Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations

I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospher...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Highlights of astronomy 1977, Vol.4 (2), p.143-154
1. Verfasser: Thomas, Richard N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 154
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
container_title Highlights of astronomy
container_volume 4
creator Thomas, Richard N.
description I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as: (1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1539299600003245
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1539299600003245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1539299600003245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-5978dbd145f4027dab76c6dbb194919f365ce411dd51ccdb04af4b36e492faa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplT8tOwzAQ9AEkqtIP6C0_YPDGr7o3iKAgBXFo75HttYVRSZBdhPh7HODGXmY1MxrNELIGdgUM9PUeJDetMYrV462QZ2QxU3TmLsiqlNcqgGJKA1uQ7e30MaLNX003jZhOaRpL85lOL82TLYX2UynbZhfGkO1xtpSE9f2xXZLzaI8lrP5wSQ73d4fugfbPu8fupqd-IyWVRm_QIQgZBWs1WqeVV-gcGGHARK6kDwIAUYL36JiwUTiugjBttFbyJYHfWJ9rmRzi8J7TW208ABvmycO_yfwbk7hK-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thomas, Richard N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><description>I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as: (1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-2996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1539299600003245</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Highlights of astronomy, 1977, Vol.4 (2), p.143-154</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-5978dbd145f4027dab76c6dbb194919f365ce411dd51ccdb04af4b36e492faa53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><title>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</title><title>Highlights of astronomy</title><description>I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as: (1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.</description><issn>1539-2996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplT8tOwzAQ9AEkqtIP6C0_YPDGr7o3iKAgBXFo75HttYVRSZBdhPh7HODGXmY1MxrNELIGdgUM9PUeJDetMYrV462QZ2QxU3TmLsiqlNcqgGJKA1uQ7e30MaLNX003jZhOaRpL85lOL82TLYX2UynbZhfGkO1xtpSE9f2xXZLzaI8lrP5wSQ73d4fugfbPu8fupqd-IyWVRm_QIQgZBWs1WqeVV-gcGGHARK6kDwIAUYL36JiwUTiugjBttFbyJYHfWJ9rmRzi8J7TW208ABvmycO_yfwbk7hK-w</recordid><startdate>1977</startdate><enddate>1977</enddate><creator>Thomas, Richard N.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1977</creationdate><title>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</title><author>Thomas, Richard N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-5978dbd145f4027dab76c6dbb194919f365ce411dd51ccdb04af4b36e492faa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Highlights of astronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Richard N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Highlights of astronomy</jtitle><date>1977</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>143-154</pages><issn>1539-2996</issn><abstract>I begin by stating very explicitly and unambiguously that I completely disagree with any idea that a stellar atmosphere can be in any sense a boundary of the star, or that the atmosphere sets boundary conditions on stellar structure. Such an idea is what underlies all the single-layer, LTE atmospheric models, which misdirected atmospheric studies for so many years by introducing a false separation between “normal” and “extended” atmospheric phenomena. On the contrary, I assert that a more correct physical picture for the atmosphere than as a boundary comes from the characterization of star and atmosphere as: (1) The STAR is: a concentration of matter and energy, C (M, E), in its parental environment, the interstellar medium (ISM); with boundary conditions on stellar structure being set by the way one models (a) storage modes for matter and energy in the star and ISM, and (b) energy generation in the star.</abstract><doi>10.1017/S1539299600003245</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1539-2996
ispartof Highlights of astronomy, 1977, Vol.4 (2), p.143-154
issn 1539-2996
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1539299600003245
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Boundary Conditions with Mass-Loss: General Considerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A19%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boundary%20Conditions%20with%20Mass-Loss:%20General%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Highlights%20of%20astronomy&rft.au=Thomas,%20Richard%20N.&rft.date=1977&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=143-154&rft.issn=1539-2996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1539299600003245&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S1539299600003245%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true