Understanding Artifacts in Chiroptical Spectroscopy

Spectroscopic techniques can extract information about the chiral structure of molecules. However, because these methods typically rely on chiroptical effects that are very weak, even small errors in our control of optical polarization can induce experimental artifacts. Distinguishing these artifact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS photonics 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.475-483
Hauptverfasser: Lightner, Carin R., Desmet, Filip, Gisler, Daniel, Meyer, Stefan A., Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis, Niese, Hannah, Rosspeintner, Arnulf, Keitel, Robert C., Bürgi, Thomas, Herrebout, Wouter A., Johannessen, Christian, Norris, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 483
container_issue 2
container_start_page 475
container_title ACS photonics
container_volume 10
creator Lightner, Carin R.
Desmet, Filip
Gisler, Daniel
Meyer, Stefan A.
Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis
Niese, Hannah
Rosspeintner, Arnulf
Keitel, Robert C.
Bürgi, Thomas
Herrebout, Wouter A.
Johannessen, Christian
Norris, David J.
description Spectroscopic techniques can extract information about the chiral structure of molecules. However, because these methods typically rely on chiroptical effects that are very weak, even small errors in our control of optical polarization can induce experimental artifacts. Distinguishing these artifacts from true signals remains an important practical problem. Here, we present a comprehensive study of chiroptical artifacts using Raman optical activity (ROA) as a challenging example. ROA measures the difference in Raman scattering between right- and left-circularly polarized light. While ROA spectra can yield valuable information about the vibrational modes and handedness of a chiral molecule, ROA is particularly prone to artifacts as signals are 103−104 times smaller than in standard Raman spectroscopy. We develop a Mueller-matrix model to examine the origins of artifacts in ROA. We then combine our model with experimental examples from multiple ROA instruments to understand real-world artifacts. For example, we disprove a commonly held belief that ROA spectra that exhibit mirror symmetry about the intensity axis for an enantiomeric pair confirm a true signal. Based on our findings, we describe characteristics of common artifacts and propose a list of standard controls that researchers should perform to increase the likelihood that their data represent true signal. This work is intended as a resource for those working in chiroptical spectroscopy, providing methods to understand, identify, and avoid experimental artifacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01586
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acsphotonics_2c01586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c795405020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-f221285f6565312fffd843d18b75c5c99bf4460a9477141b2b851b4600f612243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01rwzAMhs3YYKXrP9ghfyCdJH8kOZayLyjssPUcHCdeXTo72N6h_34Z7aGnniT08kh6GHtEWCIQPmmTxl3IwTuTlmQAZa1u2Iw4h1IA0e1Ff88WKe0BAEFypcSM8a3vh5iy9r3z38UqZme1yalwvljvXAxjdkYfis9xMDmGZMJ4fGB3Vh_SsDjXOdu-PH-t38rNx-v7erUpNRHl0hIh1dIqqSRHstb2teA91l0ljTRN01khFOhGVBUK7KirJXbTBKxCIsHnTJz2mulwioNtx-h-dDy2CO2_e3vp3p7dJwxO2JS2-_Ab_fTkdeQPLiFgMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Artifacts in Chiroptical Spectroscopy</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Lightner, Carin R. ; Desmet, Filip ; Gisler, Daniel ; Meyer, Stefan A. ; Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis ; Niese, Hannah ; Rosspeintner, Arnulf ; Keitel, Robert C. ; Bürgi, Thomas ; Herrebout, Wouter A. ; Johannessen, Christian ; Norris, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lightner, Carin R. ; Desmet, Filip ; Gisler, Daniel ; Meyer, Stefan A. ; Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis ; Niese, Hannah ; Rosspeintner, Arnulf ; Keitel, Robert C. ; Bürgi, Thomas ; Herrebout, Wouter A. ; Johannessen, Christian ; Norris, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Spectroscopic techniques can extract information about the chiral structure of molecules. However, because these methods typically rely on chiroptical effects that are very weak, even small errors in our control of optical polarization can induce experimental artifacts. Distinguishing these artifacts from true signals remains an important practical problem. Here, we present a comprehensive study of chiroptical artifacts using Raman optical activity (ROA) as a challenging example. ROA measures the difference in Raman scattering between right- and left-circularly polarized light. While ROA spectra can yield valuable information about the vibrational modes and handedness of a chiral molecule, ROA is particularly prone to artifacts as signals are 103−104 times smaller than in standard Raman spectroscopy. We develop a Mueller-matrix model to examine the origins of artifacts in ROA. We then combine our model with experimental examples from multiple ROA instruments to understand real-world artifacts. For example, we disprove a commonly held belief that ROA spectra that exhibit mirror symmetry about the intensity axis for an enantiomeric pair confirm a true signal. Based on our findings, we describe characteristics of common artifacts and propose a list of standard controls that researchers should perform to increase the likelihood that their data represent true signal. This work is intended as a resource for those working in chiroptical spectroscopy, providing methods to understand, identify, and avoid experimental artifacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2330-4022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2330-4022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>ACS photonics, 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.475-483</ispartof><rights>2023 American Chemical Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-f221285f6565312fffd843d18b75c5c99bf4460a9477141b2b851b4600f612243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-f221285f6565312fffd843d18b75c5c99bf4460a9477141b2b851b4600f612243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5980-5386 ; 0000-0003-3132-0296 ; 0000-0003-2613-9476 ; 0000-0002-9412-8034 ; 0000-0003-0906-082X ; 0000-0002-3765-0678 ; 0000-0002-1828-5206 ; 0000-0002-3167-8944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01586$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01586$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lightner, Carin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desmet, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gisler, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Stefan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niese, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosspeintner, Arnulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keitel, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürgi, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrebout, Wouter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannessen, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Artifacts in Chiroptical Spectroscopy</title><title>ACS photonics</title><addtitle>ACS Photonics</addtitle><description>Spectroscopic techniques can extract information about the chiral structure of molecules. However, because these methods