Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms

With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theory and practice of logic programming 2019-03, Vol.19 (2), p.109-113
Hauptverfasser: ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN, SCHULZ, CLAUDIA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 2
container_start_page 109
container_title Theory and practice of logic programming
container_volume 19
creator ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN
SCHULZ, CLAUDIA
description With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1471068418000510
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1471068418000510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1471068418000510</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1471068418000510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-717b5953aa3641009c2412a26e133d1a6fc230ea1192b612396b54aa360cabc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4EZO3GSJap4VIpERNt1NHGc4KqJKztd8Pck0B0Sq3ncOVejy9g9wgMCpo8bjFMElcWYAUCCcMEW0yqJJGR4-dNjNOvX7CaEPQAqKeIFo_Uwetec9GjdwEfHx0_Dt2VR8s3RaEsHvg7hZPgk7oLxkfPWDKNpeOE6q3npXeep7-3QcRoa_mEouGGeSvLU2K4Pt-yqpUMwd-e6ZLuX5-3qLSreX9erpyLSIovHKMW0TvJEEkkVI0CuRYyChDIoZYOkWi0kGELMRa1QyFzVSTxfg6ZaK7lk-OurvQvBm7Y6etuT_6oQqjmj6k9GEyPPDPW1t01nqr07-WH68x_qG836aCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN ; SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creator><creatorcontrib>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN ; SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creatorcontrib><description>With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1471068418000510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Editorial ; Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</subject><ispartof>Theory and practice of logic programming, 2019-03, Vol.19 (2), p.109-113</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-717b5953aa3641009c2412a26e133d1a6fc230ea1192b612396b54aa360cabc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1471068418000510/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</title><title>Theory and practice of logic programming</title><addtitle>Theory and Practice of Logic Programming</addtitle><description>With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.</description><subject>Editorial</subject><subject>Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</subject><issn>1471-0684</issn><issn>1475-3081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8A4EZO3GSJap4VIpERNt1NHGc4KqJKztd8Pck0B0Sq3ncOVejy9g9wgMCpo8bjFMElcWYAUCCcMEW0yqJJGR4-dNjNOvX7CaEPQAqKeIFo_Uwetec9GjdwEfHx0_Dt2VR8s3RaEsHvg7hZPgk7oLxkfPWDKNpeOE6q3npXeep7-3QcRoa_mEouGGeSvLU2K4Pt-yqpUMwd-e6ZLuX5-3qLSreX9erpyLSIovHKMW0TvJEEkkVI0CuRYyChDIoZYOkWi0kGELMRa1QyFzVSTxfg6ZaK7lk-OurvQvBm7Y6etuT_6oQqjmj6k9GEyPPDPW1t01nqr07-WH68x_qG836aCE</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</creator><creator>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</title><author>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN ; SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-717b5953aa3641009c2412a26e133d1a6fc230ea1192b612396b54aa360cabc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Editorial</topic><topic>Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Theory and practice of logic programming</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ELLMAUTHALER, STEFAN</au><au>SCHULZ, CLAUDIA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms</atitle><jtitle>Theory and practice of logic programming</jtitle><addtitle>Theory and Practice of Logic Programming</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>109-113</pages><issn>1471-0684</issn><eissn>1475-3081</eissn><abstract>With the rise of machine learning, and more recently the overwhelming interest in deep learning, knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) approaches struggle to maintain their position within the wider Artificial Intelligence (AI) community. Often considered as part of the good old-fashioned AI (Haugeland 1985) – like a memory of glorious old days that have come to an end – many consider KRR as no longer applicable (on its own) to the problems faced by AI today (Blackwell 2015; Garnelo et al. 2016). What they see are logical languages with symbols incomprehensible by most, inference mechanisms that even experts have difficulties tracing and debugging, and the incapability to process unstructured data like text.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1471068418000510</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-0684
ispartof Theory and practice of logic programming, 2019-03, Vol.19 (2), p.109-113
issn 1471-0684
1475-3081
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S1471068418000510
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Editorial
Special Issue on User-Oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms
title Introduction to the TPLP Special Issue on User-oriented Logic Programming and Reasoning Paradigms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction%20to%20the%20TPLP%20Special%20Issue%20on%20User-oriented%20Logic%20Programming%20and%20Reasoning%20Paradigms&rft.jtitle=Theory%20and%20practice%20of%20logic%20programming&rft.au=ELLMAUTHALER,%20STEFAN&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=109-113&rft.issn=1471-0684&rft.eissn=1475-3081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1471068418000510&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S1471068418000510%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1471068418000510&rfr_iscdi=true