Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426
Studies were conducted at Rosemount and Crookston, MN, in 1994 and 1995 to determine weed control efficacy and crop injury of F8426 (proposed common name carfentrazone-ethyl) in hard red spring wheat. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba generally controlled common lambs-quarters, kochia, and velve...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 1997-07, Vol.11 (3), p.489-495 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 495 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 489 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Durgan, B.R Yenish, J.P Daml, R.J Miller, D.W |
| description | Studies were conducted at Rosemount and Crookston, MN, in 1994 and 1995 to determine weed control efficacy and crop injury of F8426 (proposed common name carfentrazone-ethyl) in hard red spring wheat. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba generally controlled common lambs-quarters, kochia, and velvetleaf 90% or more at 0.026 and 0.035 kg/ha. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba controlled Pennsylvania smartweed, wild buckwheat, and wild mustard 39 to 100% and was less consistent than control of the aforementioned species. Weed control varied little among the F8426 rates. Weed control was inconsistent between location, year, and species when F8426 was combined with crop oil concentrate, urea-ammonium nitrate solution, and nonionic surfactant. Control was more consistent when 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D or 0.07 kg/ha dicamba was tank mixed with either F8426 rate. The best control with an F8426 treatment was similar to control from MCPA tank mixed with thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, bromoxynil, or dicamba. Weed control 30 and 45 days after treatment (DAT) was less for F8426-containing treatments than standard treatments, which likely was related to reduced crop competition after severe crop injury. Increasing F8426 rate from 0.026 to 0.035 kg/ha did not greatly increase wheat injury, whereas adding 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D to either F8426 rate greatly increased crop injury. Wheat yield was reduced up to 63% by F8426 and 2,4-D combinations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s0890037x00045309 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00045309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988426</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-1b3258633db91f06e6791c4951f2285352854c658700a806f4a52d981438ce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QFDIwYMeVmeSzW5y1GJVKHpohd6WNJu0W7bdkmyt_ntTVnuZgfneG2YeIZcI9wiYPwSQCoDn3wCQCg7qiPRQCEhYnsIx6e1xEvn0lJyFsATAjDHokfcn3-iyttrRnbUlNc269U1NqzVdaF9SH2dh46v1nO4WVrf0duKrtjLbFdU2tNXXdnVHd1W7oEOZsuycnDhdB3vx1_tkMnyeDF6T0cfL2-BxlBiOok1wxpmQGeflTKGDzGa5QpMqgY4xKbiIJTWZkDmAlpC5VAtWKokpl8ZK3ifYrTW-CcFbV8QTV9r_FAjFPo9i_JfH9D-P6LnpPBsdjK6d12tThYORgQREjLKrTrYMbeMPmCu5_y_i6w473RR67uOGzzEqlYPIkUv-C7nxbyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Durgan, B.R ; Yenish, J.P ; Daml, R.J ; Miller, D.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Durgan, B.R ; Yenish, J.P ; Daml, R.J ; Miller, D.W</creatorcontrib><description>Studies were conducted at Rosemount and Crookston, MN, in 1994 and 1995 to determine weed control efficacy and crop injury of F8426 (proposed common name carfentrazone-ethyl) in hard red spring wheat. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba generally controlled common lambs-quarters, kochia, and velvetleaf 90% or more at 0.026 and 0.035 kg/ha. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba controlled Pennsylvania smartweed, wild buckwheat, and wild mustard 39 to 100% and was less consistent than control of the aforementioned species. Weed control varied little among the F8426 rates. Weed control was inconsistent between location, year, and species when F8426 was combined with crop oil concentrate, urea-ammonium nitrate solution, and nonionic surfactant. Control was more consistent when 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D or 0.07 kg/ha dicamba was tank mixed with either F8426 rate. The best control with an F8426 treatment was similar to control from MCPA tank mixed with thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, bromoxynil, or dicamba. Weed control 30 and 45 days after treatment (DAT) was less for F8426-containing treatments than standard treatments, which likely was related to reduced crop competition after severe crop injury. Increasing F8426 rate from 0.026 to 0.035 