Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides
Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenz...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 1997-07, Vol.11 (3), p.591-597 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 597 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 591 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Spandl, E Durgan, B.R Miller, D.W |
| description | Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenzoquat, imazamethabenz, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, and fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA were applied to four- to five-leaf wild oat at 1/2 ×, 3/4 ×, and 1 × rates. Wild oat response to herbicide rate and timing was similar in wheat and barley. Wild oat control with 1/2 × rates generally was less than that with 3/4 × rates, which was lower than or similar to that with 1 × rates. Wild oat biomass was often reduced less with 1/2 × rates than 1 × rates. However, reducing herbicide rates generally did not influence grain yields or net economic return. Grain yields and net economic return were generally greater in herbicide-treated plots than in the nontreated control. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s0890037x00045474 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00045474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988443</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-8235aace4b5fdf6426973f0259865b7b74f7c24a14e919e8fa0c0493b9bbeba73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1q3DAUhUVpodO0D1BoQYsuMgu3Vz8eWcsQ2qQQ6CIJzc5cy1czCh5rkORJ8hJ95niYNKu7-M534B7GPgv4LkCYHxkaC6DMIwDoWhv9hi1EXUMljYa3bHHA1czv3rMPOd8DiJWUsGD__oah5xELPz3b04jcY5lwyV0cS4oDDyPPuxTGNX_Y0CF1k0IJbtpypFzCftouOY497zAN9MRPL2Pqaab7aVhjoiV_CGXDE_WTo54nLJR59HwXc6EtpTWNjviGUhdc6Cl_ZO88Dpk-vdwTdvvr5835ZXX15-L3-dlV5ZSoS9VIVSM60l3te7_ScmWN8iBr26zqznRGe-OkRqHJCkuNR3Cgreps11GHRp0wcex1KeacyLfzk1tMT62A9jBoe_0y6N3_QWfn29HZYXY4-ISjC_lVlNAIqw7VX46x-1xiesXKNo3WasZfj9hjbHGd5obba2GtgdpI0ahnTAyJ5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Spandl, E ; Durgan, B.R ; Miller, D.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Spandl, E ; Durgan, B.R ; Miller, D.W</creatorcontrib><description>Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenzoquat, imazamethabenz, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, and fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA were applied to four- to five-leaf wild oat at 1/2 ×, 3/4 ×, and 1 × rates. Wild oat response to herbicide rate and timing was similar in wheat and barley. Wild oat control with 1/2 × rates generally was less than that with 3/4 × rates, which was lower than or similar to that with 1 × rates. Wild oat biomass was often reduced less with 1/2 × rates than 1 × rates. However, reducing herbicide rates generally did not influence grain yields or net economic return. Grain yields and net economic return were generally greater in herbicide-treated plots than in the nontreated control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0890037x00045474</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; AGRICULTURA DE BAJO INSUMO ; AGRICULTURE FAIBLE NIVEAU INTRANTS ; ANALISIS ECONOMICO ; ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE ; APPLICATION DATE ; APPLICATION RATES ; AVENA FATUA ; Barley ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass production ; CHEMICAL CONTROL ; CHOIX DE LA DATE ; CONTROL QUIMICO ; Crop density ; CROP YIELD ; DATE D'APPLICATION ; DESHERBAGE ; DICLOFOP ; DIFENZOCUAT ; DIFENZOQUAT ; DOSE D'APPLICATION ; DOSIS DE APLICACION ; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ; ELECCION DE LA EPOCA ; Energy crops ; ESCARDA ; FECHA DE APLICACION ; FENOXAPROP ; Fertilizer application timing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grains ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDE MIXTURES ; HERBICIDES ; HORDEUM VULGARE ; IMAZAMETHABENZ ; LOW INPUT AGRICULTURE ; LUTTE CHIMIQUE ; MCPA ; MINNESOTA ; Oats ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PROFITABILITY ; RENDEMENT DES CULTURES ; RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS ; RENTABILIDAD ; RENTABILITE ; RETURNS ; SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES ; THIFENSULFURON ; TIMING ; TRIBENURON ; TRITICUM AESTIVUM ; WEED CONTROL ; Weeds ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1997-07, Vol.11 (3), p.591-597</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-8235aace4b5fdf6426973f0259865b7b74f7c24a14e919e8fa0c0493b9bbeba73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-8235aace4b5fdf6426973f0259865b7b74f7c24a14e919e8fa0c0493b9bbeba73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988443$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2081937$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spandl, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durgan, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.W</creatorcontrib><title>Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenzoquat, imazamethabenz, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, and fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA were applied to four- to five-leaf wild oat at 1/2 ×, 3/4 ×, and 1 × rates. Wild oat response to herbicide rate and timing was similar in wheat and barley. Wild oat control with 1/2 × rates generally was less than that with 3/4 × rates, which was lower than or similar to that with 1 × rates. Wild oat biomass was often reduced less with 1/2 × rates than 1 × rates. However, reducing herbicide rates generally did not influence grain yields or net economic return. Grain yields and net economic return were generally greater in herbicide-treated plots than in the nontreated control.</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>AGRICULTURA DE BAJO INSUMO</subject><subject>AGRICULTURE FAIBLE NIVEAU INTRANTS</subject><subject>ANALISIS ECONOMICO</subject><subject>ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE</subject><subject>APPLICATION DATE</subject><subject>APPLICATION RATES</subject><subject>AVENA FATUA</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>CHEMICAL CONTROL</subject><subject>CHOIX DE LA DATE</subject><subject>CONTROL QUIMICO</subject><subject>Crop density</subject><subject>CROP YIELD</subject><subject>DATE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>DESHERBAGE</subject><subject>DICLOFOP</subject><subject>DIFENZOCUAT</subject><subject>DIFENZOQUAT</subject><subject>DOSE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>DOSIS DE APLICACION</subject><subject>ECONOMIC ANALYSIS</subject><subject>ELECCION DE LA EPOCA</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>ESCARDA</subject><subject>FECHA DE APLICACION</subject><subject>FENOXAPROP</subject><subject>Fertilizer application timing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grains</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDE MIXTURES</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>HORDEUM VULGARE</subject><subject>IMAZAMETHABENZ</subject><subject>LOW INPUT AGRICULTURE</subject><subject>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>MCPA</subject><subject>MINNESOTA</subject><subject>Oats</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PROFITABILITY</subject><subject>RENDEMENT DES CULTURES</subject><subject>RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS</subject><subject>RENTABILIDAD</subject><subject>RENTABILITE</subject><subject>RETURNS</subject><subject>SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES</subject><subject>THIFENSULFURON</subject><subject>TIMING</subject><subject>TRIBENURON</subject><subject>TRITICUM AESTIVUM</subject><subject>WEED CONTROL</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1q3DAUhUVpodO0D1BoQYsuMgu3Vz8eWcsQ2qQQ6CIJzc5cy1czCh5rkORJ8hJ95niYNKu7-M534B7GPgv4LkCYHxkaC6DMIwDoWhv9hi1EXUMljYa3bHHA1czv3rMPOd8DiJWUsGD__oah5xELPz3b04jcY5lwyV0cS4oDDyPPuxTGNX_Y0CF1k0IJbtpypFzCftouOY497zAN9MRPL2Pqaab7aVhjoiV_CGXDE_WTo54nLJR59HwXc6EtpTWNjviGUhdc6Cl_ZO88Dpk-vdwTdvvr5835ZXX15-L3-dlV5ZSoS9VIVSM60l3te7_ScmWN8iBr26zqznRGe-OkRqHJCkuNR3Cgreps11GHRp0wcex1KeacyLfzk1tMT62A9jBoe_0y6N3_QWfn29HZYXY4-ISjC_lVlNAIqw7VX46x-1xiesXKNo3WasZfj9hjbHGd5obba2GtgdpI0ahnTAyJ5g</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>Spandl, E</creator><creator>Durgan, B.R</creator><creator>Miller, D.W</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides</title><author>Spandl, E ; Durgan, B.R ; Miller, D.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-8235aace4b5fdf6426973f0259865b7b74f7c24a14e919e8fa0c0493b9bbeba73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>AGRICULTURA DE BAJO INSUMO</topic><topic>AGRICULTURE FAIBLE NIVEAU INTRANTS</topic><topic>ANALISIS ECONOMICO</topic><topic>ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE</topic><topic>APPLICATION DATE</topic><topic>APPLICATION RATES</topic><topic>AVENA FATUA</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>CHEMICAL CONTROL</topic><topic>CHOIX DE LA DATE</topic><topic>CONTROL QUIMICO</topic><topic>Crop density</topic><topic>CROP YIELD</topic><topic>DATE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>DESHERBAGE</topic><topic>DICLOFOP</topic><topic>DIFENZOCUAT</topic><topic>DIFENZOQUAT</topic><topic>DOSE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>DOSIS