Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition
Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of paleontology 1990-07, Vol.64 (4), p.629-637 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 637 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 629 |
container_title | Journal of paleontology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Kusmer, Karla D. |
description | Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022336000042669 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022336000042669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022336000042669</cupid><jstor_id>1305529</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1305529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j0FLxDAQhYMoWFd_gOCheK_OZJqmPcqiq7DgwfVckk2iLe2mJBXZf2_LLngQnMvAe3wfPMauEe4QUN6_AXBOVMB0OS-K6oQlWJHMplCesmSus7k_ZxcxtgDIC8SE3W7U8Ol3vt-n3qX-u0sH23V2TI0dfGzGxu8u2ZlTXbRXx79g70-Pm-Vztn5dvSwf1pkiwjEToB0o46gyW9DSOA0WyZUAyhW8rICbshR8Sh0IBCtkXmpJGmSuK1KGFgwP3m3wMQbr6iE0vQr7GqGeR9Z_Rk7MzYFp4-jDL0AgBJ9rOipVr0NjPmzd-q-wm2b8I_0Boe9btQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kusmer, Karla D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kusmer, Karla D.</creatorcontrib><description>Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022336000042669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal digestion ; Barns ; Birds of prey ; Bones ; Carnivores ; Femur ; Fossils ; Owls ; Taphonomy ; Tooth erosion</subject><ispartof>Journal of paleontology, 1990-07, Vol.64 (4), p.629-637</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 1990 The Paleontological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1305529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1305529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kusmer, Karla D.</creatorcontrib><title>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</title><title>Journal of paleontology</title><addtitle>J. Paleontol</addtitle><description>Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.</description><subject>Animal digestion</subject><subject>Barns</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Taphonomy</subject><subject>Tooth erosion</subject><issn>0022-3360</issn><issn>1937-2337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j0FLxDAQhYMoWFd_gOCheK_OZJqmPcqiq7DgwfVckk2iLe2mJBXZf2_LLngQnMvAe3wfPMauEe4QUN6_AXBOVMB0OS-K6oQlWJHMplCesmSus7k_ZxcxtgDIC8SE3W7U8Ol3vt-n3qX-u0sH23V2TI0dfGzGxu8u2ZlTXbRXx79g70-Pm-Vztn5dvSwf1pkiwjEToB0o46gyW9DSOA0WyZUAyhW8rICbshR8Sh0IBCtkXmpJGmSuK1KGFgwP3m3wMQbr6iE0vQr7GqGeR9Z_Rk7MzYFp4-jDL0AgBJ9rOipVr0NjPmzd-q-wm2b8I_0Boe9btQ</recordid><startdate>19900701</startdate><enddate>19900701</enddate><creator>Kusmer, Karla D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Paleontological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900701</creationdate><title>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</title><author>Kusmer, Karla D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a331t-50bf0adf39dc0b7dfb0e13f800af628902d8852b0ef0510e5748b73b074b93ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal digestion</topic><topic>Barns</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Taphonomy</topic><topic>Tooth erosion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kusmer, Karla D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of paleontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kusmer, Karla D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paleontology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Paleontol</addtitle><date>1990-07-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>637</epage><pages>629-637</pages><issn>0022-3360</issn><eissn>1937-2337</eissn><abstract>Remains derived from owl pellets are a major source of small-animal remains in paleontological and archaeological sites. Pellet remains are examined here to further develop workable strategies for extracting taphonomic information from microvertebrate assemblages. Study of the remains of three wild owl species yielded characteristic patterns of bone fragmentation and skeletal element representation. At the assemblage level, owl-derived assemblages are shown to differ quantitatively from other assemblages. The possible variability to be expected in owl-derived assemblages is examined and the patterns are contrasted with those produced by other depositional agents. The patterns can be useful in the identification of owl-deposited remains in some assemblages; however, overlap with patterns produced by other mechanisms may complicate analysis.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022336000042669</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3360 |
ispartof | Journal of paleontology, 1990-07, Vol.64 (4), p.629-637 |
issn | 0022-3360 1937-2337 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022336000042669 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Animal digestion Barns Birds of prey Bones Carnivores Femur Fossils Owls Taphonomy Tooth erosion |
title | Taphonomy of owl pellet deposition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A24%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taphonomy%20of%20owl%20pellet%20deposition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paleontology&rft.au=Kusmer,%20Karla%20D.&rft.date=1990-07-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=637&rft.pages=629-637&rft.issn=0022-3360&rft.eissn=1937-2337&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022336000042669&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1305529%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022336000042669&rft_jstor_id=1305529&rfr_iscdi=true |