The “Legacy Problem” and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and the Philippines

New democracies face the arduous task of determining how to deal with gross human rights violations committed during their authoritarian pasts, or the “torturer problem,” to quote Samuel P. Huntington (1991). A new democracy can enhance its legitimacy if it brings human rights violators to justice,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of East Asian studies 2003-04, Vol.3 (1), p.43-74
1. Verfasser: Lee, Nae Young
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Journal of East Asian studies
container_volume 3
creator Lee, Nae Young
description New democracies face the arduous task of determining how to deal with gross human rights violations committed during their authoritarian pasts, or the “torturer problem,” to quote Samuel P. Huntington (1991). A new democracy can enhance its legitimacy if it brings human rights violators to justice, thus demonstrating the supremacy of democratic values, including the rule of law. By ensuring that no wrongdoer will go unpunished, the democratic regime prevents the danger of a future military coup d'état and future human rights abuses. Equally critical, it strengthens the power base of democratic forces by delegitimizing or even occasioning a purge of key authoritarian leaders, who often wield influence within the institutions of power, including the military, even after democratic transition. Punishing past wrongdoings constitutes an act of preempting a democratic reversal. In this sense, the question of the past becomes a struggle over power with today's authoritarian forces and for the future of third-wave democracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1598240800001119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1598240800001119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1598240800001119</cupid><jstor_id>23417740</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23417740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1560-4a9fe95e7d2910b38e3290da50bf153bdff11e9862a51d78e17227bcc316d3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsP4ELIC4zmJvOXpdRfLFhoBXdDJrnTpsxMSjJduOuD6Mv1SZza4kbwbi6Xc88H5xByCewaGGQ3U0hkzmOWs34AQB6RAecijtI0FsdksJOjnX5KzkJYMsZTycWAvM8WSLebzzHOlf6gE-_KGpvt5ouq1tA7bJz2qrOajlwbXG1Nf7iW2pZO3bpb0BfnUf38dj1osrC1Xa1si-GcnFSqDnhx2EPy9nA_Gz1F49fH59HtONKQpCyKlaxQJpgZLoGVIkfBJTMqYWUFiShNVQGgzFOuEjBZjpBxnpVaC0iNwFIMCey52rsQPFbFyttG-Y8CWLGrpvhTTe-52nuWoXP-19DXBVkWs14XB6ZqSm_NHIulW_u2z_EP9RuMKXD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Legacy Problem” and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and the Philippines</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Lee, Nae Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nae Young</creatorcontrib><description>New democracies face the arduous task of determining how to deal with gross human rights violations committed during their authoritarian pasts, or the “torturer problem,” to quote Samuel P. Huntington (1991). A new democracy can enhance its legitimacy if it brings human rights violators to justice, thus demonstrating the supremacy of democratic values, including the rule of law. By ensuring that no wrongdoer will go unpunished, the democratic regime prevents the danger of a future military coup d'état and future human rights abuses. Equally critical, it strengthens the power base of democratic forces by delegitimizing or even occasioning a purge of key authoritarian leaders, who often wield influence within the institutions of power, including the military, even after democratic transition. Punishing past wrongdoings constitutes an act of preempting a democratic reversal. In this sense, the question of the past becomes a struggle over power with today's authoritarian forces and for the future of third-wave democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1598-2408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1598240800001119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Criminal investigation ; Criminal prosecution ; Democracy ; Human rights ; Human rights violations ; Legacies ; Massacres ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Political parties</subject><ispartof>Journal of East Asian studies, 2003-04, Vol.3 (1), p.43-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright © East Asia Institute</rights><rights>2003 East Asia Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1560-4a9fe95e7d2910b38e3290da50bf153bdff11e9862a51d78e17227bcc316d3eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1560-4a9fe95e7d2910b38e3290da50bf153bdff11e9862a51d78e17227bcc316d3eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23417740$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23417740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nae Young</creatorcontrib><title>The “Legacy Problem” and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and the Philippines</title><title>Journal of East Asian studies</title><addtitle>Journal of East Asian Studies</addtitle><description>New democracies face the arduous task of determining how to deal with gross human rights violations committed during their authoritarian pasts, or the “torturer problem,” to quote