Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges

At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aeronautical journal 2013-04, Vol.117 (1190), p.343-388
Hauptverfasser: Pavel, M. D., White, M., Padfield, G. D., Roth, G., Hamers, M., Taghizad, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 1190
container_start_page 343
container_title Aeronautical journal
container_volume 117
creator Pavel, M. D.
White, M.
Padfield, G. D.
Roth, G.
Hamers, M.
Taghizad, A.
description At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with real world behaviour, underpins the usefulness of the flight simulator. The present paper examines the state of the art achieved in validating mathematical models for helicopter simulators, addressing the strengths and weaknesses of the present European standard for the qualification of helicopter flight simulators, JAR FSTD-H (previously JAR-STD-1H/2H/3H). Essential questions are examined, such as: What is the required model fidelity to guarantee a simulation is sufficiently representative to be fit for purpose? Are the tolerances set in the current standards fine enough that they lead to only minor changes in handling qualities? What is an acceptable tuning process for the simulation? What is the effect of modelling fidelity on the overall pilot control strategy? What is the relationship between the settings of the simulator cueing environment and the behaviour of the pilot? What is the industrial experience on qualification of flight simulators that might usefully inform developments? Many of these questions were addressed in Europe in a previous GARTEUR Action Group (AG) HC/AG-12 the results of which are documented in this paper. Solutions are proposed for improving the current JAR-FSTD standard with respect to validation of mathematical models.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0001924000008058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0001924000008058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0001924000008058</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S0001924000008058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cc3ee989ebdbcd65ed6b42d602ec199c60bc25977858ad71c8c7c41fc973af8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPxDAQhC0EEsfBD6BzQ0fAdpyHS3TiJZ1EwaONHHt98cmJI9sp-PckuhMNElvsFrMz0jcIXVNyRwmt7t8JIVQwTpapSVGfoBUjhchKXvJTtFrkbNHP0UWMe0JywjhfIfMlndUyWT9gb3AvUwfzsko63HsNLmLjA-7AWeXHBAEbZ3ddwtH2k5PJh4hHGdMtHgNEGBKWg8ZmSlMArDrpHAw7iJfozEgX4ep41-jz6fFj85Jt355fNw_bTOVUpEypHEDUAlrdKl0WoMuWM10SBooKoUrSKlaIqqqLWuqKqlpVilOjRJVLU7f5GtFDrgo-xgCmGYPtZfhuKGmWopo_Rc2em4Nn5pixTZCDsvHXyCpGqSj4_Jcfs2XfBqt30Oz9FIaZ55_0H0vCef8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Pavel, M. D. ; White, M. ; Padfield, G. D. ; Roth, G. ; Hamers, M. ; Taghizad, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavel, M. D. ; White, M. ; Padfield, G. D. ; Roth, G. ; Hamers, M. ; Taghizad, A.</creatorcontrib><description>At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with real world behaviour, underpins the usefulness of the flight simulator. The present paper examines the state of the art achieved in validating mathematical models for helicopter simulators, addressing the strengths and weaknesses of the present European standard for the qualification of helicopter flight simulators, JAR FSTD-H (previously JAR-STD-1H/2H/3H). Essential questions are examined, such as: What is the required model fidelity to guarantee a simulation is sufficiently representative to be fit for purpose? Are the tolerances set in the current standards fine enough that they lead to only minor changes in handling qualities? What is an acceptable tuning process for the simulation? What is the effect of modelling fidelity on the overall pilot control strategy? What is the relationship between the settings of the simulator cueing environment and the behaviour of the pilot? What is the industrial experience on qualification of flight simulators that might usefully inform developments? Many of these questions were addressed in Europe in a previous GARTEUR Action Group (AG) HC/AG-12 the results of which are documented in this paper. Solutions are proposed for improving the current JAR-FSTD standard with respect to validation of mathematical models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-9240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-6464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0001924000008058</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENJAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Air transportation and traffic ; Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><ispartof>Aeronautical journal, 2013-04, Vol.117 (1190), p.343-388</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cc3ee989ebdbcd65ed6b42d602ec199c60bc25977858ad71c8c7c41fc973af8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cc3ee989ebdbcd65ed6b42d602ec199c60bc25977858ad71c8c7c41fc973af8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0001924000008058/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27211954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavel, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padfield, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamers, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghizad, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges</title><title>Aeronautical journal</title><addtitle>Aeronaut. j. (1968)</addtitle><description>At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with real world behaviour, underpins the usefulness of the flight simulator. The present paper examines the state of