EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC
We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the sp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The review of symbolic logic 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.505-536 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 536 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | The review of symbolic logic |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | INCURVATI, LUCA SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J. |
description | We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati & Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic
$\mathbf {S5}$
modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1755020320000313 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755020320000313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1755020320000313</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1755020320000313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8FOwzAMhiMEEmPwAEgc9gIFO26T9FhVBSp12sS6c5S0CdrEGErgwNuTwcQFCV9s-f8_yz9j1wi3CCjvViiLAjgQh1SEdMImh1UGHPH0dwY6ZxcxbgEE56Qm7KZZtqu-mbf1bL7u-rar-uap6mbd4qGtL9mZNy_RXR37lK3vm75-zL7VqssGIv6ecVRCgSq4gSH3tuRGOI_IUVrrnVQl5bkwo7HJJ2Vpko5udI4EFMkz0JThz90h7GMMzuu3sNmZ8KkR9CGe_hMvMXRkzM6Gzfjs9Hb_EV7Tn_9QX5NKTK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>INCURVATI, LUCA ; SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creator><creatorcontrib>INCURVATI, LUCA ; SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creatorcontrib><description>We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati & Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic
$\mathbf {S5}$
modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-0203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-0211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1755020320000313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>The review of symbolic logic, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.505-536</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1755020320000313/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>INCURVATI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creatorcontrib><title>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</title><title>The review of symbolic logic</title><addtitle>The Review of Symbolic Logic</addtitle><description>We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati & Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic
$\mathbf {S5}$
modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.</description><issn>1755-0203</issn><issn>1755-0211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j8FOwzAMhiMEEmPwAEgc9gIFO26T9FhVBSp12sS6c5S0CdrEGErgwNuTwcQFCV9s-f8_yz9j1wi3CCjvViiLAjgQh1SEdMImh1UGHPH0dwY6ZxcxbgEE56Qm7KZZtqu-mbf1bL7u-rar-uap6mbd4qGtL9mZNy_RXR37lK3vm75-zL7VqssGIv6ecVRCgSq4gSH3tuRGOI_IUVrrnVQl5bkwo7HJJ2Vpko5udI4EFMkz0JThz90h7GMMzuu3sNmZ8KkR9CGe_hMvMXRkzM6Gzfjs9Hb_EV7Tn_9QX5NKTK4</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>INCURVATI, LUCA</creator><creator>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</title><author>INCURVATI, LUCA ; SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>INCURVATI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The review of symbolic logic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>INCURVATI, LUCA</au><au>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</atitle><jtitle>The review of symbolic logic</jtitle><addtitle>The Review of Symbolic Logic</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>505-536</pages><issn>1755-0203</issn><eissn>1755-0211</eissn><abstract>We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati & Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic
$\mathbf {S5}$
modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1755020320000313</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-0203 |
ispartof | The review of symbolic logic, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.505-536 |
issn | 1755-0203 1755-0211 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755020320000313 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
title | EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EPISTEMIC%20MULTILATERAL%20LOGIC&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20symbolic%20logic&rft.au=INCURVATI,%20LUCA&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=505-536&rft.issn=1755-0203&rft.eissn=1755-0211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1755020320000313&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S1755020320000313%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1755020320000313&rfr_iscdi=true |