Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods: ecologic and paleoecologic significance

It has been claimed that articulate brachiopods are excluded from turbulent environments by the weakness of their pedicle attachment. The evidence does not support this conclusion. Experiments on the force required to remove brachiopods from their substrate show that removal force often equals that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paleobiology 1975, Vol.1 (4), p.388-399
1. Verfasser: Thayer, Charles W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 4
container_start_page 388
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 1
creator Thayer, Charles W.
description It has been claimed that articulate brachiopods are excluded from turbulent environments by the weakness of their pedicle attachment. The evidence does not support this conclusion. Experiments on the force required to remove brachiopods from their substrate show that removal force often equals that of bivalve mussels from turbulent environments having the same valve area. Intertidal brachiopods probably occupy cryptic habitats to avoid desiccation, not to avoid waves. Subtidal brachiopods are abundant in tidal currents of 4 knots (2 m/sec) where they are usually attached in exposed positions. Although paleoecologists often assume that the size of the pedicle foramen is directly proportional to attachment strength, the relationship is not precise. Experimental detachment of brachiopods resulted from failure of the substrate, pedicle-substrate attachment, pedicle, or pedicle adjustor muscles, in approximately equal frequencies. At the same attachment strength, the foramen in Terebratalia is four times the size of the foramen in Hemithiris. Although subapical foramina are supposedly unable to enlarge as the brachiopod grows, the subapical foramen of Hemithiris appears to do so.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0094837300002694
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0094837300002694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0094837300002694</cupid><jstor_id>2400141</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2400141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2441-263b1177c3fb777dca939ca741345f2415d4a549ce7514157a8269d74c5595ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMFKAzEQDaJgrX6A4CE_sJpskqbxJkWrUPBQPS-zSXabsk2WJD3496a09CI4l2HmzXvDewjdU_JICZVPa0IUnzPJSKl6pvgFmlDF5pVgjF6iyQGuDvg1uklpW46UmMkJgnWO1vd5g0OHR2ucHiyGnEFvdtZn7DyGmJ3eD5AtbmPZuzAGk56x1WEIvdMYvMEjDDacN8n13nVOg9f2Fl11MCR7d-pT9P32-rV4r1afy4_Fy6qCmnNa1TPWUiqlZl0rpTQaFFMaJKeMi67mVBgOgittpaBlkjAvNo3kWgglrGZTRI-6OoaUou2aMbodxJ-GkuaQUfMno8J5OHK2KYd4JtSckPKjwOwkCbs2OtPbZhv20Rcb_4j-AqRxcqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods: ecologic and paleoecologic significance</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Thayer, Charles W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been claimed that articulate brachiopods are excluded from turbulent environments by the weakness of their pedicle attachment. The evidence does not support this conclusion. Experiments on the force required to remove brachiopods from their substrate show that removal force often equals that of bivalve mussels from turbulent environments having the same valve area. Intertidal brachiopods probably occupy cryptic habitats to avoid desiccation, not to avoid waves. Subtidal brachiopods are abundant in tidal currents of 4 knots (2 m/sec) where they are usually attached in exposed positions. Although paleoecologists often assume that the size of the pedicle foramen is directly proportional to attachment strength, the relationship is not precise. Experimental detachment of brachiopods resulted from failure of the substrate, pedicle-substrate attachment, pedicle, or pedicle adjustor muscles, in approximately equal frequencies. At the same attachment strength, the foramen in Terebratalia is four times the size of the foramen in Hemithiris. Although subapical foramina are supposedly unable to enlarge as the brachiopod grows, the subapical foramen of Hemithiris appears to do so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0094837300002694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Correlation coefficients ; Ecological competition ; Fossils ; Heart valves ; Marine ecology ; Mussels ; Ocean currents ; Paleoecology ; Waves ; Young animals</subject><ispartof>Paleobiology, 1975, Vol.1 (4), p.388-399</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 1975 The Paleontological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2441-263b1177c3fb777dca939ca741345f2415d4a549ce7514157a8269d74c5595ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2441-263b1177c3fb777dca939ca741345f2415d4a549ce7514157a8269d74c5595ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2400141$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2400141$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><title>Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods: ecologic and paleoecologic significance</title><title>Paleobiology</title><addtitle>Paleobiology</addtitle><description>It has been claimed that articulate brachiopods are excluded from turbulent environments by the weakness of their pedicle attachment. The evidence does not support this conclusion. Experiments on the force required to remove brachiopods from their substrate show that removal force often equals that of bivalve mussels from turbulent environments having the same valve area. Intertidal brachiopods probably occupy cryptic habitats to avoid desiccation, not to avoid waves. Subtidal brachiopods are abundant in tidal currents of 4 knots (2 m/sec) where they are usually attached in exposed positions. Although paleoecologists often assume that the size of the pedicle foramen is directly proportional to attachment strength, the relationship is not precise. Experimental detachment of brachiopods resulted from failure of the substrate, pedicle-substrate attachment, pedicle, or pedicle adjustor muscles, in approximately equal frequencies. At the same attachment strength, the foramen in Terebratalia is four times the size of the foramen in Hemithiris. Although subapical foramina are supposedly unable to enlarge as the brachiopod grows, the subapical foramen of Hemithiris appears to do so.</description><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Heart valves</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Ocean currents</subject><subject>Paleoecology</subject><subject>Waves</subject><subject>Young animals</subject><issn>0094-8373</issn><issn>1938-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMFKAzEQDaJgrX6A4CE_sJpskqbxJkWrUPBQPS-zSXabsk2WJD3496a09CI4l2HmzXvDewjdU_JICZVPa0IUnzPJSKl6pvgFmlDF5pVgjF6iyQGuDvg1uklpW46UmMkJgnWO1vd5g0OHR2ucHiyGnEFvdtZn7DyGmJ3eD5AtbmPZuzAGk56x1WEIvdMYvMEjDDacN8n13nVOg9f2Fl11MCR7d-pT9P32-rV4r1afy4_Fy6qCmnNa1TPWUiqlZl0rpTQaFFMaJKeMi67mVBgOgittpaBlkjAvNo3kWgglrGZTRI-6OoaUou2aMbodxJ-GkuaQUfMno8J5OHK2KYd4JtSckPKjwOwkCbs2OtPbZhv20Rcb_4j-AqRxcqo</recordid><startdate>1975</startdate><enddate>1975</enddate><creator>Thayer, Charles W.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Paleontological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1975</creationdate><title>Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods: ecologic and paleoecologic significance</title><author>Thayer, Charles W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2441-263b1177c3fb777dca939ca741345f2415d4a549ce7514157a8269d74c5595ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Heart valves</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Ocean currents</topic><topic>Paleoecology</topic><topic>Waves</topic><topic>Young animals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thayer, Charles W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods: ecologic and paleoecologic significance</atitle><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Paleobiology</addtitle><date>1975</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>388</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>388-399</pages><issn>0094-8373</issn><eissn>1938-5331</eissn><abstract>It has been claimed that articulate brachiopods are excluded from turbulent environments by the weakness of their pedicle attachment. The evidence does not support this conclusion. Experiments on the force required to remove brachiopods from their substrate show that removal force often equals that of bivalve mussels from turbulent environments having the same valve area. Intertidal brachiopods probably occupy cryptic habitats to avoid desiccation, not to avoid waves. Subtidal brachiopods are abundant in tidal currents of 4 knots (2 m/sec) where they are usually attached in exposed positions. Although paleoecologists often assume that the size of the pedicle foramen is directly proportional to attachment strength, the relationship is not precise. Experimental detachment of brachiopods resulted from failure of the substrate, pedicle-substrate attachment, pedicle, or pedicle adjustor muscles, in approximately equal frequencies. At the same attachment strength, the foramen in Terebratalia is four times the size of the foramen in Hemithiris. Although subapical foramina are supposedly unable to enlarge as the brachiopod grows, the subapical foramen of Hemithiris appears to do so.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0094837300002694</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8373
ispartof Paleobiology, 1975, Vol.1 (4), p.388-399
issn 0094-8373
1938-5331
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0094837300002694
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Correlation coefficients
Ecological competition
Fossils
Heart valves
Marine ecology
Mussels
Ocean currents
Paleoecology
Waves
Young animals
title Strength of pedicle attachment in articulate brachiopods: ecologic and paleoecologic significance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A33%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20of%20pedicle%20attachment%20in%20articulate%20brachiopods:%20ecologic%20and%20paleoecologic%20significance&rft.jtitle=Paleobiology&rft.au=Thayer,%20Charles%20W.&rft.date=1975&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=388-399&rft.issn=0094-8373&rft.eissn=1938-5331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0094837300002694&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E2400141%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0094837300002694&rft_jstor_id=2400141&rfr_iscdi=true