Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations

It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial and organizational psychology 2025-01, p.1-21
Hauptverfasser: Voss, Nathaniel M., Stoffregen, Stacy A., Couture, Kelsey L., DiGirolamo, Joel A., Furman, Melissa, Haidar, Sarah, Hammer, Leslie B., Lee, Jin, Maneotis, Sarina M., McCloy, Rodney A., Olson, Ryan, Spector, Paul E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Industrial and organizational psychology
container_volume
creator Voss, Nathaniel M.
Stoffregen, Stacy A.
Couture, Kelsey L.
DiGirolamo, Joel A.
Furman, Melissa
Haidar, Sarah
Hammer, Leslie B.
Lee, Jin
Maneotis, Sarina M.
McCloy, Rodney A.
Olson, Ryan
Spector, Paul E.
description It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a particular method of inclusive, collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process—can help reduce this academic–practice gap and advance the impact of I-O psychology. To examine the current state of the field, we reviewed empirical evidence of the current prevalence of collaborative research by examining the number of articles that contain nonacademic authors across 14 key I-O psychology journals from 2018 to 2023. We then build on these findings by describing how engaged scholarship can be integrated throughout the research process and conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to conduct more collaborative research. Overall, our goal is to facilitate a fruitful conversation about the value of collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process in hopes of reducing the academic–practice gap. We also aim to inspire action in the field to maintain and enhance the impact of I-O psychology on the future world of work.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/iop.2024.61
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_iop_2024_61</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_iop_2024_61</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c721-fbdaeaaffddd659a5f0a8c0baa37aea12021c8320e83091f948ff8152431dac23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DusjWTZL-8SdEqFDzY-zKbTXYj282SpEL99aYqnmZg5n3gfQi5BbYCBuW9dfOKMy5XBZyRBZS5zGop5Pn_zotLchXCB2OF4EwuSHgfcLZTT-OgqTnEg9fUGWqn7hCitzhmzvc42S-M1k040jkc1eBG1x8f6C5loscpGOf36eFT09lFPcWUO1G8Dhq9Gqhy44it8z-QcE0uDI5B3_zNJdk9P-3WL9n2bfO6ftxmquSQmbZDjWhM13VFXmNuGFaKtYiiTAdIPUFVqYWuBKvB1LIypoKcSwEdKi6W5O4Xq7wLwWvTzN7u0R8bYM1JV5N0NSddTQHiGz2aYoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Voss, Nathaniel M. ; Stoffregen, Stacy A. ; Couture, Kelsey L. ; DiGirolamo, Joel A. ; Furman, Melissa ; Haidar, Sarah ; Hammer, Leslie B. ; Lee, Jin ; Maneotis, Sarina M. ; McCloy, Rodney A. ; Olson, Ryan ; Spector, Paul E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Voss, Nathaniel M. ; Stoffregen, Stacy A. ; Couture, Kelsey L. ; DiGirolamo, Joel A. ; Furman, Melissa ; Haidar, Sarah ; Hammer, Leslie B. ; Lee, Jin ; Maneotis, Sarina M. ; McCloy, Rodney A. ; Olson, Ryan ; Spector, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><description>It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a particular method of inclusive, collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process—can help reduce this academic–practice gap and advance the impact of I-O psychology. To examine the current state of the field, we reviewed empirical evidence of the current prevalence of collaborative research by examining the number of articles that contain nonacademic authors across 14 key I-O psychology journals from 2018 to 2023. We then build on these findings by describing how engaged scholarship can be integrated throughout the research process and conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to conduct more collaborative research. Overall, our goal is to facilitate a fruitful conversation about the value of collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process in hopes of reducing the academic–practice gap. We also aim to inspire action in the field to maintain and enhance the impact of I-O psychology on the future world of work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-9426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-9434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/iop.2024.61</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Industrial and organizational psychology, 2025-01, p.1-21</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c721-fbdaeaaffddd659a5f0a8c0baa37aea12021c8320e83091f948ff8152431dac23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5020-7163 ; 0000-0002-1595-0987</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voss, Nathaniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoffregen, Stacy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couture, Kelsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGirolamo, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furman, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haidar, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maneotis, Sarina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCloy, Rodney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><title>Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations</title><title>Industrial and organizational psychology</title><description>It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a particular method of inclusive, collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process—can help reduce this academic–practice gap and advance the impact of I-O psychology. To examine the current state of the field, we reviewed empirical evidence of the current prevalence of collaborative research by examining the number of articles that contain nonacademic authors across 14 key I-O psychology journals from 2018 to 2023. We then build on these findings by describing how engaged scholarship can be integrated throughout the research process and conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to conduct more collaborative research. Overall, our goal is to facilitate a fruitful conversation about the value of collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process in hopes of reducing the academic–practice gap. We also aim to inspire action in the field to maintain and enhance the impact of I-O psychology on the future world of work.