Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition

Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of paleontology 1990-07, Vol.64 (4), p.629-637
1. Verfasser: Kusmer, Karla D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 637
container_issue 4
container_start_page 629
container_title Journal of paleontology
container_volume 64
creator Kusmer, Karla D.
description Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022336000042669
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022336000042669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022336000042669</cupid><jstor_id>1305529</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1305529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j0FLxDAQhYMoWFd_gOCheK_OZJqmPcqiq7DgwfVckk2iLe2mJBXZf2_LLngQnMvAe3wfPMauEe4QUN6_AXBOVMB0OS-K6oQlWJHMplCesmSus7k_ZxcxtgDIC8SE3W7U8Ol3vt-n3qX-u0sH23V2TI0dfGzGxu8u2ZlTXbRXx79g70-Pm-Vztn5dvSwf1pkiwjEToB0o46gyW9DSOA0WyZUAyhW8rICbshR8Sh0IBCtkXmpJGmSuK1KGFgwP3m3wMQbr6iE0vQr7GqGeR9Z_Rk7MzYFp4-jDL0AgBJ9rOipVr0NjPmzd-q-wm2b8I_0Boe9btQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kusmer, Karla D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kusmer, Karla D.</creatorcontrib><description>Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022336000042669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal digestion ; Barns ; Birds of prey ; Bones ; Carnivores ; Femur ; Fossils ; Owls ; Taphonomy ; Tooth erosion</subject><ispartof>Journal of paleontology, 1990-07, Vol.64 (4), p.629-637</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 1990 The Paleontological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1305529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1305529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kusmer, Karla D.</creatorcontrib><title>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</title><title>Journal of paleontology</title><addtitle>J. Paleontol</addtitle><description>Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.</description><subject>Animal digestion</subject><subject>Barns</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Taphonomy</subject><subject>Tooth erosion</subject><issn>0022-3360</issn><issn>1937-2337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j0FLxDAQhYMoWFd_gOCheK_OZJqmPcqiq7DgwfVckk2iLe2mJBXZf2_LLngQnMvAe3wfPMauEe4QUN6_AXBOVMB0OS-K6oQlWJHMplCesmSus7k_ZxcxtgDIC8SE3W7U8Ol3vt-n3qX-u0sH23V2TI0dfGzGxu8u2ZlTXbRXx79g70-Pm-Vztn5dvSwf1pkiwjEToB0o46gyW9DSOA0WyZUAyhW8rICbshR8Sh0IBCtkXmpJGmSuK1KGFgwP3m3wMQbr6iE0vQr7GqGeR9Z_Rk7MzYFp4-jDL0AgBJ9rOipVr0NjPmzd-q-wm2b8I_0Boe9btQ</recordid><startdate>19900701</startdate><enddate>19900701</enddate><creator>Kusmer, Karla D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Paleontological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900701</creationdate><title>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</title><author>Kusmer, Karla D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal digestion</topic><topic>Barns</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Taphonomy</topic><topic>Tooth erosion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kusmer, Karla D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of paleontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kusmer, Karla D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paleontology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Paleontol</addtitle><date>1990-07-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>637</epage><pages>629-637</pages><issn>0022-3360</issn><eissn>1937-2337</eissn><abstract>Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022336000042669</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3360
ispartof Journal of paleontology, 1990-07, Vol.64 (4), p.629-637
issn 0022-3360
1937-2337
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022336000042669
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal digestion
Barns
Birds of prey
Bones
Carnivores
Femur
Fossils
Owls
Taphonomy
Tooth erosion
title Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A24%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taphonomy%20of%20owl%20pellet%20deposition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paleontology&rft.au=Kusmer,%20Karla%20D.&rft.date=1990-07-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=637&rft.pages=629-637&rft.issn=0022-3360&rft.eissn=1937-2337&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022336000042669&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1305529%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022336000042669&rft_jstor_id=1305529&rfr_iscdi=true