How do Educators of Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings Understand and Apply the Australian Curriculum Framework?
Despite aspirations to be a world-class national curriculum, the Australian Curriculum (AC) has been criticised as 'manifestly deficient' (Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2014 p. 5) as an inclusive curriculum, failing to meet the needs of all students with disab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australasian journal of special and inclusive education 2018-12, Vol.42 (2), p.111-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Australasian journal of special and inclusive education |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Walker, Peter M Carson, Karyn L Jarvis, Jane M McMillan, Julie M Noble, Anna G Armstrong, David J Bissaker, Kerry A Palmer, Carolyn D |
description | Despite aspirations to be a world-class national curriculum, the Australian Curriculum (AC) has been criticised as 'manifestly deficient' (Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2014 p. 5) as an inclusive curriculum, failing to meet the needs of all students with disabilities (SWD) and their teachers. There is a need for research into the daily attempts of educators to navigate the tension between a 'top-down' system-wide curriculum and a 'bottom-up' regard for individual student needs, with a view to informing both policy and practice. This article is the first of two research papers in which we report the findings from a national online Research in Special Education (RISE) Australian Curriculum Survey of special educators in special schools, classes, and units regarding their experience using the AC to plan for and teach SWD. Survey results indicated (a) inconsistent use of the AC as the primary basis for developing learning objectives and designing learning experiences, (b) infrequent use of the achievement standards to support assessment and reporting, and (c) considerable supplementation of the AC from other resources when educating SWD. Overall, participants expressed a lack of confidence in translating the AC framework into a meaningful curriculum for SWD. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed. [Author abstract] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/jsi.2018.13 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_jsi_2018_13</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1196507</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.221547</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2196544080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-90619d8aca0cca9f53c9e64d3d0ee85fd1c957eabb5109092f66c626d4159c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1r4zAQxc2yhZa2pz0XBHssSTWS5VinkqZJPyj0kJbdm1AkuVHqWF5pTOmp__raSclhmIH3Yx7vZdkvoGOgMLnaJD9mFMox8B_ZCRMgRnSS__15uDkcZ-cpbSilDHgpyvIk-7oPH8QGMred0RhiIqEiS-ysazCRPx7X5NYnvfK1R-8S8Q1Zts54XfuEZOkQffOWyGtjXUyoG0uGmbZt_Ulw7ci0Sxh7WDdk1sXoTVd3W7KIeus-Qny_PsuOKl0nd_69T7PXxfxldj96er57mE2fRobnDEeSFiBtqY2mxmhZCW6kK3LLLXWuFJUFI8XE6dVKAJVUsqooTMEKm4OQpo9-mv3e_21j-Ne5hGoTutj0loqBLESe05L21OWeMjGkFF2l2ui3On4qoGooWfUlq6FkBbynL_a063MdyPkjDA93njd7PW49Ku18i2qN2CZlNWrlmyrslBDflA1-8OAcim-SMRD5hP8HJEuSYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2196544080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do Educators of Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings Understand and Apply the Australian Curriculum Framework?</title><source>Cambridge core</source><creator>Walker, Peter M ; Carson, Karyn L ; Jarvis, Jane M ; McMillan, Julie M ; Noble, Anna G ; Armstrong, David J ; Bissaker, Kerry A ; Palmer, Carolyn D</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Peter M ; Carson, Karyn L ; Jarvis, Jane M ; McMillan, Julie M ; Noble, Anna G ; Armstrong, David J ; Bissaker, Kerry A ; Palmer, Carolyn D</creatorcontrib><description>Despite aspirations to be a world-class national curriculum, the Australian Curriculum (AC) has been criticised as 'manifestly deficient' (Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2014 p. 5) as an inclusive curriculum, failing to meet the needs of all students with disabilities (SWD) and their teachers. There is a need for research into the daily attempts of educators to navigate the tension between a 'top-down' system-wide curriculum and a 'bottom-up' regard for individual student needs, with a view to informing both policy and practice. This article is the first of two research papers in which we report the findings from a national online Research in Special Education (RISE) Australian Curriculum Survey of special educators in special schools, classes, and units regarding their experience using the AC to plan for and teach SWD. Survey results indicated (a) inconsistent use of the AC as the primary basis for developing learning objectives and designing learning experiences, (b) infrequent use of the achievement standards to support assessment and reporting, and (c) considerable supplementation of the AC from other resources when educating SWD. Overall, participants expressed a lack of confidence in translating the AC framework into a meaningful curriculum for SWD. