Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race

Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of political science 2024-05, p.1-20
Hauptverfasser: Hjortskov, Morten, Andersen, Simon Calmar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title British journal of political science
container_volume
creator Hjortskov, Morten
Andersen, Simon Calmar
description Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed. We suggest voters have lexicographic preferences, meaning they rank their preferences and focus primarily on the candidate's party affiliation. Second-order preferences such as gender and race are mostly necessary when there is a tie in first-order preferences when voters choose between two same-party candidates or have no party information. We show how conjoint experiments can be used to test for lexicographic preferences and use data from a US-representative sample and a pre-registered replication to confirm that in the United States, gender and race are second-order preferences. Lexicographic preferences provide a theoretical lens explaining some of the mixed results of gender and race in the candidate literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0007123424000048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007123424000048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0007123424000048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-a70eddce04b2a213b5f1c859fbda6c61a81d8526efe01196f17789af2a16afb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcPMPpHidl3OsArRIkah4XIk29poatUllR4L-fR3BjdPOamZXM8PYLYgFCCjvXoUQJcg0k1lEIlNnbAZZUSUSQJ6z2UQnE3_JrkL4iqtKFczYR0M_Tg-fHg9bp_nGkyVPvabAXc9r7I0zOBKvt4PTtODr4Ztv0I9HvrTW7RyObuj5_bB3fZQFvqLekOfxjr-gpmt2YXEX6OZvztn748NbvU6a59VTvWwSHf2OCZaCjNEksk6ihLTLLWiVV7YzWOgCUIFRuSyiOQFQFRbKUlVoJUKBtsvSOYPfv9oPIcQQ7cG7PfpjC6KdCmr_FZSeAH1XWPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Hjortskov, Morten ; Andersen, Simon Calmar</creator><creatorcontrib>Hjortskov, Morten ; Andersen, Simon Calmar</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed. We suggest voters have lexicographic preferences, meaning they rank their preferences and focus primarily on the candidate's party affiliation. Second-order preferences such as gender and race are mostly necessary when there is a tie in first-order preferences when voters choose between two same-party candidates or have no party information. We show how conjoint experiments can be used to test for lexicographic preferences and use data from a US-representative sample and a pre-registered replication to confirm that in the United States, gender and race are second-order preferences. Lexicographic preferences provide a theoretical lens explaining some of the mixed results of gender and race in the candidate literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007123424000048</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>British journal of political science, 2024-05, p.1-20</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-a70eddce04b2a213b5f1c859fbda6c61a81d8526efe01196f17789af2a16afb43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6631-7017 ; 0000-0001-5274-6953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hjortskov, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Simon Calmar</creatorcontrib><title>Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race</title><title>British journal of political science</title><description>Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed. We suggest voters have lexicographic preferences, meaning they rank their preferences and focus primarily on the candidate's party affiliation. Second-order preferences such as gender and race are mostly necessary when there is a tie in first-order preferences when voters choose between two same-party candidates or have no party information. We show how conjoint experiments can be used to test for lexicographic preferences and use data from a US-representative sample and a pre-registered replication to confirm that in the United States, gender and race are second-order preferences. Lexicographic preferences provide a theoretical lens explaining some of the mixed results of gender and race in the candidate literature.</description><issn>0007-1234</issn><issn>1469-2112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcPMPpHidl3OsArRIkah4XIk29poatUllR4L-fR3BjdPOamZXM8PYLYgFCCjvXoUQJcg0k1lEIlNnbAZZUSUSQJ6z2UQnE3_JrkL4iqtKFczYR0M_Tg-fHg9bp_nGkyVPvabAXc9r7I0zOBKvt4PTtODr4Ztv0I9HvrTW7RyObuj5_bB3fZQFvqLekOfxjr-gpmt2YXEX6OZvztn748NbvU6a59VTvWwSHf2OCZaCjNEksk6ihLTLLWiVV7YzWOgCUIFRuSyiOQFQFRbKUlVoJUKBtsvSOYPfv9oPIcQQ7cG7PfpjC6KdCmr_FZSeAH1XWPc</recordid><startdate>20240521</startdate><enddate>20240521</enddate><creator>Hjortskov, Morten</creator><creator>Andersen, Simon Calmar</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-7017</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-6953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240521</creationdate><title>Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race</title><author>Hjortskov, Morten ; Andersen, Simon Calmar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-a70eddce04b2a213b5f1c859fbda6c61a81d8526efe01196f17789af2a16afb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hjortskov, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Simon Calmar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hjortskov, Morten</au><au>Andersen, Simon Calmar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race</atitle><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle><date>2024-05-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>1-20</pages><issn>0007-1234</issn><eissn>1469-2112</eissn><abstract>Understanding which political candidates are elected for office is fundamental to democracy and political science. Whereas there is much agreement that party affiliation is one of the most important candidate characteristics to voters, evidence regarding the gender and race of the candidate is mixed. We suggest voters have lexicographic preferences, meaning they rank their preferences and focus primarily on the candidate's party affiliation. Second-order preferences such as gender and race are mostly necessary when there is a tie in first-order preferences when voters choose between two same-party candidates or have no party information. We show how conjoint experiments can be used to test for lexicographic preferences and use data from a US-representative sample and a pre-registered replication to confirm that in the United States, gender and race are second-order preferences. Lexicographic preferences provide a theoretical lens explaining some of the mixed results of gender and race in the candidate literature.</abstract><doi>10.1017/S0007123424000048</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-7017</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-6953</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1234
ispartof British journal of political science, 2024-05, p.1-20
issn 0007-1234
1469-2112
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007123424000048
source Cambridge Journals
title Lexicographic Preferences in Candidate Choice. How Party Affiliation Dominates Gender and Race
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A08%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lexicographic%20Preferences%20in%20Candidate%20Choice.%20How%20Party%20Affiliation%20Dominates%20Gender%20and%20Race&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Hjortskov,%20Morten&rft.date=2024-05-21&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=1-20&rft.issn=0007-1234&rft.eissn=1469-2112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007123424000048&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S0007123424000048%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true