Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms
With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theory and practice of logic programming 2019-03, Vol.19 (2), p.109-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Theory and practice of logic programming |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN SCHULZ, CLAUDIA |
description | With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1471068418000510 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1471068418000510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1471068418000510</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1471068418000510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-717b5953aa3641009c2412a26e133d1a6fc230ea1192b612396b54aa360cabc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4EZO3GSJap4VIpERNt1NHGc4KqJKztd8Pck0B0Sq3ncOVejy9g9wgMCpo8bjFMElcWYAUCCcMEW0yqJJGR4-dNjNOvX7CaEPQAqKeIFo_Uwetec9GjdwEfHx0_Dt2VR8s3RaEsHvg7hZPgk7oLxkfPWDKNpeOE6q3npXeep7-3QcRoa_mEouGGeSvLU2K4Pt-yqpUMwd-e6ZLuX5-3qLSreX9erpyLSIovHKMW0TvJEEkkVI0CuRYyChDIoZYOkWi0kGELMRa1QyFzVSTxfg6ZaK7lk-OurvQvBm7Y6etuT_6oQqjmj6k9GEyPPDPW1t01nqr07-WH68x_qG836aCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN ; SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creator><creatorcontrib>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN ; SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creatorcontrib><description>With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1471068418000510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Editorial ; Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</subject><ispartof>Theory and practice of logic programming, 2019-03, Vol.19 (2), p.109-113</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-717b5953aa3641009c2412a26e133d1a6fc230ea1192b612396b54aa360cabc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1471068418000510/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</title><title>Theory and practice of logic programming</title><addtitle>Theory and Practice of Logic Programming</addtitle><description>With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.</description><subject>Editorial</subject><subject>Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</subject><issn>1471-0684</issn><issn>1475-3081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4EZO3GSJap4VIpERNt1NHGc4KqJKztd8Pck0B0Sq3ncOVejy9g9wgMCpo8bjFMElcWYAUCCcMEW0yqJJGR4-dNjNOvX7CaEPQAqKeIFo_Uwetec9GjdwEfHx0_Dt2VR8s3RaEsHvg7hZPgk7oLxkfPWDKNpeOE6q3npXeep7-3QcRoa_mEouGGeSvLU2K4Pt-yqpUMwd-e6ZLuX5-3qLSreX9erpyLSIovHKMW0TvJEEkkVI0CuRYyChDIoZYOkWi0kGELMRa1QyFzVSTxfg6ZaK7lk-OurvQvBm7Y6etuT_6oQqjmj6k9GEyPPDPW1t01nqr07-WH68x_qG836aCE</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</creator><creator>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</title><author>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN ; SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-717b5953aa3641009c2412a26e133d1a6fc230ea1192b612396b54aa360cabc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Editorial</topic><topic>Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Theory and practice of logic programming</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</au><au>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</atitle><jtitle>Theory and practice of logic programming</jtitle><addtitle>Theory and Practice of Logic Programming</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>109-113</pages><issn>1471-0684</issn><eissn>1475-3081</eissn><abstract>With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1471068418000510</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-0684 |
ispartof | Theory and practice of logic programming, 2019-03, Vol.19 (2), p.109-113 |
issn | 1471-0684 1475-3081 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1471068418000510 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Editorial Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms |
title | Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction%20to%20the%20TPLP%20Special%20Issue%20on%20User-oriented%20Logic%20Programming%20and%20Reasoning%20Paradigms&rft.jtitle=Theory%20and%20practice%20of%20logic%20programming&rft.au=ELLMAUTHALER,%20STEFAN&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=109-113&rft.issn=1471-0684&rft.eissn=1475-3081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1471068418000510&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S1471068418000510%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1471068418000510&rfr_iscdi=true |