</description><issn>1754-9426</issn><issn>1754-9434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DusjWTZL-8SdEqFDzY-zKbTXYj282SpEL99aYqnmZg5n3gfQi5BbYCBuW9dfOKMy5XBZyRBZS5zGop5Pn_zotLchXCB2OF4EwuSHgfcLZTT-OgqTnEg9fUGWqn7hCitzhmzvc42S-M1k040jkc1eBG1x8f6C5loscpGOf36eFT09lFPcWUO1G8Dhq9Gqhy44it8z-QcE0uDI5B3_zNJdk9P-3WL9n2bfO6ftxmquSQmbZDjWhM13VFXmNuGFaKtYiiTAdIPUFVqYWuBKvB1LIypoKcSwEdKi6W5O4Xq7wLwWvTzN7u0R8bYM1JV5N0NSddTQHiGz2aYoA</recordid><startdate>20250109</startdate><enddate>20250109</enddate><creator>Voss, Nathaniel M.</creator><creator>Stoffregen, Stacy A.</creator><creator>Couture, Kelsey L.</creator><creator>DiGirolamo, Joel A.</creator><creator>Furman, Melissa</creator><creator>Haidar, Sarah</creator><creator>Hammer, Leslie B.</creator><creator>Lee, Jin</creator><creator>Maneotis, Sarina M.</creator><creator>McCloy, Rodney A.</creator><creator>Olson, Ryan</creator><creator>Spector, Paul E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5020-7163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-0987</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250109</creationdate><title>Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations</title><author>Voss, Nathaniel M. ; Stoffregen, Stacy A. ; Couture, Kelsey L. ; DiGirolamo, Joel A. ; Furman, Melissa ; Haidar, Sarah ; Hammer, Leslie B. ; Lee, Jin ; Maneotis, Sarina M. ; McCloy, Rodney A. ; Olson, Ryan ; Spector, Paul E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c721-fbdaeaaffddd659a5f0a8c0baa37aea12021c8320e83091f948ff8152431dac23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voss, Nathaniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoffregen, Stacy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couture, Kelsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGirolamo, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furman, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haidar, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, Leslie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maneotis, Sarina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCloy, Rodney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voss, Nathaniel M.</au><au>Stoffregen, Stacy A.</au><au>Couture, Kelsey L.</au><au>DiGirolamo, Joel A.</au><au>Furman, Melissa</au><au>Haidar, Sarah</au><au>Hammer, Leslie B.</au><au>Lee, Jin</au><au>Maneotis, Sarina M.</au><au>McCloy, Rodney A.</au><au>Olson, Ryan</au><au>Spector, Paul E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle><date>2025-01-09</date><risdate>2025</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><issn>1754-9426</issn><eissn>1754-9434</eissn><abstract>It is important for the research produced by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists to be rigorous, relevant, and useful to organizations. However, I-O psychology research is often not used in practice. In this paper, we (both practitioners and academics) argue that engaged scholarship—a particular method of inclusive, collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process—can help reduce this academic–practice gap and advance the impact of I-O psychology. To examine the current state of the field, we reviewed empirical evidence of the current prevalence of collaborative research by examining the number of articles that contain nonacademic authors across 14 key I-O psychology journals from 2018 to 2023. We then build on these findings by describing how engaged scholarship can be integrated throughout the research process and conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to conduct more collaborative research. Overall, our goal is to facilitate a fruitful conversation about the value of collaborative research that incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process in hopes of reducing the academic–practice gap. We also aim to inspire action in the field to maintain and enhance the impact of I-O psychology on the future world of work.</abstract><doi>10.1017/iop.2024.61</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5020-7163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-0987</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-9426
ispartof Industrial and organizational psychology, 2025-01, p.1-21
issn 1754-9426
1754-9434
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_iop_2024_61
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
title Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shaping%20the%20future%20of%20industrial-organizational%20psychology:%20The%20transformative%20potential%20of%20research%20collaborations&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Voss,%20Nathaniel%20M.&rft.date=2025-01-09&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.issn=1754-9426&rft.eissn=1754-9434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/iop.2024.61&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_iop_2024_61%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true