Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron
Field experiments were conducted in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to evaluate injurious interactions between nicosulfuron herbicide applied POST and nine insecticides applied at planting on 'Pioneer 3751' field corn in 1991. Insecticides were applied in-furrow, T-band, and surface ban...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.289-295 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 295 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 289 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Morton, C.A Harvey, R.G Wedberg, J.L Kells, J.J Landis, D.A Lueschen, W.E |
| description | Field experiments were conducted in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to evaluate injurious interactions between nicosulfuron herbicide applied POST and nine insecticides applied at planting on 'Pioneer 3751' field corn in 1991. Insecticides were applied in-furrow, T-band, and surface band at planting. Corn injury from nicosulfuron and terbufos applications was more severe in Wisconsin than in Michigan. No corn injury was observed in Minnesota. Terbufos 15% ai granule (15G) or 20% ai controlled release granule (20CR) increased nicosulfuron injury to corn in Wisconsin. Nicosulfuron at 35 g ai/ha caused the greatest vigor reduction following terbufos 15G, intermediate vigor reduction following terbufos 20CR, phorate 20G, or phorate 20CR, and the least vigor reduction following fonofos, chlorpyrifos, chlorethoxyfos, tefluthrin, or carbofuran in Wisconsin. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/s0890037x00038793 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00038793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988105</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69759a222fcd333f296559671a618be9ef23d373724523e906473375782a19a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPGQgwc9rGYyyWZzlOJHoeChFoqXNaaJrmw3Jdmi_fdu2drLDMzzPnN4CTkHdgsM1F1ihWYM1S_rZqE0HpABSMkyrgQ7JIMtzjo-PyYnKX0zBjnnbEDex42v166xjgZPbYgNjSG0PyEuadUkZ9vKVguXaGho--VodGkVuvs27StXL3rn-s0ZujSbdEPbQJvKhrSu_TqG5pQceVMnd7bbQzJ7fHgdPWeTl6fx6H6SWQTeZrlWUhvOubcLRPRc51LqXIHJofhw2nmOC1SouJAcnWa5UIhKqoIb0AZwSKD_a2NIKTpfrmK1NHFTAiu3FZXTXUXz_4o656p3ViZZU_toGlulvShACA2ii132se_UhrjHqIsCmOzwRY-9CaX5jN2H2VRLEAVD_AMoJHbL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Morton, C.A ; Harvey, R.G ; Wedberg, J.L ; Kells, J.J ; Landis, D.A ; Lueschen, W.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Morton, C.A ; Harvey, R.G ; Wedberg, J.L ; Kells, J.J ; Landis, D.A ; Lueschen, W.E</creatorcontrib><description>Field experiments were conducted in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to evaluate injurious interactions between nicosulfuron herbicide applied POST and nine insecticides applied at planting on 'Pioneer 3751' field corn in 1991. Insecticides were applied in-furrow, T-band, and surface band at planting. Corn injury from nicosulfuron and terbufos applications was more severe in Wisconsin than in Michigan. No corn injury was observed in Minnesota. Terbufos 15% ai granule (15G) or 20% ai controlled release granule (20CR) increased nicosulfuron injury to corn in Wisconsin. Nicosulfuron at 35 g ai/ha caused the greatest vigor reduction following terbufos 15G, intermediate vigor reduction following terbufos 20CR, phorate 20G, or phorate 20CR, and the least vigor reduction following fonofos, chlorpyrifos, chlorethoxyfos, tefluthrin, or carbofuran in Wisconsin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0890037x00038793</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>ABIOTIC INJURIES ; Agricultural soils ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; APPLICATION METHODS ; Biological and medical sciences ; CARBOFURAN ; CARBOFURANO ; CHEMICAL CONTROL ; chlorethoxyfos ; CHLORPYRIFOS ; CLORPIRIFOS ; CONTROL DE INSECTOS ; CONTROL QUIMICO ; Controlled release ; Corn ; CROP DAMAGE ; CROP LOSSES ; DESHERBAGE ; ESCARDA ; FITOTOXICIDAD ; FONOFOS ; FORATO ; FORMULACIONES ; FORMULATION ; FORMULATIONS ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grains ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDES ; INSECT CONTROL ; INSECTICIDAS ; INSECTICIDE ; INSECTICIDES ; INTERACTIONS ; Invertebrates ; LUTTE ANTIINSECTE ; LUTTE CHIMIQUE ; METHODE D'APPLICATION ; METODOS DE APLICACION ; MICHIGAN ; MINNESOTA ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA ; PERTE DE RECOLTE ; PHORATE ; PHOSPHONOTHIOATE INSECTICIDES ; Phosphoric acid esters ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PHYTOTOXICITE ; PHYTOTOXICITY ; Planting ; Rootworms ; Soil organic matter ; SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES ; TEFLUTHRIN ; TERBUFOS ; WEED CONTROL ; Weeds ; WISCONSIN ; ZEA MAYS</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69759a222fcd333f296559671a618be9ef23d373724523e906473375782a19a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69759a222fcd333f296559671a618be9ef23d373724523e906473375782a19a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,800,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4144914$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morton, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, R.