Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections
Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 1982-07, Vol.30 (4), p.339-343 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 343 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | Weed science |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Andersen, Robert N. |
description | Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0043174500040716 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500040716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0043174500040716</cupid><jstor_id>4043621</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4043621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4AQSSP-lA9ufXyKEM3YSC4TXwraZqumWszkxbx35uy4Yvg0zmH75Z8CF0SuCNAkvsFAGck4QLCAgmJj9CICAERTUR2jEYDHA34KTrzfgNAYkqyEfp8k87IztgWmxZPnf3qajyThemwbEv8qv3Otl7jzuJJrRuj5NZj2dh2jZe10xpPbBOuMNTHVhe9wzfvsu1q0zfYd65vgn3f3OKF3mo1xPhzdFIFE31xmGO0enpcTmbR_GX6PHmYR4okKYm4yCoWi1QJXmhJuSQqE7qCUlECDKSikgFPmC64CIS0oIonZZXSMqYiLigbI7L3Vc5673SV75wJz_nOCeRDZ_mfzoLmaq_Z-M66XwEPvFBXgK_3cCVtLtfO-Hy1IFnKIANGYggEdsiUTeFMudb5xvauDf_8J_UHqCiBNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Andersen, Robert N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Robert N. ; SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</creatorcontrib><description>Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0043174500040716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Axils ; Branches ; Greenhouses ; Leaves ; Necrosis ; Petroleum ; Photoperiod ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Solvents</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 1982-07, Vol.30 (4), p.339-343</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 1982 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4043621$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4043621$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.</description><subject>Axils</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Photoperiod</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4AQSSP-lA9ufXyKEM3YSC4TXwraZqumWszkxbx35uy4Yvg0zmH75Z8CF0SuCNAkvsFAGck4QLCAgmJj9CICAERTUR2jEYDHA34KTrzfgNAYkqyEfp8k87IztgWmxZPnf3qajyThemwbEv8qv3Otl7jzuJJrRuj5NZj2dh2jZe10xpPbBOuMNTHVhe9wzfvsu1q0zfYd65vgn3f3OKF3mo1xPhzdFIFE31xmGO0enpcTmbR_GX6PHmYR4okKYm4yCoWi1QJXmhJuSQqE7qCUlECDKSikgFPmC64CIS0oIonZZXSMqYiLigbI7L3Vc5673SV75wJz_nOCeRDZ_mfzoLmaq_Z-M66XwEPvFBXgK_3cCVtLtfO-Hy1IFnKIANGYggEdsiUTeFMudb5xvauDf_8J_UHqCiBNQ</recordid><startdate>19820701</startdate><enddate>19820701</enddate><creator>Andersen, Robert N.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820701</creationdate><title>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</title><author>Andersen, Robert N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Axils</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Photoperiod</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Robert N.</au><aucorp>SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>1982-07-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>339-343</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0043174500040716</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
ispartof | Weed science, 1982-07, Vol.30 (4), p.339-343 |
issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500040716 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Axils Branches Greenhouses Leaves Necrosis Petroleum Photoperiod Plant growth Plants Solvents |
title | Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A19%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20Growth%20Habit%20and%20Response%20to%20Chemicals%20among%20Three%20Common%20Cocklebur%20(Xanthium%20strumarium)%20Selections&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Andersen,%20Robert%20N.&rft.aucorp=SEAMEO%20Regional%20Center%20for%20Tropical%20Biology,%20Bogor%20(Indonesia)&rft.date=1982-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=339-343&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0043174500040716&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4043621%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0043174500040716&rft_jstor_id=4043621&rfr_iscdi=true |