Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois

Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 1997-10, Vol.11 (4), p.828-831
Hauptverfasser: Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.), Curry, M.P, Wax, L.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 831
container_issue 4
container_start_page 828
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 11
creator Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)
Curry, M.P
Wax, L.M
description Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0890037x00043517
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00043517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988783</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfQFDIwevqy59tkqMUbQsFD7XQ25LNJu2W3U1JFqrf3pStPT2G38zAG4QeCbwSIOItglQATPwAAGc5EVdoRPIcMio4XKPRCWeJb27RXYx7ADKhFEZoPgv-aAPWxthDrztjsXfYGt_5tja43wUbd76pInY-4KO1FW51p7e2tV2P6w4vmqbufB3v0Y3TTbQP5ztG68-P7-k8W37NFtP3ZWYYyfuspCSXHKhxUitpq6o0qmTUlkROOLfMJSEVNzTJiiowTBJrFHNMWFFSzsaIDL0m-BiDdcUh1K0OvwWB4jRFsTpPsfmfImVehsxBR6MbF9KfdbwEKeEiJZPtabDtY-_DBTMlpZAs4ecBO-0LvQ2pYb0iSgnIJ4rl7A_YNHBl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) ; Curry, M.P ; Wax, L.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) ; Curry, M.P ; Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><description>Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0890037x00043517</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>AGRICULTEUR ; AGRICULTORES ; AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS ; Agricultural management ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Crop economics ; Crop management ; Crops ; DECISION MAKING ; DESHERBAGE ; Economic surveys ; ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS ; Education/Extension/Survey ; ENCUESTAS ; ENQUETE ; ESCARDA ; Farm economics ; FARMERS ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA ; GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR ; Herbicides ; ILLINOIS ; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PRISE DE DECISION ; SEUIL ECONOMIQUE ; SURVEYS ; TOMA DE DECISIONES ; UMBRAL ECONOMICO ; WEED CONTROL ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1997-10, Vol.11 (4), p.828-831</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988783$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988783$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2147101$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><title>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.</description><subject>AGRICULTEUR</subject><subject>AGRICULTORES</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Crop economics</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>DESHERBAGE</subject><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS</subject><subject>Education/Extension/Survey</subject><subject>ENCUESTAS</subject><subject>ENQUETE</subject><subject>ESCARDA</subject><subject>Farm economics</subject><subject>FARMERS</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA</subject><subject>GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>ILLINOIS</subject><subject>INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PRISE DE DECISION</subject><subject>SEUIL ECONOMIQUE</subject><subject>SURVEYS</subject><subject>TOMA DE DECISIONES</subject><subject>UMBRAL ECONOMICO</subject><subject>WEED CONTROL</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfQFDIwevqy59tkqMUbQsFD7XQ25LNJu2W3U1JFqrf3pStPT2G38zAG4QeCbwSIOItglQATPwAAGc5EVdoRPIcMio4XKPRCWeJb27RXYx7ADKhFEZoPgv-aAPWxthDrztjsXfYGt_5tja43wUbd76pInY-4KO1FW51p7e2tV2P6w4vmqbufB3v0Y3TTbQP5ztG68-P7-k8W37NFtP3ZWYYyfuspCSXHKhxUitpq6o0qmTUlkROOLfMJSEVNzTJiiowTBJrFHNMWFFSzsaIDL0m-BiDdcUh1K0OvwWB4jRFsTpPsfmfImVehsxBR6MbF9KfdbwEKeEiJZPtabDtY-_DBTMlpZAs4ecBO-0LvQ2pYb0iSgnIJ4rl7A_YNHBl</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</creator><creator>Curry, M.P</creator><creator>Wax, L.M</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</title><author>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) ; Curry, M.P ; Wax, L.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTEUR</topic><topic>AGRICULTORES</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Crop economics</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>DESHERBAGE</topic><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS</topic><topic>Education/Extension/Survey</topic><topic>ENCUESTAS</topic><topic>ENQUETE</topic><topic>ESCARDA</topic><topic>Farm economics</topic><topic>FARMERS</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA</topic><topic>GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>ILLINOIS</topic><topic>INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PRISE DE DECISION</topic><topic>SEUIL ECONOMIQUE</topic><topic>SURVEYS</topic><topic>TOMA DE DECISIONES</topic><topic>UMBRAL ECONOMICO</topic><topic>WEED CONTROL</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</au><au>Curry, M.P</au><au>Wax, L.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>828</spage><epage>831</epage><pages>828-831</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/s0890037x00043517</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 1997-10, Vol.11 (4), p.828-831
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00043517
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects AGRICULTEUR
AGRICULTORES
AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS
Agricultural management
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical control
Crop economics
Crop management
Crops
DECISION MAKING
DESHERBAGE
Economic surveys
ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS
Education/Extension/Survey
ENCUESTAS
ENQUETE
ESCARDA
Farm economics
FARMERS
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA
GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR
Herbicides
ILLINOIS
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT
Parasitic plants. Weeds
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
PRISE DE DECISION
SEUIL ECONOMIQUE
SURVEYS
TOMA DE DECISIONES
UMBRAL ECONOMICO
WEED CONTROL
Weeds
title Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A35%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grower%20acceptance%20of%20economic%20thresholds%20for%20weed%20management%20in%20Illinois&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Czapar,%20G.F.%20(University%20of%20Illinois,%20Springfield.)&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=828&rft.epage=831&rft.pages=828-831&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0890037x00043517&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3988783%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988783&rfr_iscdi=true