Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois
Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 1997-10, Vol.11 (4), p.828-831 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 831 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 828 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) Curry, M.P Wax, L.M |
description | Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s0890037x00043517 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00043517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988783</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfQFDIwevqy59tkqMUbQsFD7XQ25LNJu2W3U1JFqrf3pStPT2G38zAG4QeCbwSIOItglQATPwAAGc5EVdoRPIcMio4XKPRCWeJb27RXYx7ADKhFEZoPgv-aAPWxthDrztjsXfYGt_5tja43wUbd76pInY-4KO1FW51p7e2tV2P6w4vmqbufB3v0Y3TTbQP5ztG68-P7-k8W37NFtP3ZWYYyfuspCSXHKhxUitpq6o0qmTUlkROOLfMJSEVNzTJiiowTBJrFHNMWFFSzsaIDL0m-BiDdcUh1K0OvwWB4jRFsTpPsfmfImVehsxBR6MbF9KfdbwEKeEiJZPtabDtY-_DBTMlpZAs4ecBO-0LvQ2pYb0iSgnIJ4rl7A_YNHBl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) ; Curry, M.P ; Wax, L.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) ; Curry, M.P ; Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><description>Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0890037x00043517</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>AGRICULTEUR ; AGRICULTORES ; AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS ; Agricultural management ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Crop economics ; Crop management ; Crops ; DECISION MAKING ; DESHERBAGE ; Economic surveys ; ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS ; Education/Extension/Survey ; ENCUESTAS ; ENQUETE ; ESCARDA ; Farm economics ; FARMERS ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA ; GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR ; Herbicides ; ILLINOIS ; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PRISE DE DECISION ; SEUIL ECONOMIQUE ; SURVEYS ; TOMA DE DECISIONES ; UMBRAL ECONOMICO ; WEED CONTROL ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1997-10, Vol.11 (4), p.828-831</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988783$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988783$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2147101$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><title>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.</description><subject>AGRICULTEUR</subject><subject>AGRICULTORES</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Crop economics</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>DESHERBAGE</subject><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS</subject><subject>Education/Extension/Survey</subject><subject>ENCUESTAS</subject><subject>ENQUETE</subject><subject>ESCARDA</subject><subject>Farm economics</subject><subject>FARMERS</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA</subject><subject>GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>ILLINOIS</subject><subject>INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PRISE DE DECISION</subject><subject>SEUIL ECONOMIQUE</subject><subject>SURVEYS</subject><subject>TOMA DE DECISIONES</subject><subject>UMBRAL ECONOMICO</subject><subject>WEED CONTROL</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfQFDIwevqy59tkqMUbQsFD7XQ25LNJu2W3U1JFqrf3pStPT2G38zAG4QeCbwSIOItglQATPwAAGc5EVdoRPIcMio4XKPRCWeJb27RXYx7ADKhFEZoPgv-aAPWxthDrztjsXfYGt_5tja43wUbd76pInY-4KO1FW51p7e2tV2P6w4vmqbufB3v0Y3TTbQP5ztG68-P7-k8W37NFtP3ZWYYyfuspCSXHKhxUitpq6o0qmTUlkROOLfMJSEVNzTJiiowTBJrFHNMWFFSzsaIDL0m-BiDdcUh1K0OvwWB4jRFsTpPsfmfImVehsxBR6MbF9KfdbwEKeEiJZPtabDtY-_DBTMlpZAs4ecBO-0LvQ2pYb0iSgnIJ4rl7A_YNHBl</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</creator><creator>Curry, M.P</creator><creator>Wax, L.M</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</title><author>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.) ; Curry, M.P ; Wax, L.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-b2158402cf8a98eddbc9b32eb18644e3fb32894c2864d290c381ec93f37e7b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTEUR</topic><topic>AGRICULTORES</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Crop economics</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>DESHERBAGE</topic><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS</topic><topic>Education/Extension/Survey</topic><topic>ENCUESTAS</topic><topic>ENQUETE</topic><topic>ESCARDA</topic><topic>Farm economics</topic><topic>FARMERS</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA</topic><topic>GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>ILLINOIS</topic><topic>INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PRISE DE DECISION</topic><topic>SEUIL ECONOMIQUE</topic><topic>SURVEYS</topic><topic>TOMA DE DECISIONES</topic><topic>UMBRAL ECONOMICO</topic><topic>WEED CONTROL</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Czapar, G.F. (University of Illinois, Springfield.)</au><au>Curry, M.P</au><au>Wax, L.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>828</spage><epage>831</epage><pages>828-831</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Although economic thresholds are often used to make insect control decisions, the use of thresholds for weed management has been limited. Surveys of growers, agricultural chemical dealers, and farm managers/rural appraisers helped identify limitations to grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Most growers were concerned about harvest problems due to weeds, with 64% identifying this factor as a major limitation. Landlord perception and weed seed production were identified by 38% of the growers as major limitations, while 36% of the growers listed general appearance of the field as reasons. In contrast, 75% of the agricultural chemical dealers and 63% of the farm managers surveyed listed field appearance as a major reason limiting grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management. Since grower concerns involve risk management and future profitability, economic weed thresholds that address long-term costs and benefits of weed control decisions may be more fully accepted.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/s0890037x00043517</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 1997-10, Vol.11 (4), p.828-831 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00043517 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | AGRICULTEUR AGRICULTORES AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL DEALERS Agricultural management Biological and medical sciences Chemical control Crop economics Crop management Crops DECISION MAKING DESHERBAGE Economic surveys ECONOMIC THRESHOLDS Education/Extension/Survey ENCUESTAS ENQUETE ESCARDA Farm economics FARMERS Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology GESTION DE LUCHA INTEGRADA GESTION INTEGREE ANTIRAVAGEUR Herbicides ILLINOIS INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection PRISE DE DECISION SEUIL ECONOMIQUE SURVEYS TOMA DE DECISIONES UMBRAL ECONOMICO WEED CONTROL Weeds |
title | Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A35%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grower%20acceptance%20of%20economic%20thresholds%20for%20weed%20management%20in%20Illinois&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Czapar,%20G.F.%20(University%20of%20Illinois,%20Springfield.)&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=828&rft.epage=831&rft.pages=828-831&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0890037x00043517&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3988783%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988783&rfr_iscdi=true |