Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors

The increased usage of purge arguments for demonstrating control of mutagenic impurities in drug substances, in accordance with ICH M7, necessitates an increasingly standardized approach to their implementation across industry. The strength of the approach is highly reliant upon a conservative imple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organic process research & development 2023-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1751-1758
Hauptverfasser: Burns, Michael J., Andrews, Ian X., Baumann, Jens-Christoph, Elliott, Eric L., Fennell, Jared W., Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M., Lemaire, Sebastien, Murphy, Natasha S., Palacio, Magali, Raw, Steven A., Roberts, Alastair J., Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio, Schils, Didier, Oestrich, Rolf Schulte, Shannon-Little, Andrew L., Stevenson, Neil, Talavera, Pere, Teasdale, Andrew, Urquhart, Michael W., Waechter, Fernanda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1758
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1751
container_title Organic process research & development
container_volume 27
creator Burns, Michael J.
Andrews, Ian X.
Baumann, Jens-Christoph
Elliott, Eric L.
Fennell, Jared W.
Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M.
Lemaire, Sebastien
Murphy, Natasha S.
Palacio, Magali
Raw, Steven A.
Roberts, Alastair J.
Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio
Schils, Didier
Oestrich, Rolf Schulte
Shannon-Little, Andrew L.
Stevenson, Neil
Talavera, Pere
Teasdale, Andrew
Urquhart, Michael W.
Waechter, Fernanda
description The increased usage of purge arguments for demonstrating control of mutagenic impurities in drug substances, in accordance with ICH M7, necessitates an increasingly standardized approach to their implementation across industry. The strength of the approach is highly reliant upon a conservative implementation of the principles to maintain regulatory confidence. Different parameters may influence a purge calculation, such as reactivity, solubility, and volatility. While reactivity data are commonly available in literature, there are comparatively fewer resources to draw upon when assigning purge values for solubility related purifications, despite these processes accounting for high degrees of purge and there being an abundance of different techniques which can be utilized. Herein, the authors seek to outline general principles to be adopted as an industry wide best practice for the application of solubility-based purge factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_oprd_2c00360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>b994653354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-b10da359043ad13707376eb2e6e3aa2a57c8b6c2a66cd1428a5039ccb996aaa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4MoOKd3j_kAdr4kS9oe59hUGDiYirfymqZbRm1Kkh727W3Zrp7eg_d-f_78CHlkMGPA2TPqMHOdr2ZcAwgFV2TCJIdEZurnetghE4liCm7JXQhHAJCK8Qn5XoWIZWPDwbZ7-mJCpFuPOlptaO08jQdDF13XWI3RupZiW9Fd33XOR-pqunNNX9rGxhPd9n5v6HpgnQ_35KbGJpiHy5ySr_Xqc_mWbD5e35eLTYKC85iUDCoUMoe5wIqJFFKRKlNyo4xA5ChTnZVKc1RKV2zOM5Qgcq3LPFeImIspgXOu9i4Eb-qi8_YX_algUIxeisFLMXopLl4G5OmMjJej6307FPz__Q-ttGfj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Burns, Michael J. ; Andrews, Ian X. ; Baumann, Jens-Christoph ; Elliott, Eric L. ; Fennell, Jared W. ; Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M. ; Lemaire, Sebastien ; Murphy, Natasha S. ; Palacio, Magali ; Raw, Steven A. ; Roberts, Alastair J. ; Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio ; Schils, Didier ; Oestrich, Rolf Schulte ; Shannon-Little, Andrew L. ; Stevenson, Neil ; Talavera, Pere ; Teasdale, Andrew ; Urquhart, Michael W. ; Waechter, Fernanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, Michael J. ; Andrews, Ian X. ; Baumann, Jens-Christoph ; Elliott, Eric L. ; Fennell, Jared W. ; Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M. ; Lemaire, Sebastien ; Murphy, Natasha S. ; Palacio, Magali ; Raw, Steven A. ; Roberts, Alastair J. ; Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio ; Schils, Didier ; Oestrich, Rolf Schulte ; Shannon-Little, Andrew L. ; Stevenson, Neil ; Talavera, Pere ; Teasdale, Andrew ; Urquhart, Michael W. ; Waechter, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><description>The increased usage of purge arguments for demonstrating control of mutagenic impurities in drug substances, in accordance with ICH M7, necessitates an increasingly standardized approach to their implementation across industry. The strength of the approach is highly reliant upon a conservative implementation of the principles to maintain regulatory confidence. Different parameters may influence a purge calculation, such as reactivity, solubility, and volatility. While reactivity data are commonly available in literature, there are comparatively fewer resources to draw upon when assigning