Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization
Regularization can improve statistical estimates made with highly correlated data. However, any regularization procedure embeds assumptions about the data generating process that can have counterintuitive consequences when those assumptions are untenable. We show that rather than simply shrinking es...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American political science review 2024-10, p.1-9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The American political science review |
container_volume | |
creator | MELLON, JONATHAN PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER |
description | Regularization can improve statistical estimates made with highly correlated data. However, any regularization procedure embeds assumptions about the data generating process that can have counterintuitive consequences when those assumptions are untenable. We show that rather than simply shrinking estimates, regularization can reopen backdoor causal paths, inflating the estimates of some effects, and in the wrong circumstances, even reversing their direction. Recently, Cavari and Freedman (2023), argued that declining cooperation rates in surveys have inflated measures of mass polarization. We show that this finding is driven by large penalty terms in their regularized regressions, which leads to the estimates being confounded with time. Alternative methods do not show a clear positive or negative effect of declining cooperation on estimated levels of mass polarization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0003055424000935 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0003055424000935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0003055424000935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-4c2a91daaeacf29fe08a4e680bec67cecae2be54e8f06a096b76f9fa75c50d953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFPhDAUhBujibj6A7z1D6CvQIF6U6KryRqNrhcv5NG-ruhKTQsH_fUW9eZpZjKT7zCMHQs4ESCq00cAyEHKIiuiU7ncYYmQeZVKVeS7LJnrdO732UEIrzGCgDphzw-0mbbo-y8yPHpPIfRu4A0OMfbD6J2ZNPEL1G_GOc8bN1g3DaYfNmd8_UJxGYg7y28xBH7vflg4RsYh27O4DXT0pwv2dHW5bq7T1d3ypjlfpVpUMKaFzlAJg0iobaYsQY0FlTV0pMtKk0bKOpIF1RZKBFV2VWmVxUpqCUbJfMHEL1d7F4In2374_h39Zyugnc9p_52TfwOjsFj4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>MELLON, JONATHAN ; PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</creator><creatorcontrib>MELLON, JONATHAN ; PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</creatorcontrib><description>Regularization can improve statistical estimates made with highly correlated data. However, any regularization procedure embeds assumptions about the data generating process that can have counterintuitive consequences when those assumptions are untenable. We show that rather than simply shrinking estimates, regularization can reopen backdoor causal paths, inflating the estimates of some effects, and in the wrong circumstances, even reversing their direction. Recently, Cavari and Freedman (2023), argued that declining cooperation rates in surveys have inflated measures of mass polarization. We show that this finding is driven by large penalty terms in their regularized regressions, which leads to the estimates being confounded with time. Alternative methods do not show a clear positive or negative effect of declining cooperation on estimated levels of mass polarization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055424000935</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The American political science review, 2024-10, p.1-9</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-4c2a91daaeacf29fe08a4e680bec67cecae2be54e8f06a096b76f9fa75c50d953</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6754-203X ; 0000-0002-2992-8190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MELLON, JONATHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</creatorcontrib><title>Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization</title><title>The American political science review</title><description>Regularization can improve statistical estimates made with highly correlated data. However, any regularization procedure embeds assumptions about the data generating process that can have counterintuitive consequences when those assumptions are untenable. We show that rather than simply shrinking estimates, regularization can reopen backdoor causal paths, inflating the estimates of some effects, and in the wrong circumstances, even reversing their direction. Recently, Cavari and Freedman (2023), argued that declining cooperation rates in surveys have inflated measures of mass polarization. We show that this finding is driven by large penalty terms in their regularized regressions, which leads to the estimates being confounded with time. Alternative methods do not show a clear positive or negative effect of declining cooperation on estimated levels of mass polarization.</description><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFPhDAUhBujibj6A7z1D6CvQIF6U6KryRqNrhcv5NG-ruhKTQsH_fUW9eZpZjKT7zCMHQs4ESCq00cAyEHKIiuiU7ncYYmQeZVKVeS7LJnrdO732UEIrzGCgDphzw-0mbbo-y8yPHpPIfRu4A0OMfbD6J2ZNPEL1G_GOc8bN1g3DaYfNmd8_UJxGYg7y28xBH7vflg4RsYh27O4DXT0pwv2dHW5bq7T1d3ypjlfpVpUMKaFzlAJg0iobaYsQY0FlTV0pMtKk0bKOpIF1RZKBFV2VWmVxUpqCUbJfMHEL1d7F4In2374_h39Zyugnc9p_52TfwOjsFj4</recordid><startdate>20241031</startdate><enddate>20241031</enddate><creator>MELLON, JONATHAN</creator><creator>PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-203X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-8190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241031</creationdate><title>Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization</title><author>MELLON, JONATHAN ; PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-4c2a91daaeacf29fe08a4e680bec67cecae2be54e8f06a096b76f9fa75c50d953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MELLON, JONATHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MELLON, JONATHAN</au><au>PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><date>2024-10-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>Regularization can improve statistical estimates made with highly correlated data. However, any regularization procedure embeds assumptions about the data generating process that can have counterintuitive consequences when those assumptions are untenable. We show that rather than simply shrinking estimates, regularization can reopen backdoor causal paths, inflating the estimates of some effects, and in the wrong circumstances, even reversing their direction. Recently, Cavari and Freedman (2023), argued that declining cooperation rates in surveys have inflated measures of mass polarization. We show that this finding is driven by large penalty terms in their regularized regressions, which leads to the estimates being confounded with time. Alternative methods do not show a clear positive or negative effect of declining cooperation on estimated levels of mass polarization.</abstract><doi>10.1017/S0003055424000935</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-203X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-8190</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0554 |
ispartof | The American political science review, 2024-10, p.1-9 |
issn | 0003-0554 1537-5943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0003055424000935 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
title | Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T15%3A15%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regularized%20Regression%20Can%20Reintroduce%20Backdoor%20Confounding:%20The%20Case%20of%20Mass%20Polarization&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=MELLON,%20JONATHAN&rft.date=2024-10-31&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055424000935&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1017_S0003055424000935%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |