An SEM Analysis Of Amphipleura pellucida with New Findings

For many years, as long ago as 1872, the Amphipleura pellucida (Ap) diatom striae and punctae have been an intense object for measuring the quality of resolution of the light microscope (LM). More recent publications have also referenced Ap and the difficulty of resolving its punctae. Thus, from 187...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microscopy today 2007-05, Vol.15 (3), p.12-17
1. Verfasser: Gaugler, Gary
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 3
container_start_page 12
container_title Microscopy today
container_volume 15
creator Gaugler, Gary
description For many years, as long ago as 1872, the Amphipleura pellucida (Ap) diatom striae and punctae have been an intense object for measuring the quality of resolution of the light microscope (LM). More recent publications have also referenced Ap and the difficulty of resolving its punctae. Thus, from 1872 to 1947,much attention was directed towards Ap but without paying much attention to its detailed valve structure. This was probably due to lack of resolution of LM to reveal the details for the Ap punctae (pores). Work by Stoermer and Pankratz did TEM analysis of Ap in 1964. While their results and mine do not agree, this could be attributed to specimen preparation and the source of the diatoms. However, there is an heretofore unresolved issue about the physical differences of Ap from different geographic locations. My current work should resolve this issue. This started as a challenge about whether Ap could be selectively oriented inside up or inside down.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1551929500055498
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1551929500055498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1551929500055498</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1551929500055498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1298-7cc0cb3d86d32bc225a90c0b85e495e0b90f6e6d649fa620eefd45fbf59ac6073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j99KwzAchYMoOOYewLu8QPWXtEkT78rYdDDdxfS65O-W0XYlsYy9vSvuTvDqXJzzHfgQeiTwRICUz1vCGJFUMgBgrJDiBk0oYZDlTOS3aDLW2djfo1lKBxhnRSl4MUEvVYe3i3dcdao5p5DwxuOq7fehb9wQFe5d0wwmWIVP4XuPP9wJL0NnQ7dLD-jOqya52TWn6Gu5-Jy_ZevN62perTNDqBRZaQwYnVvBbU61oZQpCQa0YK6QzIGW4LnjlhfSK07BOW8L5rVnUhkOZT5F5PfXxGNK0fm6j6FV8VwTqEf_-o__hcmvjGp1DHbn6sNxiBfJ9A_1Aw-jW5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>An SEM Analysis Of Amphipleura pellucida with New Findings</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gaugler, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaugler, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>For many years, as long ago as 1872, the Amphipleura pellucida (Ap) diatom striae and punctae have been an intense object for measuring the quality of resolution of the light microscope (LM). More recent publications have also referenced Ap and the difficulty of resolving its punctae. Thus, from 1872 to 1947,much attention was directed towards Ap but without paying much attention to its detailed valve structure. This was probably due to lack of resolution of LM to reveal the details for the Ap punctae (pores). Work by Stoermer and Pankratz did TEM analysis of Ap in 1964. While their results and mine do not agree, this could be attributed to specimen preparation and the source of the diatoms. However, there is an heretofore unresolved issue about the physical differences of Ap from different geographic locations. My current work should resolve this issue. This started as a challenge about whether Ap could be selectively oriented inside up or inside down.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-3583</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1551929500055498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>Microscopy today, 2007-05, Vol.15 (3), p.12-17</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2007</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaugler, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>An SEM Analysis Of Amphipleura pellucida with New Findings</title><title>Microscopy today</title><addtitle>Micros. Today</addtitle><description>For many years, as long ago as 1872, the Amphipleura pellucida (Ap) diatom striae and punctae have been an intense object for measuring the quality of resolution of the light microscope (LM). More recent publications have also referenced Ap and the difficulty of resolving its punctae. Thus, from 1872 to 1947,much attention was directed towards Ap but without paying much attention to its detailed valve structure. This was probably due to lack of resolution of LM to reveal the details for the Ap punctae (pores). Work by Stoermer and Pankratz did TEM analysis of Ap in 1964. While their results and mine do not agree, this could be attributed to specimen preparation and the source of the diatoms. However, there is an heretofore unresolved issue about the physical differences of Ap from different geographic locations. My current work should resolve this issue. This started as a challenge about whether Ap could be selectively oriented inside up or inside down.</description><issn>1551-9295</issn><issn>2150-3583</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j99KwzAchYMoOOYewLu8QPWXtEkT78rYdDDdxfS65O-W0XYlsYy9vSvuTvDqXJzzHfgQeiTwRICUz1vCGJFUMgBgrJDiBk0oYZDlTOS3aDLW2djfo1lKBxhnRSl4MUEvVYe3i3dcdao5p5DwxuOq7fehb9wQFe5d0wwmWIVP4XuPP9wJL0NnQ7dLD-jOqya52TWn6Gu5-Jy_ZevN62perTNDqBRZaQwYnVvBbU61oZQpCQa0YK6QzIGW4LnjlhfSK07BOW8L5rVnUhkOZT5F5PfXxGNK0fm6j6FV8VwTqEf_-o__hcmvjGp1DHbn6sNxiBfJ9A_1Aw-jW5o</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>Gaugler, Gary</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>An SEM Analysis Of Amphipleura pellucida with New Findings</title><author>Gaugler, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1298-7cc0cb3d86d32bc225a90c0b85e495e0b90f6e6d649fa620eefd45fbf59ac6073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaugler, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Microscopy today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaugler, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An SEM Analysis Of Amphipleura pellucida with New Findings</atitle><jtitle>Microscopy today</jtitle><addtitle>Micros. Today</addtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>12-17</pages><issn>1551-9295</issn><eissn>2150-3583</eissn><abstract>For many years, as long ago as 1872, the Amphipleura pellucida (Ap) diatom striae and punctae have been an intense object for measuring the quality of resolution of the light microscope (LM). More recent publications have also referenced Ap and the difficulty of resolving its punctae. Thus, from 1872 to 1947,much attention was directed towards Ap but without paying much attention to its detailed valve structure. This was probably due to lack of resolution of LM to reveal the details for the Ap punctae (pores). Work by Stoermer and Pankratz did TEM analysis of Ap in 1964. While their results and mine do not agree, this could be attributed to specimen preparation and the source of the diatoms. However, there is an heretofore unresolved issue about the physical differences of Ap from different geographic locations. My current work should resolve this issue. This started as a challenge about whether Ap could be selectively oriented inside up or inside down.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1551929500055498</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-9295
ispartof Microscopy today, 2007-05, Vol.15 (3), p.12-17
issn 1551-9295
2150-3583
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1551929500055498
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title An SEM Analysis Of Amphipleura pellucida with New Findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20SEM%20Analysis%20Of%20Amphipleura%20pellucida%20with%20New%20Findings&rft.jtitle=Microscopy%20today&rft.au=Gaugler,%20Gary&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=12-17&rft.issn=1551-9295&rft.eissn=2150-3583&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1551929500055498&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S1551929500055498%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1551929500055498&rfr_iscdi=true