Samuel P. Huntington (1991). A new democracy can enhance its legitimacy if it brings human rights violators to justice, thus demonstrating the supremacy of democratic values, including the rule of law. By ensuring that no wrongdoer will go unpunished, the democratic regime prevents the danger of a future military coup d'état and future human rights abuses. Equally critical, it strengthens the power base of democratic forces by delegitimizing or even occasioning a purge of key authoritarian leaders, who often wield influence within the institutions of power, including the military, even after democratic transition. Punishing past wrongdoings constitutes an act of preempting a democratic reversal. In this sense, the question of the past becomes a struggle over power with today's authoritarian forces and for the future of third-wave democracy.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Criminal investigation</subject><subject>Criminal prosecution</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Human rights violations</subject><subject>Legacies</subject><subject>Massacres</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><issn>1598-2408</issn><issn>2234-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsP4ELIC4zmJvOXpdRfLFhoBXdDJrnTpsxMSjJduOuD6Mv1SZza4kbwbi6Xc88H5xByCewaGGQ3U0hkzmOWs34AQB6RAecijtI0FsdksJOjnX5KzkJYMsZTycWAvM8WSLebzzHOlf6gE-_KGpvt5ouq1tA7bJz2qrOajlwbXG1Nf7iW2pZO3bpb0BfnUf38dj1osrC1Xa1si-GcnFSqDnhx2EPy9nA_Gz1F49fH59HtONKQpCyKlaxQJpgZLoGVIkfBJTMqYWUFiShNVQGgzFOuEjBZjpBxnpVaC0iNwFIMCey52rsQPFbFyttG-Y8CWLGrpvhTTe-52nuWoXP-19DXBVkWs14XB6ZqSm_NHIulW_u2z_EP9RuMKXD0</recordid><startdate>200304</startdate><enddate>200304</enddate><creator>Lee, Nae Young</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Lynne Rienner Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200304</creationdate><title>The “Legacy Problem” and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and the Philippines</title><author>Lee, Nae Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1560-4a9fe95e7d2910b38e3290da50bf153bdff11e9862a51d78e17227bcc316d3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Criminal investigation</topic><topic>Criminal prosecution</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Human rights violations</topic><topic>Legacies</topic><topic>Massacres</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nae Young</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of East Asian studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Nae Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The “Legacy Problem” and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and the Philippines</atitle><jtitle>Journal of East Asian studies</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of East Asian Studies</addtitle><date>2003-04</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>43-74</pages><issn>1598-2408</issn><eissn>2234-6643</eissn><abstract>New democracies face the arduous task of determining how to deal with gross human rights violations committed during their authoritarian pasts, or the “torturer problem,” to quote Samuel P. Huntington (1991). A new democracy can enhance its legitimacy if it brings human rights violators to justice, thus demonstrating the supremacy of democratic values, including the rule of law. By ensuring that no wrongdoer will go unpunished, the democratic regime prevents the danger of a future military coup d'état and future human rights abuses. Equally critical, it strengthens the power base of democratic forces by delegitimizing or even occasioning a purge of key authoritarian leaders, who often wield influence within the institutions of power, including the military, even after democratic transition. Punishing past wrongdoings constitutes an act of preempting a democratic reversal. In this sense, the question of the past becomes a struggle over power with today's authoritarian forces and for the future of third-wave democracy.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1598240800001119</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1598-2408
ispartof Journal of East Asian studies, 2003-04, Vol.3 (1), p.43-74
issn 1598-2408
2234-6643
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1598240800001119
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Authoritarianism
Criminal investigation
Criminal prosecution
Democracy
Human rights
Human rights violations
Legacies
Massacres
Nongovernmental organizations
Political parties
title The “Legacy Problem” and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and the Philippines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T12%3A14%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CLegacy%20Problem%E2%80%9D%20and%20Democratic%20Consolidation%20in%20South%20Korea%20and%20the%20Philippines&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20East%20Asian%20studies&rft.au=Lee,%20Nae%20Young&rft.date=2003-04&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=43-74&rft.issn=1598-2408&rft.eissn=2234-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1598240800001119&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23417740%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1598240800001119&rft_jstor_id=23417740&rfr_iscdi=true