Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics

The relative efficacy of Cocaine and Lignocaine as local anaesthetic agents in the nose were compared. Twenty-five patients undergoing bilateral intra-nasal antroscopy under local anaesthetic were used as their own controls when one nasal cavity was anaesthetised with Cocaine and the other with Lign...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of laryngology and otology 1988-07, Vol.102 (7), p.628-629
Hauptverfasser: Jonathan, D. A., Violaris, N. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 629
container_issue 7
container_start_page 628
container_title Journal of laryngology and otology
container_volume 102
creator Jonathan, D. A.
Violaris, N. S.
description The relative efficacy of Cocaine and Lignocaine as local anaesthetic agents in the nose were compared. Twenty-five patients undergoing bilateral intra-nasal antroscopy under local anaesthetic were used as their own controls when one nasal cavity was anaesthetised with Cocaine and the other with Lignocaine. On 56 per cent of occasions the patients experienced no difference in the level of discomfort. However, on 36 per cent of occasions Cocaine was noted to give better subjective anaesthesia as compared with 8 per cent of occasions when Lignocaine was superior.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022215100105924
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022215100105924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022215100105924</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0022215100105924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-cf73b40908110a8f059b1be8acec84899c63dc899d67fb8e712dff3bece0b7f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EKqXwAzgg5cA14LWT2DlC1QeoEuJ1tmzHLi5pUtmpBP8eVw29IHFarecba3YQugR8AxjY7SvGhBDIAWPAeUmyIzQElvE0zwp8jIY7Od3pp-gshBWOGMNkgAY0AyAED9Fk3K430rvQNklrE91q6RqTyKZKardsfteQuKbzspFB1kkdX-uISBO6D9M5Hc7RiZV1MBf9HKH36eRtPE8XT7OH8d0i1ZQVXaotoyrDJeYAWHIbIytQhkttNM94WeqCVjrOqmBWccOAVNZSZbTBillCRwj2_2rfhuCNFRvv1tJ_C8Bi14j400j0XO09m61am-rg6CuI-nWvyxDvsvFK7cIBYyQnHGjE0j3mQme-DrL0n6JglOWimD0LNmcv5eMUxH3kaR9VrpV31dKIVbv1Taznn7A_2vCGYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Jonathan, D. A. ; Violaris, N. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jonathan, D. A. ; Violaris, N. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The relative efficacy of Cocaine and Lignocaine as local anaesthetic agents in the nose were compared. Twenty-five patients undergoing bilateral intra-nasal antroscopy under local anaesthetic were used as their own controls when one nasal cavity was anaesthetised with Cocaine and the other with Lignocaine. On 56 per cent of occasions the patients experienced no difference in the level of discomfort. However, on 36 per cent of occasions Cocaine was noted to give better subjective anaesthesia as compared with 8 per cent of occasions when Lignocaine was superior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022215100105924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3411220</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLOTAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia, Local ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Records ; Cocaine ; Female ; Humans ; Lidocaine ; Male ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of laryngology and otology, 1988-07, Vol.102 (7), p.628-629</ispartof><rights>Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1988</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-cf73b40908110a8f059b1be8acec84899c63dc899d67fb8e712dff3bece0b7f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-cf73b40908110a8f059b1be8acec84899c63dc899d67fb8e712dff3bece0b7f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022215100105924/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7252813$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3411220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jonathan, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Violaris, N. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics</title><title>Journal of laryngology and otology</title><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><description>The relative efficacy of Cocaine and Lignocaine as local anaesthetic agents in the nose were compared. Twenty-five patients undergoing bilateral intra-nasal antroscopy under local anaesthetic were used as their own controls when one nasal cavity was anaesthetised with Cocaine and the other with Lignocaine. On 56 per cent of occasions the patients experienced no difference in the level of discomfort. However, on 36 per cent of occasions Cocaine was noted to give better subjective anaesthesia as compared with 8 per cent of occasions when Lignocaine was superior.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Records</subject><subject>Cocaine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><issn>0022-2151</issn><issn>1748-5460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EKqXwAzgg5cA14LWT2DlC1QeoEuJ1tmzHLi5pUtmpBP8eVw29IHFarecba3YQugR8AxjY7SvGhBDIAWPAeUmyIzQElvE0zwp8jIY7Od3pp-gshBWOGMNkgAY0AyAED9Fk3K430rvQNklrE91q6RqTyKZKardsfteQuKbzspFB1kkdX-uISBO6D9M5Hc7RiZV1MBf9HKH36eRtPE8XT7OH8d0i1ZQVXaotoyrDJeYAWHIbIytQhkttNM94WeqCVjrOqmBWccOAVNZSZbTBillCRwj2_2rfhuCNFRvv1tJ_C8Bi14j400j0XO09m61am-rg6CuI-nWvyxDvsvFK7cIBYyQnHGjE0j3mQme-DrL0n6JglOWimD0LNmcv5eMUxH3kaR9VrpV31dKIVbv1Taznn7A_2vCGYg</recordid><startdate>19880701</startdate><enddate>19880701</enddate><creator>Jonathan, D. A.</creator><creator>Violaris, N. S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880701</creationdate><title>Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics</title><author>Jonathan, D. A. ; Violaris, N. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-cf73b40908110a8f059b1be8acec84899c63dc899d67fb8e712dff3bece0b7f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Records</topic><topic>Cocaine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jonathan, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Violaris, N. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jonathan, D. A.</au><au>Violaris, N. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><date>1988-07-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>628</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>628-629</pages><issn>0022-2151</issn><eissn>1748-5460</eissn><coden>JLOTAX</coden><abstract>The relative efficacy of Cocaine and Lignocaine as local anaesthetic agents in the nose were compared. Twenty-five patients undergoing bilateral intra-nasal antroscopy under local anaesthetic were used as their own controls when one nasal cavity was anaesthetised with Cocaine and the other with Lignocaine. On 56 per cent of occasions the patients experienced no difference in the level of discomfort. However, on 36 per cent of occasions Cocaine was noted to give better subjective anaesthesia as compared with 8 per cent of occasions when Lignocaine was superior.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>3411220</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0022215100105924</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2151
ispartof Journal of laryngology and otology, 1988-07, Vol.102 (7), p.628-629
issn 0022-2151
1748-5460
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022215100105924
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia, Local
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Records
Cocaine
Female
Humans
Lidocaine
Male
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
title Comparison of cocaine and lignocaine as intranasal local anaesthetics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A10%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cocaine%20and%20lignocaine%20as%20intranasal%20local%20anaesthetics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laryngology%20and%20otology&rft.au=Jonathan,%20D.%20A.&rft.date=1988-07-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=628&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=628-629&rft.issn=0022-2151&rft.eissn=1748-5460&rft.coden=JLOTAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022215100105924&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S0022215100105924%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/3411220&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022215100105924&rfr_iscdi=true