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed. [Author abstract]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-0731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-074X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jsi.2018.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Age ; Associations ; Confidence ; Core curriculum ; Curriculum development ; Curriculum implementation ; Design ; Disabilities ; Disability ; Educational Needs ; Foreign Countries ; Handicapped accessibility ; Inclusion ; Individualized Education Programs ; Learning ; National Curriculum ; Primary secondary education ; Special Education ; Special Education Teachers ; Special Needs Students ; Student Needs ; Students with disabilities ; Surveys ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Australasian journal of special and inclusive education, 2018-12, Vol.42 (2), p.111-126</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-90619d8aca0cca9f53c9e64d3d0ee85fd1c957eabb5109092f66c626d4159c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-90619d8aca0cca9f53c9e64d3d0ee85fd1c957eabb5109092f66c626d4159c073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1196507$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Karyn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Jane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Anna G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bissaker, Kerry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Carolyn D</creatorcontrib><title>How do Educators of Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings Understand and Apply the Australian Curriculum Framework?</title><title>Australasian journal of special and inclusive education</title><description>Despite aspirations to be a world-class national curriculum, the Australian Curriculum (AC) has been criticised as 'manifestly deficient' (Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2014 p. 5) as an inclusive curriculum, failing to meet the needs of all students with disabilities (SWD) and their teachers. There is a need for research into the daily attempts of educators to navigate the tension between a 'top-down' system-wide curriculum and a 'bottom-up' regard for individual student needs, with a view to informing both policy and practice. This article is the first of two research papers in which we report the findings from a national online Research in Special Education (RISE) Australian Curriculum Survey of special educators in special schools, classes, and units regarding their experience using the AC to plan for and teach SWD. Survey results indicated (a) inconsistent use of the AC as the primary basis for developing learning objectives and designing learning experiences, (b) infrequent use of the achievement standards to support assessment and reporting, and (c) considerable supplementation of the AC from other resources when educating SWD. Overall, participants expressed a lack of confidence in translating the AC framework into a meaningful curriculum for SWD. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed. [Author abstract]</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>Curriculum implementation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Educational Needs</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Handicapped accessibility</subject><subject>Inclusion</subject><subject>Individualized Education Programs</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>National Curriculum</subject><subject>Primary secondary education</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Special Education Teachers</subject><subject>Special Needs Students</subject><subject>Student Needs</subject><subject>Students with disabilities</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>2515-0731</issn><issn>2515-074X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1r4zAQxc2yhZa2pz0XBHssSTWS5VinkqZJPyj0kJbdm1AkuVHqWF5pTOmp__raSclhmIH3Yx7vZdkvoGOgMLnaJD9mFMox8B_ZCRMgRnSS__15uDkcZ-cpbSilDHgpyvIk-7oPH8QGMred0RhiIqEiS-ysazCRPx7X5NYnvfK1R-8S8Q1Zts54XfuEZOkQffOWyGtjXUyoG0uGmbZt_Ulw7ci0Sxh7WDdk1sXoTVd3W7KIeus-Qny_PsuOKl0nd_69T7PXxfxldj96er57mE2fRobnDEeSFiBtqY2mxmhZCW6kK3LLLXWuFJUFI8XE6dVKAJVUsqooTMEKm4OQpo9-mv3e_21j-Ne5hGoTutj0loqBLESe05L21OWeMjGkFF2l2ui3On4qoGooWfUlq6FkBbynL_a063MdyPkjDA93njd7PW49Ku18i2qN2CZlNWrlmyrslBDflA1-8OAcim-SMRD5hP8HJEuSYQ</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Walker, Peter M</creator><creator>Carson, Karyn L</creator><creator>Jarvis, Jane M</creator><creator>McMillan, Julie M</creator><creator>Noble, Anna G</creator><creator>Armstrong, David J</creator><creator>Bissaker, Kerry A</creator><creator>Palmer, Carolyn D</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>How do Educators of Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings Understand and Apply the Australian Curriculum Framework?