the art achieved in validating mathematical models for helicopter simulators, addressing the strengths and weaknesses of the present European standard for the qualification of helicopter flight simulators, JAR FSTD-H (previously JAR-STD-1H/2H/3H). Essential questions are examined, such as: What is the required model fidelity to guarantee a simulation is sufficiently representative to be fit for purpose? Are the tolerances set in the current standards fine enough that they lead to only minor changes in handling qualities? What is an acceptable tuning process for the simulation? What is the effect of modelling fidelity on the overall pilot control strategy? What is the relationship between the settings of the simulator cueing environment and the behaviour of the pilot? What is the industrial experience on qualification of flight simulators that might usefully inform developments? Many of these questions were addressed in Europe in a previous GARTEUR Action Group (AG) HC/AG-12 the results of which are documented in this paper. Solutions are proposed for improving the current JAR-FSTD standard with respect to validation of mathematical models.</description><subject>Air transportation and traffic</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><issn>0001-9240</issn><issn>2059-6464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPxDAQhC0EEsfBD6BzQ0fAdpyHS3TiJZ1EwaONHHt98cmJI9sp-PckuhMNElvsFrMz0jcIXVNyRwmt7t8JIVQwTpapSVGfoBUjhchKXvJTtFrkbNHP0UWMe0JywjhfIfMlndUyWT9gb3AvUwfzsko63HsNLmLjA-7AWeXHBAEbZ3ddwtH2k5PJh4hHGdMtHgNEGBKWg8ZmSlMArDrpHAw7iJfozEgX4ep41-jz6fFj85Jt355fNw_bTOVUpEypHEDUAlrdKl0WoMuWM10SBooKoUrSKlaIqqqLWuqKqlpVilOjRJVLU7f5GtFDrgo-xgCmGYPtZfhuKGmWopo_Rc2em4Nn5pixTZCDsvHXyCpGqSj4_Jcfs2XfBqt30Oz9FIaZ55_0H0vCef8</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Pavel, M. D.</creator><creator>White, M.</creator><creator>Padfield, G. D.</creator><creator>Roth, G.</creator><creator>Hamers, M.</creator><creator>Taghizad, A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Royal Aeronautical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges</title><author>Pavel, M. D. ; White, M. ; Padfield, G. D. ; Roth, G. ; Hamers, M. ; Taghizad, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cc3ee989ebdbcd65ed6b42d602ec199c60bc25977858ad71c8c7c41fc973af8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air transportation and traffic</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavel, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padfield, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamers, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghizad, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Aeronautical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavel, M. D.</au><au>White, M.</au><au>Padfield, G. D.</au><au>Roth, G.</au><au>Hamers, M.</au><au>Taghizad, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges</atitle><jtitle>Aeronautical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aeronaut. j. (1968)</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1190</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>343-388</pages><issn>0001-9240</issn><eissn>2059-6464</eissn><coden>AENJAK</coden><abstract>At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with real world behaviour, underpins the usefulness of the flight simulator. The present paper examines the state of the art achieved in validating mathematical models for helicopter simulators, addressing the strengths and weaknesses of the present European standard for the qualification of helicopter flight simulators, JAR FSTD-H (previously JAR-STD-1H/2H/3H). Essential questions are examined, such as: What is the required model fidelity to guarantee a simulation is sufficiently representative to be fit for purpose? Are the tolerances set in the current standards fine enough that they lead to only minor changes in handling qualities? What is an acceptable tuning process for the simulation? What is the effect of modelling fidelity on the overall pilot control strategy? What is the relationship between the settings of the simulator cueing environment and the behaviour of the pilot? What is the industrial experience on qualification of flight simulators that might usefully inform developments? Many of these questions were addressed in Europe in a previous GARTEUR Action Group (AG) HC/AG-12 the results of which are documented in this paper. Solutions are proposed for improving the current JAR-FSTD standard with respect to validation of mathematical models.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0001924000008058</doi><tpages>46</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-9240
ispartof Aeronautical journal, 2013-04, Vol.117 (1190), p.343-388
issn 0001-9240
2059-6464
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1017_S0001924000008058
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Air transportation and traffic
Applied sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
title Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20mathematical%20models%20for%20helicopter%20flight%20simulators%20past,%20present%20and%20future%20challenges&rft.jtitle=Aeronautical%20journal&rft.au=Pavel,%20M.%20D.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=1190&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=343-388&rft.issn=0001-9240&rft.eissn=2059-6464&rft.coden=AENJAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0001924000008058&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_cross%3E10_1017_S0001924000008058%3C/cambridge_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0001924000008058&rfr_iscdi=true