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wedberg, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kells, J.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landis, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lueschen, W.E</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Field experiments were conducted in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to evaluate injurious interactions between nicosulfuron herbicide applied POST and nine insecticides applied at planting on 'Pioneer 3751' field corn in 1991. Insecticides were applied in-furrow, T-band, and surface band at planting. Corn injury from nicosulfuron and terbufos applications was more severe in Wisconsin than in Michigan. No corn injury was observed in Minnesota. Terbufos 15% ai granule (15G) or 20% ai controlled release granule (20CR) increased nicosulfuron injury to corn in Wisconsin. Nicosulfuron at 35 g ai/ha caused the greatest vigor reduction following terbufos 15G, intermediate vigor reduction following terbufos 20CR, phorate 20G, or phorate 20CR, and the least vigor reduction following fonofos, chlorpyrifos, chlorethoxyfos, tefluthrin, or carbofuran in Wisconsin.</description><subject>ABIOTIC INJURIES</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>APPLICATION METHODS</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CARBOFURAN</subject><subject>CARBOFURANO</subject><subject>CHEMICAL CONTROL</subject><subject>chlorethoxyfos</subject><subject>CHLORPYRIFOS</subject><subject>CLORPIRIFOS</subject><subject>CONTROL DE INSECTOS</subject><subject>CONTROL QUIMICO</subject><subject>Controlled release</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>CROP DAMAGE</subject><subject>CROP LOSSES</subject><subject>DESHERBAGE</subject><subject>ESCARDA</subject><subject>FITOTOXICIDAD</subject><subject>FONOFOS</subject><subject>FORATO</subject><subject>FORMULACIONES</subject><subject>FORMULATION</subject><subject>FORMULATIONS</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grains</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>INSECT CONTROL</subject><subject>INSECTICIDAS</subject><subject>INSECTICIDE</subject><subject>INSECTICIDES</subject><subject>INTERACTIONS</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>LUTTE ANTIINSECTE</subject><subject>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>METHODE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>METODOS DE APLICACION</subject><subject>MICHIGAN</subject><subject>MINNESOTA</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA</subject><subject>PERTE DE RECOLTE</subject><subject>PHORATE</subject><subject>PHOSPHONOTHIOATE INSECTICIDES</subject><subject>Phosphoric acid esters</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITE</subject><subject>PHYTOTOXICITY</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Rootworms</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES</subject><subject>TEFLUTHRIN</subject><subject>TERBUFOS</subject><subject>WEED CONTROL</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>WISCONSIN</subject><subject>ZEA MAYS</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPGQgwc9rGYyyWZzlOJHoeChFoqXNaaJrmw3Jdmi_fdu2drLDMzzPnN4CTkHdgsM1F1ihWYM1S_rZqE0HpABSMkyrgQ7JIMtzjo-PyYnKX0zBjnnbEDex42v166xjgZPbYgNjSG0PyEuadUkZ9vKVguXaGho--VodGkVuvs27StXL3rn-s0ZujSbdEPbQJvKhrSu_TqG5pQceVMnd7bbQzJ7fHgdPWeTl6fx6H6SWQTeZrlWUhvOubcLRPRc51LqXIHJofhw2nmOC1SouJAcnWa5UIhKqoIb0AZwSKD_a2NIKTpfrmK1NHFTAiu3FZXTXUXz_4o656p3ViZZU_toGlulvShACA2ii132se_UhrjHqIsCmOzwRY-9CaX5jN2H2VRLEAVD_AMoJHbL</recordid><startdate>19940401</startdate><enddate>19940401</enddate><creator>Morton, C.A</creator><creator>Harvey, R.G</creator><creator>Wedberg, J.L</creator><creator>Kells, J.J</creator><creator>Landis, D.A</creator><creator>Lueschen, W.E</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940401</creationdate><title>Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron</title><author>Morton, C.A ; Harvey, R.G ; Wedberg, J.L ; Kells, J.J ; Landis, D.A ; Lueschen, W.