Exploring Avenues beyond Revised DSD Functionals: I. Range Separation, with x DSD as a Special Case

We have explored the use of range separation as a possible avenue for further improvement on our revDSD minimally empirical double hybrid functionals. Such ωDSD functionals encompass the XYG3 type of double hybrid ( , DSD) as a special case for ω → 0. As in our previous studies, the large and chemically diverse GMTKN55 benchmark suite was used for evaluation. Especially when using the D4 rather than D3BJ dispersion model, DSD has a slight performance advantage in WTMAD2. As in previous studies, PBEP86 is the winning combination for the semilocal parts. DSD -PBEP86-D4 marginally outperforms the previous "best in class" ωB97M(2) Berkeley double hybrid but without range separation and using fewer than half the number of empirical parameters. Range separation turns out to offer only marginal further improvements on GMTKN55 itself. While ωB97M(2) still yields better performance for small-molecule thermochemistry, this is compensated in WTMAD2 by the superior performance of the new functionals for conformer equilibria. Results for two external test sets with pronounced static correlation effects may indicate that range-separated double hybrids are more resilient to such effects.