Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration
European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European constitutional law review 2017-12, Vol.13 (4), p.641-672 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 672 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 641 |
container_title | European constitutional law review |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Dragos, Dacian Neamtu, Bogdana |
description | European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S157401961700030X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S157401961700030X</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S157401961700030X</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230614089965</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1971753621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-84383da41667d20121a74e4009b32e38e34197023e160971762ea0fc096840c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UV1r3DAQNKWFpkl_QN8EfY3TXUuW7L6FNF_lSCBpoG9CZ60vCifrKtmB_J7-0cq5SwmUPu2wOzsz7BbFJ4QjBFRfbrFWArCVqACAw883xR4qIcq6xvptxnlczvP3xYeUHgAEcl7vFb_PIpENnoWeXQ59iN6MLgzMDWy8J3Z694K8s2mcWQtamTW7mdaUDtn3Kbq0iZOloSNmBsuu_XKyf1tftypTDBsyw27oMzKJfaNHWud-nFWvsnOawXkIlh1b7waXxvgc5qB415t1oo-7ul_cnZ3-OLkoF9fnlyfHi7ITAsayEbzh1giUUtkKsEKjBAmAdskr4g1xga2CihNKaBUqWZGBvoNWNgI6wfeLz1vdTQy_JkqjfghTHLKlxplfc1lhZuGW1cWQUqReb6LzJj5pBD3_Qv_zi7xzsd2J3o3arPLNRp3IxO5eu-er53aIK22Dm2U4R_lCq3JikCigaVtZZym-szd-GZ1d0auU_w3wB_MEo80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1971753621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Dragos, Dacian ; Neamtu, Bogdana</creator><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian ; Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><description>European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts</description><identifier>ISSN: 1574-0196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5515</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S157401961700030X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Ambiguity ; Case law ; Constitutional law ; Courts ; Decision making ; European Council ; Freedom of information ; Governance ; Human rights ; Initiatives ; Investigations ; Jurisprudence ; Legal norms ; Legality ; Management ; Ombudsman programs ; Rule of law ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>European constitutional law review, 2017-12, Vol.13 (4), p.641-672</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-84383da41667d20121a74e4009b32e38e34197023e160971762ea0fc096840c43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S157401961700030X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><title>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</title><title>European constitutional law review</title><addtitle>European Constitutional Law Review</addtitle><description>European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>European Council</subject><subject>Freedom of information</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Legal norms</subject><subject>Legality</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Ombudsman programs</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1574-0196</issn><issn>1744-5515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UV1r3DAQNKWFpkl_QN8EfY3TXUuW7L6FNF_lSCBpoG9CZ60vCifrKtmB_J7-0cq5SwmUPu2wOzsz7BbFJ4QjBFRfbrFWArCVqACAw883xR4qIcq6xvptxnlczvP3xYeUHgAEcl7vFb_PIpENnoWeXQ59iN6MLgzMDWy8J3Z694K8s2mcWQtamTW7mdaUDtn3Kbq0iZOloSNmBsuu_XKyf1tftypTDBsyw27oMzKJfaNHWud-nFWvsnOawXkIlh1b7waXxvgc5qB415t1oo-7ul_cnZ3-OLkoF9fnlyfHi7ITAsayEbzh1giUUtkKsEKjBAmAdskr4g1xga2CihNKaBUqWZGBvoNWNgI6wfeLz1vdTQy_JkqjfghTHLKlxplfc1lhZuGW1cWQUqReb6LzJj5pBD3_Qv_zi7xzsd2J3o3arPLNRp3IxO5eu-er53aIK22Dm2U4R_lCq3JikCigaVtZZym-szd-GZ1d0auU_w3wB_MEo80</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Dragos, Dacian</creator><creator>Neamtu, Bogdana</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</title><author>Dragos, Dacian ; Neamtu, Bogdana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-84383da41667d20121a74e4009b32e38e34197023e160971762ea0fc096840c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>European Council</topic><topic>Freedom of information</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Legal norms</topic><topic>Legality</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Ombudsman programs</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Dacian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neamtu, Bogdana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dragos, Dacian</au><au>Neamtu, Bogdana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration</atitle><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle><addtitle>European Constitutional Law Review</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>641-672</pages><issn>1574-0196</issn><eissn>1744-5515</eissn><abstract>European Ombudsman – Free access to information in the EU – Regulation No 1049/2001– Standard of assessment used by European Ombudsman – Legal norms versus norms of good administration and whether good administration can be understood outside legality – European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour and the rather ambiguous concept of maladministration – European Ombudsman as developer of norms of good administration in the area of free access to information – A rather limited role as developer of norms of good administration for the European Ombudsman in individual decisions – Role in ‘translating’ the case law into somewhat more accessible jargon and explaining how existing principles and norms of good governance apply to the circumstances of a specific case – Own inquiries as a policy instrument for advising EU institutions and agencies on how to deal with certain aspects pertaining to access to documents and transparency – Interesting interplay between European Ombudsman and the courts</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S157401961700030X</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1574-0196 |
ispartof | European constitutional law review, 2017-12, Vol.13 (4), p.641-672 |
issn | 1574-0196 1744-5515 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S157401961700030X |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Access to information Ambiguity Case law Constitutional law Courts Decision making European Council Freedom of information Governance Human rights Initiatives Investigations Jurisprudence Legal norms Legality Management Ombudsman programs Rule of law Transparency |
title | Freedom of Information in the EU in the midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: the European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A01%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freedom%20of%20Information%20in%20the%20EU%20in%20the%20midst%20of%20Legal%20Rules,%20Jurisprudence%20and%20Ombudsprudence:%20the%20European%20Ombudsman%20as%20Developer%20of%20Norms%20of%20Good%20Administration&rft.jtitle=European%20constitutional%20law%20review&rft.au=Dragos,%20Dacian&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=641-672&rft.issn=1574-0196&rft.eissn=1744-5515&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S157401961700030X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1971753621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1971753621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S157401961700030X&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230614089965&rfr_iscdi=true |