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69759a222fcd333f296559671a618be9ef23d373724523e906473375782a19a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>ABIOTIC INJURIES</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>APPLICATION METHODS</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CARBOFURAN</topic><topic>CARBOFURANO</topic><topic>CHEMICAL CONTROL</topic><topic>chlorethoxyfos</topic><topic>CHLORPYRIFOS</topic><topic>CLORPIRIFOS</topic><topic>CONTROL DE INSECTOS</topic><topic>CONTROL QUIMICO</topic><topic>Controlled release</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>CROP DAMAGE</topic><topic>CROP LOSSES</topic><topic>DESHERBAGE</topic><topic>ESCARDA</topic><topic>FITOTOXICIDAD</topic><topic>FONOFOS</topic><topic>FORATO</topic><topic>FORMULACIONES</topic><topic>FORMULATION</topic><topic>FORMULATIONS</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grains</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>INSECT CONTROL</topic><topic>INSECTICIDAS</topic><topic>INSECTICIDE</topic><topic>INSECTICIDES</topic><topic>INTERACTIONS</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>LUTTE ANTIINSECTE</topic><topic>LUTTE CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>METHODE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>METODOS DE APLICACION</topic><topic>MICHIGAN</topic><topic>MINNESOTA</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA</topic><topic>PERTE DE RECOLTE</topic><topic>PHORATE</topic><topic>PHOSPHONOTHIOATE INSECTICIDES</topic><topic>Phosphoric acid esters</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITE</topic><topic>PHYTOTOXICITY</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Rootworms</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES</topic><topic>TEFLUTHRIN</topic><topic>TERBUFOS</topic><topic>WEED CONTROL</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>WISCONSIN</topic><topic>ZEA MAYS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morton, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, R.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wedberg, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kells, J.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landis, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lueschen, W.E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morton, C.A</au><au>Harvey, R.G</au><au>Wedberg, J.L</au><au>Kells, J.J</au><au>Landis, D.A</au><au>Lueschen, W.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>1994-04-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Field experiments were conducted in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to evaluate injurious interactions between nicosulfuron herbicide applied POST and nine insecticides applied at planting on 'Pioneer 3751' field corn in 1991. Insecticides were applied in-furrow, T-band, and surface band at planting. Corn injury from nicosulfuron and terbufos applications was more severe in Wisconsin than in Michigan. No corn injury was observed in Minnesota. Terbufos 15% ai granule (15G) or 20% ai controlled release granule (20CR) increased nicosulfuron injury to corn in Wisconsin. Nicosulfuron at 35 g ai/ha caused the greatest vigor reduction following terbufos 15G, intermediate vigor reduction following terbufos 20CR, phorate 20G, or phorate 20CR, and the least vigor reduction following fonofos, chlorpyrifos, chlorethoxyfos, tefluthrin, or carbofuran in Wisconsin.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/s0890037x00038793</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 1994-04, Vol.8 (2), p.289-295 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0890037X00038793 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | ABIOTIC INJURIES Agricultural soils Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions APPLICATION METHODS Biological and medical sciences CARBOFURAN CARBOFURANO CHEMICAL CONTROL chlorethoxyfos CHLORPYRIFOS CLORPIRIFOS CONTROL DE INSECTOS CONTROL QUIMICO Controlled release Corn CROP DAMAGE CROP LOSSES DESHERBAGE ESCARDA FITOTOXICIDAD FONOFOS FORATO FORMULACIONES FORMULATION FORMULATIONS Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grains HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE HERBICIDES INSECT CONTROL INSECTICIDAS INSECTICIDE INSECTICIDES INTERACTIONS Invertebrates LUTTE ANTIINSECTE LUTTE CHIMIQUE METHODE D'APPLICATION METODOS DE APLICACION MICHIGAN MINNESOTA Parasitic plants. Weeds PERDIDAS DE LA COSECHA PERTE DE RECOLTE PHORATE PHOSPHONOTHIOATE INSECTICIDES Phosphoric acid esters Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection PHYTOTOXICITE PHYTOTOXICITY Planting Rootworms Soil organic matter SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES TEFLUTHRIN TERBUFOS WEED CONTROL Weeds WISCONSIN ZEA MAYS |
| title | Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20corn%20rootworm%20insecticides%20on%20the%20response%20of%20field%20corn%20(Zea%20mays)%20to%20nicosulfuron&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Morton,%20C.A&rft.date=1994-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0890037x00038793&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3988105%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988105&rfr_iscdi=true |