Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration

European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European constitutional law review 2017-12, Vol.13 (4), p.641-672
Hauptverfasser: Dragos, Dacian, Neamtu, Bogdana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 672
container_issue 4
container_start_page 641
container_title European constitutional law review
container_volume 13
creator Dragos, Dacian
Neamtu, Bogdana
description European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S157401961700030X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S157401961700030X</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S157401961700030X</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230614089965</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1971753621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-84383da41667d20121a74e4009b32e38e34197023e160971762ea0fc096840c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UV1r3DAQNKWFpkl_QN8EfY3TXUuW7L6FNF_lSCBpoG9CZ60vCifrKtmB_J7-0cq5SwmUPu2wOzsz7BbFJ4QjBFRfbrFWArCVqACAw883xR4qIcq6xvptxnlczvP3xYeUHgAEcl7vFb_PIpENnoWeXQ59iN6MLgzMDWy8J3Z694K8s2mcWQtamTW7mdaUDtn3Kbq0iZOloSNmBsuu_XKyf1tftypTDBsyw27oMzKJfaNHWud-nFWvsnOawXkIlh1b7waXxvgc5qB415t1oo-7ul_cnZ3-OLkoF9fnlyfHi7ITAsayEbzh1giUUtkKsEKjBAmAdskr4g1xga2CihNKaBUqWZGBvoNWNgI6wfeLz1vdTQy_JkqjfghTHLKlxplfc1lhZuGW1cWQUqReb6LzJj5pBD3_Qv_zi7xzsd2J3o3arPLNRp3IxO5eu-er53aIK22Dm2U4R_lCq3JikCigaVtZZym-szd-GZ1d0auU_w3wB_MEo80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1971753621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Dragos, Dacian ; Neamtu, Bogdana</creator><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian ; Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><description>European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts</description><identifier>ISSN: 1574-0196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5515</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S157401961700030X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Ambiguity ; Case law ; Constitutional law ; Courts ; Decision making ; European Council ; Freedom of information ; Governance ; Human rights ; Initiatives ; Investigations ; Jurisprudence ; Legal norms ; Legality ; Management ; Ombudsman programs ; Rule of law ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>European constitutional law review, 2017-12, Vol.13 (4), p.641-672</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-84383da41667d20121a74e4009b32e38e34197023e160971762ea0fc096840c43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S157401961700030X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><title>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</title><title>European constitutional law review</title><addtitle>European Constitutional Law Review</addtitle><description>European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>European Council</subject><subject>Freedom of information</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Legal norms</subject><subject>Legality</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Ombudsman programs</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1574-0196</issn><issn>1744-5515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UV1r3DAQNKWFpkl_QN8EfY3TXUuW7L6FNF_lSCBpoG9CZ60vCifrKtmB_J7-0cq5SwmUPu2wOzsz7BbFJ4QjBFRfbrFWArCVqACAw883xR4qIcq6xvptxnlczvP3xYeUHgAEcl7vFb_PIpENnoWeXQ59iN6MLgzMDWy8J3Z694K8s2mcWQtamTW7mdaUDtn3Kbq0iZOloSNmBsuu_XKyf1tftypTDBsyw27oMzKJfaNHWud-nFWvsnOawXkIlh1b7waXxvgc5qB415t1oo-7ul_cnZ3-OLkoF9fnlyfHi7ITAsayEbzh1giUUtkKsEKjBAmAdskr4g1xga2CihNKaBUqWZGBvoNWNgI6wfeLz1vdTQy_JkqjfghTHLKlxplfc1lhZuGW1cWQUqReb6LzJj5pBD3_Qv_zi7xzsd2J3o3arPLNRp3IxO5eu-er53aIK22Dm2U4R_lCq3JikCigaVtZZym-szd-GZ1d0auU_w3wB_MEo80</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Dragos, Dacian</creator><creator>Neamtu, Bogdana</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</title><author>Dragos, Dacian ; Neamtu, Bogdana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-84383da41667d20121a74e4009b32e38e34197023e160971762ea0fc096840c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>European Council</topic><topic>Freedom of information</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Legal norms</topic><topic>Legality</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Ombudsman programs</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dragos, Dacian</au><au>Neamtu, Bogdana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</atitle><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle><addtitle>European Constitutional Law Review</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>641-672</pages><issn>1574-0196</issn><eissn>1744-5515</eissn><abstract>European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S157401961700030X</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1574-0196
ispartof European constitutional law review, 2017-12, Vol.13 (4), p.641-672
issn 1574-0196
1744-5515
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S157401961700030X
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Access to information
Ambiguity
Case law
Constitutional law
Courts
Decision making
European Council
Freedom of information
Governance
Human rights
Initiatives
Investigations
Jurisprudence
Legal norms
Legality
Management
Ombudsman programs
Rule of law
Transparency
title Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A01%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freedom%20of%20Information%20in%20the%20EU%20in%20the%20midst%20of%20Legal%20Rules,%20Jurisprudence%20and%20Ombudsprudence:%20the%20European%20Ombudsman%20as%20Developer%20of%20Norms%20of%20Good%20Administration&rft.jtitle=European%20constitutional%20law%20review&rft.au=Dragos,%20Dacian&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=641-672&rft.issn=1574-0196&rft.eissn=1744-5515&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S157401961700030X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1971753621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1971753621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S157401961700030X&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230614089965&rfr_iscdi=true