Evaluation of Solvent Recovery Options for Economic Feasibility through a Superstructure-Based Optimization Framework

As the chemical market continues to expand, environmental concerns have increased due to excessive disposal of organic solvents. To date, there is no comprehensive mitigation plan to completely handle such a volume of solvent waste generated annually by the chemicals sector. These organic solvents c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2020-04, Vol.59 (13), p.5931-5944
Hauptverfasser: Chea, John D, Lehr, Austin L, Stengel, Jake P, Savelski, Mariano J, Slater, C. Stewart, Yenkie, Kirti M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5944
container_issue 13
container_start_page 5931
container_title Industrial & engineering chemistry research
container_volume 59
creator Chea, John D
Lehr, Austin L
Stengel, Jake P
Savelski, Mariano J
Slater, C. Stewart
Yenkie, Kirti M
description As the chemical market continues to expand, environmental concerns have increased due to excessive disposal of organic solvents. To date, there is no comprehensive mitigation plan to completely handle such a volume of solvent waste generated annually by the chemicals sector. These organic solvents can account for up to 90% of the process by mass and are often discarded after a single use. Incineration, the most widely used process for solvent disposal, is not a green method because of the release of harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases to the environment. A systematic framework for solvent recovery has been developed to overcome the drawbacks of the existing disposal methods. This framework uses a superstructure-based approach that considers the simultaneous comparison of multiple separation technologies for solvent recovery. The viability of this framework was tested using two representative case studies of varying complexities. These case studies were analyzed and formulated as mixed-integer nonlinear programming optimization problems. In both cases, solvent recovery is an economically favorable choice to conventional incineration. Herein, we demonstrate the capability of our solvent recovery framework to obtain economically viable solvent recovery pathways.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06725
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_iecr_9b06725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>b952185180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-844ede5aa09143eafa9f0c0a4d786e85ed18d162f8354d6e4730ea8ff0743f4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw55gHoMNpkzY7wrQB0iQkBufKSx2W0S5T0g6Np2dlu3Ly4ff32_oYuxUwEpCKezRx5MiE0XgJeZGqMzYQKoVEgVTnbABa60RprS7ZVYxrAFBKygHrpjusO2yd33Bv-cLXO9q0_I2M31HY89dtH0VufeBT4ze-cYbPCKNbutq1e96ugu8-Vxz5ottSiG3oTNsFSh4xUvXHN-7neGAWsKFvH76u2YXFOtLNaQ7Zx2z6PnlO5q9PL5OHeYKphjbRUlJFChHGQmaEFscWDKCsCp2TVlQJXYk8tTpTsspJFhkQamuhkJmVy2zI4Nhrgo8xkC23wTUY9qWAstdWHrSVvbbypO2A3B2RPln7LmwOD_6__gtZFXTn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Solvent Recovery Options for Economic Feasibility through a Superstructure-Based Optimization Framework</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Chea, John D ; Lehr, Austin L ; Stengel, Jake P ; Savelski, Mariano J ; Slater, C. Stewart ; Yenkie, Kirti M</creator><creatorcontrib>Chea, John D ; Lehr, Austin L ; Stengel, Jake P ; Savelski, Mariano J ; Slater, C. Stewart ; Yenkie, Kirti M</creatorcontrib><description>As the chemical market continues to expand, environmental concerns have increased due to excessive disposal of organic solvents. To date, there is no comprehensive mitigation plan to completely handle such a volume of solvent waste generated annually by the chemicals sector. These organic solvents can account for up to 90% of the process by mass and are often discarded after a single use. Incineration, the most widely used process for solvent disposal, is not a green method because of the release of harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases to the environment. A systematic framework for solvent recovery has been developed to overcome the drawbacks of the existing disposal methods. This framework uses a superstructure-based approach that considers the simultaneous comparison of multiple separation technologies for solvent recovery. The viability of this framework was tested using two representative case studies of varying complexities. These case studies were analyzed and formulated as mixed-integer nonlinear programming optimization problems. In both cases, solvent recovery is an economically favorable choice to conventional incineration. Herein, we demonstrate the capability of our solvent recovery framework to obtain economically viable solvent recovery pathways.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-5885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research, 2020-04, Vol.59 (13), p.5931-5944</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-844ede5aa09143eafa9f0c0a4d786e85ed18d162f8354d6e4730ea8ff0743f4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-844ede5aa09143eafa9f0c0a4d786e85ed18d162f8354d6e4730ea8ff0743f4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8052-6509 ; 0000-0002-8044-0369</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06725$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06725$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chea, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehr, Austin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stengel, Jake P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelski, Mariano J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, C. Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yenkie, Kirti M</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Solvent Recovery Options for Economic Feasibility through a Superstructure-Based Optimization Framework</title><title>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</title><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><description>As the chemical market continues to expand, environmental concerns have increased due to excessive disposal of organic solvents. To date, there is no comprehensive mitigation plan to completely handle such a volume of solvent waste generated annually by the chemicals sector. These organic solvents can account for up to 90% of the process by mass and are often discarded after a single use. Incineration, the most widely used process for solvent disposal, is not a green method because of the release of harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases to the environment. A systematic framework for solvent recovery has been developed to overcome the drawbacks of the existing disposal methods. This framework uses a superstructure-based approach that considers the simultaneous comparison of multiple separation technologies for solvent recovery. The viability of this framework was tested using two representative case studies of varying complexities. These case studies were analyzed and formulated as mixed-integer nonlinear programming optimization problems. In both cases, solvent recovery is an economically favorable choice to conventional incineration. Herein, we demonstrate the capability of our solvent recovery framework to obtain economically viable solvent recovery pathways.</description><issn>0888-5885</issn><issn>1520-5045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw55gHoMNpkzY7wrQB0iQkBufKSx2W0S5T0g6Np2dlu3Ly4ff32_oYuxUwEpCKezRx5MiE0XgJeZGqMzYQKoVEgVTnbABa60RprS7ZVYxrAFBKygHrpjusO2yd33Bv-cLXO9q0_I2M31HY89dtH0VufeBT4ze-cYbPCKNbutq1e96ugu8-Vxz5ottSiG3oTNsFSh4xUvXHN-7neGAWsKFvH76u2YXFOtLNaQ7Zx2z6PnlO5q9PL5OHeYKphjbRUlJFChHGQmaEFscWDKCsCp2TVlQJXYk8tTpTsspJFhkQamuhkJmVy2zI4Nhrgo8xkC23wTUY9qWAstdWHrSVvbbypO2A3B2RPln7LmwOD_6__gtZFXTn</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Chea, John D</creator><creator>Lehr, Austin L</creator><creator>Stengel, Jake P</creator><creator>Savelski, Mariano J</creator><creator>Slater, C. Stewart</creator><creator>Yenkie, Kirti M</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-6509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-0369</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Solvent Recovery Options for Economic Feasibility through a Superstructure-Based Optimization Framework</title><author>Chea, John D ; Lehr, Austin L ; Stengel, Jake P ; Savelski, Mariano J ; Slater, C. Stewart ; Yenkie, Kirti M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a280t-844ede5aa09143eafa9f0c0a4d786e85ed18d162f8354d6e4730ea8ff0743f4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chea, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehr, Austin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stengel, Jake P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelski, Mariano J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, C. Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yenkie, Kirti M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chea, John D</au><au>Lehr, Austin L</au><au>Stengel, Jake P</au><au>Savelski, Mariano J</au><au>Slater, C. Stewart</au><au>Yenkie, Kirti M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Solvent Recovery Options for Economic Feasibility through a Superstructure-Based Optimization Framework</atitle><jtitle>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>5931</spage><epage>5944</epage><pages>5931-5944</pages><issn>0888-5885</issn><eissn>1520-5045</eissn><abstract>As the chemical market continues to expand, environmental concerns have increased due to excessive disposal of organic solvents. To date, there is no comprehensive mitigation plan to completely handle such a volume of solvent waste generated annually by the chemicals sector. These organic solvents can account for up to 90% of the process by mass and are often discarded after a single use. Incineration, the most widely used process for solvent disposal, is not a green method because of the release of harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases to the environment. A systematic framework for solvent recovery has been developed to overcome the drawbacks of the existing disposal methods. This framework uses a superstructure-based approach that considers the simultaneous comparison of multiple separation technologies for solvent recovery. The viability of this framework was tested using two representative case studies of varying complexities. These case studies were analyzed and formulated as mixed-integer nonlinear programming optimization problems. In both cases, solvent recovery is an economically favorable choice to conventional incineration. Herein, we demonstrate the capability of our solvent recovery framework to obtain economically viable solvent recovery pathways.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06725</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-6509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-0369</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-5885
ispartof Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2020-04, Vol.59 (13), p.5931-5944
issn 0888-5885
1520-5045
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_iecr_9b06725
source ACS Publications
title Evaluation of Solvent Recovery Options for Economic Feasibility through a Superstructure-Based Optimization Framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Solvent%20Recovery%20Options%20for%20Economic%20Feasibility%20through%20a%20Superstructure-Based%20Optimization%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20engineering%20chemistry%20research&rft.au=Chea,%20John%20D&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=5931&rft.epage=5944&rft.pages=5931-5944&rft.issn=0888-5885&rft.eissn=1520-5045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06725&rft_dat=%3Cacs_cross%3Eb952185180%3C/acs_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true