DE APLICACION</topic><topic>ECONOMIC ANALYSIS</topic><topic>ELECCION DE LA EPOCA</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>ESCARDA</topic><topic>FECHA DE APLICACION</topic><topic>FENOXAPROP</topic><topic>Fertilizer application timing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grains</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDE MIXTURES</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>HORDEUM VULGARE</topic><topic>IMAZAMETHABENZ</topic><topic>LOW INPUT AGRICULTURE</topic><topic>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>MCPA</topic><topic>MINNESOTA</topic><topic>Oats</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PROFITABILITY</topic><topic>RENDEMENT DES CULTURES</topic><topic>RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS</topic><topic>RENTABILIDAD</topic><topic>RENTABILITE</topic><topic>RETURNS</topic><topic>SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES</topic><topic>THIFENSULFURON</topic><topic>TIMING</topic><topic>TRIBENURON</topic><topic>TRITICUM AESTIVUM</topic><topic>WEED CONTROL</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spandl, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durgan, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spandl, E</au><au>Durgan, B.R</au><au>Miller, D.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>597</epage><pages>591-597</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Rates and application timings of postemergence herbicides for wild oat control in spring wheat and barley were evaluated at Crookston, MN, from 1994 to 1996. Diclofop, imazamethabenz, and fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were applied to one- to three-leaf wild oat; and difenzoquat, imazamethabenz, fenoxaprop plus MCPA plus thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, and fenoxaprop plus 2,4-D plus MCPA were applied to four- to five-leaf wild oat at 1/2 ×, 3/4 ×, and 1 × rates. Wild oat response to herbicide rate and timing was similar in wheat and barley. Wild oat control with 1/2 × rates generally was less than that with 3/4 × rates, which was lower than or similar to that with 1 × rates. Wild oat biomass was often reduced less with 1/2 × rates than 1 × rates. However, reducing herbicide rates generally did not influence grain yields or net economic return. Grain yields and net economic return were generally greater in herbicide-treated plots than in the nontreated control.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/s0890037x00045474</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 1997-07, Vol.11 (3), p.591-597 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00045474 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | 2,4-D AGRICULTURA DE BAJO INSUMO AGRICULTURE FAIBLE NIVEAU INTRANTS ANALISIS ECONOMICO ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE APPLICATION DATE APPLICATION RATES AVENA FATUA Barley Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biomass production CHEMICAL CONTROL CHOIX DE LA DATE CONTROL QUIMICO Crop density CROP YIELD DATE D'APPLICATION DESHERBAGE DICLOFOP DIFENZOCUAT DIFENZOQUAT DOSE D'APPLICATION DOSIS DE APLICACION ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ELECCION DE LA EPOCA Energy crops ESCARDA FECHA DE APLICACION FENOXAPROP Fertilizer application timing Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grains HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE HERBICIDE MIXTURES HERBICIDES HORDEUM VULGARE IMAZAMETHABENZ LOW INPUT AGRICULTURE LUTTE CHIMIQUE MCPA MINNESOTA Oats Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection PROFITABILITY RENDEMENT DES CULTURES RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS RENTABILIDAD RENTABILITE RETURNS SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES THIFENSULFURON TIMING TRIBENURON TRITICUM AESTIVUM WEED CONTROL Weeds Wheat |
| title | Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A11%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wild%20oat%20(Avena%20fatua)%20control%20in%20spring%20wheat%20(Triticum%20aestivum)%20and%20barley%20(Hordeum%20vulgare)%20with%20reduced%20rates%20of%20postemergence%20herbicides&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Spandl,%20E&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=597&rft.pages=591-597&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0890037x00045474&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3988443%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988443&rfr_iscdi=true |