Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?: A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al . (2015)

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Psychological medicine 2016-01, Vol.46 (1), p.59-61
Hauptverfasser:	Moritz, S., Werner, D., Menon, M., Balzan, R. P., Woodward, T. S.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	61
container_issue	1
container_start_page	59
container_title	Psychological medicine
container_volume	46
creator	Moritz, S. Werner, D. Menon, M. Balzan, R. P. Woodward, T. S.
description
doi_str_mv	10.1017/S0033291715002068
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033291715002068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0033291715002068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-bd023b327ee55ed366344c0d24e877509e7f1d3e93912e7c706c19d41d3d61f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD1OxDAUhC0EEmHhAHS-gOE927HjCqGIX61EAdSRY78sQbvJKs4ibccduCEnIRF0VCPNNzPFMHaOcIGA9vIZQCnp0GIOIMEUByxDbZwonC0OWTZjMfNjdpLSOwAq1DJj5eNus227FR973tHKj-0H8dB3Yb1Lbd8l_v35xT0PPhHvG57GXdyLKfZGw9yqW5-uTtlR49eJzv50wV5vb17Ke7F8unsor5cioLOjqCNIVStpifKcojJGaR0gSk2FtTk4sg1GRU45lGSDBTMVo568aLDJ1YLh724Y-pQGaqrt0G78sK8QqvmF6t8L6geuVU9U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?: A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al . (2015)</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Moritz, S. ; Werner, D. ; Menon, M. ; Balzan, R. P. ; Woodward, T. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moritz, S. ; Werner, D. ; Menon, M. ; Balzan, R. P. ; Woodward, T. S.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715002068</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2016-01, Vol.46 (1), p.59-61</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-bd023b327ee55ed366344c0d24e877509e7f1d3e93912e7c706c19d41d3d61f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moritz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balzan, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, T. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?: A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al . (2015)</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkD1OxDAUhC0EEmHhAHS-gOE927HjCqGIX61EAdSRY78sQbvJKs4ibccduCEnIRF0VCPNNzPFMHaOcIGA9vIZQCnp0GIOIMEUByxDbZwonC0OWTZjMfNjdpLSOwAq1DJj5eNus227FR973tHKj-0H8dB3Yb1Lbd8l_v35xT0PPhHvG57GXdyLKfZGw9yqW5-uTtlR49eJzv50wV5vb17Ke7F8unsor5cioLOjqCNIVStpifKcojJGaR0gSk2FtTk4sg1GRU45lGSDBTMVo568aLDJ1YLh724Y-pQGaqrt0G78sK8QqvmF6t8L6geuVU9U</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Moritz, S.</creator><creator>Werner, D.</creator><creator>Menon, M.</creator><creator>Balzan, R. P.</creator><creator>Woodward, T. S.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?</title><author>Moritz, S. ; Werner, D. ; Menon, M. ; Balzan, R. P. ; Woodward, T. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-bd023b327ee55ed366344c0d24e877509e7f1d3e93912e7c706c19d41d3d61f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moritz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balzan, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, T. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moritz, S.</au><au>Werner, D.</au><au>Menon, M.</au><au>Balzan, R. P.</au><au>Woodward, T. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?: A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al . (2015)</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>59-61</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><doi>10.1017/S0033291715002068</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0033-2917
ispartof	Psychological medicine, 2016-01, Vol.46 (1), p.59-61
issn	0033-2917 1469-8978
language	eng
recordid	cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033291715002068
source	Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
title	Jumping to negative conclusions – a case of study-gathering bias?: A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al . (2015)
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T22%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jumping%20to%20negative%20conclusions%20%E2%80%93%20a%20case%20of%20study-gathering%20bias?:%20A%20reply%20by%20the%20developers%20of%20metacognitive%20training%20(MCT)%20to%20the%20meta-analysis%20of%20van%20Oosterhout%20et%20al%20.%20(2015)&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=Moritz,%20S.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=59-61&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291715002068&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S0033291715002068%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true