</title><author>Walker, Peter M ; Carson, Karyn L ; Jarvis, Jane M ; McMillan, Julie M ; Noble, Anna G ; Armstrong, David J ; Bissaker, Kerry A ; Palmer, Carolyn D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-90619d8aca0cca9f53c9e64d3d0ee85fd1c957eabb5109092f66c626d4159c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>Curriculum implementation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Educational Needs</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Handicapped accessibility</topic><topic>Inclusion</topic><topic>Individualized Education Programs</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>National Curriculum</topic><topic>Primary secondary education</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Special Education Teachers</topic><topic>Special Needs Students</topic><topic>Student Needs</topic><topic>Students with disabilities</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Karyn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Jane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Anna G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bissaker, Kerry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Carolyn D</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Australasian journal of special and inclusive education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Peter M</au><au>Carson, Karyn L</au><au>Jarvis, Jane M</au><au>McMillan, Julie M</au><au>Noble, Anna G</au><au>Armstrong, David J</au><au>Bissaker, Kerry A</au><au>Palmer, Carolyn D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1196507</ericid><atitle>How do Educators of Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings Understand and Apply the Australian Curriculum Framework?</atitle><jtitle>Australasian journal of special and inclusive education</jtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>111-126</pages><issn>2515-0731</issn><eissn>2515-074X</eissn><abstract>Despite aspirations to be a world-class national curriculum, the Australian Curriculum (AC) has been criticised as 'manifestly deficient' (Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2014 p. 5) as an inclusive curriculum, failing to meet the needs of all students with disabilities (SWD) and their teachers. There is a need for research into the daily attempts of educators to navigate the tension between a 'top-down' system-wide curriculum and a 'bottom-up' regard for individual student needs, with a view to informing both policy and practice. This article is the first of two research papers in which we report the findings from a national online Research in Special Education (RISE) Australian Curriculum Survey of special educators in special schools, classes, and units regarding their experience using the AC to plan for and teach SWD. Survey results indicated (a) inconsistent use of the AC as the primary basis for developing learning objectives and designing learning experiences, (b) infrequent use of the achievement standards to support assessment and reporting, and (c) considerable supplementation of the AC from other resources when educating SWD. Overall, participants expressed a lack of confidence in translating the AC framework into a meaningful curriculum for SWD. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed. [Author abstract]</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jsi.2018.13</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2515-0731 |
ispartof | Australasian journal of special and inclusive education, 2018-12, Vol.42 (2), p.111-126 |
issn | 2515-0731 2515-074X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_jsi_2018_13 |
source | Cambridge core |
subjects | Accountability Age Associations Confidence Core curriculum Curriculum development Curriculum implementation Design Disabilities Disability Educational Needs Foreign Countries Handicapped accessibility Inclusion Individualized Education Programs Learning National Curriculum Primary secondary education Special Education Special Education Teachers Special Needs Students Student Needs Students with disabilities Surveys Teachers Teaching Methods |
title | How do Educators of Students With Disabilities in Specialist Settings Understand and Apply the Australian Curriculum Framework? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20Educators%20of%20Students%20With%20Disabilities%20in%20Specialist%20Settings%20Understand%20and%20Apply%20the%20Australian%20Curriculum%20Framework?&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20journal%20of%20special%20and%20inclusive%20education&rft.au=Walker,%20Peter%20M&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=111-126&rft.issn=2515-0731&rft.eissn=2515-074X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jsi.2018.13&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2196544080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2196544080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1196507&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.221547&rfr_iscdi=true |