Triclosan export from low-volume sources in an urban to rural watershed

[Display omitted] •Triclosan (TCS) sources determined in a rural to urban watershed.•Streamwater TCS concentrations amongst highest in literature.•TCS concentrations/yields linked to a multitude of low volume sources.•Relative contribution of TCS loading delineated between low and high-volume sources. Triclosan (TCS), an emerging contaminant linked to antimicrobial resistance, has been the focus of many surface water studies to date. However, these initial studies have predominantly used sampling locations downstream of large volume (i.e., >0.5 million gallons per day) wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This approach overlooks potential inputs from their low volume counterparts as well as non-point sources, such as sewage network leaks, biosolid application to agricultural fields and leach fields associated with septic systems. Here we examine the range of concentrations, overall loading, and potential controls on TCS delivery to the East Branch of the Brandywine Creek (EBBC), a rural to suburban watershed located in southeastern Pennsylvania. TCS measurements were collected from 13 locations in the EBBC during baseflow conditions and immediately following a storm event. A regulatory database review identified WWTP density an order of magnitude greater than the national average, thereby confirming their pervasiveness in rural to urban systems. Detectable concentrations of TCS in the EBBC ranged from 0.2 to 0.6 ng/L during baseflow conditions and 0.5 to over 1000 ng/L following a storm event. The lack of a statistical relationship between TCS concentrations and yields with the number of upstream WWTPs and/or volume of treated effluent during both sampling periods confirm the importance of individual WWTP practices and the volume of the receiving water body, while a positive statistically-significant relationship between TCS concentrations and upstream developed open space following the storm event was likely influenced by runoff of spray-applied treated wastewater and/or sewage network leaks. Furthermore, the presence of detectable concentrations of TCS in sub-watersheds with no WWTP systems implies field applied biosolids or treated wastewater, as well as septic tank related leach fields are all viable sources of TCS. These findings suggest we must greatly expand our consideration of sources for emerging contaminants in waterways.