Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications

Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N 4,N 4-diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluorometh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 1979-05, Vol.27 (3), p.312-317
Hauptverfasser: Abernathy, J. R., Keeling, J. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 317
container_issue 3
container_start_page 312
container_title Weed science
container_volume 27
creator Abernathy, J. R.
Keeling, J. W.
description Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N 4,N 4-diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], and USB 3153 (N 3,N 3-di-N-propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl-m-phenylenediamine) were applied to evaluate weed control, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′) tolerance, and effect on rotational crops. Each herbicide was applied at 1-month intervals for 6 months prior to planting at 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 2X the recommended rates. Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting. Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control. Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control. USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May. Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0043174500044088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500044088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0043174500044088</cupid><jstor_id>4043029</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4043029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-d2178760a973f9da1f76d18201ba9286087fbf53fe440af70d8f89aa4f02110a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRsFYfQBDZF4jO5G93L0utVigI1l6HSbJbtqTZsBuFvr2JLd4IXs3Ad84Z5jB2i_CAgOJxDZAmKNIMhiUFKc_YBLMMolhk6pxNRhyN_JJdhbADwDxGNWHlwhhbUXXg1Nb83fXUW9dSw-fedfxdh861QfPe8ZX-0k34kT1RrwN3hj_Z1vbeUWsb22q-1L60la01n3VdM8SOWeGaXRhqgr45zSnbPC8-5sto9fbyOp-toirOkz6qYxRS5EBKJEbVhEbkNcoYsCQVyxykMKXJEqOH_8gIqKWRiig1ECMCJVOGx9zKuxC8NkXn7Z78oUAoxpKKPyUNnrujZxd6538N6aCDWA34_ogNuYK23oZis0YlATLIEzUKktNN2pfe1ltd7NynHwoM_1z9BpuBe4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Abernathy, J. R. ; Keeling, J. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, J. R. ; Keeling, J. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N 4,N 4-diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], and USB 3153 (N 3,N 3-di-N-propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl-m-phenylenediamine) were applied to evaluate weed control, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′) tolerance, and effect on rotational crops. Each herbicide was applied at 1-month intervals for 6 months prior to planting at 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 2X the recommended rates. Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting. Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control. Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control. USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May. Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0043174500044088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agrology ; Cotton ; Crop rotation ; Herbicides ; Planting ; Sand soils ; Sorghum ; Tillage ; Weed control ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 1979-05, Vol.27 (3), p.312-317</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 1979 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-d2178760a973f9da1f76d18201ba9286087fbf53fe440af70d8f89aa4f02110a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-d2178760a973f9da1f76d18201ba9286087fbf53fe440af70d8f89aa4f02110a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4043029$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4043029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, J. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N 4,N 4-diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], and USB 3153 (N 3,N 3-di-N-propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl-m-phenylenediamine) were applied to evaluate weed control, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′) tolerance, and effect on rotational crops. Each herbicide was applied at 1-month intervals for 6 months prior to planting at 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 2X the recommended rates. Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting. Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control. Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control. USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May. Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].</description><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Sand soils</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRsFYfQBDZF4jO5G93L0utVigI1l6HSbJbtqTZsBuFvr2JLd4IXs3Ad84Z5jB2i_CAgOJxDZAmKNIMhiUFKc_YBLMMolhk6pxNRhyN_JJdhbADwDxGNWHlwhhbUXXg1Nb83fXUW9dSw-fedfxdh861QfPe8ZX-0k34kT1RrwN3hj_Z1vbeUWsb22q-1L60la01n3VdM8SOWeGaXRhqgr45zSnbPC8-5sto9fbyOp-toirOkz6qYxRS5EBKJEbVhEbkNcoYsCQVyxykMKXJEqOH_8gIqKWRiig1ECMCJVOGx9zKuxC8NkXn7Z78oUAoxpKKPyUNnrujZxd6538N6aCDWA34_ogNuYK23oZis0YlATLIEzUKktNN2pfe1ltd7NynHwoM_1z9BpuBe4s</recordid><startdate>19790501</startdate><enddate>19790501</enddate><creator>Abernathy, J. R.</creator><creator>Keeling, J. W.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790501</creationdate><title>Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications</title><author>Abernathy, J. R. ; Keeling, J. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-d2178760a973f9da1f76d18201ba9286087fbf53fe440af70d8f89aa4f02110a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Sand soils</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abernathy, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, J. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abernathy, J. R.</au><au>Keeling, J. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>1979-05-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>312-317</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N 4,N 4-diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], and USB 3153 (N 3,N 3-di-N-propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl-m-phenylenediamine) were applied to evaluate weed control, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′) tolerance, and effect on rotational crops. Each herbicide was applied at 1-month intervals for 6 months prior to planting at 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 2X the recommended rates. Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting. Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control. Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control. USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May. Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0043174500044088</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 1979-05, Vol.27 (3), p.312-317
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500044088
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Agrology
Cotton
Crop rotation
Herbicides
Planting
Sand soils
Sorghum
Tillage
Weed control
Wheat
title Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A24%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20Rotational%20Crop%20Response%20to%20Levels%20and%20Dates%20of%20Dinitroaniline%20Herbicide%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Abernathy,%20J.%20R.&rft.date=1979-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=312-317&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0043174500044088&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4043029%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0043174500044088&rft_jstor_id=4043029&rfr_iscdi=true