Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces
In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ACS photonics 2016-12, Vol.3 (12), p.2303-2307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2303 |
container_title | ACS photonics |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Aygar, Ayse Melis Balci, Osman Cakmakyapan, Semih Kocabas, Coskun Caglayan, Humeyra Ozbay, Ekmel |
description | In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acsphotonics_6b00440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>d04089910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpH7DwD6SMX0m9hIoWpCIWhHU0cWyS0tqRnQrx96RqF12xmpHmntHVIeSewZwBZw9oUt-GIfjOpHleA0gJV2TChYBMAufXF_stmaW0BQAGSuS5nJByGfY9xi4FT4OjT2i-KfqGlqGnaxw6_0U_TGv3NtGfbmhpefBY7yxdR-xb6y1dRTQD7uibHTAdokNj0x25cbhLdnaeU_K5ei6XL9nmff26fNxkKMRiyPgCsdDoFDbOSSOxBq1Z45TRosg1H0s61TiudZEvcseUqbFQICwbk04rMSXy9NfEkFK0rupjt8f4WzGojnKqSznVWc6IwQkbr9U2HKIfS_6P_AEMAmyf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Aygar, Ayse Melis ; Balci, Osman ; Cakmakyapan, Semih ; Kocabas, Coskun ; Caglayan, Humeyra ; Ozbay, Ekmel</creator><creatorcontrib>Aygar, Ayse Melis ; Balci, Osman ; Cakmakyapan, Semih ; Kocabas, Coskun ; Caglayan, Humeyra ; Ozbay, Ekmel</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2330-4022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2330-4022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>ACS photonics, 2016-12, Vol.3 (12), p.2303-2307</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aygar, Ayse Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmakyapan, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocabas, Coskun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caglayan, Humeyra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozbay, Ekmel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</title><title>ACS photonics</title><addtitle>ACS Photonics</addtitle><description>In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.</description><issn>2330-4022</issn><issn>2330-4022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpH7DwD6SMX0m9hIoWpCIWhHU0cWyS0tqRnQrx96RqF12xmpHmntHVIeSewZwBZw9oUt-GIfjOpHleA0gJV2TChYBMAufXF_stmaW0BQAGSuS5nJByGfY9xi4FT4OjT2i-KfqGlqGnaxw6_0U_TGv3NtGfbmhpefBY7yxdR-xb6y1dRTQD7uibHTAdokNj0x25cbhLdnaeU_K5ei6XL9nmff26fNxkKMRiyPgCsdDoFDbOSSOxBq1Z45TRosg1H0s61TiudZEvcseUqbFQICwbk04rMSXy9NfEkFK0rupjt8f4WzGojnKqSznVWc6IwQkbr9U2HKIfS_6P_AEMAmyf</recordid><startdate>20161221</startdate><enddate>20161221</enddate><creator>Aygar, Ayse Melis</creator><creator>Balci, Osman</creator><creator>Cakmakyapan, Semih</creator><creator>Kocabas, Coskun</creator><creator>Caglayan, Humeyra</creator><creator>Ozbay, Ekmel</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161221</creationdate><title>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</title><author>Aygar, Ayse Melis ; Balci, Osman ; Cakmakyapan, Semih ; Kocabas, Coskun ; Caglayan, Humeyra ; Ozbay, Ekmel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-28aa79af5adff4c4ab0991df5c937692105f5df2997686f15cba7503e1ab0f953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aygar, Ayse Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmakyapan, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocabas, Coskun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caglayan, Humeyra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozbay, Ekmel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ACS photonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aygar, Ayse Melis</au><au>Balci, Osman</au><au>Cakmakyapan, Semih</au><au>Kocabas, Coskun</au><au>Caglayan, Humeyra</au><au>Ozbay, Ekmel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces</atitle><jtitle>ACS photonics</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Photonics</addtitle><date>2016-12-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2303</spage><epage>2307</epage><pages>2303-2307</pages><issn>2330-4022</issn><eissn>2330-4022</eissn><abstract>In this work, fractal metasurfaces that consist of periodic gold squares on graphene are used to increase light–graphene interaction. We show by simulations and experiments that higher level fractal structures result in higher spectral tunability of resonance wavelength. This is explained by higher field localization for higher level fractal structures. Furthermore, spectral tunability of fractal metasurfaces integrated with graphene is investigated comparing two different schemes for electrostatic gating. Experiment results show that a top-gated device yields more spectral tunability (8% of resonance wavelength) while requiring much smaller gate voltages compared to the back-gated device.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2330-4022 |
ispartof | ACS photonics, 2016-12, Vol.3 (12), p.2303-2307 |
issn | 2330-4022 2330-4022 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acsphotonics_6b00440 |
source | American Chemical Society Journals |
title | Comparison of Back and Top Gating Schemes with Tunable Graphene Fractal Metasurfaces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Back%20and%20Top%20Gating%20Schemes%20with%20Tunable%20Graphene%20Fractal%20Metasurfaces&rft.jtitle=ACS%20photonics&rft.au=Aygar,%20Ayse%20Melis&rft.date=2016-12-21&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2303&rft.epage=2307&rft.pages=2303-2307&rft.issn=2330-4022&rft.eissn=2330-4022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00440&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Ed04089910%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |