EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC

We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the sp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The review of symbolic logic 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.505-536
Hauptverfasser: INCURVATI, LUCA, SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 536
container_issue 2
container_start_page 505
container_title The review of symbolic logic
container_volume 15
creator INCURVATI, LUCA
SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.
description We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati & Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic $\mathbf {S5}$ modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1755020320000313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755020320000313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1755020320000313</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1755020320000313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8FOwzAMhiMEEmPwAEgc9gIFO26T9FhVBSp12sS6c5S0CdrEGErgwNuTwcQFCV9s-f8_yz9j1wi3CCjvViiLAjgQh1SEdMImh1UGHPH0dwY6ZxcxbgEE56Qm7KZZtqu-mbf1bL7u-rar-uap6mbd4qGtL9mZNy_RXR37lK3vm75-zL7VqssGIv6ecVRCgSq4gSH3tuRGOI_IUVrrnVQl5bkwo7HJJ2Vpko5udI4EFMkz0JThz90h7GMMzuu3sNmZ8KkR9CGe_hMvMXRkzM6Gzfjs9Hb_EV7Tn_9QX5NKTK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>INCURVATI, LUCA ; SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creator><creatorcontrib>INCURVATI, LUCA ; SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creatorcontrib><description>We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati &amp; Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic $\mathbf {S5}$ modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-0203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-0211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1755020320000313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>The review of symbolic logic, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.505-536</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1755020320000313/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>INCURVATI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creatorcontrib><title>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</title><title>The review of symbolic logic</title><addtitle>The Review of Symbolic Logic</addtitle><description>We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati &amp; Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic $\mathbf {S5}$ modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.</description><issn>1755-0203</issn><issn>1755-0211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j8FOwzAMhiMEEmPwAEgc9gIFO26T9FhVBSp12sS6c5S0CdrEGErgwNuTwcQFCV9s-f8_yz9j1wi3CCjvViiLAjgQh1SEdMImh1UGHPH0dwY6ZxcxbgEE56Qm7KZZtqu-mbf1bL7u-rar-uap6mbd4qGtL9mZNy_RXR37lK3vm75-zL7VqssGIv6ecVRCgSq4gSH3tuRGOI_IUVrrnVQl5bkwo7HJJ2Vpko5udI4EFMkz0JThz90h7GMMzuu3sNmZ8KkR9CGe_hMvMXRkzM6Gzfjs9Hb_EV7Tn_9QX5NKTK4</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>INCURVATI, LUCA</creator><creator>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</title><author>INCURVATI, LUCA ; SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-218680852a0c4fb92a6ef11217bbfe7893446adab186779a2a61edee360517bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>INCURVATI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The review of symbolic logic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>INCURVATI, LUCA</au><au>SCHLÖDER, JULIAN J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC</atitle><jtitle>The review of symbolic logic</jtitle><addtitle>The Review of Symbolic Logic</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>505-536</pages><issn>1755-0203</issn><eissn>1755-0211</eissn><abstract>We present epistemic multilateral logic, a general logical framework for reasoning involving epistemic modality. Standard bilateral systems use propositional formulae marked with signs for assertion and rejection. Epistemic multilateral logic extends standard bilateral systems with a sign for the speech act of weak assertion (Incurvati &amp; Schlöder, 2019) and an operator for epistemic modality. We prove that epistemic multilateral logic is sound and complete with respect to the modal logic $\mathbf {S5}$ modulo an appropriate translation. The logical framework developed provides the basis for a novel, proof-theoretic approach to the study of epistemic modality. To demonstrate the fruitfulness of the approach, we show how the framework allows us to reconcile classical logic with the contradictoriness of so-called Yalcin sentences and to distinguish between various inference patterns on the basis of the epistemic properties they preserve.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1755020320000313</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-0203
ispartof The review of symbolic logic, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.505-536
issn 1755-0203
1755-0211
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755020320000313
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
title EPISTEMIC MULTILATERAL LOGIC
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EPISTEMIC%20MULTILATERAL%20LOGIC&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20symbolic%20logic&rft.au=INCURVATI,%20LUCA&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=505-536&rft.issn=1755-0203&rft.eissn=1755-0211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1755020320000313&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S1755020320000313%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1755020320000313&rfr_iscdi=true