Rosetta-Enabled Structural Prediction of Permissive Loop Insertion Sites in Proteins

While loop motifs frequently play a major role in protein function, our understanding of how to rationally engineer proteins with novel loop domains remains limited. In the absence of rational approaches, the incorporation of loop domains often destabilizes proteins, thereby requiring massive screen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemistry (Easton) 2020-10, Vol.59 (41), p.3993-4002
Hauptverfasser: Plaks, Joseph G, Brewer, Jeff A, Jacobsen, Nicole K, McKenna, Michael, Uzarski, Joshua R, Lawton, Timothy J, Filocamo, Shaun F, Kaar, Joel L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4002
container_issue 41
container_start_page 3993
container_title Biochemistry (Easton)
container_volume 59
creator Plaks, Joseph G
Brewer, Jeff A
Jacobsen, Nicole K
McKenna, Michael
Uzarski, Joshua R
Lawton, Timothy J
Filocamo, Shaun F
Kaar, Joel L
description While loop motifs frequently play a major role in protein function, our understanding of how to rationally engineer proteins with novel loop domains remains limited. In the absence of rational approaches, the incorporation of loop domains often destabilizes proteins, thereby requiring massive screening and selection to identify sites that can accommodate loop insertion. We developed a computational strategy for rapidly scanning the entire structure of a scaffold protein to determine the impact of loop insertion at all possible amino acid positions. This approach is based on the Rosetta kinematic loop modeling protocol and was demonstrated by identifying sites in lipase that were permissive to insertion of the LAP peptide. Interestingly, the identification of permissive sites was dependent on the contribution of the residues in the near-loop environment on the Rosetta score and did not correlate with conventional structural features (e.g., -factors). As evidence of this, several insertion sites (e.g., following residues 17, 47-49, and 108), which were predicted and confirmed to be permissive, interrupted helices, while others (e.g., following residues 43, 67, 116, 119, and 121), which are situated in loop regions, were nonpermissive. This approach was further shown to be predictive for β-glucosidase and human phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), and to facilitate the engineering of insertion sites through mutagenesis. By enabling the design of loop-containing protein libraries with high probabilities of soluble expression, this approach has broad implications in many areas of protein engineering, including antibody design, improving enzyme activity, and protein modification.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00533
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_biochem_0c00533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32970423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-aaa17cd4a9f074b1b09b50796261fb4bb1da9dfd6965f1443ab784b03f3c66fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kO1KwzAYhYMobk6vQJDcQOubJk3NTxlzDgYON3-XfGJkbUaSCd691VV_vRxensPhQeiWQEmgIvdSp1L5oN9tV4IGqCk9Q1NSV1AwIepzNAUAXlSCwwRdpfQxRAYNu0QTWokGWEWnaPcaks1ZFoteqr01eJvjUedjlHu8idZ4nX3ocXB4Y2PnU_KfFq9DOOBVn2z8fW59tgn7fgBCtr5P1-jCyX2yN-OdobenxW7-XKxflqv547rQFOpcSClJow2Twg2zFFEgVA2N4BUnTjGliJHCOMMFrx1hjErVPDAF1FHNuTN0huipV8eQUrSuPUTfyfjVEmh_HLWDo3Z01I6OBuruRB2OqrPmn_mTQr8B32hnJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rosetta-Enabled Structural Prediction of Permissive Loop Insertion Sites in Proteins</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Plaks, Joseph G ; Brewer, Jeff A ; Jacobsen, Nicole K ; McKenna, Michael ; Uzarski, Joshua R ; Lawton, Timothy J ; Filocamo, Shaun F ; Kaar, Joel L</creator><creatorcontrib>Plaks, Joseph G ; Brewer, Jeff A ; Jacobsen, Nicole K ; McKenna, Michael ; Uzarski, Joshua R ; Lawton, Timothy J ; Filocamo, Shaun F ; Kaar, Joel L</creatorcontrib><description>While loop motifs frequently play a major role in protein function, our understanding of how to rationally engineer proteins with novel loop domains remains limited. In the absence of rational approaches, the incorporation of loop domains often destabilizes proteins, thereby requiring massive screening and selection to identify sites that can accommodate loop insertion. We developed a computational strategy for rapidly scanning the entire structure of a scaffold protein to determine the impact of loop insertion at all possible amino acid positions. This approach is based on the Rosetta kinematic loop modeling protocol and was demonstrated by identifying sites in lipase that were permissive to insertion of the LAP peptide. Interestingly, the identification of permissive sites was dependent on the contribution of the residues in the near-loop environment on the Rosetta score and did not correlate with conventional structural features (e.g., -factors). As evidence of