Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data

Count rates, representing the rate of 14 C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14 C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14 C data reporting (table 1) causes headache...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiocarbon 1977, Vol.19 (3), p.355-363
Hauptverfasser: Stuiver, Minze, Polach, Henry A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 363
container_issue 3
container_start_page 355
container_title Radiocarbon
container_volume 19
creator Stuiver, Minze
Polach, Henry A
description Count rates, representing the rate of 14 C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14 C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14 C data reporting (table 1) causes headaches to many. Minor deflections in pathway, depending on personal interpretations, are possible and give end results that are not always useful for inter-laboratory comparisons. This discussion is an attempt to identify some of these problems and to recommend certain procedures by which reporting ambiguities can be avoided.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0033822200003672
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033822200003672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0033822200003672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c902-12ecc20f5f5750b828d2f0720a117e9ce536a73b0db54d298f9550f9ffec223e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYMoWGd8AHfxAaL33jRNspSOfzAgOLMvaZorFZ0Oybjw7Z2iO8_mLD44h0-IK4QbBLS3GwCtHRHBMbqxdCIq9LVRxhpzKqoZq5mfi4tS3gEIG2crcb0aS_wqZZx28jXtp3wYd29yYom1bOUqHMJSnHH4KOnyrxdi-3C_bZ_U-uXxub1bq-iBFFKKkYANHw-hd-QGYrAEAdEmH5PRTbC6h6E39UDesTcG2DOnSKSTXgj8nY15KiUn7vZ5_Az5u0PoZsXun6L-AXjJQPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Stuiver, Minze ; Polach, Henry A</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuiver, Minze ; Polach, Henry A</creatorcontrib><description>Count rates, representing the rate of 14 C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14 C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14 C data reporting (table 1) causes headaches to many. Minor deflections in pathway, depending on personal interpretations, are possible and give end results that are not always useful for inter-laboratory comparisons. This discussion is an attempt to identify some of these problems and to recommend certain procedures by which reporting ambiguities can be avoided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-5755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033822200003672</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Radiocarbon, 1977, Vol.19 (3), p.355-363</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c902-12ecc20f5f5750b828d2f0720a117e9ce536a73b0db54d298f9550f9ffec223e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c902-12ecc20f5f5750b828d2f0720a117e9ce536a73b0db54d298f9550f9ffec223e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuiver, Minze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polach, Henry A</creatorcontrib><title>Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data</title><title>Radiocarbon</title><description>Count rates, representing the rate of 14 C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14 C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14 C data reporting (table 1) causes headaches to many. Minor deflections in pathway, depending on personal interpretations, are possible and give end results that are not always useful for inter-laboratory comparisons. This discussion is an attempt to identify some of these problems and to recommend certain procedures by which reporting ambiguities can be avoided.</description><issn>0033-8222</issn><issn>1945-5755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYMoWGd8AHfxAaL33jRNspSOfzAgOLMvaZorFZ0Oybjw7Z2iO8_mLD44h0-IK4QbBLS3GwCtHRHBMbqxdCIq9LVRxhpzKqoZq5mfi4tS3gEIG2crcb0aS_wqZZx28jXtp3wYd29yYom1bOUqHMJSnHH4KOnyrxdi-3C_bZ_U-uXxub1bq-iBFFKKkYANHw-hd-QGYrAEAdEmH5PRTbC6h6E39UDesTcG2DOnSKSTXgj8nY15KiUn7vZ5_Az5u0PoZsXun6L-AXjJQPs</recordid><startdate>1977</startdate><enddate>1977</enddate><creator>Stuiver, Minze</creator><creator>Polach, Henry A</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1977</creationdate><title>Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data</title><author>Stuiver, Minze ; Polach, Henry A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c902-12ecc20f5f5750b828d2f0720a117e9ce536a73b0db54d298f9550f9ffec223e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuiver, Minze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polach, Henry A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiocarbon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuiver, Minze</au><au>Polach, Henry A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data</atitle><jtitle>Radiocarbon</jtitle><date>1977</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>355-363</pages><issn>0033-8222</issn><eissn>1945-5755</eissn><abstract>Count rates, representing the rate of 14 C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14 C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14 C data reporting (table 1) causes headaches to many. Minor deflections in pathway, depending on personal interpretations, are possible and give end results that are not always useful for inter-laboratory comparisons. This discussion is an attempt to identify some of these problems and to recommend certain procedures by which reporting ambiguities can be avoided.</abstract><doi>10.1017/S0033822200003672</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8222
ispartof Radiocarbon, 1977, Vol.19 (3), p.355-363
issn 0033-8222
1945-5755
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033822200003672
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
title Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discussion%20Reporting%20of%2014%20C%20Data&rft.jtitle=Radiocarbon&rft.au=Stuiver,%20Minze&rft.date=1977&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=355-363&rft.issn=0033-8222&rft.eissn=1945-5755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033822200003672&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S0033822200003672%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true