K5ei6XL9nmff26fNxkKMRiyPgCsdDoFDbOSSOxBq1Z45TRosg1H0s61TiudZEvcseUqbFQICwbk04rMSXy9NfEkFK0rupjt8f4WzGojnKqSznVWc6IwQkbr9U2HKIfS_6P_AEMAmyf</recordid><startdate>20161221</startdate><enddate>20161221</enddate><creator>Aygar, Ayse Melis</creator><creator>Balci, Osman</creator><creator>Cakmakyapan, Semih</creator><creator>Kocabas, Coskun</creator><creator>Caglayan, Humeyra</creator><creator>Ozbay, Ekmel</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161221</creationdate><title>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</title><author>Aygar, Ayse Melis ; Balci, Osman ; Cakmakyapan, Semih ; Kocabas, Coskun ; Caglayan, Humeyra ; Ozbay, Ekmel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aygar, Ayse Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmakyapan, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocabas, Coskun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caglayan, Humeyra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozbay, Ekmel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ACS photonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aygar, Ayse Melis</au><au>Balci, Osman</au><au>Cakmakyapan, Semih</au><au>Kocabas, Coskun</au><au>Caglayan, Humeyra</au><au>Ozbay, Ekmel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</atitle><jtitle>ACS photonics</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Photonics</addtitle><date>2016-12-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2303</spage><epage>2307</epage><pages>2303-2307</pages><issn>2330-4022</issn><eissn>2330-4022</eissn><abstract>In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2330-4022
ispartof ACS photonics, 2016-12, Vol.3 (12), p.2303-2307
issn 2330-4022
2330-4022
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acsphotonics_6b00440
source American Chemical Society Journals
title Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Back%20and%20Top%20Gating%20Schemes%20with%20Tunable%20Graphene%20Fractal%20Metasurfaces&rft.jtitle=ACS%20photonics&rft.au=Aygar,%20Ayse%20Melis&rft.date=2016-12-21&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2303&rft.epage=2307&rft.pages=2303-2307&rft.issn=2330-4022&rft.eissn=2330-4022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Ed04089910%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true