this, several insertion sites (e.g., following residues 17, 47-49, and 108), which were predicted and confirmed to be permissive, interrupted helices, while others (e.g., following residues 43, 67, 116, 119, and 121), which are situated in loop regions, were nonpermissive. This approach was further shown to be predictive for β-glucosidase and human phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), and to facilitate the engineering of insertion sites through mutagenesis. By enabling the design of loop-containing protein libraries with high probabilities of soluble expression, this approach has broad implications in many areas of protein engineering, including antibody design, improving enzyme activity, and protein modification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00533</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32970423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Binding Sites ; Humans ; Protein Engineering - methods ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; Proteins - chemistry ; Proteins - metabolism ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase - chemistry ; PTEN Phosphohydrolase - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Biochemistry (Easton), 2020-10, Vol.59 (41), p.3993-4002</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-aaa17cd4a9f074b1b09b50796261fb4bb1da9dfd6965f1443ab784b03f3c66fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-aaa17cd4a9f074b1b09b50796261fb4bb1da9dfd6965f1443ab784b03f3c66fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0794-3955 ; 0000-0002-5971-1670</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plaks, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jeff A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Nicole K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzarski, Joshua R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filocamo, Shaun F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaar, Joel L</creatorcontrib><title>Rosetta-Enabled Structural Prediction of Permissive Loop Insertion Sites in Proteins</title><title>Biochemistry (Easton)</title><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><description>While loop motifs frequently play a major role in protein function, our understanding of how to rationally engineer proteins with novel loop domains remains limited. In the absence of rational approaches, the incorporation of loop domains often destabilizes proteins, thereby requiring massive screening and selection to identify sites that can accommodate loop insertion. We developed a computational strategy for rapidly scanning the entire structure of a scaffold protein to determine the impact of loop insertion at all possible amino acid positions. This approach is based on the Rosetta kinematic loop modeling protocol and was demonstrated by identifying sites in lipase that were permissive to insertion of the LAP peptide. Interestingly, the identification of permissive sites was dependent on the contribution of the residues in the near-loop environment on the Rosetta score and did not correlate with conventional structural features (e.g., -factors). As evidence of this, several insertion sites (e.g., following residues 17, 47-49, and 108), which were predicted and confirmed to be permissive, interrupted helices, while others (e.g., following residues 43, 67, 116, 119, and 121), which are situated in loop regions, were nonpermissive. This approach was further shown to be predictive for β-glucosidase and human phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), and to facilitate the engineering of insertion sites through mutagenesis. By enabling the design of loop-containing protein libraries with high probabilities of soluble expression, this approach has broad implications in many areas of protein engineering, including antibody design, improving enzyme activity, and protein modification.</description><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Protein Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - chemistry</subject><subject>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - metabolism</subject><issn>0006-2960</issn><issn>1520-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kO1KwzAYhYMobk6vQJDcQOubJk3NTxlzDgYON3-XfGJkbUaSCd691VV_vRxensPhQeiWQEmgIvdSp1L5oN9tV4IGqCk9Q1NSV1AwIepzNAUAXlSCwwRdpfQxRAYNu0QTWokGWEWnaPcaks1ZFoteqr01eJvjUedjlHu8idZ4nX3ocXB4Y2PnU_KfFq9DOOBVn2z8fW59tgn7fgBCtr5P1-jCyX2yN-OdobenxW7-XKxflqv547rQFOpcSClJow2Twg2zFFEgVA2N4BUnTjGliJHCOMMFrx1hjErVPDAF1FHNuTN0huipV8eQUrSuPUTfyfjVEmh_HLWDo3Z01I6OBuruRB2OqrPmn_mTQr8B32hnJQ</recordid><startdate>20201020</startdate><enddate>20201020</enddate><creator>Plaks, Joseph G</creator><creator>Brewer, Jeff A</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Nicole K</creator><creator>McKenna, Michael</creator><creator>Uzarski, Joshua R</creator><creator>Lawton, Timothy J</creator><creator>Filocamo, Shaun