purge values for solubility related purifications, despite these processes accounting for high degrees of purge and there being an abundance of different techniques which can be utilized. Herein, the authors seek to outline general principles to be adopted as an industry wide best practice for the application of solubility-based purge factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-6160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-586X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Organic process research &amp; development, 2023-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1751-1758</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-b10da359043ad13707376eb2e6e3aa2a57c8b6c2a66cd1428a5039ccb996aaa93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-b10da359043ad13707376eb2e6e3aa2a57c8b6c2a66cd1428a5039ccb996aaa93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3305-6361 ; 0000-0001-9434-2439 ; 0000-0001-7412-360X ; 0000-0002-8626-0123 ; 0000-0002-5569-1270 ; 0000-0002-9343-0493 ; 0000-0002-1063-7342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Ian X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Jens-Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennell, Jared W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemaire, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Natasha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palacio, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raw, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Alastair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schils, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oestrich, Rolf Schulte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shannon-Little, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talavera, Pere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasdale, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquhart, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waechter, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors</title><title>Organic process research &amp; development</title><addtitle>Org. Process Res. Dev</addtitle><description>The increased usage of purge arguments for demonstrating control of mutagenic impurities in drug substances, in accordance with ICH M7, necessitates an increasingly standardized approach to their implementation across industry. The strength of the approach is highly reliant upon a conservative implementation of the principles to maintain regulatory confidence. Different parameters may influence a purge calculation, such as reactivity, solubility, and volatility. While reactivity data are commonly available in literature, there are comparatively fewer resources to draw upon when assigning purge values for solubility related purifications, despite these processes accounting for high degrees of purge and there being an abundance of different techniques which can be utilized. Herein, the authors seek to outline general principles to be adopted as an industry wide best practice for the application of solubility-based purge factors.</description><issn>1083-6160</issn><issn>1520-586X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4MoOKd3j_kAdr4kS9oe59hUGDiYirfymqZbRm1Kkh727W3Zrp7eg_d-f_78CHlkMGPA2TPqMHOdr2ZcAwgFV2TCJIdEZurnetghE4liCm7JXQhHAJCK8Qn5XoWIZWPDwbZ7-mJCpFuPOlptaO08jQdDF13XWI3RupZiW9Fd33XOR-pqunNNX9rGxhPd9n5v6HpgnQ_35KbGJpiHy5ySr_Xqc_mWbD5e35eLTYKC85iUDCoUMoe5wIqJFFKRKlNyo4xA5ChTnZVKc1RKV2zOM5Qgcq3LPFeImIspgXOu9i4Eb-qi8_YX_algUIxeisFLMXopLl4G5OmMjJej6307FPz__Q-ttGfj</recordid><startdate>20231020</startdate><enddate>20231020</enddate><creator>Burns, Michael J.</creator><creator>Andrews, Ian X.</creator><creator>Baumann, Jens-Christoph</creator><creator>Elliott, Eric L.</creator><creator>Fennell, Jared W.</creator><creator>Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Lemaire, Sebastien</creator><creator>Murphy, Natasha S.</creator><creator>Palacio, Magali</creator><creator>Raw, Steven A.</creator><creator>Roberts, Alastair J.</creator><creator>Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio</creator><creator>Schils, Didier</creator><creator>Oestrich, Rolf Schulte</creator><creator>Shannon-Little, Andrew L.</creator><creator>Stevenson, Neil</creator><creator>Talavera, Pere</creator><creator>Teasdale, Andrew</creator><creator>Urquhart, Michael W.