kg/ha did not greatly increase wheat injury, whereas adding 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D to either F8426 rate greatly increased crop injury. Wheat yield was reduced up to 63% by F8426 and 2,4-D combinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0890037x00045309</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; ABIOTIC INJURIES ; ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI ; ADJUVANT ; ADJUVANTS ; AMMONIUM NITRATE ; APPLICATION RATES ; Biological and medical sciences ; BRASSICA ; BRASSICA KABER ; Broadleaf weeds ; BROMOXINILO ; BROMOXYNIL ; Buckwheat ; CARFENTRAZONE-ETHYL ; CHEMICAL CONTROL ; CHENOPODIUM ; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM ; COADYUVANTES ; CONTROL QUIMICO ; CROP LOSSES ; CROP OIL CONCENTRATE ; Crops ; DESHERBAGE ; DICAMBA ; DOSE D'APPLICATION ; DOSIS DE APLICACION ; ESCARDA ; FALLOPIA CONVOLVULUS ; FITOTOXICIDAD ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDE MIXTURES ; Herbicide resistant weeds ; HERBICIDES ; KOCHIA ; KOCHIA SCOPARIA ; LUTTE CHIMIQUE ; MALEZAS ; MAUVAISE HERBE ; MCPA ; Mustards ; NITRATE D'AMMONIUM ; NITRATO DE AMONIO ; NONIONIC SURFACTANTS ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA ; PERTE DE RECOLTE ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PHYTOTOXICITE ; PHYTOTOXICITY ; Plants ; POLYGONACEAE ; POLYGONUM ; POLYGONUM PENSYLVANICUM ; RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES ; RESISTANCE TO CHEMICALS ; RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS ; SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES ; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS ; SURFACTANT ; SURFACTANTES ; Surfactants ; THIFENSULFURON ; TRIBENURON ; TRITICUM AESTIVUM ; UREA ; UREE ; WEED CONTROL ; WEEDS ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1997-07, Vol.11 (3), p.489-495</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-1b3258633db91f06e6791c4951f2285352854c658700a806f4a52d981438ce83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-1b3258633db91f06e6791c4951f2285352854c658700a806f4a52d981438ce83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988426$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988426$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2080111$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durgan, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yenish, J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daml, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.W</creatorcontrib><title>Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Studies were conducted at Rosemount and Crookston, MN, in 1994 and 1995 to determine weed control efficacy and crop injury of F8426 (proposed common name carfentrazone-ethyl) in hard red spring wheat. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba generally controlled common lambs-quarters, kochia, and velvetleaf 90% or more at 0.026 and 0.035 kg/ha. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba controlled Pennsylvania smartweed, wild buckwheat, and wild mustard 39 to 100% and was less consistent than control of the aforementioned species. Weed control varied little among the F8426 rates. Weed control was inconsistent between location, year, and species when F8426 was combined with crop oil concentrate, urea-ammonium nitrate solution, and nonionic surfactant. Control was more consistent when 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D or 0.07 kg/ha dicamba was tank mixed with either F8426 rate. The best control with an F8426 treatment was similar to control from MCPA tank mixed with thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, bromoxynil, or dicamba. Weed control 30 and 45 days after treatment (DAT) was less for F8426-containing treatments than standard treatments, which likely was related to reduced crop competition after severe crop injury. Increasing F8426 rate from 0.026 to 0.035 kg/ha did not greatly increase wheat injury, whereas adding 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D to either F8426 rate greatly increased crop injury. Wheat yield was reduced up to 63% by F8426 and 2,4-D combinations.