Response of Three Annual Grasses to Fluazifop
In greenhouse studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} applied preemergence at 0.035 kg ai/ha gave 91% control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica Gaertn. ♯ ELEIN), 79% control of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. ♯ DIGS...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 1985-09, Vol.33 (5), p.693-697 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 697 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 693 |
| container_title | Weed science |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Derr, Jeffrey F. Monaco, Thomas J. Sheets, Thomas J. |
| description | In greenhouse studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} applied preemergence at 0.035 kg ai/ha gave 91% control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica Gaertn. ♯ ELEIN), 79% control of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. ♯ DIGSA], and 73% control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFA). In field studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.56 kg ai/ha applied preemergence gave 79% control of goosegrass, 76% control of large crabgrass, and 53% control of giant foxtail. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.07 kg/ha gave 79 to 85% control of each grass at the pretillering stage in field studies. The same rate applied at the early tillering stage gave 84% control of goosegrass but only 53 and 58% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively. Relative species response was similar from spray and leaf-spot applications of the herbicide. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 4 μg/plant when spot-applied to leaves of the three grasses at the tillering stage resulted in 65% control of goosegrass but only 20 and 25% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0043174500083107 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500083107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0043174500083107</cupid><jstor_id>4044072</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4044072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2030-a4f8143c73a9adc0187713f4994fddaff5ba7b207414c833ad591053e69a95923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwA0AMGVgDd7Fdx2NV0YJUCYm2c3RN7JIqjSO7GeDXkyhVFySmG7733t07xu4RnhFQvawABEclJACkHEFdsBFKCXGipL5kox7HPb9mNyHsAXCSoB6x-NOExtXBRM5G6y9vTDSt65aqaOEpBBOio4vmVUs_pXXNLbuyVAVzd5pjtpm_rmdv8fJj8T6bLuM8AQ4xCZui4LnipKnIAVOlkFuhtbBFQdbKLaltAkqgyFPOqZAaQXIz0aSlTviY4ZCbexeCNzZrfHkg_50hZH3f7E_fzvM0eBoKOVXWU52X4WxMuZYph072OMj24ej8GQsQAlS_-WHAllxGO98lbFbphCcadQf56Sw6bH1Z7Ey2d62vu1f8c9gv-edzMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Three Annual Grasses to Fluazifop</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Derr, Jeffrey F. ; Monaco, Thomas J. ; Sheets, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Derr, Jeffrey F. ; Monaco, Thomas J. ; Sheets, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description>In greenhouse studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} applied preemergence at 0.035 kg ai/ha gave 91% control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica Gaertn. ♯ ELEIN), 79% control of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. ♯ DIGSA], and 73% control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFA). In field studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.56 kg ai/ha applied preemergence gave 79% control of goosegrass, 76% control of large crabgrass, and 53% control of giant foxtail. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.07 kg/ha gave 79 to 85% control of each grass at the pretillering stage in field studies. The same rate applied at the early tillering stage gave 84% control of goosegrass but only 53 and 58% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively. Relative species response was similar from spray and leaf-spot applications of the herbicide. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 4 μg/plant when spot-applied to leaves of the three grasses at the tillering stage resulted in 65% control of goosegrass but only 20 and 25% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0043174500083107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WEESA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>APPLICATION RATES ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES ; DOSE D'APPLICATION ; DOSIS DE APLICACION ; ELEUSINE INDICA ; Esters ; ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Greenhouses ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; HERBICIDES ; Leaves ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant growth ; Planting ; Plants ; Regrowth ; SETARIA (GRAMINEA) ; SETARIA (GRAMINEE) ; SETARIA (GRASS) ; STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT ; SUSCEPTIBILITY ; Tillering ; Tillers ; Weed Control and Herbicide Technology ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 1985-09, Vol.33 (5), p.693-697</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 1985 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2030-a4f8143c73a9adc0187713f4994fddaff5ba7b207414c833ad591053e69a95923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2030-a4f8143c73a9adc0187713f4994fddaff5ba7b207414c833ad591053e69a95923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4044072$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4044072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27926,27927,58019,58252</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8395830$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derr, Jeffrey F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Three Annual Grasses to Fluazifop</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>In greenhouse studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} applied preemergence at 0.035 kg ai/ha gave 91% control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica Gaertn. ♯ ELEIN), 79% control of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. ♯ DIGSA], and 73% control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFA). In field studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.56 kg ai/ha applied preemergence gave 79% control of goosegrass, 76% control of large crabgrass, and 53% control of giant foxtail. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.07 kg/ha gave 79 to 85% control of each grass at the pretillering stage in field studies. The same rate applied at the early tillering stage gave 84% control of goosegrass but only 53 and 58% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively. Relative species response was similar from spray and leaf-spot applications of the herbicide. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 4 μg/plant when spot-applied to leaves of the three grasses at the tillering stage resulted in 65% control of goosegrass but only 20 and 25% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively.</description><subject>APPLICATION RATES</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES</subject><subject>DOSE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>DOSIS DE APLICACION</subject><subject>ELEUSINE INDICA</subject><subject>Esters</subject><subject>ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>HERBICIDES</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>SETARIA (GRAMINEA)</subject><subject>SETARIA (GRAMINEE)</subject><subject>SETARIA (GRASS)</subject><subject>STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT</subject><subject>SUSCEPTIBILITY</subject><subject>Tillering</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><subject>Weed Control and Herbicide Technology</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwA0AMGVgDd7Fdx2NV0YJUCYm2c3RN7JIqjSO7GeDXkyhVFySmG7733t07xu4RnhFQvawABEclJACkHEFdsBFKCXGipL5kox7HPb9mNyHsAXCSoB6x-NOExtXBRM5G6y9vTDSt65aqaOEpBBOio4vmVUs_pXXNLbuyVAVzd5pjtpm_rmdv8fJj8T6bLuM8AQ4xCZui4LnipKnIAVOlkFuhtbBFQdbKLaltAkqgyFPOqZAaQXIz0aSlTviY4ZCbexeCNzZrfHkg_50hZH3f7E_fzvM0eBoKOVXWU52X4WxMuZYph072OMj24ej8GQsQAlS_-WHAllxGO98lbFbphCcadQf56Sw6bH1Z7Ey2d62vu1f8c9gv-edzMQ</recordid><startdate>19850901</startdate><enddate>19850901</enddate><creator>Derr, Jeffrey F.</creator><creator>Monaco, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Sheets, Thomas J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850901</creationdate><title>Response of Three Annual Grasses to Fluazifop</title><author>Derr, Jeffrey F. ; Monaco, Thomas J. ; Sheets, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2030-a4f8143c73a9adc0187713f4994fddaff5ba7b207414c833ad591053e69a95923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>APPLICATION RATES</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES</topic><topic>DOSE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>DOSIS DE APLICACION</topic><topic>ELEUSINE INDICA</topic><topic>Esters</topic><topic>ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>HERBICIDES</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>SETARIA (GRAMINEA)</topic><topic>SETARIA (GRAMINEE)</topic><topic>SETARIA (GRASS)</topic><topic>STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT</topic><topic>SUSCEPTIBILITY</topic><topic>Tillering</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><topic>Weed Control and Herbicide Technology</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derr, Jeffrey F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derr, Jeffrey F.</au><au>Monaco, Thomas J.</au><au>Sheets, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Three Annual Grasses to Fluazifop</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>1985-09-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>693</spage><epage>697</epage><pages>693-697</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><coden>WEESA6</coden><abstract>In greenhouse studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid} applied preemergence at 0.035 kg ai/ha gave 91% control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica Gaertn. ♯ ELEIN), 79% control of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. ♯ DIGSA], and 73% control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFA). In field studies, the butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.56 kg ai/ha applied preemergence gave 79% control of goosegrass, 76% control of large crabgrass, and 53% control of giant foxtail. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 0.07 kg/ha gave 79 to 85% control of each grass at the pretillering stage in field studies. The same rate applied at the early tillering stage gave 84% control of goosegrass but only 53 and 58% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively. Relative species response was similar from spray and leaf-spot applications of the herbicide. The butyl ester of fluazifop at 4 μg/plant when spot-applied to leaves of the three grasses at the tillering stage resulted in 65% control of goosegrass but only 20 and 25% control of large crabgrass and giant foxtail, respectively.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0043174500083107</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
| ispartof | Weed science, 1985-09, Vol.33 (5), p.693-697 |
| issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500083107 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | APPLICATION RATES Biological and medical sciences Chemical control DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES DOSE D'APPLICATION DOSIS DE APLICACION ELEUSINE INDICA Esters ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Greenhouses HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE HERBICIDES Leaves Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant growth Planting Plants Regrowth SETARIA (GRAMINEA) SETARIA (GRAMINEE) SETARIA (GRASS) STADE DE DEVELOPPEMENT SUSCEPTIBILITY Tillering Tillers Weed Control and Herbicide Technology Weeds |
| title | Response of Three Annual Grasses to Fluazifop |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Three%20Annual%20Grasses%20to%20Fluazifop&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Derr,%20Jeffrey%20F.&rft.date=1985-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=693&rft.epage=697&rft.pages=693-697&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft.coden=WEESA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0043174500083107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4044072%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0043174500083107&rft_jstor_id=4044072&rfr_iscdi=true |