F</creator><creator>Kaar, Joel L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-3955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-1670</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201020</creationdate><title>Rosetta-Enabled Structural Prediction of Permissive Loop Insertion Sites in Proteins</title><author>Plaks, Joseph G ; Brewer, Jeff A ; Jacobsen, Nicole K ; McKenna, Michael ; Uzarski, Joshua R ; Lawton, Timothy J ; Filocamo, Shaun F ; Kaar, Joel L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-aaa17cd4a9f074b1b09b50796261fb4bb1da9dfd6965f1443ab784b03f3c66fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Protein Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - chemistry</topic><topic>PTEN Phosphohydrolase - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plaks, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jeff A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Nicole K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzarski, Joshua R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filocamo, Shaun F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaar, Joel L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plaks, Joseph G</au><au>Brewer, Jeff A</au><au>Jacobsen, Nicole K</au><au>McKenna, Michael</au><au>Uzarski, Joshua R</au><au>Lawton, Timothy J</au><au>Filocamo, Shaun F</au><au>Kaar, Joel L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rosetta-Enabled Structural Prediction of Permissive Loop Insertion Sites in Proteins</atitle><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><date>2020-10-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>41</issue><spage>3993</spage><epage>4002</epage><pages>3993-4002</pages><issn>0006-2960</issn><eissn>1520-4995</eissn><abstract>While loop motifs frequently play a major role in protein function, our understanding of how to rationally engineer proteins with novel loop domains remains limited. In the absence of rational approaches, the incorporation of loop domains often destabilizes proteins, thereby requiring massive screening and selection to identify sites that can accommodate loop insertion. We developed a computational strategy for rapidly scanning the entire structure of a scaffold protein to determine the impact of loop insertion at all possible amino acid positions. This approach is based on the Rosetta kinematic loop modeling protocol and was demonstrated by identifying sites in lipase that were permissive to insertion of the LAP peptide. Interestingly, the identification of permissive sites was dependent on the contribution of the residues in the near-loop environment on the Rosetta score and did not correlate with conventional structural features (e.g., -factors). As evidence of this, several insertion sites (e.g., following residues 17, 47-49, and 108), which were predicted and confirmed to be permissive, interrupted helices, while others (e.g., following residues 43, 67, 116, 119, and 121), which are situated in loop regions, were nonpermissive. This approach was further shown to be predictive for β-glucosidase and human phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), and to facilitate the engineering of insertion sites through mutagenesis. By enabling the design of loop-containing protein libraries with high probabilities of soluble expression, this approach has broad implications in many areas of protein engineering, including antibody design, improving enzyme activity, and protein modification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32970423</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00533</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-3955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-1670</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-2960
ispartof Biochemistry (Easton), 2020-10, Vol.59 (41), p.3993-4002
issn 0006-2960
1520-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_biochem_0c00533
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Binding Sites
Humans
Protein Engineering - methods
Protein Structure, Secondary
Proteins - chemistry
Proteins - metabolism
PTEN Phosphohydrolase - chemistry
PTEN Phosphohydrolase - metabolism
title Rosetta-Enabled Structural Prediction of Permissive Loop Insertion Sites in Proteins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A12%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rosetta-Enabled%20Structural%20Prediction%20of%20Permissive%20Loop%20Insertion%20Sites%20in%20Proteins&rft.jtitle=Biochemistry%20(Easton)&rft.au=Plaks,%20Joseph%20G&rft.date=2020-10-20&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=41&rft.spage=3993&rft.epage=4002&rft.pages=3993-4002&rft.issn=0006-2960&rft.eissn=1520-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00533&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32970423%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32970423&rfr_iscdi=true