</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>ABIOTIC INJURIES</subject><subject>ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI</subject><subject>ADJUVANT</subject><subject>ADJUVANTS</subject><subject>AMMONIUM NITRATE</subject><subject>APPLICATION RATES</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BRASSICA</subject><subject>BRASSICA KABER</subject><subject>Broadleaf weeds</subject><subject>BROMOXINILO</subject><subject>BROMOXYNIL</subject><subject>Buckwheat</subject><subject>CARFENTRAZONE-ETHYL</subject><subject>CHEMICAL CONTROL</subject><subject>CHENOPODIUM</subject><subject>CHENOPODIUM ALBUM</subject><subject>COADYUVANTES</subject><subject>CONTROL QUIMICO</subject><subject>CROP LOSSES</subject><subject>CROP OIL CONCENTRATE</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>DESHERBAGE</subject><subject>DICAMBA</subject><subject>DOSE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>DOSIS DE APLICACION</subject><subject>ESCARDA</subject><subject>FALLOPIA CONVOLVULUS</subject><subject>FITOTOXICIDAD</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDE MIXTURES</subject><subject>Herbicide resistant weeds</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>KOCHIA</subject><subject>KOCHIA SCOPARIA</subject><subject>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>MALEZAS</subject><subject>MAUVAISE HERBE</subject><subject>MCPA</subject><subject>Mustards</subject><subject>NITRATE D'AMMONIUM</subject><subject>NITRATO DE AMONIO</subject><subject>NONIONIC SURFACTANTS</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA</subject><subject>PERTE DE RECOLTE</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITE</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITY</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>POLYGONACEAE</subject><subject>POLYGONUM</subject><subject>POLYGONUM PENSYLVANICUM</subject><subject>RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES</subject><subject>RESISTANCE TO CHEMICALS</subject><subject>RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</subject><subject>SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES</subject><subject>SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS</subject><subject>SURFACTANT</subject><subject>SURFACTANTES</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>THIFENSULFURON</subject><subject>TRIBENURON</subject><subject>TRITICUM AESTIVUM</subject><subject>UREA</subject><subject>UREE</subject><subject>WEED CONTROL</subject><subject>WEEDS</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QFDIwYMeVmeSzW5y1GJVKHpohd6WNJu0W7bdkmyt_ntTVnuZgfneG2YeIZcI9wiYPwSQCoDn3wCQCg7qiPRQCEhYnsIx6e1xEvn0lJyFsATAjDHokfcn3-iyttrRnbUlNc269U1NqzVdaF9SH2dh46v1nO4WVrf0duKrtjLbFdU2tNXXdnVHd1W7oEOZsuycnDhdB3vx1_tkMnyeDF6T0cfL2-BxlBiOok1wxpmQGeflTKGDzGa5QpMqgY4xKbiIJTWZkDmAlpC5VAtWKokpl8ZK3ifYrTW-CcFbV8QTV9r_FAjFPo9i_JfH9D-P6LnpPBsdjK6d12tThYORgQREjLKrTrYMbeMPmCu5_y_i6w473RR67uOGzzEqlYPIkUv-C7nxbyg</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>Durgan, B.R</creator><creator>Yenish, J.P</creator><creator>Daml, R.J</creator><creator>Miller, D.W</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426</title><author>Durgan, B.R ; Yenish, J.P ; Daml, R.J ; Miller, D.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-1b3258633db91f06e6791c4951f2285352854c658700a806f4a52d981438ce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>ABIOTIC INJURIES</topic><topic>ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI</topic><topic>ADJUVANT</topic><topic>ADJUVANTS</topic><topic>AMMONIUM NITRATE</topic><topic>APPLICATION RATES</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BRASSICA</topic><topic>BRASSICA KABER</topic><topic>Broadleaf weeds</topic><topic>BROMOXINILO</topic><topic>BROMOXYNIL</topic><topic>Buckwheat</topic><topic>CARFENTRAZONE-ETHYL</topic><topic>CHEMICAL CONTROL</topic><topic>CHENOPODIUM</topic><topic>CHENOPODIUM ALBUM</topic><topic>COADYUVANTES</topic><topic>CONTROL QUIMICO</topic><topic>CROP LOSSES</topic><topic>CROP OIL CONCENTRATE</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>DESHERBAGE</topic><topic>DICAMBA</topic><topic>DOSE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>DOSIS DE APLICACION</topic><topic>ESCARDA</topic><topic>FALLOPIA CONVOLVULUS</topic><topic>FITOTOXICIDAD</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDE MIXTURES</topic><topic>Herbicide resistant weeds</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>KOCHIA</topic><topic>KOCHIA SCOPARIA</topic><topic>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>MALEZAS</topic><topic>MAUVAISE HERBE</topic><topic>MCPA</topic><topic>Mustards</topic><topic>NITRATE D'AMMONIUM</topic><topic>NITRATO DE AMONIO</topic><topic>NONIONIC SURFACTANTS</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA</topic><topic>PERTE DE RECOLTE</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITE</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITY</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>POLYGONACEAE</topic><topic>POLYGONUM</topic><topic>POLYGONUM