</creator><creator>Waechter, Fernanda</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-6361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-2439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-360X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8626-0123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5569-1270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-0493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-7342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231020</creationdate><title>Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors</title><author>Burns, Michael J. ; Andrews, Ian X. ; Baumann, Jens-Christoph ; Elliott, Eric L. ; Fennell, Jared W. ; Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M. ; Lemaire, Sebastien ; Murphy, Natasha S. ; Palacio, Magali ; Raw, Steven A. ; Roberts, Alastair J. ; Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio ; Schils, Didier ; Oestrich, Rolf Schulte ; Shannon-Little, Andrew L. ; Stevenson, Neil ; Talavera, Pere ; Teasdale, Andrew ; Urquhart, Michael W. ; Waechter, Fernanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-b10da359043ad13707376eb2e6e3aa2a57c8b6c2a66cd1428a5039ccb996aaa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Ian X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Jens-Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennell, Jared W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemaire, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Natasha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palacio, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raw, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Alastair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schils, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oestrich, Rolf Schulte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shannon-Little, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talavera, Pere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasdale, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquhart, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waechter, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Organic process research &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, Michael J.</au><au>Andrews, Ian X.</au><au>Baumann, Jens-Christoph</au><au>Elliott, Eric L.</au><au>Fennell, Jared W.</au><au>Kallemeyn, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Lemaire, Sebastien</au><au>Murphy, Natasha S.</au><au>Palacio, Magali</au><au>Raw, Steven A.</au><au>Roberts, Alastair J.</au><au>Moura Rocha, Nayrton Flávio</au><au>Schils, Didier</au><au>Oestrich, Rolf Schulte</au><au>Shannon-Little, Andrew L.</au><au>Stevenson, Neil</au><au>Talavera, Pere</au><au>Teasdale, Andrew</au><au>Urquhart, Michael W.</au><au>Waechter, Fernanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors</atitle><jtitle>Organic process research &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Org. Process Res. Dev</addtitle><date>2023-10-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1751</spage><epage>1758</epage><pages>1751-1758</pages><issn>1083-6160</issn><eissn>1520-586X</eissn><abstract>The increased usage of purge arguments for demonstrating control of mutagenic impurities in drug substances, in accordance with ICH M7, necessitates an increasingly standardized approach to their implementation across industry. The strength of the approach is highly reliant upon a conservative implementation of the principles to maintain regulatory confidence. Different parameters may influence a purge calculation, such as reactivity, solubility, and volatility. While reactivity data are commonly available in literature, there are comparatively fewer resources to draw upon when assigning purge values for solubility related purifications, despite these processes accounting for high degrees of purge and there being an abundance of different techniques which can be utilized. Herein, the authors seek to outline general principles to be adopted as an industry wide best practice for the application of solubility-based purge factors.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-6361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-2439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-360X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8626-0123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5569-1270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-0493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-7342</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-6160
ispartof Organic process research & development, 2023-10, Vol.27 (10), p.1751-1758
issn 1083-6160
1520-586X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_oprd_2c00360
source American Chemical Society Journals
title Establishing Best Practice for the Application and Support of Solubility Purge Factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20Best%20Practice%20for%20the%20Application%20and%20Support%20of%20Solubility%20Purge%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Organic%20process%20research%20&%20development&rft.au=Burns,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2023-10-20&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1751&rft.epage=1758&rft.pages=1751-1758&rft.issn=1083-6160&rft.eissn=1520-586X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00360&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Eb994653354%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true