Infringement Actions 2.0: How to Protect EU Values before the Court of Justice
Infringement actions and EU values – constitutional backsliding in Hungary and Poland – the role of the Court of Justice – judicial independence and Article 19 TEU – the Charter of Fundamental Rights – the toolkit to protect EU values – political and judicial mechanisms – a bottom-up approach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European constitutional law review 2022-03, Vol.18 (1), p.30-58 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | European constitutional law review |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Bonelli, Matteo |
description | Infringement actions and EU values – constitutional backsliding in Hungary and Poland – the role of the Court of Justice – judicial independence and Article 19 TEU – the Charter of Fundamental Rights – the toolkit to protect EU values – political and judicial mechanisms – a bottom-up approach |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1574019622000049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1574019622000049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1574019622000049</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230518088592</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2671903825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2858e09b53e53df495fd713783d2c72af89338f06f11a3e6b987485c835976f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFOAjEQ3RhNRPQDvDXxvNh2ttvWGyEoGKImitdm2W2hBLbYlhj_3m7AeDDOZSYzb957M1l2TfCAYMJvXwnjBSaypBSnKORJ1iO8KHLGCDtNdRrn3fw8uwhhnRAEgPWyp2lrvG2XeqvbiIZ1tK4NiA7wHZq4TxQdevEu6jqi8Ry9V5u9DmihjfMaxZVGI7f3ETmDHvch2lpfZmem2gR9dcz9bH4_fhtN8tnzw3Q0nOV1QVnMqWBCY7lgoBk0ppDMNJwAF9DQmtPKCAkgDC4NIRXociEFLwSrBTDJSwPQz24OvDvvPpKnqNbJSZskFS05kRgEZQlFDqjauxC8Nmrn7bbyX4pg1b1N_Xlb2pkcdvzWRlUtbdhFFXTl65WybTq8azu_VI2zHQ0AKX9gFFPAjAgsBJM0UcFRvtouvG2W-tfl_wa-AWyWhE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671903825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infringement Actions 2.0: How to Protect EU Values before the Court of Justice</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Bonelli, Matteo</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonelli, Matteo</creatorcontrib><description>Infringement actions and EU values – constitutional backsliding in Hungary and Poland – the role of the Court of Justice – judicial independence and Article 19 TEU – the Charter of Fundamental Rights – the toolkit to protect EU values – political and judicial mechanisms – a bottom-up approach</description><identifier>ISSN: 1574-0196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5515</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1574019622000049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age discrimination ; Case law ; Central banks ; Charters ; Common markets ; Constitutional law ; Courts ; Fines & penalties ; Human rights ; Infringement ; International obligations ; Judges & magistrates ; Judicial independence ; Judiciary ; Retirement ; Rule of law ; Values</subject><ispartof>European constitutional law review, 2022-03, Vol.18 (1), p.30-58</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with European Constitutional Law Review</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with European Constitutional Law Review. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2858e09b53e53df495fd713783d2c72af89338f06f11a3e6b987485c835976f33</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-2683-2481</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1574019622000049/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,27907,27908,55611</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonelli, Matteo</creatorcontrib><title>Infringement Actions 2.0: How to Protect EU Values before the Court of Justice</title><title>European constitutional law review</title><addtitle>European Constitutional Law Review</addtitle><description>Infringement actions and EU values – constitutional backsliding in Hungary and Poland – the role of the Court of Justice – judicial independence and Article 19 TEU – the Charter of Fundamental Rights – the toolkit to protect EU values – political and judicial mechanisms – a bottom-up approach</description><subject>Age discrimination</subject><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Charters</subject><subject>Common markets</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>International obligations</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Judicial independence</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1574-0196</issn><issn>1744-5515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFOAjEQ3RhNRPQDvDXxvNh2ttvWGyEoGKImitdm2W2hBLbYlhj_3m7AeDDOZSYzb957M1l2TfCAYMJvXwnjBSaypBSnKORJ1iO8KHLGCDtNdRrn3fw8uwhhnRAEgPWyp2lrvG2XeqvbiIZ1tK4NiA7wHZq4TxQdevEu6jqi8Ry9V5u9DmihjfMaxZVGI7f3ETmDHvch2lpfZmem2gR9dcz9bH4_fhtN8tnzw3Q0nOV1QVnMqWBCY7lgoBk0ppDMNJwAF9DQmtPKCAkgDC4NIRXociEFLwSrBTDJSwPQz24OvDvvPpKnqNbJSZskFS05kRgEZQlFDqjauxC8Nmrn7bbyX4pg1b1N_Xlb2pkcdvzWRlUtbdhFFXTl65WybTq8azu_VI2zHQ0AKX9gFFPAjAgsBJM0UcFRvtouvG2W-tfl_wa-AWyWhE8</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Bonelli, Matteo</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2683-2481</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Infringement Actions 2.0: How to Protect EU Values before the Court of Justice</title><author>Bonelli, Matteo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2858e09b53e53df495fd713783d2c72af89338f06f11a3e6b987485c835976f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age discrimination</topic><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Charters</topic><topic>Common markets</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>International obligations</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Judicial independence</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonelli, Matteo</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonelli, Matteo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infringement Actions 2.0: How to Protect EU Values before the Court of Justice</atitle><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle><addtitle>European Constitutional Law Review</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>30-58</pages><issn>1574-0196</issn><eissn>1744-5515</eissn><abstract>Infringement actions and EU values – constitutional backsliding in Hungary and Poland – the role of the Court of Justice – judicial independence and Article 19 TEU – the Charter of Fundamental Rights – the toolkit to protect EU values – political and judicial mechanisms – a bottom-up approach</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1574019622000049</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2683-2481</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1574-0196 |
ispartof | European constitutional law review, 2022-03, Vol.18 (1), p.30-58 |
issn | 1574-0196 1744-5515 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1574019622000049 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Age discrimination Case law Central banks Charters Common markets Constitutional law Courts Fines & penalties Human rights Infringement International obligations Judges & magistrates Judicial independence Judiciary Retirement Rule of law Values |
title | Infringement Actions 2.0: How to Protect EU Values before the Court of Justice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infringement%20Actions%202.0:%20How%20to%20Protect%20EU%20Values%20before%20the%20Court%20of%20Justice&rft.jtitle=European%20constitutional%20law%20review&rft.au=Bonelli,%20Matteo&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=30-58&rft.issn=1574-0196&rft.eissn=1744-5515&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1574019622000049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671903825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671903825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1574019622000049&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230518088592&rfr_iscdi=true |