Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations
I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospher...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Highlights of astronomy 1977, Vol.4 (2), p.143-154 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 143 |
container_title | Highlights of astronomy |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Thomas, Richard N. |
description | I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as:
(1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1539299600003245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1539299600003245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1539299600003245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-5978dbd145f4027dab76c6dbb194919f365ce411dd51ccdb04af4b36e492faa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplT8tOwzAQ9AEkqtIP6C0_YPDGr7o3iKAgBXFo75HttYVRSZBdhPh7HODGXmY1MxrNELIGdgUM9PUeJDetMYrV462QZ2QxU3TmLsiqlNcqgGJKA1uQ7e30MaLNX003jZhOaRpL85lOL82TLYX2UynbZhfGkO1xtpSE9f2xXZLzaI8lrP5wSQ73d4fugfbPu8fupqd-IyWVRm_QIQgZBWs1WqeVV-gcGGHARK6kDwIAUYL36JiwUTiugjBttFbyJYHfWJ9rmRzi8J7TW208ABvmycO_yfwbk7hK-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thomas, Richard N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><description>I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as:
(1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-2996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1539299600003245</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Highlights of astronomy, 1977, Vol.4 (2), p.143-154</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-5978dbd145f4027dab76c6dbb194919f365ce411dd51ccdb04af4b36e492faa53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><title>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</title><title>Highlights of astronomy</title><description>I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as:
(1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.</description><issn>1539-2996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplT8tOwzAQ9AEkqtIP6C0_YPDGr7o3iKAgBXFo75HttYVRSZBdhPh7HODGXmY1MxrNELIGdgUM9PUeJDetMYrV462QZ2QxU3TmLsiqlNcqgGJKA1uQ7e30MaLNX003jZhOaRpL85lOL82TLYX2UynbZhfGkO1xtpSE9f2xXZLzaI8lrP5wSQ73d4fugfbPu8fupqd-IyWVRm_QIQgZBWs1WqeVV-gcGGHARK6kDwIAUYL36JiwUTiugjBttFbyJYHfWJ9rmRzi8J7TW208ABvmycO_yfwbk7hK-w</recordid><startdate>1977</startdate><enddate>1977</enddate><creator>Thomas, Richard N.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1977</creationdate><title>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</title><author>Thomas, Richard N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-5978dbd145f4027dab76c6dbb194919f365ce411dd51ccdb04af4b36e492faa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Highlights of astronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Richard N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Highlights of astronomy</jtitle><date>1977</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>143-154</pages><issn>1539-2996</issn><abstract>I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as:
(1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.</abstract><doi>10.1017/S1539299600003245</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1539-2996 |
ispartof | Highlights of astronomy, 1977, Vol.4 (2), p.143-154 |
issn | 1539-2996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1539299600003245 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A19%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boundary%20Conditions%20with%20Mass-Loss:%20General%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Highlights%20of%20astronomy&rft.au=Thomas,%20Richard%20N.&rft.date=1977&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=143-154&rft.issn=1539-2996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1539299600003245&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S1539299600003245%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |