Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections

Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 1982-07, Vol.30 (4), p.339-343
1. Verfasser: Andersen, Robert N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 343
container_issue 4
container_start_page 339
container_title Weed science
container_volume 30
creator Andersen, Robert N.
description Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0043174500040716
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500040716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0043174500040716</cupid><jstor_id>4043621</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4043621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4AQSSP-lA9ufXyKEM3YSC4TXwraZqumWszkxbx35uy4Yvg0zmH75Z8CF0SuCNAkvsFAGck4QLCAgmJj9CICAERTUR2jEYDHA34KTrzfgNAYkqyEfp8k87IztgWmxZPnf3qajyThemwbEv8qv3Otl7jzuJJrRuj5NZj2dh2jZe10xpPbBOuMNTHVhe9wzfvsu1q0zfYd65vgn3f3OKF3mo1xPhzdFIFE31xmGO0enpcTmbR_GX6PHmYR4okKYm4yCoWi1QJXmhJuSQqE7qCUlECDKSikgFPmC64CIS0oIonZZXSMqYiLigbI7L3Vc5673SV75wJz_nOCeRDZ_mfzoLmaq_Z-M66XwEPvFBXgK_3cCVtLtfO-Hy1IFnKIANGYggEdsiUTeFMudb5xvauDf_8J_UHqCiBNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Andersen, Robert N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Robert N. ; SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</creatorcontrib><description>Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0043174500040716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Axils ; Branches ; Greenhouses ; Leaves ; Necrosis ; Petroleum ; Photoperiod ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Solvents</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 1982-07, Vol.30 (4), p.339-343</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 1982 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4043621$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4043621$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.</description><subject>Axils</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Photoperiod</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4AQSSP-lA9ufXyKEM3YSC4TXwraZqumWszkxbx35uy4Yvg0zmH75Z8CF0SuCNAkvsFAGck4QLCAgmJj9CICAERTUR2jEYDHA34KTrzfgNAYkqyEfp8k87IztgWmxZPnf3qajyThemwbEv8qv3Otl7jzuJJrRuj5NZj2dh2jZe10xpPbBOuMNTHVhe9wzfvsu1q0zfYd65vgn3f3OKF3mo1xPhzdFIFE31xmGO0enpcTmbR_GX6PHmYR4okKYm4yCoWi1QJXmhJuSQqE7qCUlECDKSikgFPmC64CIS0oIonZZXSMqYiLigbI7L3Vc5673SV75wJz_nOCeRDZ_mfzoLmaq_Z-M66XwEPvFBXgK_3cCVtLtfO-Hy1IFnKIANGYggEdsiUTeFMudb5xvauDf_8J_UHqCiBNQ</recordid><startdate>19820701</startdate><enddate>19820701</enddate><creator>Andersen, Robert N.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820701</creationdate><title>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</title><author>Andersen, Robert N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1781-459f3658c54bea24a1c95ef0dc21030ac2a30473eb45bea8b2c47df82d6256b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Axils</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Photoperiod</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Robert N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Robert N.</au><aucorp>SEAMEO Regional Center for Tropical Biology, Bogor (Indonesia)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>1982-07-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>339-343</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Burs of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) obtained from Stoneville, Mississippi; Urbana, Illinois; and Lamberton, Minnesota, were used in greenhouse and growth chamber studies. The Mississippi and the Illinois strains were both classified as being in the “strumarium” complex of X. strumarium, whereas, the Minnesota strain was classified as being in the “hybrid” complex. The Minnesota common cocklebur developed branch leaves in the leaf axils of the main stem to a much greater extent than did the Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur. The Mississippi common cocklebur was frequently more tolerant of postemergence applications of bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than were the Illinois and Minnesota common cockebur. The Mississippi and Illinois common cocklebur developed leaf necrosis when sprayed with an insecticide formulation containing malathion (o, o-dimethyl phosphorodithioate of mercaptosuccinate) and petroleum solvents; the Minnesota common cocklebur did not.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0043174500040716</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 1982-07, Vol.30 (4), p.339-343
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043174500040716
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Axils
Branches
Greenhouses
Leaves
Necrosis
Petroleum
Photoperiod
Plant growth
Plants
Solvents
title Variation in Growth Habit and Response to Chemicals among Three Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Selections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A19%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20Growth%20Habit%20and%20Response%20to%20Chemicals%20among%20Three%20Common%20Cocklebur%20(Xanthium%20strumarium)%20Selections&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Andersen,%20Robert%20N.&rft.aucorp=SEAMEO%20Regional%20Center%20for%20Tropical%20Biology,%20Bogor%20(Indonesia)&rft.date=1982-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=339-343&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0043174500040716&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4043621%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0043174500040716&rft_jstor_id=4043621&rfr_iscdi=true