Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer

Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer

Comparative tests of the snow resistograph with the ram penetrometer indicate that there is a high degree of correlation between the two instruments despite fundamental differences in operation. It is probable therefore that the two instruments are measuring essentially the same parameters and may b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of glaciology 1973, Vol.12 (65), p.315-321
Hauptverfasser: Lawrence, William St, Bradley, Charles C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 321
container_issue 65
container_start_page 315
container_title Journal of glaciology
container_volume 12
creator Lawrence, William St
Bradley, Charles C.
description Comparative tests of the snow resistograph with the ram penetrometer indicate that there is a high degree of correlation between the two instruments despite fundamental differences in operation. It is probable therefore that the two instruments are measuring essentially the same parameters and may be used interchangeably. The resistograph has a large advantage over the ram penetrometer, in terms of speed and ease of operation, and in its capacity to measure the strength of very weak snow.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022143000032123
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022143000032123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0022143000032123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1333-62f73cbdc01f7142e22f7891c7e3b20e124471b76c54dc7ad718ffdc43bca41f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM9KxDAYxIMoWFcfwFteoJovSZvdoxT_LKwou-65pOkXW7FJSSKLb2-7enMuw8wP5jCEXAO7AQbqdscY5yAFmyQ4cHFCMlBc5UVZ8FOSzTif-Tm5iPFjiqsCICP7tYspfA3oUqTatfQZU-fbSCs_jDr00TvqLU0d0p3zB7rF2Mfk34MeO3roU3dEWz3QV3SYgh8wYbgkZ1Z_Rrz68wXZP9y_VU_55uVxXd1tcgNCiLzkVgnTtIaBVSA58qlYrsAoFA1nCFxKBY0qTSFbo3SrYGlta6RojJZgxYLA764JPsaAth5DP-jwXQOr51_qf7-IH0cYVgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lawrence, William St ; Bradley, Charles C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, William St ; Bradley, Charles C.</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative tests of the snow resistograph with the ram penetrometer indicate that there is a high degree of correlation between the two instruments despite fundamental differences in operation. It is probable therefore that the two instruments are measuring essentially the same parameters and may be used interchangeably. The resistograph has a large advantage over the ram penetrometer, in terms of speed and ease of operation, and in its capacity to measure the strength of very weak snow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1727-5652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022143000032123</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of glaciology, 1973, Vol.12 (65), p.315-321</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1333-62f73cbdc01f7142e22f7891c7e3b20e124471b76c54dc7ad718ffdc43bca41f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, William St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Charles C.</creatorcontrib><title>Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer</title><title>Journal of glaciology</title><description>Comparative tests of the snow resistograph with the ram penetrometer indicate that there is a high degree of correlation between the two instruments despite fundamental differences in operation. It is probable therefore that the two instruments are measuring essentially the same parameters and may be used interchangeably. The resistograph has a large advantage over the ram penetrometer, in terms of speed and ease of operation, and in its capacity to measure the strength of very weak snow.</description><issn>0022-1430</issn><issn>1727-5652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkM9KxDAYxIMoWFcfwFteoJovSZvdoxT_LKwou-65pOkXW7FJSSKLb2-7enMuw8wP5jCEXAO7AQbqdscY5yAFmyQ4cHFCMlBc5UVZ8FOSzTif-Tm5iPFjiqsCICP7tYspfA3oUqTatfQZU-fbSCs_jDr00TvqLU0d0p3zB7rF2Mfk34MeO3roU3dEWz3QV3SYgh8wYbgkZ1Z_Rrz68wXZP9y_VU_55uVxXd1tcgNCiLzkVgnTtIaBVSA58qlYrsAoFA1nCFxKBY0qTSFbo3SrYGlta6RojJZgxYLA764JPsaAth5DP-jwXQOr51_qf7-IH0cYVgk</recordid><startdate>1973</startdate><enddate>1973</enddate><creator>Lawrence, William St</creator><creator>Bradley, Charles C.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1973</creationdate><title>Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer</title><author>Lawrence, William St ; Bradley, Charles C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1333-62f73cbdc01f7142e22f7891c7e3b20e124471b76c54dc7ad718ffdc43bca41f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, William St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Charles C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of glaciology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawrence, William St</au><au>Bradley, Charles C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of glaciology</jtitle><date>1973</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>65</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>315-321</pages><issn>0022-1430</issn><eissn>1727-5652</eissn><abstract>Comparative tests of the snow resistograph with the ram penetrometer indicate that there is a high degree of correlation between the two instruments despite fundamental differences in operation. It is probable therefore that the two instruments are measuring essentially the same parameters and may be used interchangeably. The resistograph has a large advantage over the ram penetrometer, in terms of speed and ease of operation, and in its capacity to measure the strength of very weak snow.</abstract><doi>10.1017/S0022143000032123</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1430
ispartof Journal of glaciology, 1973, Vol.12 (65), p.315-321
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022143000032123
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Instruments and Methods Comparison of the Snow Resistograph with the Ram Penetrometer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T22%3A23%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Instruments%20and%20Methods%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Snow%20Resistograph%20with%20the%20Ram%20Penetrometer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20glaciology&rft.au=Lawrence,%20William%20St&rft.date=1973&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=65&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=315-321&rft.issn=0022-1430&rft.eissn=1727-5652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022143000032123&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S0022143000032123%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true