typically rely on chiroptical effects that are very weak, even small errors in our control of optical polarization can induce experimental artifacts. Distinguishing these artifacts from true signals remains an important practical problem. Here, we present a comprehensive study of chiroptical artifacts using Raman optical activity (ROA) as a challenging example. ROA measures the difference in Raman scattering between right- and left-circularly polarized light. While ROA spectra can yield valuable information about the vibrational modes and handedness of a chiral molecule, ROA is particularly prone to artifacts as signals are 103−104 times smaller than in standard Raman spectroscopy. We develop a Mueller-matrix model to examine the origins of artifacts in ROA. We then combine our model with experimental examples from multiple ROA instruments to understand real-world artifacts. For example, we disprove a commonly held belief that ROA spectra that exhibit mirror symmetry about the intensity axis for an enantiomeric pair confirm a true signal. Based on our findings, we describe characteristics of common artifacts and propose a list of standard controls that researchers should perform to increase the likelihood that their data represent true signal. This work is intended as a resource for those working in chiroptical spectroscopy, providing methods to understand, identify, and avoid experimental artifacts.</description><issn>2330-4022</issn><issn>2330-4022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j01rwzAMhs3YYKXrP9ghfyCdJH8kOZayLyjssPUcHCdeXTo72N6h_34Z7aGnniT08kh6GHtEWCIQPmmTxl3IwTuTlmQAZa1u2Iw4h1IA0e1Ff88WKe0BAEFypcSM8a3vh5iy9r3z38UqZme1yalwvljvXAxjdkYfis9xMDmGZMJ4fGB3Vh_SsDjXOdu-PH-t38rNx-v7erUpNRHl0hIh1dIqqSRHstb2teA91l0ljTRN01khFOhGVBUK7KirJXbTBKxCIsHnTJz2mulwioNtx-h-dDy2CO2_e3vp3p7dJwxO2JS2-_Ab_fTkdeQPLiFgMw</recordid><startdate>20230215</startdate><enddate>20230215</enddate><creator>Lightner, Carin R.</creator><creator>Desmet, Filip</creator><creator>Gisler, Daniel</creator><creator>Meyer, Stefan A.</creator><creator>Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis</creator><creator>Niese, Hannah</creator><creator>Rosspeintner, Arnulf</creator><creator>Keitel, Robert C.</creator><creator>Bürgi, Thomas</creator><creator>Herrebout, Wouter A.</creator><creator>Johannessen, Christian</creator><creator>Norris, David J.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5980-5386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-0296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-8034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-0678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-5206</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-8944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230215</creationdate><title>Understanding Artifacts in Chiroptical Spectroscopy</title><author>Lightner, Carin R. ; Desmet, Filip ; Gisler, Daniel ; Meyer, Stefan A. ; Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis ; Niese, Hannah ; Rosspeintner, Arnulf ; Keitel, Robert C. ; Bürgi, Thomas ; Herrebout, Wouter A. ; Johannessen, Christian ; Norris, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a222t-f221285f6565312fffd843d18b75c5c99bf4460a9477141b2b851b4600f612243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lightner, Carin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desmet, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gisler, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Stefan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niese, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosspeintner, Arnulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keitel, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürgi, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrebout, Wouter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannessen, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ACS photonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lightner, Carin R.</au><au>Desmet, Filip</au><au>Gisler, Daniel</au><au>Meyer, Stefan A.</au><au>Perez Mellor, Ariel Francis</au><au>Niese, Hannah</au><au>Rosspeintner, Arnulf</au><au>Keitel, Robert C.</au><au>Bürgi, Thomas</au><au>Herrebout, Wouter A.</au><au>Johannessen, Christian</au><au>Norris, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Artifacts in Chiroptical Spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>ACS photonics</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Photonics</addtitle><date>2023-02-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>475-483</pages><issn>2330-4022</issn><eissn>2330-4022</eissn><abstract>Spectroscopic techniques can extract information about the chiral structure of molecules. However, because these methods typically rely on chiroptical effects that are very weak, even small errors in our control of optical polarization can induce experimental artifacts. Distinguishing these artifacts from true signals remains an important practical problem. Here, we present a comprehensive study of chiroptical artifacts using Raman optical activity (ROA) as a challenging example. ROA measures the difference in Raman scattering between right- and left-circularly polarized light. While ROA spectra can yield valuable information about the vibrational modes and handedness of a chiral molecule, ROA is particularly prone to artifacts as signals are 103−104 times smaller than in standard Raman spectroscopy. We develop a Mueller-matrix model to examine the origins of artifacts in ROA. We then combine our model with experimental examples from multiple ROA instruments to understand real-world artifacts. For example, we disprove a commonly held belief that ROA spectra that exhibit mirror symmetry about the intensity axis for an enantiomeric pair confirm a true signal. Based on our findings, we describe characteristics of common artifacts and propose a list of standard controls that researchers should perform to increase the likelihood that their data represent true signal. This work is intended as a resource for those working in chiroptical spectroscopy, providing methods to understand, identify, and avoid experimental artifacts.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01586</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5980-5386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-0296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-8034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-0678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-5206</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-8944</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2330-4022
ispartof ACS photonics, 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.475-483
issn 2330-4022
2330-4022
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acsphotonics_2c01586
source ACS Publications
title Understanding Artifacts in Chiroptical Spectroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A05%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Artifacts%20in%20Chiroptical%20Spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=ACS%20photonics&rft.au=Lightner,%20Carin%20R.&rft.date=2023-02-15&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=475-483&rft.issn=2330-4022&rft.eissn=2330-4022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01586&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Ec795405020%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true