PENSYLVANICUM</topic><topic>RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES</topic><topic>RESISTANCE TO CHEMICALS</topic><topic>RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</topic><topic>SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES</topic><topic>SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS</topic><topic>SURFACTANT</topic><topic>SURFACTANTES</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>THIFENSULFURON</topic><topic>TRIBENURON</topic><topic>TRITICUM AESTIVUM</topic><topic>UREA</topic><topic>UREE</topic><topic>WEED CONTROL</topic><topic>WEEDS</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durgan, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yenish, J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daml, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durgan, B.R</au><au>Yenish, J.P</au><au>Daml, R.J</au><au>Miller, D.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>495</epage><pages>489-495</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Studies were conducted at Rosemount and Crookston, MN, in 1994 and 1995 to determine weed control efficacy and crop injury of F8426 (proposed common name carfentrazone-ethyl) in hard red spring wheat. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba generally controlled common lambs-quarters, kochia, and velvetleaf 90% or more at 0.026 and 0.035 kg/ha. F8426 alone and with 2,4-D or dicamba controlled Pennsylvania smartweed, wild buckwheat, and wild mustard 39 to 100% and was less consistent than control of the aforementioned species. Weed control varied little among the F8426 rates. Weed control was inconsistent between location, year, and species when F8426 was combined with crop oil concentrate, urea-ammonium nitrate solution, and nonionic surfactant. Control was more consistent when 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D or 0.07 kg/ha dicamba was tank mixed with either F8426 rate. The best control with an F8426 treatment was similar to control from MCPA tank mixed with thifensulfuron plus tribenuron, bromoxynil, or dicamba. Weed control 30 and 45 days after treatment (DAT) was less for F8426-containing treatments than standard treatments, which likely was related to reduced crop competition after severe crop injury. Increasing F8426 rate from 0.026 to 0.035 kg/ha did not greatly increase wheat injury, whereas adding 0.28 kg/ha 2,4-D to either F8426 rate greatly increased crop injury. Wheat yield was reduced up to 63% by F8426 and 2,4-D combinations.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/s0890037x00045309</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 1997-07, Vol.11 (3), p.489-495 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00045309 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | 2,4-D ABIOTIC INJURIES ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI ADJUVANT ADJUVANTS AMMONIUM NITRATE APPLICATION RATES Biological and medical sciences BRASSICA BRASSICA KABER Broadleaf weeds BROMOXINILO BROMOXYNIL Buckwheat CARFENTRAZONE-ETHYL CHEMICAL CONTROL CHENOPODIUM CHENOPODIUM ALBUM COADYUVANTES CONTROL QUIMICO CROP LOSSES CROP OIL CONCENTRATE Crops DESHERBAGE DICAMBA DOSE D'APPLICATION DOSIS DE APLICACION ESCARDA FALLOPIA CONVOLVULUS FITOTOXICIDAD Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE HERBICIDE MIXTURES Herbicide resistant weeds HERBICIDES KOCHIA KOCHIA SCOPARIA LUTTE CHIMIQUE MALEZAS MAUVAISE HERBE MCPA Mustards NITRATE D'AMMONIUM NITRATO DE AMONIO NONIONIC SURFACTANTS Parasitic plants. Weeds PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA PERTE DE RECOLTE Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection PHYTOTOXICITE PHYTOTOXICITY Plants POLYGONACEAE POLYGONUM POLYGONUM PENSYLVANICUM RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES RESISTANCE TO CHEMICALS RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS SURFACTANT SURFACTANTES Surfactants THIFENSULFURON TRIBENURON TRITICUM AESTIVUM UREA UREE WEED CONTROL WEEDS Wheat |
| title | Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A10%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Broadleaf%20weed%20control%20in%20hard%20red%20spring%20wheat%20(Triticum%20aestivum)%20with%20F8426&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Durgan,%20B.R&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=495&rft.pages=489-495&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0890037x00045309&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3988426%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988426&rfr_iscdi=true |